No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Aurea CX Process vs CMW Tracker comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Aurea CX Process
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
38th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Design (22nd)
CMW Tracker
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
27th
Average Rating
9.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
Process Automation (30th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Aurea CX Process is 1.2%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CMW Tracker is 1.6%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business Process Management (BPM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
CMW Tracker1.6%
Aurea CX Process1.2%
Other97.2%
Business Process Management (BPM)
 

Featured Reviews

HC
Savvion (BPM) J2EE Developer at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
Facilitates development flexibility and easy customization
Flexibility of development. Developer can use various JavaScript APIs for development. Most (or all) of the components are plug and play. Customization is easily achievable most of the time As mentioned above, it is more flexible than other products available in the market. Performance. More…
Excellent task manager software - supports both management and workflow
Excellent task manager software - supports both management and workflow. Time tracking is available and much used in our firm. Integration with Microsoft Outlook is also a great feature, along with the ability to access from mobile. Being able to use Comindware Tracker for common processes or standalone tasks for crucial in our decision to test the software. The software is flexible and computer-novice friendly, making training required minimal and efficient to implement.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Flexibility of development; the developer can use various JavaScript APIs for development and most or all of the components are plug and play, so customization is easily achievable most of the time."
"The workflow tracker helps us to track our staff's workflow. It helps us to improve the productivity of our team."
"Comindware Tracker took us from a blind email to fully-transparent automated workflow with travel management and reporting, and improved efficiency, as well as making continuous workflow improvement possible."
"The ability to access Comindware Tracker from mobile has been greatly valuable to our organization. We are often out of office and this can create timeframe and task management issues. Being able to access tasks and time tracking while on the move is a great asset."
"The feature I have found most valuable is the easy synchronization with other tools."
"It successfully routes hand-offs between different teams, adds transparency to workflows, and has a set of social collaboration tools."
"This solution can be useful for tracking the different stages of projects and the people working on them."
"It helps very well with project management, and the workflow process is very easy and fast."
"Comindware Tracker gives a lot of configurations and business rules to the administrators, and these can also be delegated to business users so that they could build and maintain their own step-based workflows."
 

Cons

"Yes, the servers are not as efficient as required."
"The initial setup seemed a bit complex, and there is no great documentation."
"I would like them to offer a one-time payment plan that one can choose."
"Figuring out how to integrate defined teams or groups into this system is difficult, and there are no contextual menus."
"However, if you have a not so common issue, it might take time to get a final solution."
"It lacks workflow samples, which would make it even easier for non-technical users to build their own apps."
"I am expecting new updates to improve the software."
"The initial setup can be quite slow and finicky."
"The UX/UI could be reviewed and revamped to meet new the criteria of Digitalization and Innovation."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"This solution has a very lost cost."
"Price per user works for me when they do not count my clients, which fill forms."
"The pricing and licensing is as per market standards, except that the process of extending licenses is also easy."
"Great value for the money."
"I benefit from this software by getting a variety of reporting options and features for a relatively low cost"
"Setup cost is reasonable and average on the market. They offer simple licensing and price per user."
"The price is so reasonable."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Construction Company
19%
Outsourcing Company
18%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Financial Services Firm
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise3
 

Also Known As

CX Process Enterprise, Savvion BusinessManager, Savvion Process Modeler
Comindware Tracker
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Air France-KLM, Proximus, Barratt Developments, Heathrow, HomeServe, Paypal, Freedom Mortgage
Anthem, Hertz, Aetna, CVS Pharmacy, Covidien, Quicken Loans, Associated British Ports, United Card Services
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Automation Anywhere, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM). Updated: October 2026.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.