AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs MSP360 Backup comparison

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs. MSP360 Backup

Download the complete report

Helped 851,491 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

30th

Ranking in Cloud Backup

19th

Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

16th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

MSP360 Backup

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

55th

Ranking in Cloud Backup

43rd

Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

28th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

MSP Backup (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MSP360 Backup is 0.4%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Vijay Londhe

Assistant Programmer at Mahadis

Managed services with seamless integration and good reliability

Since I have to view everything on the console, the previous application solutions like IBM and Sanavi showed the RPO and RTO status directly. In AWS Disaster Recovery Service, these details are not available, making it difficult to check my replication status. I have to calculate whether my data is replicated to the Adarabad region or not. These features, if available in AWS, would be beneficial.

Read full review

CONRAD FORREST

President at MTS Consulting Group, Inc.

The solution provides the ability to backup all types of cloud drives, is inexpensive, and has decent support

MSP360 Backup provides the backup functionality, but we need to provide the storage component. We can use Azure, AWS, or another provider, but we need to choose the storage provider and create a bucket to store our data. The vendor is making changes to improve the functionality of the service and the separation of storage, but I would like to see more integration and a knowledge base of the tool. Currently trying to understand why the storage is separated and how to implement the storage properly is a challenge. Using the solution incurs additional charges for the device storage and backup which are not included in the service. Unlike other solutions such as Kohl which includes everything at one price. MSP360 Backup can be improved by adding inclusive pricing.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"For regular backup and restore solutions, this product is fine."

"Since it is a managed service, I reduce my time to manage infrastructure and applications."

"The initial setup is really straightforward."

"Technical support has been very good. They usually respond quickly to our requests."

"The initial setup is pretty straightforward, it's not complex."

"It's on the cheaper side and not too expensive for users."

"The most valuable aspect of CloudEndure Disaster Recovery is its instant block replication feature. This allows us to perform live block verification and eliminates the need to concern ourselves with recovery point objectives. This capability is particularly advantageous for critical workloads."

"What I like about ECR AWS is that it is a fully managed service, so I don't need to manage the underlying infrastructure or worry about scalability in AWS concerning building, maintenance, security, and high availability."

More AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery pros

"The UI is pretty good. It's very simple. That is one thing that we like about this. It's very user-friendly."

"General ease of use and performance of the Windows version is the most valuable feature."

"The feature that I have found most valuable is its online backup capacity because you don't have to do an entire backup again and again, it just does whatever you type in, you type a, it goes a, you type b, it goes b. It doesn't take an entire site up again and again. So that incremental and bit by bit backup is important, it is a nice feature here."

"Block level transfers have significantly reduced the amount of time for transfers over some other solutions"

"Technical support is very good."

"The most valuable feature of MSP360 Backup is its reliability."

"The solution is simple to use and easy to configure."

"The initial setup is very easy. It's not overly complex."

More MSP360 Backup pros

Cons

"In its current state, ECL integrates with CloudWatch for basic logging and monitoring, yet improvements could include more detailed logs for specific actions, like when I perform actions such as push or pull."

"I have not seen any areas that need improvement at this time."

"The cost of AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is seen as expensive."

"The failback could be improved. It should be more intuitive."

"Definitely there should be better logging. From a customer perspective I would like to see more logs on what is happening. If there is an issue, I would like to know what the problem is. Right now, we have to depend on the support of the vendor to check and let us know, because we don't have access to a lot of logging information."

"I set up a test, deleted the source, and went to fail it back, and it didn't work."

"The solution's network setup and a lot of the control tower setup could be improved."

"The product could be improved by incorporating more AI-driven automation for deployment and additional security features. These enhancements would make the solution even more user-friendly and secure."

More AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery cons

"There are some things that we don't like about it. That is why I was exploring alternatives in a hyper-scale environment. That is why I was checking IT Central Station."

"The Linux GUI leaves a lot to be desired. It lacks many of the features of the Windows version and is buggy, but it is still usable."

"Maybe implement an easier interface for basic users. For example, a set-up wizard with all the commonly used features as default."

"The initial setup is a little complex as it has to be done in the office and requires someone to come in and install the solution on your server, then configure the scheduling, backup pushing, and so on."

"As for what can be improved, some reports could be simplified so that you know how much backup you have done and what your backup details are. That report is available but it is very tough to get. I would like to know "today I have just uploaded 35 MB, tomorrow I have loaded 10 MB so my trend of backup is increasing.""

"The solution needs a better graphical user interface. It's a graphical user interface that is very old-school right now. They could give it a little more modern feel."

"They can add some production backup capabilities and the ability to do single instance back up. At the moment, it doesn't do deduplication on the standard backup. So, the issue is backing up PSG files for customers who have limited bandwidth. The other issue is that I don't like the implementation of the SQL backup. We do use SQL ourselves using a PowerShell script with the VDA tools as a module. That's how we back up. The rotation feature would be nice to have, but I know that they've got it on their dashboard or on their list to look at. They can also do a few tweaks to the dashboard. I would like the reporting capabilities on the portal to be much more granular. Normally, I export it to a text file, and then I run it through a pivot table in order to look at it from a cost-recovery point of view and to see when the backup last ran and if it was successful when it ran two or three days ago. Such a feature would work really well for my market. They can also add a cost-effective backup for Android and Apple cellphones. I've had one or two customers who were looking for this feature. I haven't found this functionality at the moment. I've been looking for a product that does that."

"The interface feels like it is targeted for end users who typically are looking for an all-in-one integrated push button solution. It would be better if the interface had a beginner mode and an expert mode."

More MSP360 Backup cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"They license us on a per machine basis. We have a set number of machines, which we have licensed."

"Where the price adds up, there are CloudEndure licenses, then there is the AWS environment, and finally, there is the AWS storage, so cumulatively, it adds up."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."

"We were happy with the pricing that they gave us."

"I rate the price of CloudEndure Disaster Recovery a six out of ten."

"It has saved us money from having to buy hardware for disaster recovery."

"The pricing is better now that they had come out with the Tier 2 which replicates a little less often. In comparison to what I would have been spending with any other type of solution, the pricing is fair."

"CloudEndure Disaster Recovery is charging clients $20 to do the DR backups. It is an expensive solution."

More AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery pricing and cost advice

"The cost is pretty inexpensive. Around four to five dollars per device, per workstation on each server."

"Pricing is reasonable although can be quite a large upfront cost."

"Its pricing needs improvement."

"We have a very good return on investment."

"MSP360 is vastly cheaper than its competitors and has almost all the same features."

"It provides a good cost savings compared to our previous cloud backup."

"I rate the price of MSP360 Backup a seven out of ten."

"The solution is expensive."

More MSP360 Backup pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,491 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

12%

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CloudEndure Disaster Recovery?

CloudEndure Disaster Recovery is a fairly stable solution.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudEndure Disaster Recovery?

The setup is actually managed by our partner. I have taken a rate of per user. Licensing is completely managed by the partner. I am paying per user and per GB storage cost, while the infrastructure...

What needs improvement with CloudEndure Disaster Recovery?

In its current state, ECL integrates with CloudWatch for basic logging and monitoring, yet improvements could include more detailed logs for specific actions, like when I perform actions such as pu...

What do you like most about MSP360 Backup?

MSP360 Backup's most valuable feature is its backup interface.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MSP360 Backup?

I rate the price of MSP360 Backup a seven out of ten.

What needs improvement with MSP360 Backup?

The product could be more user-friendly. Its pricing needs improvement as well.

AWS Backup vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Comparisons

Compared 40% of the time

Azure Site Recovery vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 19% of the time

Zerto vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 10% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 9% of the time

Oracle Data Guard vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 7% of the time

More AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Competitors

Acronis Cyber Protect vs MSP360 Backup

Compared 31% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs MSP360 Backup

Compared 23% of the time

N-able Cove Data Protection vs MSP360 Backup

Compared 14% of the time

NinjaOne vs MSP360 Backup

Compared 13% of the time

Comet Backup vs MSP360 Backup

Compared 10% of the time

More MSP360 Backup Competitors

Product Reports

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Download AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery product report

MSP360 Backup

Download MSP360 Backup product report

Also Known As

CloudEndure Disaster Recovery

Cloudberry Backup

Overview

CloudEndure Disaster Recovery enables real-time replication and rapid recovery to enhance organizational resilience. Key features include block-level data replication, ease of use, cost-effectiveness, and automated recovery orchestration. Users benefit from increased efficiency, improved workflows, and enhanced data management, significantly improving organizational performance and business continuity.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

MSP360 Backup is a comprehensive data protection solution designed for businesses of all sizes. It offers a wide range of features and capabilities to ensure the safety and security of critical data.

With support for various storage destinations, including local drives, network shares, and cloud storage providers, MSP360 Backup provides flexibility and scalability. It also offers advanced scheduling options, allowing users to automate backups based on specific time intervals or events.

The solution supports both full and incremental backups, minimizing storage requirements and optimizing backup speed. MSP360 Backup also includes built-in encryption and compression, ensuring data privacy and reducing storage costs. Additionally, it offers easy file and folder recovery, allowing users to quickly restore lost or corrupted data.

With its intuitive user interface and robust set of features, MSP360 Backup is a reliable and efficient solution for businesses looking to protect their valuable data.

MSP360

Sample Customers

Agio, Cloud Nation, Limelight Networks

StratX

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs. MSP360 Backup