

Kiteworks and Control-M are often compared in the enterprise software market. While Kiteworks offers advantages in pricing and customer service, Control-M is preferred for its extensive feature set, catering to different organizational needs.
Features: Kiteworks stands out with secure file-sharing capabilities, compliance support, and a user-friendly administration interface. It enables easy management of data transfers and provides detailed reporting on user activity. Control-M offers advanced workload automation, comprehensive integration with IT environments, and cross-platform job scheduling. It supports a wide range of applications through its control modules and rich API offerings.
Room for Improvement: Kiteworks could enhance its integration with third-party applications and improve mobile accessibility features to better support remote work scenarios. Additionally, expanding its API capabilities would improve customization. Control-M could benefit from simplifying the initial setup process, enhancing user interface aspects for newcomers, and refining its licensing model to be more flexible for various business sizes.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kiteworks provides a straightforward deployment process with a focus on quick implementation and reliable support. It is ideal for organizations needing fast onboarding. Control-M, while requiring more complex setup due to its extensive features, provides thorough documentation and resources, facilitating management of sophisticated infrastructures.
Pricing and ROI: Kiteworks offers a cost-effective setup, appealing to cost-sensitive enterprises, with benefits realized through improved productivity and security. Control-M requires a higher initial investment, justified by its comprehensive features, delivering significant ROI for organizations focusing on automation and IT orchestration. Kiteworks favors immediate savings, whereas Control-M provides long-term value in advanced automation.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Control-M | 7.1% |
| Kiteworks | 6.5% |
| Other | 86.4% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 37 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 23 |
| Large Enterprise | 140 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 11 |
Control-M SaaS by BMC is tailored for growing teams, offering essential orchestration for managing hybrid cloud workflows starting at $29,000 annually.
Control-M integrates automation, orchestration, and a user-friendly interface to streamline workflows across banking, DevOps, and cloud environments. Key modules like Managed File Transfer and cross-platform support simplify job monitoring, while Batch Impact Manager enhances scheduling. Despite its capabilities, improvements in output analysis, reporting customization, offline access, and API integration are desired by users.
What are Control-M's key features?Control-M is implemented in industries such as finance and enterprise operations, aiding in automating batch processing across platforms like SAP and Teradata. It integrates with secure file transfers, ERP systems, and databases, whether deployed on-premises or cloud, ensuring seamless operation optimization.
Kiteworks empowers organizations to effectively manage risk in every send, share, receive, and save of sensitive content over numerous communications channels: email, file sharing, managed file transfer, APIs, and web forms. The Kiteworks platform unifies, tracks, controls, and secures sensitive content moving within, into, and out of an organization, significantly improving risk management and ensuring regulatory compliance.
We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.