CMW Tracker vs OpenText MBPM comparison

CMW Lab and OpenText are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. CMW Lab is ranked #42, while OpenText is ranked #38. CMW Lab holds a 0.4% mindshare in BPM, compared to OpenText’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of CMW Lab users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

CMW Tracker

Read 15 CMW Tracker reviews

409 Views
323 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText MBPM

Read 2 OpenText MBPM reviews

430 Views
366 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CMW Tracker

OpenText MBPM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2025

OpenText MBPM and CMW Tracker are competitors in the business process management sector. CMW Tracker seems to have the upper hand due to its scalability and user-friendly customization, appealing to a broader range of businesses seeking adaptable solutions.

Features: OpenText MBPM offers advanced data integration, robust data management, and workflow automation, beneficial for complex environments. CMW Tracker provides intuitive design, flexibility, and easy tailoring to specific needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText MBPM provides a comprehensive deployment model with extensive integrations and structured processes, though it is complex. CMW Tracker is known for straightforward implementation and excellent customer service, aiding smoother onboarding.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText MBPM involves higher initial costs but delivers long-term benefits for large operations needing sophisticated management. CMW Tracker offers cost-effective pricing with faster ROI, making it appealing for smaller businesses.

To learn more, read our detailed CMW Tracker vs. OpenText MBPM Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CMW Tracker vs. OpenText MBPM

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,760 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CMW Tracker

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

42nd

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (42nd)

OpenText MBPM

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

38th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of CMW Tracker is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText MBPM is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
OpenText MBPM	0.5%
CMW Tracker	0.4%
Other	99.1%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Sarah Sheluchin

Works

Excellent task manager software - supports both management and workflow

Excellent task manager software - supports both management and workflow. Time tracking is available and much used in our firm. Integration with Microsoft Outlook is also a great feature, along with the ability to access from mobile. Being able to use Comindware Tracker for common processes or standalone tasks for crucial in our decision to test the software. The software is flexible and computer-novice friendly, making training required minimal and efficient to implement.

Read full review

Jaideep MS

Practice Director at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees

A solution offering good automation capabilities while needing to improve its support and documentation

I think the solution's support could do a better job. I rate the support somewhere around four and five out of ten. There is a hoard of people that they get in touch with while contacting them. So we've done some work with them in the past. I mean, we've been a support partner for a while. But apart from that, in terms of understanding the issues for a particular technology, I think there is a lack of people at their end. So they don't really have many people with them. And by the time we could get hold of the right person, especially for production issues, it's a little too late.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The feature I have found most valuable is the easy synchronization with other tools."

"Low code development."

"The workflow tracker helps us to track our staff's workflow. It helps us to improve the productivity of our team."

"It was easy to set up my team with access credentials to their files."

"This solution can be useful for tracking the different stages of projects and the people working on them."

"Customize workflow processes visually and interactively."

"It is perhaps the most user-friendly web forms automation software. At least, I did not find anything better while testing several others similar to it."

"The configurable dashboard analytics and reporting capabilities ensure timely decision making."

More CMW Tracker pros

"Not just the solution's automation capabilities, but we like everything about it since we are more of a system integrator."

Cons

"This solution lacks API integration with some popular websites."

"The OpenAPI is good, but it is not enough. It lacks out-of-box integrations with popular web services."

"The initial setup seemed a bit complex, and there is no great documentation."

"We are using the backdated version of this software. That is why we lack of some features. I hope when we update the version, then all the problems will be solved."

"There are not very many report templates, and if there were more, it would really help."

"If your organization has only a few team members then this tool is not suitable."

"I am expecting new updates to improve the software."

"It would be wonderful to have newer version releases more frequently, but it is quite a minor con."

More CMW Tracker cons

"The user interface could be better in OpenText MBPM."

"There are shortcomings in the solution's support and documentation part."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Great value for the money."

"Price per user works for me when they do not count my clients, which fill forms."

"The pricing and licensing is as per market standards, except that the process of extending licenses is also easy."

"The price is so reasonable."

"Setup cost is reasonable and average on the market. They offer simple licensing and price per user."

"I benefit from this software by getting a variety of reporting options and features for a relatively low cost"

"This solution has a very lost cost."

"There is an annual license to use OpenText MBPM."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cost-efficient, and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing somewhere between nine and ten since it is a costly solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	3

No data available

Comparisons

No data available

Apache Airflow vs OpenText MBPM

Compared 33% of the time

Appian vs OpenText MBPM

Compared 23% of the time

IBM Case Foundation vs OpenText MBPM

Compared 23% of the time

IBM BPM vs OpenText MBPM

Compared 21% of the time

More OpenText MBPM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CMW Tracker

October 2025

Download CMW Tracker product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

October 2025

Download OpenText MBPM product report

Also Known As

Comindware Tracker

Metastorm BPM

Overview

CMW Tracker offers a browser-accessible workflow management platform supporting low code development with features such as team collaboration and excellent customer service. Users value its affordability and ability to enhance transparency and standardize processes.

CMW Tracker streamlines project management by allowing non-technical users to create workflows, manage tasks, and synchronize tools efficiently. This platform emphasizes ease of deployment and modification, bringing transparency and clarity to processes while enabling workflow automation. Its user-friendly design, robust analytics, and cost-effectiveness make it a favored choice for organizations needing efficient workflow management.

What are the main features of CMW Tracker?

Easy Deployment and Modification: Quickly set up and customize according to user needs.
Browser Accessibility: Access from any location using any web browser.
Low Code Development: Empower users without technical expertise to create workflows.
Team Collaboration Tools: Facilitate seamless communication and collaboration among team members.
Robust Analytics and Reporting: Comprehensive analysis and reporting to track and optimize projects.
Mobile Accessibility: Manage time and tasks efficiently outside the office.

What benefits can users expect from CMW Tracker?

Improved Transparency: Increased visibility into project processes and status.
Standardized Processes: Better alignment and consistency in task management.
Cost-Effective Solution: Affordability without compromising on features and support.
Enhanced Ease of Use: User-friendly design reduces reliance on technical teams.

CMW Tracker is widely implemented across industries requiring efficient workflow management, particularly in settings where collaboration and process transparency are critical. Organizations benefit from its ability to standardize operations, reduce IT dependency, and enhance service delivery by enabling seamless communication among dispersed team members working on joint projects.

CMW Lab

OpenText's MBPM (formerly Metastorm BPM) delivers the insight, power and agility you need to make your vision for business improvement a reality.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Anthem, Hertz, Aetna, CVS Pharmacy, Covidien, Quicken Loans, Associated British Ports, United Card Services

Kommunales Rechenzentrum Minden-Ravensburg/Lippe (KRZ), Hawksford Group, Gauteng Provincial Government Department of Economic Development, Deutsche Post DHL, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, London Underground, Great Clips, Fiat, Rompetrol, Gaston Memorial Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Bachmann, Alliance Healthcare

Buyer's Guide

CMW Tracker vs. OpenText MBPM

September 2025

Free Report: CMW Tracker vs. OpenText MBPM

Find out what your peers are saying about CMW Tracker vs. OpenText MBPM and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CMW Tracker vs. OpenText MBPM report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.