CMW Tracker vs OpenText ProVision comparison

CMW Lab and OpenText are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. CMW Lab is ranked #39, while OpenText is ranked #45. CMW Lab holds a 0.9% mindshare in BPM, compared to OpenText’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of CMW Lab users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

CMW Tracker

Read 15 CMW Tracker reviews

885 Views
584 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText ProVision

Read 3 OpenText ProVision reviews

721 Views
454 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

CMW Tracker

OpenText ProVision

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 21, 2025

OpenText ProVision and CMW Tracker are leading contenders in the business process management software category. Based on data comparisons, CMW Tracker emerges superior due to its robust features and value for the price.

Features: OpenText ProVision is known for its comprehensive process modeling, strategic process alignment, and detailed analysis capabilities. CMW Tracker stands out with seamless task management, workflow automation, and flexibility in adapting to project requirements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CMW Tracker offers a straightforward cloud deployment model and strong customer service that supports quick implementation. OpenText ProVision provides extensive setup options, requiring a more detailed deployment process.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText ProVision presents an attractive setup cost and strong ROI by aligning business goals and processes. CMW Tracker offers competitive pricing with a focus on automation, which leads to faster returns.

To learn more, read our detailed CMW Tracker vs. OpenText ProVision Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CMW Tracker vs. OpenText ProVision

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CMW Tracker

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

39th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (38th)

OpenText ProVision

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

45th

Average Rating

6.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Architecture Management (28th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of CMW Tracker is 0.9%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText ProVision is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
CMW Tracker	0.9%
OpenText ProVision	0.6%
Other	98.5%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Sarah Sheluchin

Works

Excellent task manager software - supports both management and workflow

Excellent task manager software - supports both management and workflow. Time tracking is available and much used in our firm. Integration with Microsoft Outlook is also a great feature, along with the ability to access from mobile. Being able to use Comindware Tracker for common processes or standalone tasks for crucial in our decision to test the software. The software is flexible and computer-novice friendly, making training required minimal and efficient to implement.

Read full review

reviewer1944672

Senior Director, Head of Process & Functional Architecture, Intelligent Automation at a real estate/law firm with 10,001+ employees

Good attribute attachment but problems with collaboration

I primarily use OpenText ProVision to create our end-to-end process repository and library for different parts of the organization, capturing the collaboration process to get the right inputs OpenText ProVision's best feature is the capability to attach a variety of attributes and extract and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I love this software because this software helps me to increase team productivity day-by-day."

"It was easy to set up my team with access credentials to their files."

"This solution can be useful for tracking the different stages of projects and the people working on them."

"This software added transparency to our workflows. It helped with increasing throughput of clients and their satisfaction."

"It successfully routes hand-offs between different teams, adds transparency to workflows, and has a set of social collaboration tools."

"This software makes it so easy and enjoyable to work with the team. Any user can learn and start using the application quickly."

"The ability to access Comindware Tracker from mobile has been greatly valuable to our organization. We are often out of office and this can create timeframe and task management issues. Being able to access tasks and time tracking while on the move is a great asset."

"The feature I have found most valuable is the easy synchronization with other tools."

More CMW Tracker pros

"The stability of the product is very good."

"All the features come as part of a standard license."

"OpenText ProVision's best feature is the capability to attach a variety of attributes and extract and analyze that information."

Cons

"I am expecting new updates to improve the software."

"The UX/UI could be reviewed and revamped to meet new the criteria of Digitalization and Innovation."

"The OpenAPI is good, but it is not enough. It lacks out-of-box integrations with popular web services."

"There are not very many report templates, and if there were more, it would really help."

"Figuring out how to integrate defined teams or groups into this system is difficult, and there are no contextual menus."

"We are using the backdated version of this software. That is why we lack of some features. I hope when we update the version, then all the problems will be solved."

"This solution lacks API integration with some popular websites."

"I would like them to offer a one-time payment plan that one can choose."

More CMW Tracker cons

"Lacks the ability to have your own in-house developments."

"Integrating with or interfacing with other tools like data management tools would be very helpful."

"OpenText ProVision's collaboration management is quite complicated and difficult to use."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Setup cost is reasonable and average on the market. They offer simple licensing and price per user."

"This solution has a very lost cost."

"The price is so reasonable."

"The pricing and licensing is as per market standards, except that the process of extending licenses is also easy."

"I benefit from this software by getting a variety of reporting options and features for a relatively low cost"

"Great value for the money."

"Price per user works for me when they do not count my clients, which fill forms."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	3

No data available

Comparisons

Aurea CX Process vs CMW Tracker

Compared 15% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs CMW Tracker

Compared 13% of the time

OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs CMW Tracker

Compared 12% of the time

IBM BPM vs CMW Tracker

Compared 11% of the time

Fujitsu Interstage BPM vs CMW Tracker

Compared 10% of the time

More CMW Tracker Competitors

Visio vs OpenText ProVision

Compared 21% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs OpenText ProVision

Compared 16% of the time

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs OpenText ProVision

Compared 15% of the time

IBM Rational System Architect vs OpenText ProVision

Compared 13% of the time

LeanIX vs OpenText ProVision

Compared 12% of the time

More OpenText ProVision Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CMW Tracker

January 2026

Download CMW Tracker product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

January 2026

Download OpenText ProVision product report

Also Known As

Comindware Tracker

Metastorm ProVision

Overview

CMW Tracker offers a browser-accessible workflow management platform supporting low code development with features such as team collaboration and excellent customer service. Users value its affordability and ability to enhance transparency and standardize processes.

CMW Tracker streamlines project management by allowing non-technical users to create workflows, manage tasks, and synchronize tools efficiently. This platform emphasizes ease of deployment and modification, bringing transparency and clarity to processes while enabling workflow automation. Its user-friendly design, robust analytics, and cost-effectiveness make it a favored choice for organizations needing efficient workflow management.

What are the main features of CMW Tracker?

Easy Deployment and Modification: Quickly set up and customize according to user needs.
Browser Accessibility: Access from any location using any web browser.
Low Code Development: Empower users without technical expertise to create workflows.
Team Collaboration Tools: Facilitate seamless communication and collaboration among team members.
Robust Analytics and Reporting: Comprehensive analysis and reporting to track and optimize projects.
Mobile Accessibility: Manage time and tasks efficiently outside the office.

What benefits can users expect from CMW Tracker?

Improved Transparency: Increased visibility into project processes and status.
Standardized Processes: Better alignment and consistency in task management.
Cost-Effective Solution: Affordability without compromising on features and support.
Enhanced Ease of Use: User-friendly design reduces reliance on technical teams.

CMW Tracker is widely implemented across industries requiring efficient workflow management, particularly in settings where collaboration and process transparency are critical. Organizations benefit from its ability to standardize operations, reduce IT dependency, and enhance service delivery by enabling seamless communication among dispersed team members working on joint projects.

CMW Lab

OpenTextâs MIM (formerly Metastorm Integration & Managed File Transfer) solution provides a single platform for you to manage both batch and real-time, system-based integrations and processes complete with an audit trail to ensure operational success. With OpenText MIM, your organization can: Track high volume transaction and data transfers and file content from a centralized dashboard Ensure corporate data and auditing compliance requirements Enhance agility and visibility into end-to-end process activities at the system, data and human interaction levels Tie legacy systems into new SOA environments Simplify interactions with your existing legacy systems and data by integrating them into your improved business processes

OpenText

Sample Customers

Anthem, Hertz, Aetna, CVS Pharmacy, Covidien, Quicken Loans, Associated British Ports, United Card Services

Delta Technology, Export Development Canada, Rompetrol, Salt River Project, AMEC, U.S. Air Force, HP Consulting & Integration

Buyer's Guide

CMW Tracker vs. OpenText ProVision

December 2025

Free Report: CMW Tracker vs. OpenText ProVision

Find out what your peers are saying about CMW Tracker vs. OpenText ProVision and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CMW Tracker vs. OpenText ProVision report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.