We performed a comparison between Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Ubiquiti Wireless based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: Based on the parameters we compared, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Ubiquiti Wireless are similar to one another. Overall, PeerSpot users found that both solutions have unique features, including great scalability and stability. Users found Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN to be more expensive, but were generally happy with its service and support. Meanwhile, users of Ubiquiti Wireless are less satisfied with the customer service but happier with the price.
"The solution is stable."
"The artificial intelligence feature is very good."
"The AI capabilities of Mist Wireless are superior to other OEMs."
"The simplicity is great."
"The solution is pretty generic and easy to use."
"It provides private network access, helping us protect our company’s devices."
"In terms of reporting, in terms of all the user reports, it's very rich."
"With Mist, every Wednesday they roll out new features."
"The solution is fast."
"The solution is stable and reliable."
"The fact that Cisco Meraki is cloud based and is reasonably priced has been most valuable."
"I really don't have any problems with the stability of the product."
"Multiple access ID capabilities, meshing, and the quality of the product itself are all valuable features."
"It is easy to manage and configure. The dashboard of Meraki is easy to use."
"The user interface is very simple and easy to use — our customers are very satisfied."
"The most valuable features are the management tools, including monitoring and reporting."
"It offers fair pricing."
"The failure rate is very low on these devices - I've had them installed for five years and have only lost one out of a hundred."
"The ease of the setup is one of its most valuable aspects."
"In general, the setup process is straightforward."
"I like the fact that you can set it up like a wireless connection. Previously, we used to connect from one SSID to another. When we started using Ubiquiti, everyone was so happy because even if they moved from one place or another, say from the pantry to a meeting room, they didn't need to connect manually to another SSID. This is one of the features that I really like about it. It is doing a great job. It offers a free controller that you can use to see if the devices are connected or not and if they are up or down."
"The indoor WiFi connection works well."
"The range is usually pretty good, which is the most important thing to use because more or less, all wireless access points are the same."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of setup."
"The solution is expensive."
"The pricing should be made cheaper."
"The product should include adaptive Wi-Fi to show a more accurate location."
"The price could be better."
"The pricing is very high in the Indian market."
"If you want to do more specific stuff, it's a bit limited."
"Improving third-party integration is key for Juniper Mist's next release."
"Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points’ support services need improvement."
"Quality of technical support varies."
"When we are using SSID roaming, it is not flexible in terms of which AP it connects to."
"It would be good to integrate with ISE in the future."
"The solution should be more secure."
"There needs to be some work done on security because, with time, some viruses may emerge that one may not know about."
"It could be slightly cheaper but it's fine."
"The user interface needs to be improved."
"I would like to see integration with sensors."
"t does not have traffic shaping or traffic policies in its wireless requirements."
"Its stability could be better."
"The documentation and support provided by the solution areas of concern where improvements are required."
"Ubiquiti could develop a more elaborate firewall solution. Their firewall solutions at the moment are entry-level. Maybe they don't want to bring those products in because many people prefer putting a third-party firewall into a solution like that. We usually do."
"Ubiquiti Wireless could improve stability."
"Sometimes we have some micro breaks we do not know what causes them."
"We'd like them to improve aspects of device management."
"The mesh configuration and WiFi 6 coverage should be improved."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is ranked 4th in Wireless LAN with 115 reviews while Ubiquiti Wireless is ranked 1st in Wireless WAN with 68 reviews. Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is rated 8.2, while Ubiquiti Wireless is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN writes "Offers good mobility, stability and scalability ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ubiquiti Wireless writes "It's cheap and easy to use but isn't suitable for large deployments or complex use cases ". Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Mist AI and Cloud, Ruckus Wireless, Cisco Wireless and Huawei Wireless, whereas Ubiquiti Wireless is most compared with Ruckus Wireless WAN, Cambium Networks Wireless WAN, Aruba Wireless, ExtremeCloud IQ and Fortinet FortiWLM.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
