ConnectWise RMM vs TeamViewer ONE comparison

ConnectWise and TeamViewer are both solutions in the Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) category. ConnectWise is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.5, while TeamViewer is ranked #9 with an average rating of 9.0. Additionally, 100% of ConnectWise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of TeamViewer users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 24, 2026

ConnectWise RMM and TeamViewer ONE target remote management needs. TeamViewer ONE is favored for its enhanced features despite higher costs, while ConnectWise RMM shines in pricing and support.

Features:ConnectWise RMM provides automated patch management, remote access, and network monitoring, aiding streamlined IT operations. In contrast, TeamViewer ONE is known for multi-platform support, robust remote control, and secure data transfer, offering comprehensive device management. These advanced capabilities make it a favored choice for users requiring high functionality.

Room for Improvement:ConnectWise RMM could enhance integration options, improve user interface design, and expand their third-party compatibility to increase overall effectiveness. TeamViewer ONE, on the other hand, might focus on reducing overall costs, enhancing customer training resources, and improving workflow efficiency for better user satisfaction.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:ConnectWise RMM boasts straightforward deployment and responsive customer service, simplifying integration into existing environments. TeamViewer ONE, while offering quick installation and robust technical support, wins in terms of speedy setup, appealing to companies needing rapid implementation.

Pricing and ROI:ConnectWise RMM presents cost-effective pricing and solid ROI, attracting budget-conscious buyers. In contrast, TeamViewer ONE, despite higher initial costs, delivers substantial value through its advanced features and extensive support, meriting consideration for those prioritizing feature-rich experiences over immediate expenses.

To learn more, read our detailed ConnectWise RMM vs. TeamViewer ONE Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ConnectWise RMM vs. TeamViewer ONE

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 906,418 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Intune

Featured Reviews

OluwashileAdeniyi

Senior Infrastructure Security Engineer at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees

Centralized endpoint security has improved and supports hybrid work and BYOD policies

Regarding what I dislike about Microsoft Intune and its downsides, I would say that more Mac controls are needed because we have limited Mac and Linux control. When comparing controls and policies between Windows, Mac, and Linux, Windows has almost everything you can think of, while Mac and Linux have limited types of control. You cannot implement certain things on Mac and Linux that you can on Windows. The limited controls are a major issue. Additionally, if Microsoft could find a way to embed servers into Microsoft Intune, that would be beneficial. Microsoft Intune is not really designed for servers or Windows servers. It is more tailored towards Windows 11 and Windows 10 operating systems. Windows servers are not fully supported. Enterprise organizations usually have both servers and endpoints, which are users' workstations. For servers, most people look for other solutions such as SCCM, which is Configuration Manager. However, SCCM is what Microsoft Intune is trying to replace. Both SCCM and Microsoft Intune belong to Microsoft. Microsoft is trying to transition organizations into Microsoft Intune, the native cloud solution. However, because this update is still in process, servers are not fully compatible with Microsoft Intune and cannot be managed by it. The current policy that has emerged from issues with clients is what they call co-management, which is relatively new, and I do not know if adoption is significant. Many legacy or older customers who have been using these products for decades still have SCCM. When it is time for them to manage their Windows devices, they use what is called cloud attach. Cloud attach is a term whereby your SCCM is connected to your Microsoft Intune. Most people do not know about it, but I have deployed it for several organizations. Cloud attach and co-management work together so that your device is in SCCM, but some policies are pushed from Microsoft Intune. It is like two different solutions working hand in hand. That is what they call co-management. Microsoft Intune does not bring all of your endpoint and security management tools into one place, which is the goal and how it should be. However, as I mentioned, servers are not included. If we talk about end users, Microsoft Intune does bring all your devices together. In a typical enterprise environment, you have end users with workstations, laptops, company-issued phones, and bring your own devices. You can create policies for all of these. However, for the backend, your servers do not have much coverage. Servers are not really covered by Microsoft Intune in that way.

Read full review

Faiz Fortune

Project Engineer at Moksh Tech

Automated monitoring has streamlined time tracking and project management across all clients

I think the most valuable feature of ConnectWise RMM is scheduling my time with clients and capturing my times with them. Time management is key for my workflow. It helps with keeping track of all our clients and all the devices, so ConnectWise RMM has been quite helpful in managing my IT environment overall. Automated patch management in ConnectWise RMM has made everything streamlined, allowing me to concentrate on more important tasks. I can run my automations and ensure that they go through every server, every cloud infrastructure, and every client. I've observed that with ConnectWise RMM, capturing my times used to be quite an issue when working with overseas countries, but now it's much easier, and I can monitor everything I'm doing in real-time.

Read full review

Nitesh Ranjan

Senior Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

Remote sessions have become smoother and now resolve end user issues more comfortably

One feedback I have is regarding the voice feature. Whenever we take a remote session, the voice gets enabled automatically, and we have to mute it from our side. A pop-up asking whether we want to continue with the voice or not would be helpful when accessing a remote session. The audio system could be improved because sometimes we are not aware that we need to unmute the team while taking a remote session. The end user can hear us talking with colleagues, and we sometimes forget that we have unmuted while taking a remote session. If a pop-up appears when we take a remote session with the end user asking us to unmute ourselves, that would be better for us to proceed. When the pop-up appears, we can directly mute ourselves, and the end user will not be able to hear the background noise from the office. Since many colleagues are taking remote sessions and talking to end users simultaneously, there is often significant background noise. Having this pop-up appear when accessing a remote session with the end user would be a helpful update.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The user experience of Microsoft Intune is quite good because there's not much disturbance in the background; it's just running in the background."

"The dashboards, the security, and the customization capabilities work very well for us."

"Configuration profiles, remediation, scripts, and auto-pilot features are very good."

"The biggest thing for us is enforcing logins only from devices that are managed by Intune."

"I would say right now that Microsoft Intune is one of the best solutions."

"With Microsoft Intune, we set up the device within 20 to 30 minutes, reducing the provisioning time by 70 to 80%, and it has also reduced the IT workload by 40 to 60%."

"Microsoft Intune does help me save time in terms of management of various devices—I don't have to go to those locations to manage the devices at those locations, I can do it remotely, which is very helpful."

"We saw approximately forty to fifty percent reduction in manual device setup time with Microsoft Intune as onboarding became fully automated."

More Microsoft Intune pros

"The most valuable features are RMM and patch management. However, the main reason we have been using this solution is that they are the only provider of RMM that has an outsourced NOC and help desk. This has been very useful."

"The technical support has been fantastic."

"The best features of ConnectWise RMM are the automation tools that they've included, which are quite good, enabling us to mass manage systems, schedule scripts, etc."

"We've seen a lot of MSPs who have grown by using Continuum."

"It enables us to respond to issues quickly and efficiently."

"At this point, this product does everything that I want."

"Automated patch management in ConnectWise RMM has made everything streamlined, allowing me to concentrate on more important tasks."

"My advice for others looking into using ConnectWise RMM is that it is the best tool to work with in terms of RMM, and I do not know why people prefer NinjaOne; I clearly prefer ConnectWise much more."

More ConnectWise RMM pros

"The initial setup of TeamViewer Remote Management is very simple."

"What I like about TeamViewer Remote Management is the chat feature on the dashboard, which is very useful. The solution also has a meeting feature, but I don't use that. The remote feature and other features of TeamViewer Remote Management also work fine, so it's a good solution."

"If you want to do remote troubleshooting, it's a good idea to utilize TeamViewer."

"The user interface is fine."

"The product is secure."

"The stability seems to be pretty good so far."

"I've left Splashtop running for seven or eight hours connected to a system. I've left TeamViewer running for seven or eight hours to a connection or two. I have a hard time working out on four computers at a time, but three is not impossible for me. So even if I've had three computers connected it has been fairly stable."

"The most recent enhancements are quite remarkable."

More TeamViewer ONE pros

Cons

"No option to do end-to-en macOS management. Slow implementation of policies."

"Historically, Group Policy has simplified the management of various items, such as printer and drive mappings and while Intune offers workarounds, it lacks native support for these functionalities. This is an area I believe needs improvement."

"Reporting and troubleshooting for the application deployment could be better. It's very difficult to understand."

"There is always a noise when you are going to manage any endpoint devices, and noise is definitely there with this solution."

"Microsoft Intune could improve by being more user-friendly and having it geared toward device management. The graphic interface is not very good."

"Without changing it, you cannot deploy it, so that's a limitation from the Microsoft Intune side."

"There is no catalog for mobile access management (MAM) security."

"Although Intune is from the same provider, its integration with other Microsoft products, like Microsoft Defender or Microsoft Purview, could be improved."

More Microsoft Intune cons

"If a computer hasn't been turned on for a long time and the client software is installed, it may not reconnect to the dashboard once it's powered up."

"I would like to see the incorporation of the dashboards for other products that they work with into the main dashboard."

"The solution could improve by offering better overall management and dashboards."

"The initial setup with ConnectWise RMM is painful, to be completely honest. The pain points during the initial setup with ConnectWise RMM include the migration from Automate to RMM being very time-consuming and the process not being as straightforward as indicated."

"It's a legacy tool with many outdated approaches. It is managed offshore which affects everyone because it seems the developers don't fully understand our needs."

"They can include support for vaulting, where you can actually document the entire infrastructure, including servers, desktops, networks, passwords, maps, diagrams, and customer information. Continuum has integrated everything, and you have to use a PSA. Continuum has a ticketing system and an RMM. They could integrate the functionality for IT documentation. An MSP would want everything into one tool."

"ConnectWise RMM sometimes has a lag, and the speed can be an issue."

"The audio system could be improved because sometimes we are not aware that we need to unmute the team while taking a remote session."

"I prefer to use AnyDesk. I actually uninstalled TeamViewer."

"It could be more secure."

"AnyDesk is easier compared to TeamViewer Remote Management since there is no password. We use AnyDesk more."

"I would rate the stability a seven out of ten because every application gets bugs. So, there are some instances where it might be buggy and hanging."

"The compatibility needs improvement in TeamViewer Remote Management because there's some incompatibility in some versions of the solution. Some solutions require the higher-performing version of TeamViewer Remote Management. Otherwise, there's incompatibility. The security provided by TeamViewer Remote Management in terms of data transfer also needs improvement. I'd like to see more features in the next release of TeamViewer Remote Management because it's still lacking in features. It would also be good for TeamViewer Remote Management to have a built-in remoting program similar to what Itarian has."

"I'm not sure if the security is ideal. They could work to improve it."

"I would like to see better pricing, more customization, and increased automation."

More TeamViewer ONE cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Even if they charge a premium, they aim to provide equal value."

"It is not a cheap solution. The price for a device when you start using it at a large scale can be improved. It is covered under our enterprise agreement. We pay once a year. I am not aware of any additional costs."

"With our standard E5 agreement with Microsoft, there have been no pricing concerns. Introductory professional services, like a fast-track service, were included with our E5 membership, and there have been no additional costs."

"We spend a lot of money on Intune licensing, and some of our users have to be double licensed just because of how our dev and corporate environments are segmented."

"It's affordable. It's cheaper if you have an Office 365, E5, or E3 subscription because everything is there."

"Most of our clients come to us with licensing already in place. On average, it costs $6 per device per month to add Intune to an Office 365 subscription, but I am not sure."

"If you ask the accountant or the finance department, they'll tell you that it is way too expensive, but when I look at the cost and compare it with the value you actually get, it's more than fair."

"It is expensive. The cost depends on the license that we choose."

More Microsoft Intune pricing and cost advice

"The licensing works such that the more you add, the more it costs, but for the most part, the price starts at about $5 USD per client."

"It has a pay-as-you-go model. They don't have any minimum, maximum, or such sorts of commitments with any of their partners or customers. I don't believe they have any restrictions about using a specific number of agents. You don't have to use 100 agents or 200 agents to work with this. They have a lock-in period of three months, during which you cannot switch a service plan, which is fine."

"Continuum Command price is more expensive than competitors, it is three times the price of the next lowest and costs approximately $25 an endpoint. However, when you take that into account you receive the help desk and outsource NOC included it has a lot more value because competitors do not provide the outsourced NOC and help desk."

"My company uses the free version of TeamViewer Remote Management."

"The solution relies on cloud-based infrastructure so the price is tailored to each individual model used"

"My company needs to pay towards the solution's annual licensing subscription costs. There are no extra costs in addition to the standard license fees of the product."

"Addition services could be lower priced."

"It is a licensed product."

"We pay for a yearly license."

"The solution's license is expensive."

"We are now using the free version, but probably next year we are going to follow up with the paid version."

More TeamViewer ONE pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

906,418 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Government

Construction Company

15%

Outsourcing Company

Performing Arts

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

14%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	193
Midsize Enterprise	61
Large Enterprise	186

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	19
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

How does Microsoft Intune compare with VMware Workspace One?

Microsoft Intune is a great tool for managing a mobile device fleet while keeping access control. The solution makes ...

See all answers

What are the pros and cons of Microsoft Intune?

Microsoft Intune is a great configuration management tool and has a lot of good things going for it. Here are some of...

See all answers

How does Google Cloud Identity compare with Microsoft Intune?

Microsoft Intune offers not only an easy-to-deploy data protection and productivity management solution, but also ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Continuum Command?

The pricing for ConnectWise RMM is reasonable, and I feel that we're getting good value for the dollars that we're sp...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Continuum Command?

As an MSP, we utilize ConnectWise RMM for the management of our client environment.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Continuum Command?

ConnectWise RMM seems to integrate with other tools, as they appear to be friendly when it comes to integration with ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering TeamViewer Remote Management?

Regarding pricing, since the licenses are purchased by the organization, I am not aware of the pricing details. Howev...

See all answers

What needs improvement with TeamViewer Remote Management?

One feedback I have is regarding the voice feature. Whenever we take a remote session, the voice gets enabled automat...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for TeamViewer Remote Management?

I use TeamViewer Remote Management primarily for remote session purposes in my previous and current organization.

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM MaaS360 vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 11% of the time

Jamf Pro vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 10% of the time

Workspace ONE UEM vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 4% of the time

ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 3% of the time

More Microsoft Intune Competitors

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs ConnectWise RMM

Compared 6% of the time

Everbridge IT Alerting vs ConnectWise RMM

Compared 6% of the time

NinjaOne vs ConnectWise RMM

Compared 6% of the time

Kaseya 365 vs ConnectWise RMM

Compared 6% of the time

More ConnectWise RMM Competitors

NinjaOne vs TeamViewer ONE

Compared 16% of the time

Datto Remote Monitoring and Management vs TeamViewer ONE

Compared 12% of the time

Azure Bastion vs TeamViewer ONE

Compared 11% of the time

GoTo Resolve vs TeamViewer ONE

Compared 8% of the time

N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management vs TeamViewer ONE

Compared 8% of the time

More TeamViewer ONE Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Intune

July 2026

Download Microsoft Intune product report

Buyer's Guide

ConnectWise RMM

July 2026

Download ConnectWise RMM product report

Buyer's Guide

TeamViewer ONE

June 2026

Download TeamViewer ONE product report

Also Known As

Intune, MS Intune, Microsoft Endpoint Manager

Continuum Command, Continuum RMM

TeamViewer IoT

Overview

Microsoft Intune is a cloud-based service designed for device management, security, and compliance. It supports automation and facilitates endpoint management for Windows, iOS, and Android devices, ensuring data protection and efficient policy enforcement.

Microsoft Intune offers seamless integration with tools like Windows Autopilot to automate device setup and deployment. Integrated with Azure Active Directory, it enhances policy management while providing robust reporting and analytics tools for compliance tracking. Despite its intuitive interface aimed at simplifying navigation and device security management, there are challenges such as compatibility issues with Linux and Mac, limited policy support for Android, and demands for better third-party integration. It's widely used for both corporate-owned devices and BYOD scenarios in dynamic IT environments.

What are the key features of Microsoft Intune?

Windows Autopilot: Automates device setup for rapid deployment.
Azure Active Directory Integration: Enhances user policy management.
Reporting and Analytics: Improves compliance visibility.
Mobile Application Management: Ensures app security without compromising personal data.
Cloud-Based Management: Allows management from any location.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Time Efficiency: Automation reduces time in policy enforcement and configuration updates.
Enhanced Security: Ensures data protection across corporate-owned and BYOD devices.
Improved Compliance: Advanced reporting tools enhance compliance visibility.
Flexible Management: Cloud-based nature supports management from any location.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, Microsoft Intune is implemented to ensure data protection and compliance with regulatory standards. Manufacturing sectors utilize Intune for managing a distributed workforce across global locations, while educational institutions employ it to secure and manage devices in learning environments supporting both students and faculty.

Microsoft

ConnectWise RMM enhances efficiency for MSPs through patch management and security automation, effectively reducing manual tasks and improving operational capabilities.

ConnectWise RMM empowers Managed Service Providers by offering comprehensive monitoring, management, and automation tools. Its capabilities include effective patch management, remote access via ScreenConnect, and automation tools that support system administration and script scheduling. The platform ensures network discovery and monitoring, maintaining visibility and swiftly addressing potential issues. While users appreciate its seamless integration and sophisticated interface, they also identify limitations such as its predefined nature and connectivity issues when devices are offline. Clients desire enhanced automation and customizable dashboards, as well as integration with IT documentation tools to bolster its utility.

What are the key features of ConnectWise RMM?

Patch Management: Automates updates to reduce manual effort and enhance security.
Remote Access: Utilizes ScreenConnect for efficient remote operations.
Automation Tools: Supports system management and script scheduling for streamlined processes.
Network Discovery: Maintains visibility and resolves issues quickly.
Software Deployment: Simplifies software deployment and status monitoring.

What benefits should users expect in reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Reduces manual tasks with robust automation.
Enhanced Support: Features outsourced NOC and help desk for substantial support.
Improved ROI: Effective software deployment and monitoring increase returns.

ConnectWise RMM has become integral for Managed Service Providers, particularly in IT environments requiring constant monitoring, management, and automation. It supports agent-based monitoring and real-time alerts, aiding in quick issue resolution. The platform facilitates efficient handling of network activities like responding to critical issues, deploying anti-malware, and executing scheduled commands, significantly enhancing client support dynamics in sectors relying on IT infrastructure and services.

ConnectWise

TeamViewer ONE offers remote access and cross-platform functionality, enhancing IT operations across various systems and clouds like AWS and Azure while streamlining setup and secure connections.

Providing a robust platform for IT professionals, TeamViewer ONE enables efficient remote management with features like interactive chat, file transfers, and seamless session management. Despite its strengths, users highlight the need for improved pricing models, security measures, and enhanced stability. Regular updates are requested to tackle connectivity and lag challenges, and improvements in reporting, integration, and mobile remote functionalities are desired.

What are the standout features of TeamViewer ONE?

Remote Access: Facilitates secure control across multiple devices.
Cross-Platform Functionality: Operates on different OS and cloud environments.
File Transfers: Enables smooth and efficient data exchange.
Interactive Chat: Supports real-time communication during sessions.
Remote Management: Provides a comprehensive view of system resources.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Enhanced Collaboration: Simplifies teamwork with easy connectivity.
IT Support Efficiency: Streamlines troubleshooting and support tasks.
Resource Management: Offers tools for managing system performance.
Security Assurance: Delivers trusted connections for data protection.

TeamViewer ONE is implemented in industries requiring remote support and server management, offering solutions for IT support, remote client connections, and seamless meeting management. It assists in monitoring, troubleshooting, and resolving software and hardware issues for service providers and companies.

TeamViewer

Sample Customers

Mitchells and Buzzers, Callaway

Frontier Business Products, Itek Systems Management, ZLan, Karpel, MySherpa, Arvig, CCSI, Leap Managed IT, eProsper, Pensar, Gordon Flesch, LeadingEdge, NSI, Server Sentry, Computer Consultants, Keystone IT Consulting, Ekaru, Epic Technologies, Rouse Consulting, Empower Information Systems, Computer Solutions Group, The Critical Update, Voice Smart Networks, CMIT Solutions, Preferred Communication Systems, G2 Tech Group, Pulse Business Solutions, Greystone Technology Group, Clare Computer Solutions, Evolve IT Australia

Carey Paul Honda

Buyer's Guide

ConnectWise RMM vs. TeamViewer ONE

June 2026

Free Report: ConnectWise RMM vs. TeamViewer ONE

Find out what your peers are saying about ConnectWise RMM vs. TeamViewer ONE and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

906,418 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ConnectWise RMM vs. TeamViewer ONE report.

See our list of best Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) vendors, best Patch Management vendors, and best Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) vendors.

We monitor all Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.