Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cisco Wireless WAN vs Ubiquiti Wireless comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 4, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.1
Cisco Wireless WAN is reliable and cost-effective, offering strong ROI despite high costs, with significant productivity and efficiency gains.
Sentiment score
6.3
Ubiquiti Wireless users report long-lasting equipment with minimal maintenance, though some suggest improvements and additional user controls.
Cisco's licensing structure is more expensive than FortiNet, as it requires different tiers of licenses to access advanced features.
Consultant at a comms service provider with 11-50 employees
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.7
Cisco Wireless WAN support is praised for expertise and RMA services, though response times and engineer consistency vary.
Sentiment score
5.2
Ubiquiti Wireless support varies, relying on email and forums; lacks phone support, leading to mixed user experiences.
If an engineer's shift ends, I have to re-explain everything to a new engineer, which is challenging.
Consultant at a comms service provider with 11-50 employees
I find the technical support by Cisco very supportive.
Network Security at Tech Mahindra Limited
The main concern is about response time rather than technical expertise or experience.
Technical Manager at Network Security and Crypto
I didn't have any issues with Ubiquiti support.
Systems and networks manager at Botanic-Serres Du Saleve, SAS
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
Cisco Wireless WAN is scalable and adaptable, efficiently managing users across various sectors despite some licensing challenges.
Sentiment score
7.5
Ubiquiti Wireless excels in scalability and centralized management, ideal for small to medium businesses expanding their network infrastructure.
There isn't a limit to scalability, but for deployments exceeding five thousand equipment, it requires opening a case with Meraki support to increase capacity.
Consultant at a comms service provider with 11-50 employees
We primarily use them for switching and Wi-Fi solutions.
Technical Manager at Network Security and Crypto
Ubiquiti Wireless offers large scalability, which is very important for our company as we have multiple sites that need to be interconnected and managed effectively.
Network Administrator at a retailer with 11-50 employees
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
Cisco Wireless WAN is stable and reliable, with minor configuration issues and responsive support, rated 8-10 by users.
Sentiment score
7.3
Ubiquiti Wireless is praised for its stable, reliable performance, with occasional connectivity issues noted in crowded areas.
Ubiquiti Wireless is rated ten out of ten for stability.
Network Administrator at a retailer with 11-50 employees
 

Room For Improvement

Cisco Wireless WAN needs enhanced compatibility, affordability, user-friendliness, and improved security, support, and management features.
Ubiquiti Wireless lacks advanced features, scalability, and support, facing issues with usability, integration, durability, and supply chain.
Walmart is interested in using electronic tags instead of paper labels for easier price changes on products.
Consultant at a comms service provider with 11-50 employees
We are able to see the connectivity details, and we also see the Mbps at which they are connecting.
Network Security at Tech Mahindra Limited
Enterprise users require more details and options.
Head of IT at RD Tech
When implementing Wi-Fi for a campus, we use Cisco for the core backbone infrastructure, while implementing Ubiquiti Wireless for the Wi-Fi and controller.
Technical Manager at Network Security and Crypto
The firewall configuration also requires significant effort and could be improved for ease of use.
Network Administrator at a retailer with 11-50 employees
 

Setup Cost

Cisco Wireless WAN is seen as costly due to licensing, with some seeking cheaper alternatives like Aruba and Ruckus.
Ubiquiti Wireless is praised for its affordability and no licensing fees, making it ideal for small to medium businesses.
The cost is one of the higher in the industry.
Consultant at a comms service provider with 11-50 employees
I think the pricing of Cisco Wireless WAN must be reasonable at present.
Network Security at Tech Mahindra Limited
Ubiquiti Wireless is cheaper.
Systems and networks manager at Botanic-Serres Du Saleve, SAS
Ubiquiti Wireless is quite affordable, making it accessible for smaller companies.
Technical Manager at Network Security and Crypto
The equipment is priced relatively high, though the value it provides makes it worth the cost.
Network Administrator at a retailer with 11-50 employees
 

Valuable Features

Cisco Wireless WAN provides high-speed connectivity, strong security, scalability, and reliability with easy management and comprehensive integration features.
Ubiquiti Wireless excels in setup, management, performance, and security, offering scalable, affordable solutions with robust coverage and intuitive use.
It is easy to integrate Cisco Wireless WAN with other Cisco products in the system.
Network Security at Tech Mahindra Limited
The main value of using Cisco Wireless WAN with Meraki is that the technology is cloud-based, making it more accessible for the customer to troubleshoot and implement changes remotely.
Consultant at a comms service provider with 11-50 employees
Since implementing Ubiquiti Wireless, I have seen improvements in connection security, wireless speed, and overall network stability.
Network Administrator at a retailer with 11-50 employees
The integration of Ubiquiti Wireless with other Ubiquiti products in the setup is seamless and perfect.
Technical Manager at Network Security and Crypto
All the access points provide good connectivity and are reliable.
Head of IT at RD Tech
 

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Wireless WAN
Ranking in Wireless WAN
3rd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
76
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Ubiquiti Wireless
Ranking in Wireless WAN
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
77
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Wireless WAN category, the mindshare of Cisco Wireless WAN is 6.8%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ubiquiti Wireless is 33.8%, down from 40.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Wireless WAN Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Ubiquiti Wireless33.8%
Cisco Wireless WAN6.8%
Other59.400000000000006%
Wireless WAN
 

Featured Reviews

HassanBilal - PeerSpot reviewer
Manager IT Infrastructure & Helpdesk at LCI Pakistan
Solution supports extensive connectivity but faces occasional coverage challenges
Cisco Wireless WAN has room for improvement in WiFi coverage. Sometimes, their coverage is normally good, but at the same area where the access points are deployed, people face continuous disconnectivity issues. These kinds of issues come over time, and we need to do troubleshooting, but they get resolved. This is a performance-related issue, and I think they have to work on that.
Donald Ochanda - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Manager at Network Security and Crypto
Seamless coverage amplifies connectivity while enhanced responsiveness strengthens potential
We do not prefer Ubiquiti Wireless switches for more complex environments, not because they lack scalability, but because we haven't explored their products extensively. We are strong on their Wi-Fi solution. When implementing Wi-Fi for a campus, we use Cisco for the core backbone infrastructure, while implementing Ubiquiti Wireless for the Wi-Fi and controller. Perhaps we haven't discovered switches that would match our requirements, or maybe they exist but we haven't explored their capabilities fully. Regarding improvements to Ubiquiti Wireless, I cannot provide specific suggestions as I'm not an expert on Wi-Fi, as there is a dedicated team that handles Wi-Fi solutions.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless WAN solutions are best for your needs.
879,899 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
13%
Government
10%
Educational Organization
8%
Performing Arts
8%
Computer Software Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Government
6%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business26
Midsize Enterprise16
Large Enterprise36
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business48
Midsize Enterprise10
Large Enterprise18
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco Wireless WAN?
Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco Wireless WAN?
I think the pricing of Cisco Wireless WAN must be reasonable at present.
What needs improvement with Cisco Wireless WAN?
Cisco Wireless WAN's interface could be simplified in the future. Simplification would make it more helpful to see how the user is connecting. We are able to see the connectivity details, and we al...
Is Ubiquiti Wireless better than Ruckus Wireless WAN?
Ubiquiti Wireless is extremely easy to set up and is an excellent option for small businesses, offering enterprise features for a one-time fee and no ongoing licensing fees. Ubiquiti Wireless is ve...
Which is better - Cambium or Ubiquiti Wireless?
For me, Ubiquiti was easy to install, configure, set up, and maintain, while also providing solid coverage and better handoffs between APs. This is especially relevant if you are using Apple produc...
Which is better - Ubiquiti Wireless or Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?
Ubiquiti Wireless offers a wide range of WLAN products. We tested their devices before ultimately choosing Cisco Meraki. Ubiquiti devices have good outdoor performance and the connection is very st...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Aegean Motorway, Baylor Scott & White Health, Beachbody, Bellevue, Brunel University London, Bucks County Intermediate Unit , Chartwell School, Children's Hospital Colorado, Cisco Live Milan, City of Biel, City of Mississauga, Dundee Precious Metals, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Erickson Living, Goldcorp, Great Ormond Street Hospital, Grupo Industrial Saltillo (GIS)
NASCAR Grand-AM, Maritime Parc, Outdoor Music Festival, British Armed Forces, Arcadia School District, Moscow - Enforta
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Wireless WAN vs. Ubiquiti Wireless and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
879,899 professionals have used our research since 2012.