IBM BPM and CMW Tracker are key contenders in the business process management sector. Data suggests CMW Tracker has an overall advantage due to its comprehensive features and adaptability, whereas IBM BPM remains competitive with its robust customer support.
Features: IBM BPM is known for its advanced analytics, seamless integrations, and scalability, making it ideal for complex process automation. CMW Tracker is recognized for its user-friendly design, customizable options, and efficient process tracking, providing businesses with adaptable and easy-to-use solutions.
Room for Improvement: IBM BPM could enhance its user interface to match growing market standards and incorporate more AI-driven features for smarter process automation. CMW Tracker could improve by offering deeper integration capabilities for complex IT environments and expanding advanced reporting tools to match enterprise-scale demands.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM BPM administers a traditional deployment model supported by extensive customer assistance, ensuring smooth implementations. CMW Tracker employs a flexible deployment approach complemented by effective online resources, facilitating rapid deployment and user flexibility.
Pricing and ROI: IBM BPM is positioned at a premium pricing tier, requiring significant initial investment but promising strong ROI over time. CMW Tracker presents an attractive cost-effective pricing model, offering quick deployment and robust ROI, particularly suited for small to medium-sized enterprises.
The customer service is outstanding.
On a scale from 1 to 10, support deserves a rating of 7 to 8.
We had a contract that provided on-site support, which was very satisfactory.
The solution has scalability issues; on a scale, I would rate it at eight out of ten.
The architecture of the solution offers scalability; we can scale both vertically and horizontally.
I found IBM BPM to be scalable to a certain level but it struggled with large volumes of concurrent transactions.
Technologies evolve day by day, especially with the emergence of artificial intelligence and generative AI models.
IBM BPM also lacks smaller solutions, so I must purchase multiple solutions to start with workflows and applications.
There are negative aspects, such as IBM BPM being quite heavy and not lightweight, and the licensing cost is higher, which has caused some companies to shift away.
SAP is more expensive, but IBM BPM is very expensive.
Coordination across data silos is effective, and IBM BPM can be used for that purpose.
The integration capabilities of IBM BPM are excellent.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| IBM BPM | 4.6% |
| CMW Tracker | 0.7% |
| Other | 94.7% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 3 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 30 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 19 |
| Large Enterprise | 72 |
CMW Tracker offers a browser-accessible workflow management platform supporting low code development with features such as team collaboration and excellent customer service. Users value its affordability and ability to enhance transparency and standardize processes.
CMW Tracker streamlines project management by allowing non-technical users to create workflows, manage tasks, and synchronize tools efficiently. This platform emphasizes ease of deployment and modification, bringing transparency and clarity to processes while enabling workflow automation. Its user-friendly design, robust analytics, and cost-effectiveness make it a favored choice for organizations needing efficient workflow management.
What are the main features of CMW Tracker?CMW Tracker is widely implemented across industries requiring efficient workflow management, particularly in settings where collaboration and process transparency are critical. Organizations benefit from its ability to standardize operations, reduce IT dependency, and enhance service delivery by enabling seamless communication among dispersed team members working on joint projects.
IBM BPM is a business process management tool that provides a robust set of tools to author, test, and deploy business processes, as well as full visibility and insight to managing those business processes. The solution provides tooling and run time for process design, execution, monitoring, and optimization, along with basic system integration support. To support various levels of complexity and involvement with business process management, there are two different editions of the product: IBM BPM and IBM BPM Express.
IBM BPM Features
IBM BPM has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:
IBM BPM Benefits
There are many benefits to implementing IBM BPM. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:
Reviews from Real Users
IBM BPM is a solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. Some of its major advantages are that it’s good for developing complex apps, is robust, and has helpful team management and process performance features.
Zoran C., Owner/CEO at IT SPHERE, says, “It is perfect if you have to develop complex apps without much coding (only java script). It is also good if you don't have much IT resources in your company and would like to involve business analysts in the process of developing apps. My opinion is that it can do about 50% of all developers' work.”
Suhas V., BPM Architect at GBM, mentions, “Overall the solution is robust and has the ability to integrate with any product for complex workflows."
A BPM Consultant at a financial services firm comments, "Some of the features that I like the most are team management and process performance. They are both very useful and very powerful with regard to the workflow."
A Digital Banking & Innovation Director at a financial services firm expresses, “The processing functionality makes it easy to change processes and workflows easily.”
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
