"The user interface is very simple and easy to use — our customers are very satisfied."
"We're able to automate as well as manually control as necessary."
"I like the status page Cisco added that shows you the health of the wireless connection."
"What I liked about these is that they worked. I didn't touch them or do anything with them. They were up and running when I came here. Once they are set up and running, you don't have to worry about them."
"The visibility of the site is most useful."
"You can scale the solution easily."
"The ability to manage it remotely is the most valuable. If it has an internet connection, you can get to it. It is a great product for remote clinics. We kind of thought about doing this kind of standalone technology. Meraki is easy to manage. From a management perspective, it is the easiest to use, especially in the cloud. I like Meraki. I even have it in my home."
"What I like best about Meraki is that I can change it from anywhere."
"It's an excellent option for small businesses."
"We have found the product to be scalable."
"The solution is easy to use and flexible."
"The range is usually pretty good, which is the most important thing to use because more or less, all wireless access points are the same."
"Ubiquiti is easier to install than Mikrotik."
"Having dual-band is important. Having compatibility with very old equipment on certain frequencies, for example on 2.4 and 5.8."
"I like that it's cheaper and inexpensive. It's also easy to use."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of setup."
"Currently, only a limited number of clients can connect to these devices."
"Concern when there are a number of concurrent users."
"The user interface needs to be improved."
"We haven't had any issues with the solution. We like the way it works. There isn't anything I can think of that makes me worry that it might be lacking in a certain area."
"It is expensive. Juniper seems to have a lot more to offer for future expansion. Juniper has some features that are not there in this solution."
"There should be better Spanish-language technical support."
"There could be more functionality."
"The price could be slightly better, but then again, we negotiate deals every time so the market price isn't really relevant."
"o if you are setting up any other third party product or any other different product, it sometimes can be a bit difficult. With Ubiquiti, you need to set up because you can adopt the product and that's it, where if it's not a Ubiquiti product it can sometimes be a difficult setup."
"We need an official distributor in Egypt as we don't have one right now."
"The solution needs to improve its features and offer more to the customer."
"This solution should be more robust when it comes to connectivity and improve wireless technology."
"The external devices, the outdoor devices, are not so rugged. For example, for the weather that we have here in Florida, it doesn't hold up well even though it is supposed to be designed for outdoor use."
"The control system can be improved by making it easier."
"They should have more VLAN features and a designing tool like a link planer."
"I would like local support from the parent company."
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is ranked 4th in Wireless LAN with 55 reviews while Ubiquiti Wireless is ranked 1st in Wireless WAN with 24 reviews. Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is rated 8.2, while Ubiquiti Wireless is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN writes "Knowledgeable and helpful support, and it scales and load-balances to fit our needs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ubiquiti Wireless writes "Extremely easy to set up and has never failed on me". Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Cisco Wireless, Ruckus Wireless, Mist Access Points and Aruba Instant, whereas Ubiquiti Wireless is most compared with Ruckus Wireless WAN, Cambium, Aruba Wireless, Fortinet FortiWLM and Aruba Networks Wireless WAN.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
