Cisco Nexus vs Juniper QFabric comparison

Cisco and Juniper are both solutions in the LAN Switching category. Cisco is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.6, while Juniper is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.5. Cisco holds a 8.9% mindshare in LS, compared to Juniper’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Juniper users who would recommend it.

Cisco Nexus

Read 105 Cisco Nexus reviews

1,564 Views
1,090 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Juniper QFabric

Read 10 Juniper QFabric reviews

253 Views
165 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cisco Nexus

Juniper QFabric

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

Juniper QFabric and Cisco Nexus are competing products in data center networking. Cisco Nexus generally emerges as a more feature-rich solution due to its advanced network features and robust security options, although it is priced higher. Juniper QFabric, however, is often recognized for its cost-effective pricing and excellent support structure.

Features: QFabric is known for its simplicity, efficient scalability, and easy network architecture, which supports data traffic without complex configurations. Cisco Nexus offers advanced flexibility, high security, and integration capabilities, making it ideal for comprehensive data environments.

Room for Improvement: QFabric could enhance its advanced security features and integration capabilities to match its competitors. Network flexibility and automation can also be areas for growth. Cisco Nexus may improve in simplifying its deployment and configuration steps, offer more accessible support resources, and reducing complexity in integration processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco Nexus offers comprehensive support materials for seamless implementation, though the deployment process involves significant initial configuration. It is balanced by extensive customer service. Juniper QFabric provides easier deployment with straightforward configuration, supported by reliable customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Juniper QFabric typically requires lower initial investment, offering favorable ROI from efficient resource usage. Cisco Nexus demands a higher upfront cost but delivers strong long-term ROI due to its extended functionality and adaptability, ideal for demanding network environments.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Nexus vs. Juniper QFabric Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Nexus vs. Juniper QFabric

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Nexus

Ranking in LAN Switching

3rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

105

Ranking in other categories

Data Center Networking (3rd)

Juniper QFabric

Ranking in LAN Switching

9th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the LAN Switching category, the mindshare of Cisco Nexus is 8.9%, down from 11.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Juniper QFabric is 1.9%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

LAN Switching

Featured Reviews

Joe Benítez

Systems Engineer at GAD Municipal de Guayaquil

Offer high performance capabilities and enables efficient data transmission and processing

Before Nexus, I used to have Catalyst 6500 switches. Those 6500 series chassis gave us a lot of problems. Too many problems, actually. And we had a Cisco ASA firewall blade within those chassis. And they were running outdated software. So, in fact, it was the firewall blade that caused us too many problems instead of the chassis. The chassis itself was working well and performing fine, but the firewall card was not suitable for our needs. That was one aspect. Additionally, those chassis had been in operation for more than five years. As we are a local government, we have a policy to renew hardware every five years. That's because we need to maintain all the hardware and software in the latest versions and keep up with the technology lifecycle of the technology we use.

Read full review

Suresh Pathipatti

Senior Information Technology Administrator at Aighospital

Performs well, is easy to set up, and the vendor maintains the product well

QFabric is the core switch. We also have two Brocade switches for the Fibre level The product works fine. It is an excellent product. There are different element systems and different options for each generation of the tool. We maintain the data center and analyze issues. I have no negative…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Its low latency is most valuable. Its performance is good, and it is also very stable."

"It is a scalable, reliable, stable and efficient solution."

"The solution has introduced VPC, Virtual Port Channel, which allows for more redundancy and flexibility."

"Nexus has improved my organization in the way that it provided enhanced security in a point in the network that was critical."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is to segregate the network."

"We used older versions of Cisco Cloud. The reason why we switched was just adapting with the times."

"You can scale the product."

"The integrations are valuable."

More Cisco Nexus pros

"The 40 gig backbone InterConneX was valuable for our use case. It is even faster now. QFabric has spine-leaf technology or topology, which basically makes every single hop only one hop away in terms of connecting from one device to another. It is a pretty good and robust solution. It works pretty well in terms of scalability, and their technical support is amazing."

"The most valuable features of this solution are the fabric backplane having upwards of 160 GB of communication. It is a top-of-the-rack solution where you have your directors sitting in the main area and then you have your nodes expanded out to your multiple cabinets. It has a very good design and could be your server backbone."

"Juniper QFabric has various advantages including scalability, simplicity, performance, and flexibility."

"The solution is stable."

"The vendor maintains the product well."

"It is known for being agile, flexible, and cost-effective when working with various vendors."

"QFabric supports redundancy and includes all of the enterprise and service provider features that customers would want in data center or service provider network."

"The solution is easy to use and has good performance."

More Juniper QFabric pros

Cons

"As a device meant to lead the processes related to networking and troubleshooting, I feel both aspects can be described as areas with certain concerns where improvements are required."

"It would be ideal if there was better integration with various other platforms."

"I would like to see Duo directly integrated with the Nexus hardware, instead of it being through the proxies, like how Duo works today."

"They need to understand that when we call them and have an issue, it's our production and sometimes they want us to do repairs that would cause other issues. That's the biggest problem."

"Cisco's security features are in line with other OEMs, however, for data center security in terms of layer seven security, we prefer to have different OEMs rather than relying solely on Cisco."

"Standardization across iOS and Nexus operating systems would be an improvement."

"If we could get some more automation integrated into it, it would make it easier."

"Nexus switches should be able to support network function virtualization (NFV)."

More Cisco Nexus cons

"They are working on the virtualization of the actual fabric layer. They are moving away from the original spine-leaf design to a different infrastructure. Instead of having three tiers, which was the director of the interconnected nodes, they cut them back, and they still have that kind of structure."

"The disruptive upgrade was an issue for us."

"It would be nice if Juniper provided the system integrator with training, similar to that of Cisco."

"It works too much on rebooting and there is some memory leakage."

"The stability needs to be improved."

"The pricing structure could be more budget-friendly."

"Having support for all OpenFlow versions would be beneficial."

"Improvements could be made to QFabric's life cycle management, particularly in maintaining stable versions and extending product support."

More Juniper QFabric cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of this solution is good when compared to others in the market."

"The solution is expensive."

"It is very expensive. Its licensing is on a yearly basis."

"The Nexus 9000 is very competitively priced."

"This is a very expensive product."

"We consider Juniper switches to be more affordable."

"This solution should be made more affordable."

"We have a virtual license."

More Cisco Nexus pricing and cost advice

"In terms of price, the QFabric solution is going to be probably in the middle of the road for a fabric solution."

"Juniper QFabric is a high-level solution but it could be less expensive."

"The pricing is high."

"The price is relatively high, but it offers an advantage over its competitors by providing better performance and functionality."

"The price for Juniper QFabric could improve. There are subscription, maintenance, and add-on feature fees."

"The pricing is high and it is possible to find better pricing option solutions on the market, but the licensing model is quite flexible."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which LAN Switching solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

24%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco Nexus?

The product's initial setup phase is very easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco Nexus?

The price of Cisco Nexus is on the higher side due to the premium services Cisco offers. Despite the cost, it offers valuable features and services.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco Nexus?

When I talk about data centers, which are critical infrastructure and centralized application hubs, the Nexus platforms should be highly stable. Initially, the codes I received through ACI were qui...

See all answers

What do you like most about Juniper QFabric?

The most valuable feature of QFabric for network performance is its stability.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Juniper QFabric?

Juniper QFabric is not overly expensive. Licensing is required for certain features like vRRP, but setting up a virtual chassis does not necessitate a separate license.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Juniper QFabric?

Improvements could be made to QFabric's lifecycle management, particularly in maintaining stable versions and extending product support. The rapid release cycle and short life span compared to comp...

See all answers

Comparisons

Juniper QFX Series Switches vs Cisco Nexus

Compared 44% of the time

Arista Networks Platform vs Cisco Nexus

Compared 20% of the time

Cisco Catalyst Switches vs Cisco Nexus

Compared 11% of the time

ExtremeSwitching vs Cisco Nexus

Compared 5% of the time

VMware NSX vs Cisco Nexus

Compared 4% of the time

More Cisco Nexus Competitors

Cisco FabricPath vs Juniper QFabric

Compared 36% of the time

More Juniper QFabric Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Nexus

April 2025

Download Cisco Nexus product report

Buyer's Guide

LAN Switching

March 2025

Download Juniper QFabric product report

Also Known As

No data available

QFabric

Overview

The Cisco Nexus family of switches is designed to meet the stringent requirements of the next-generation data center. Not simply bigger or faster, these switches offer the following characteristics: infrastructure that can be scaled cost-effectively and that helps you increase energy, budget, and resource efficiency, transport that can navigate the transition to 10 Gigabit Ethernet and unified fabric and can also handle architectural changes such as virtualization, Web 2.0 applications, and cloud computing and operational continuity to meet your need for an environment where system availability is assumed and maintenance windows are rare if not totally extinct.

Cisco

Juniper QFabric System is composed of multiple components working together as a single switch to provide high-performance, any-to-any connectivity and management simplicity in the data center. The QFabric System flattens the entire data center network to a single tier where all access points are equal, eliminating the effects of network locality and making it the ideal network foundation for cloud-ready, virtualized data centers.The highly scalable QFabric System improves application performance with low latency and converged services in a nonblocking, lossless architecture that supports Layer 2, Layer 3, and Fibre Channel over Ethernet (FCoE) capabilities.

Juniper

Sample Customers

Advanced Medical Transport, Banco de Guayaquil, Baylor Scott & White Health, BH Telecom, Bowling Green State University, Calligaris, Children's Hospital Colorado, City of Biel, Del Papa Distributing, Department of Justice, Dimension Data, Dualtec Cloud Builders, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Grupo Industrial Saltillo (GIS), Hertz, K&L Gates , LightEdge, Lone Star College System, Management Science Associates, Mindtree, NBC Olympics, Quest, Sony Corporation, The Department of Education in Western Australia, Valley Proteins

MCB Bank

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Nexus vs. Juniper QFabric

April 2025

Free Report: Cisco Nexus vs. Juniper QFabric

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Nexus vs. Juniper QFabric and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco Nexus vs. Juniper QFabric report.

See our list of best LAN Switching vendors.

We monitor all LAN Switching reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.