ConnectWise RMM vs TeamViewer ONE comparison

ConnectWise and TeamViewer are both solutions in the Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) category. ConnectWise is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.3, while TeamViewer is ranked #9 with an average rating of 9.0. Additionally, 100% of ConnectWise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of TeamViewer users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 24, 2026

ConnectWise RMM and TeamViewer ONE target remote management needs. TeamViewer ONE is favored for its enhanced features despite higher costs, while ConnectWise RMM shines in pricing and support.

Features:ConnectWise RMM provides automated patch management, remote access, and network monitoring, aiding streamlined IT operations. In contrast, TeamViewer ONE is known for multi-platform support, robust remote control, and secure data transfer, offering comprehensive device management. These advanced capabilities make it a favored choice for users requiring high functionality.

Room for Improvement:ConnectWise RMM could enhance integration options, improve user interface design, and expand their third-party compatibility to increase overall effectiveness. TeamViewer ONE, on the other hand, might focus on reducing overall costs, enhancing customer training resources, and improving workflow efficiency for better user satisfaction.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:ConnectWise RMM boasts straightforward deployment and responsive customer service, simplifying integration into existing environments. TeamViewer ONE, while offering quick installation and robust technical support, wins in terms of speedy setup, appealing to companies needing rapid implementation.

Pricing and ROI:ConnectWise RMM presents cost-effective pricing and solid ROI, attracting budget-conscious buyers. In contrast, TeamViewer ONE, despite higher initial costs, delivers substantial value through its advanced features and extensive support, meriting consideration for those prioritizing feature-rich experiences over immediate expenses.

To learn more, read our detailed ConnectWise RMM vs. TeamViewer ONE Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ConnectWise RMM vs. TeamViewer ONE

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,344 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Intune

Featured Reviews

OluwashileAdeniyi

Senior Infrastructure Security Engineer at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees

Centralized endpoint security has improved and supports hybrid work and BYOD policies

Regarding what I dislike about Microsoft Intune and its downsides, I would say that more Mac controls are needed because we have limited Mac and Linux control. When comparing controls and policies between Windows, Mac, and Linux, Windows has almost everything you can think of, while Mac and Linux have limited types of control. You cannot implement certain things on Mac and Linux that you can on Windows. The limited controls are a major issue. Additionally, if Microsoft could find a way to embed servers into Microsoft Intune, that would be beneficial. Microsoft Intune is not really designed for servers or Windows servers. It is more tailored towards Windows 11 and Windows 10 operating systems. Windows servers are not fully supported. Enterprise organizations usually have both servers and endpoints, which are users' workstations. For servers, most people look for other solutions such as SCCM, which is Configuration Manager. However, SCCM is what Microsoft Intune is trying to replace. Both SCCM and Microsoft Intune belong to Microsoft. Microsoft is trying to transition organizations into Microsoft Intune, the native cloud solution. However, because this update is still in process, servers are not fully compatible with Microsoft Intune and cannot be managed by it. The current policy that has emerged from issues with clients is what they call co-management, which is relatively new, and I do not know if adoption is significant. Many legacy or older customers who have been using these products for decades still have SCCM. When it is time for them to manage their Windows devices, they use what is called cloud attach. Cloud attach is a term whereby your SCCM is connected to your Microsoft Intune. Most people do not know about it, but I have deployed it for several organizations. Cloud attach and co-management work together so that your device is in SCCM, but some policies are pushed from Microsoft Intune. It is like two different solutions working hand in hand. That is what they call co-management. Microsoft Intune does not bring all of your endpoint and security management tools into one place, which is the goal and how it should be. However, as I mentioned, servers are not included. If we talk about end users, Microsoft Intune does bring all your devices together. In a typical enterprise environment, you have end users with workstations, laptops, company-issued phones, and bring your own devices. You can create policies for all of these. However, for the backend, your servers do not have much coverage. Servers are not really covered by Microsoft Intune in that way.

Read full review

Faiz Fortune

Project Engineer at Moksh Tech

Automated monitoring has streamlined time tracking and project management across all clients

I think the most valuable feature of ConnectWise RMM is scheduling my time with clients and capturing my times with them. Time management is key for my workflow. It helps with keeping track of all our clients and all the devices, so ConnectWise RMM has been quite helpful in managing my IT environment overall. Automated patch management in ConnectWise RMM has made everything streamlined, allowing me to concentrate on more important tasks. I can run my automations and ensure that they go through every server, every cloud infrastructure, and every client. I've observed that with ConnectWise RMM, capturing my times used to be quite an issue when working with overseas countries, but now it's much easier, and I can monitor everything I'm doing in real-time.

Read full review

Nitesh Ranjan

Senior Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

Remote sessions have become smoother and now resolve end user issues more comfortably

One feedback I have is regarding the voice feature. Whenever we take a remote session, the voice gets enabled automatically, and we have to mute it from our side. A pop-up asking whether we want to continue with the voice or not would be helpful when accessing a remote session. The audio system could be improved because sometimes we are not aware that we need to unmute the team while taking a remote session. The end user can hear us talking with colleagues, and we sometimes forget that we have unmuted while taking a remote session. If a pop-up appears when we take a remote session with the end user asking us to unmute ourselves, that would be better for us to proceed. When the pop-up appears, we can directly mute ourselves, and the end user will not be able to hear the background noise from the office. Since many colleagues are taking remote sessions and talking to end users simultaneously, there is often significant background noise. Having this pop-up appear when accessing a remote session with the end user would be a helpful update.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is much easier to deploy software updates and Windows updates globally because of the cloud base, so I can manage from anywhere, making it quite convenient for me."

"Within Intune, managing policies and having a consistent way to manage devices is valuable."

"My advice for those implementing Microsoft Intune is to proceed with it; there is no other software that can perform the job better, and Microsoft offers extensive experience with a mature ecosystem, so I recommend going for it."

"Given all of the factors and things to consider, including features and cost, I would say that Intune has a slight edge over competing products."

"I appreciate how easy it is to deploy certificates to end users to get control over their device with Microsoft Intune; that's what Microsoft Intune is known for, and that's what we use them for."

"Intune is a very good product and everything is cloud-based, and it provides a very simple unified platform to manage everything from the single management console."

"Intune is effective because of the configuration management and endpoint security it provides. The graphical interface makes it easier to configure and deploy devices."

"Microsoft Intune does a great job of helping protect our environment."

More Microsoft Intune pros

"The most valuable features are RMM and patch management. However, the main reason we have been using this solution is that they are the only provider of RMM that has an outsourced NOC and help desk. This has been very useful."

"The best features of ConnectWise RMM are the automation tools that they've included, which are quite good, enabling us to mass manage systems, schedule scripts, etc."

"The technical support has been fantastic."

"We've seen a lot of MSPs who have grown by using Continuum."

"My advice for others looking into using ConnectWise RMM is that it is the best tool to work with in terms of RMM, and I do not know why people prefer NinjaOne; I clearly prefer ConnectWise much more."

"At this point, this product does everything that I want."

"The most valuable feature is the patching solution."

"The user interface is the first valuable feature. The integration is the second valuable feature. The integration that you are doing with the products needs to be very certain. There shouldn't be any glitches. There are different software out there that will give you an option called scripting and ask you to do a hundred different things to set up a script for a particular customer. With Continuum, everything is done a single way. You just select the clients, script, and machine, and then you just go and deploy. The best part of Continuum is that it is not just a software company. It is a pure services company. It is an RMM software; it isn't used as a PSA. The software is just a part of the service offering. This is the difference between all other service providers out there and Continuum. Continuum is basically providing services. Continuum doesn't sell the software."

More ConnectWise RMM pros

"Transferring files and viewing data work well with TeamViewer Remote Management."

"TeamViewer Remote Management is very easy and very good for remote work."

"The product is very stable."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is Remote Access."

"Even if I've had three computers connected it has been fairly stable."

"If you want to do remote troubleshooting, it's a good idea to utilize TeamViewer."

"It is a scalable solution...The initial setup of TeamViewer Remote Management was very simple."

"It enhances collaboration among my board members during board meetings, whether annual, regular, or irregular."

More TeamViewer ONE pros

Cons

"Microsoft Intune fails a lot when it comes to device compliance."

"I switched away from Microsoft Intune because it cannot manage the MacBook very well."

"The main differences between Intune and other products are, like I mentioned, in terms of the Mac. If the customers are majorly moving and adopting Mac laptops while they are using the Intune, they are leaving for other platforms, like Workspace ONE and vMOX."

"At this time, I do not have any areas for improvement. I have heard about some downtime, but I am not in the local IT team."

"However, due to access limitations, we are unable to deploy certain security features on end-user devices."

"There are items that require improvements. One is the controls from iOS."

"It needs certificate provisioning for S/MIME purposes."

"In the past, I raised some tickets for the enhancement feature, which was missing in Intune."

More Microsoft Intune cons

"ConnectWise RMM sometimes has a lag, and the speed can be an issue."

"The solution could improve by offering better overall management and dashboards."

"If a computer hasn't been turned on for a long time and the client software is installed, it may not reconnect to the dashboard once it's powered up."

"I would like to see the incorporation of the dashboards for other products that they work with into the main dashboard."

"The initial setup with ConnectWise RMM is painful, to be completely honest. The pain points during the initial setup with ConnectWise RMM include the migration from Automate to RMM being very time-consuming and the process not being as straightforward as indicated."

"They can include support for vaulting, where you can actually document the entire infrastructure, including servers, desktops, networks, passwords, maps, diagrams, and customer information. Continuum has integrated everything, and you have to use a PSA. Continuum has a ticketing system and an RMM. They could integrate the functionality for IT documentation. An MSP would want everything into one tool."

"It's a legacy tool with many outdated approaches. It is managed offshore which affects everyone because it seems the developers don't fully understand our needs."

"One of the defects that I have noticed with TeamViewer Remote Management is that if I am on a certain version and the person to whom I am connected is not on the same version, then it does not connect at times until I update the solution."

"The compatibility needs improvement in TeamViewer Remote Management because there's some incompatibility in some versions of the solution. Some solutions require the higher-performing version of TeamViewer Remote Management. Otherwise, there's incompatibility. The security provided by TeamViewer Remote Management in terms of data transfer also needs improvement. I'd like to see more features in the next release of TeamViewer Remote Management because it's still lacking in features. It would also be good for TeamViewer Remote Management to have a built-in remoting program similar to what Itarian has."

"I have contacted customer service and support a couple of times, but it was not good."

"If there were a way for users to do access reporting, that would be an ideal addition to the product."

"Sometimes you need more services and need to buy more, depending on if you need it short term or long term."

"One feature to add would be a mobile remote feature."

"I prefer to use AnyDesk. I actually uninstalled TeamViewer."

"The connectivity could improve."

More TeamViewer ONE cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Licensing depends on how you are providing support to your enterprise, whether it's device-based or user-based."

"The E5 license is expensive."

"Microsoft Intune is more expensive than other solutions, but it offers a wider range of features and control."

"Microsoft Intune is pretty reasonable. We have difficulty with Azure, which is probably why we have not put many assets in Azure. Everything we put there is very expensive."

"There are licenses required for this solution. We enable licenses on the devices we need to manage."

"In terms of the product price and licensing costs, my company finds the product to be reasonably priced."

"We work with the subscription rather than a server license. I think it's economical this way because we don't have to have a server license for that, and I think that works in our favor."

"The pricing is competitive, but it is not cheap."

More Microsoft Intune pricing and cost advice

"Continuum Command price is more expensive than competitors, it is three times the price of the next lowest and costs approximately $25 an endpoint. However, when you take that into account you receive the help desk and outsource NOC included it has a lot more value because competitors do not provide the outsourced NOC and help desk."

"It has a pay-as-you-go model. They don't have any minimum, maximum, or such sorts of commitments with any of their partners or customers. I don't believe they have any restrictions about using a specific number of agents. You don't have to use 100 agents or 200 agents to work with this. They have a lock-in period of three months, during which you cannot switch a service plan, which is fine."

"The licensing works such that the more you add, the more it costs, but for the most part, the price starts at about $5 USD per client."

"We pay for a yearly license."

"Its price is a little high as compared to other solutions."

"Addition services could be lower priced."

"It is a licensed product."

"Our licenses for TeamViewer Remote Management are being managed directly by our procurement team. If we need more licenses they handle it."

"There are no charges to be paid for the solution since I use it for personal use."

"We are now using the free version, but probably next year we are going to follow up with the paid version."

"The solution's license is expensive."

More TeamViewer ONE pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,344 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

14%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Performing Arts

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	192
Midsize Enterprise	62
Large Enterprise	186

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	19
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

How does Microsoft Intune compare with VMware Workspace One?

Microsoft Intune is a great tool for managing a mobile device fleet while keeping access control. The solution makes ...

See all answers

What are the pros and cons of Microsoft Intune?

Microsoft Intune is a great configuration management tool and has a lot of good things going for it. Here are some of...

See all answers

How does Google Cloud Identity compare with Microsoft Intune?

Microsoft Intune offers not only an easy-to-deploy data protection and productivity management solution, but also ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Continuum Command?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was very smooth; I quickly got a quote from a ConnectWise accou...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Continuum Command?

I have not noticed any limitations or pain points so far.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Continuum Command?

I have been using ConnectWise RMM for about a year and a few months now, and I am also getting Bitdefender GravityZon...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering TeamViewer Remote Management?

Regarding pricing, since the licenses are purchased by the organization, I am not aware of the pricing details. Howev...

See all answers

What needs improvement with TeamViewer Remote Management?

One feedback I have is regarding the voice feature. Whenever we take a remote session, the voice gets enabled automat...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for TeamViewer Remote Management?

I use TeamViewer Remote Management primarily for remote session purposes in my previous and current organization.

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM MaaS360 vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 11% of the time

Jamf Pro vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 10% of the time

Workspace ONE UEM vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 3% of the time

ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 3% of the time

More Microsoft Intune Competitors

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs ConnectWise RMM

Compared 6% of the time

Everbridge IT Alerting vs ConnectWise RMM

Compared 6% of the time

NinjaOne vs ConnectWise RMM

Compared 6% of the time

Kaseya 365 vs ConnectWise RMM

Compared 6% of the time

More ConnectWise RMM Competitors

NinjaOne vs TeamViewer ONE

Compared 16% of the time

Azure Bastion vs TeamViewer ONE

Compared 11% of the time

Datto Remote Monitoring and Management vs TeamViewer ONE

Compared 11% of the time

GoTo Resolve vs TeamViewer ONE

Compared 8% of the time

N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management vs TeamViewer ONE

Compared 8% of the time

More TeamViewer ONE Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Intune

July 2026

Download Microsoft Intune product report

Buyer's Guide

ConnectWise RMM

August 2026

Download ConnectWise RMM product report

Buyer's Guide

TeamViewer ONE

July 2026

Download TeamViewer ONE product report

Also Known As

Intune, MS Intune, Microsoft Endpoint Manager

Continuum Command, Continuum RMM

TeamViewer IoT

Overview

Microsoft Intune is a cloud-based service designed for device management, security, and compliance. It supports automation and facilitates endpoint management for Windows, iOS, and Android devices, ensuring data protection and efficient policy enforcement.

Microsoft Intune offers seamless integration with tools like Windows Autopilot to automate device setup and deployment. Integrated with Azure Active Directory, it enhances policy management while providing robust reporting and analytics tools for compliance tracking. Despite its intuitive interface aimed at simplifying navigation and device security management, there are challenges such as compatibility issues with Linux and Mac, limited policy support for Android, and demands for better third-party integration. It's widely used for both corporate-owned devices and BYOD scenarios in dynamic IT environments.

What are the key features of Microsoft Intune?

Windows Autopilot: Automates device setup for rapid deployment.
Azure Active Directory Integration: Enhances user policy management.
Reporting and Analytics: Improves compliance visibility.
Mobile Application Management: Ensures app security without compromising personal data.
Cloud-Based Management: Allows management from any location.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Time Efficiency: Automation reduces time in policy enforcement and configuration updates.
Enhanced Security: Ensures data protection across corporate-owned and BYOD devices.
Improved Compliance: Advanced reporting tools enhance compliance visibility.
Flexible Management: Cloud-based nature supports management from any location.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, Microsoft Intune is implemented to ensure data protection and compliance with regulatory standards. Manufacturing sectors utilize Intune for managing a distributed workforce across global locations, while educational institutions employ it to secure and manage devices in learning environments supporting both students and faculty.

Microsoft

ConnectWise RMM enhances efficiency for MSPs through patch management and security automation, effectively reducing manual tasks and improving operational capabilities.

ConnectWise RMM empowers Managed Service Providers by offering comprehensive monitoring, management, and automation tools. Its capabilities include effective patch management, remote access via ScreenConnect, and automation tools that support system administration and script scheduling. The platform ensures network discovery and monitoring, maintaining visibility and swiftly addressing potential issues. While users appreciate its seamless integration and sophisticated interface, they also identify limitations such as its predefined nature and connectivity issues when devices are offline. Clients desire enhanced automation and customizable dashboards, as well as integration with IT documentation tools to bolster its utility.

What are the key features of ConnectWise RMM?

Patch Management: Automates updates to reduce manual effort and enhance security.
Remote Access: Utilizes ScreenConnect for efficient remote operations.
Automation Tools: Supports system management and script scheduling for streamlined processes.
Network Discovery: Maintains visibility and resolves issues quickly.
Software Deployment: Simplifies software deployment and status monitoring.

What benefits should users expect in reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Reduces manual tasks with robust automation.
Enhanced Support: Features outsourced NOC and help desk for substantial support.
Improved ROI: Effective software deployment and monitoring increase returns.

ConnectWise RMM has become integral for Managed Service Providers, particularly in IT environments requiring constant monitoring, management, and automation. It supports agent-based monitoring and real-time alerts, aiding in quick issue resolution. The platform facilitates efficient handling of network activities like responding to critical issues, deploying anti-malware, and executing scheduled commands, significantly enhancing client support dynamics in sectors relying on IT infrastructure and services.

ConnectWise

TeamViewer ONE offers remote access and cross-platform functionality, enhancing IT operations across various systems and clouds like AWS and Azure while streamlining setup and secure connections.

Providing a robust platform for IT professionals, TeamViewer ONE enables efficient remote management with features like interactive chat, file transfers, and seamless session management. Despite its strengths, users highlight the need for improved pricing models, security measures, and enhanced stability. Regular updates are requested to tackle connectivity and lag challenges, and improvements in reporting, integration, and mobile remote functionalities are desired.

What are the standout features of TeamViewer ONE?

Remote Access: Facilitates secure control across multiple devices.
Cross-Platform Functionality: Operates on different OS and cloud environments.
File Transfers: Enables smooth and efficient data exchange.
Interactive Chat: Supports real-time communication during sessions.
Remote Management: Provides a comprehensive view of system resources.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Enhanced Collaboration: Simplifies teamwork with easy connectivity.
IT Support Efficiency: Streamlines troubleshooting and support tasks.
Resource Management: Offers tools for managing system performance.
Security Assurance: Delivers trusted connections for data protection.

TeamViewer ONE is implemented in industries requiring remote support and server management, offering solutions for IT support, remote client connections, and seamless meeting management. It assists in monitoring, troubleshooting, and resolving software and hardware issues for service providers and companies.

TeamViewer

Sample Customers

Mitchells and Buzzers, Callaway

Frontier Business Products, Itek Systems Management, ZLan, Karpel, MySherpa, Arvig, CCSI, Leap Managed IT, eProsper, Pensar, Gordon Flesch, LeadingEdge, NSI, Server Sentry, Computer Consultants, Keystone IT Consulting, Ekaru, Epic Technologies, Rouse Consulting, Empower Information Systems, Computer Solutions Group, The Critical Update, Voice Smart Networks, CMIT Solutions, Preferred Communication Systems, G2 Tech Group, Pulse Business Solutions, Greystone Technology Group, Clare Computer Solutions, Evolve IT Australia

Carey Paul Honda

Buyer's Guide

ConnectWise RMM vs. TeamViewer ONE

June 2026

Free Report: ConnectWise RMM vs. TeamViewer ONE

Find out what your peers are saying about ConnectWise RMM vs. TeamViewer ONE and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,344 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ConnectWise RMM vs. TeamViewer ONE report.

See our list of best Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) vendors, best Patch Management vendors, and best Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) vendors.

We monitor all Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.