No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Aurea CX Process vs CMW Tracker comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Aurea CX Process
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
43rd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Design (23rd)
CMW Tracker
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
30th
Average Rating
9.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
Process Automation (31st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Aurea CX Process is 1.0%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CMW Tracker is 1.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business Process Management (BPM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
CMW Tracker1.5%
Aurea CX Process1.0%
Other97.5%
Business Process Management (BPM)
 

Featured Reviews

HC
Savvion (BPM) J2EE Developer at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
Facilitates development flexibility and easy customization
Flexibility of development. Developer can use various JavaScript APIs for development. Most (or all) of the components are plug and play. Customization is easily achievable most of the time As mentioned above, it is more flexible than other products available in the market. Performance. More…
Excellent task manager software - supports both management and workflow
Excellent task manager software - supports both management and workflow. Time tracking is available and much used in our firm. Integration with Microsoft Outlook is also a great feature, along with the ability to access from mobile. Being able to use Comindware Tracker for common processes or standalone tasks for crucial in our decision to test the software. The software is flexible and computer-novice friendly, making training required minimal and efficient to implement.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Flexibility of development; the developer can use various JavaScript APIs for development and most or all of the components are plug and play, so customization is easily achievable most of the time."
"Comindware Tracker allows non-technical users to build their own workflows and correct them in the course of work, delivers flexibility, and reduces workflow maintenance cost – there’s no more need to engage IT-department, when a head of department realizes that workflow should be adjusted as soon as possible."
"This software makes it so easy and enjoyable to work with the team. Any user can learn and start using the application quickly."
"The most valuable feature is that any non-technical personnel can easily work on the solution, redefining processes and creating drag and drop workflows according to the department or cross-department needs."
"It provides a scalable solution that should allow me to grow my company without too much fuss or further set up required."
"This software added transparency to our workflows. It helped with increasing throughput of clients and their satisfaction."
"This solution can be useful for tracking the different stages of projects and the people working on them."
"Comindware is great for workflow management; it's user-friendly and trustworthy, and you don't need technical skills to develop, maintain, and update workflows using the intuitive web-based visual workflow builder."
"Low code development."
 

Cons

"Yes, the servers are not as efficient as required."
"This solution lacks API integration with some popular websites."
"The UX/UI could be reviewed and revamped to meet new the criteria of Digitalization and Innovation."
"I would like them to offer a one-time payment plan that one can choose."
"Figuring out how to integrate defined teams or groups into this system is difficult, and there are no contextual menus."
"However, if you have a not so common issue, it might take time to get a final solution."
"The initial setup can be quite slow and finicky."
"It would be wonderful to have newer version releases more frequently, but it is quite a minor con."
"I am expecting new updates to improve the software."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"I benefit from this software by getting a variety of reporting options and features for a relatively low cost"
"Setup cost is reasonable and average on the market. They offer simple licensing and price per user."
"This solution has a very lost cost."
"Price per user works for me when they do not count my clients, which fill forms."
"The pricing and licensing is as per market standards, except that the process of extending licenses is also easy."
"Great value for the money."
"The price is so reasonable."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Construction Company
21%
Outsourcing Company
17%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Financial Services Firm
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise3
 

Also Known As

CX Process Enterprise, Savvion BusinessManager, Savvion Process Modeler
Comindware Tracker
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Air France-KLM, Proximus, Barratt Developments, Heathrow, HomeServe, Paypal, Freedom Mortgage
Anthem, Hertz, Aetna, CVS Pharmacy, Covidien, Quicken Loans, Associated British Ports, United Card Services
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Automation Anywhere, IBM and others in Business Process Management (BPM). Updated: September 2026.
913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.