Cisco FabricPath vs Juniper QFabric comparison

Cisco and Juniper are both solutions in the LAN Switching category. Cisco is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.3, while Juniper is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.5. Cisco holds a 3.7% mindshare in LS, compared to Juniper’s 5.0% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Juniper users who would recommend it.

Cisco FabricPath

Read 31 Cisco FabricPath reviews

682 Views
668 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Juniper QFabric

Read 10 Juniper QFabric reviews

441 Views
441 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cisco FabricPath

Juniper QFabric

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

Juniper QFabric and Cisco FabricPath compete in the data center networking category, offering scalable and high-performance solutions. Juniper QFabric seems to have the upper hand in pricing and support, while Cisco FabricPath has an edge with its feature-rich offerings that justify its higher price point.

Features: Juniper QFabric is known for its 40 gig backbone InterConneX, spine-leaf topology for single-hop connections, and scalability. It is agile, flexible, and cost-effective, integrating well with tools like Chef and Puppet. Cisco FabricPath offers reliable network performance, cloud management, and robust security features. It enhances Ethernet performance and is stable and scalable with minimal errors, flexible protocols, and traffic prioritization capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Juniper QFabric could benefit from enhanced feature flexibility and more comprehensive documentation. An expanded support network and more intuitive user interfaces would be advantageous. For Cisco FabricPath, simplifying deployment processes and reducing the need for advanced expertise would be beneficial. Enhanced cost efficiency and an improved primary client service might also add value.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Juniper QFabric offers an intuitive deployment process and excellent customer service, which facilitates quicker adoption and issue resolution. Cisco FabricPath, despite offering extensive documentation and support resources, has a challenging deployment process that often requires additional expertise. However, Cisco's support infrastructure is more robust, providing assistance through complex scenarios.

Pricing and ROI: Juniper QFabric typically has a lower initial setup cost, making it appealing for organizations mindful of budgets and seeking faster ROI. Although Cisco FabricPath entails higher deployment costs, it delivers higher long-term returns due to its advanced features and scalability, optimizing network performance and contributing significantly to ROI. The pricing strategies highlight their focus, with Cisco offering increased operational value over time.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco FabricPath vs. Juniper QFabric Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco FabricPath vs. Juniper QFabric

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,515 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco FabricPath

Ranking in LAN Switching

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Juniper QFabric

Ranking in LAN Switching

11th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the LAN Switching category, the mindshare of Cisco FabricPath is 3.7%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Juniper QFabric is 5.0%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

LAN Switching Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Cisco FabricPath	3.7%
Juniper QFabric	5.0%
Other	91.3%

LAN Switching

Featured Reviews

AmrFouad

Technical Project Manager at Cairo International Airport Co.

Offers seamless integration and boosts operational efficiency with minimum downtimes

I find stability to be the most effective feature of Cisco FabricPath; it is stable. Cisco FabricPath has good scalability; I don't have any problems with scalability as I can add any switches or distributors without any problem. I utilize the multipath routing architecture feature in Cisco FabricPath, and it's good in load balancing. Cisco FabricPath's compatibility to support Dynamic Layer 2 multipath routing in complex virtualized environments is good; I don't have any problems with it. Nothing comes to mind regarding metrics for using the Layer 2 multipath routing feature; it was good, and there were no problems at all with Cisco FabricPath. Cisco FabricPath's integration with Cisco Nexus works with virtual port channel (VPC) and is good for dual home servers and edge switches. We are using VPC in every layer of the Nexus center. Implementing Cisco FabricPath positively impacted my organization by providing minimum downtimes as the service is always up; everything is working properly with the VPC and Cisco FabricPath. I have experienced operational efficiencies with Cisco FabricPath that are 200% better than the old legacy equipment and protocols.

Read full review

Suresh Pathipatti

Senior Information Technology Administrator at Aighospital

Performs well, is easy to set up, and the vendor maintains the product well

QFabric is the core switch. We also have two Brocade switches for the Fibre level The product works fine. It is an excellent product. There are different element systems and different options for each generation of the tool. We maintain the data center and analyze issues. I have no negative…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The technical assistance is good."

"One of the most valuable features of Cisco FabricPath is its protocol freedom, which allows me to use multiple protocols at a time, such as Spanning Tree to prevent loops in the network."

"Cisco FabricPath is very fast, stable, extendable, and scalable. It doesn't have issues with patches or problems because it's built on the stable NXOS operating system. In a scenario using FabricPath, the spin and leaf architecture is beneficial. For example, we can use two separate spine switches like 9980s and multiple leaf switches as access switches. These leaf switches are connected using VPC between them, with each switch separated and not directly connected to the spine. This setup improves data center architecture by allowing two ways to arrange destinations, connecting the first connection to the first spine and the second to the second spine. The spines are configured as a virtual chassis. In FabricPath, we can enhance VXLANs, VPNs, and integrate with Cisco ISE for user authentication. It can also be configured with WLC to manage wireless technology, depending on the client's architecture."

"Cisco FabricPath ensures resilience and prevents collisions or loops on the network, maintaining stability."

"The most valuable feature is the central management where the customer can receive all the alerts."

"FabricPath's best features are routing, OSPS, ethernet, and performance."

"It's a reliable product and you know that it will work in the enterprise environment."

"The technical support we get from Cisco is excellent. It's the best in the industry. We're more than satisfied with the level of service they provide."

More Cisco FabricPath pros

"Juniper QFabric has various advantages including scalability, simplicity, performance, and flexibility."

"QFabric supports redundancy and includes all of the enterprise and service provider features that customers would want in data center or service provider network."

"It is known for being agile, flexible, and cost-effective when working with various vendors."

"The solution is easy to use and has good performance."

"The solution is stable."

"It's user-friendly."

"The vendor maintains the product well."

"The most valuable feature of QFabric for network performance is its stability."

More Juniper QFabric pros

Cons

"The solution should offer better reporting."

"Cisco FabricPath's pricing is expensive."

"The price is a little bit too high."

"Lack of security features for which we need to use another solution."

"They should consider upgrading the memory feature of the product."

"Layer 3 does not have higher availability."

"The pricing could be adjusted to make it easier to sell to clients."

"The main issue I face is the cost."

More Cisco FabricPath cons

"Improvements could be made to QFabric's life cycle management, particularly in maintaining stable versions and extending product support."

"I do not use GUI's very much for switch stacks. I am always in the CLI. However, I do know that Juniper in the past has lacked on their GUI's, but they have been working on it."

"They are working on the virtualization of the actual fabric layer. They are moving away from the original spine-leaf design to a different infrastructure. Instead of having three tiers, which was the director of the interconnected nodes, they cut them back, and they still have that kind of structure."

"The stability needs to be improved."

"It works too much on rebooting and there is some memory leakage."

"The disruptive upgrade was an issue for us."

"It would be nice if Juniper provided the system integrator with training, similar to that of Cisco."

"The pricing structure could be more budget-friendly."

More Juniper QFabric cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"FabricPath is very reasonably priced."

"It is very expensive."

"The pricing for this product is good."

"I rate the product's pricing a ten out of ten. Cisco switches cost around 15,000 dollars, and DNS licenses cost around 25,000 dollars. The total amount is 45,000 dollars, which is too expensive."

"The pricing of Cisco FabricPath can be quite high depending on the architecture, but it's justified by the stability it offers."

"Cisco is expensive but offers good-quality features, so I would rate it high on the pricing scale."

"I rate it seven out of ten on pricing as it's a bit expensive. It would be better if the price were lower, but we prioritize quality over cost."

"The price of Cisco FabricPath could be reduced, it is expensive in the market here in Sri Lanka. The solution is subscriptions based, if the customer wants any future integrations, or if there are any future enhancements they will have to pay. There are different license options available, such as one or three years purchases."

More Cisco FabricPath pricing and cost advice

"In terms of price, the QFabric solution is going to be probably in the middle of the road for a fabric solution."

"The price is relatively high, but it offers an advantage over its competitors by providing better performance and functionality."

"The price for Juniper QFabric could improve. There are subscription, maintenance, and add-on feature fees."

"Juniper QFabric is a high-level solution but it could be less expensive."

"The pricing is high and it is possible to find better pricing option solutions on the market, but the licensing model is quite flexible."

"The pricing is high."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which LAN Switching solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,515 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

12%

University

12%

Recreational Facilities/Services Company

Marketing Services Firm

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	14

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco FabricPath?

The tool makes it easy to manage multi-layer networking and increases network efficiency. I haven't faced any challenges in integrating it into our existing infrastructure.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco FabricPath?

Cisco is somewhat expensive, but it provides good quality products and operations, so I can't complain about licensing cost and setup costs. There is room for improvement in terms of pricing for th...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco FabricPath?

In future updates, I would prefer to see features such as more AI functionality or better integration added to Cisco FabricPath; more AI would be useful.

See all answers

What do you like most about Juniper QFabric?

The most valuable feature of QFabric for network performance is its stability.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Juniper QFabric?

Juniper QFabric is not overly expensive. Licensing is required for certain features like vRRP, but setting up a virtual chassis does not necessitate a separate license.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Juniper QFabric?

Improvements could be made to QFabric's lifecycle management, particularly in maintaining stable versions and extending product support. The rapid release cycle and short life span compared to comp...

See all answers

Comparisons

ExtremeSwitching vs Cisco FabricPath

Compared 28% of the time

Arista Campus LAN Switches vs Cisco FabricPath

Compared 19% of the time

HPE ProCurve vs Cisco FabricPath

Compared 16% of the time

More Cisco FabricPath Competitors

Cisco Nexus vs Juniper QFabric

Compared 27% of the time

Cisco Catalyst Switches vs Juniper QFabric

Compared 20% of the time

Arista Campus LAN Switches vs Juniper QFabric

Compared 19% of the time

Dell PowerSwitch N-Series vs Juniper QFabric

Compared 13% of the time

More Juniper QFabric Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco FabricPath

January 2026

Download Cisco FabricPath product report

Buyer's Guide

LAN Switching

January 2026

Download Juniper QFabric product report

Also Known As

FabricPath

QFabric

Overview

Cisco FabricPath is a Cisco NX-OS software innovation combining the plug-and-play simplicity of Ethernet with the reliability and scalability of Layer 3 routing. Using FabricPath, you can build highly scalable Layer 2 multipath networks without the Spanning Tree Protocol. Such networks are particularly suitable for large virtualization deployments, private clouds, and high-performance computing (HPC) environments. The benefits of Cisco FabricPath include: Minimal commands per switch ease configuration and operation, Autodiscovery simplifies addition of new links and switches, Provision additional network bandwidth without impacting network, Supports one-, two-, or three-tier architectures, VLAN extensibility across the data center.

Cisco

Juniper QFabric System is composed of multiple components working together as a single switch to provide high-performance, any-to-any connectivity and management simplicity in the data center. The QFabric System flattens the entire data center network to a single tier where all access points are equal, eliminating the effects of network locality and making it the ideal network foundation for cloud-ready, virtualized data centers.The highly scalable QFabric System improves application performance with low latency and converged services in a nonblocking, lossless architecture that supports Layer 2, Layer 3, and Fibre Channel over Ethernet (FCoE) capabilities.

Juniper

Sample Customers

Bellevue, Calligaris, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Management Science Associates, Multi-Customer, Oediv, Roper St. Francis, SNAM

MCB Bank

Buyer's Guide

Cisco FabricPath vs. Juniper QFabric

February 2026

Free Report: Cisco FabricPath vs. Juniper QFabric

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco FabricPath vs. Juniper QFabric and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,515 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco FabricPath vs. Juniper QFabric report.

See our list of best LAN Switching vendors.

We monitor all LAN Switching reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.