Coming October 25: PeerSpot Awards will be announced! Learn more

Citrix Content Collaboration vs OpenText Core Share comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Citrix Content Collaboration and OpenText Core Share based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Content Collaboration Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Citrix Content Collaboration vs. OpenText Core Share report (Updated: September 2022).
633,184 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
93
Comparisons
63
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
363
Comparisons
208
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Content Collaboration Platforms
September 2022
Find out what your peers are saying about Box, Google, Microsoft and others in Content Collaboration Platforms. Updated: September 2022.
633,184 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
Citrix
Video Not Available
Overview

Access everything—from anywhere—in one place
Employees need easy access to use and share the content they need to be productive. It's time for content collaboration that unites all your data and documents in one secure platform—empowering employees to work better.

OpenText Core Share provides all the functionality needed to securely share and collaborate on projects with everyone inside and outside of the organization. Simple and intuitive to use, Core Share is a SaaS application that offers the enterprise level security and compliance IT departments require along with the flexibility that users want. Core Share’s unique ability to enable both a hybrid environment and a full cloud experience sets it apart from other major file sharing offerings.

Core Share is integrated with OpenText Core Signature, a professional and enterprise-grade electronic signature solution. An add-on to Core Share, Core Signature allows employees and third parties to sign quotes, contracts and other documents in a fast, compliant and hassle-free way. Together, users have a unified solution to solve all their enterprise content collaboration and approval needs.

Core Share is easily deployed and integrated with existing content management systems to extend collaboration beyond the corporate firewall. It integrates seamlessly with OpenText Enterprise Information Management (EIM) solutions to extend the value of existing enterprise content management (ECM) investments into the cloud.

Offer
Learn more about Citrix Content Collaboration
Learn more about OpenText Core Share
Sample Customers
Prime Healthcare, 3173 Limited, AWL
Pacific Life Insurance Company
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company15%
Comms Service Provider14%
Government14%
Insurance Company11%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise68%
Buyer's Guide
Content Collaboration Platforms
September 2022
Find out what your peers are saying about Box, Google, Microsoft and others in Content Collaboration Platforms. Updated: September 2022.
633,184 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Citrix Content Collaboration is ranked 29th in Content Collaboration Platforms while OpenText Core Share is ranked 19th in Content Collaboration Platforms. Citrix Content Collaboration is rated 0.0, while OpenText Core Share is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Citrix Content Collaboration is most compared with Citrix ShareFile, whereas OpenText Core Share is most compared with OpenText Content Suite Platform, SharePoint and Box.

See our list of best Content Collaboration Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Content Collaboration Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.