Juniper QFabric Logo

Juniper QFabric pros and cons

Vendor: Juniper
4.3 out of 5
855 followers
Post review
 

Juniper QFabric Pros review quotes

AH
Jul 23, 2021
The most valuable features of this solution are the fabric backplane having upwards of 160 GB of communication. It is a top-of-the-rack solution where you have your directors sitting in the main area and then you have your nodes expanded out to your multiple cabinets. It has a very good design and could be your server backbone.
AH
Jan 11, 2021
The 40 gig backbone InterConneX was valuable for our use case. It is even faster now. QFabric has spine-leaf technology or topology, which basically makes every single hop only one hop away in terms of connecting from one device to another. It is a pretty good and robust solution. It works pretty well in terms of scalability, and their technical support is amazing.
RM
Sep 14, 2023
QFabric supports redundancy and includes all of the enterprise and service provider features that customers would want in data center or service provider network.
Find out what your peers are saying about Juniper, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in LAN Switching. Updated: April 2024.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
OA
Mar 29, 2024
The most valuable feature of QFabric for network performance is its stability.
Anoop-Kumar - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 16, 2021
The solution is stable.
AQ
Aug 14, 2023
Juniper QFabric has various advantages including scalability, simplicity, performance, and flexibility.
LC
Sep 3, 2021
It's user-friendly.
Suresh Pathipatti - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 27, 2024
The vendor maintains the product well.
AH
Sep 7, 2023
It is known for being agile, flexible, and cost-effective when working with various vendors.
WW
Aug 17, 2021
The solution is easy to use and has good performance.
 

Juniper QFabric Cons review quotes

AH
Jul 23, 2021
I do not use GUI's very much for switch stacks. I am always in the CLI. However, I do know that Juniper in the past has lacked on their GUI's, but they have been working on it.
AH
Jan 11, 2021
They are working on the virtualization of the actual fabric layer. They are moving away from the original spine-leaf design to a different infrastructure. Instead of having three tiers, which was the director of the interconnected nodes, they cut them back, and they still have that kind of structure.
RM
Sep 14, 2023
Having support for all OpenFlow versions would be beneficial.
Find out what your peers are saying about Juniper, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in LAN Switching. Updated: April 2024.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
OA
Mar 29, 2024
Improvements could be made to QFabric's life cycle management, particularly in maintaining stable versions and extending product support.
Anoop-Kumar - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 16, 2021
It would be nice if Juniper provided the system integrator with training, similar to that of Cisco.
AQ
Aug 14, 2023
The pricing structure could be more budget-friendly.
LC
Sep 3, 2021
The disruptive upgrade was an issue for us.
Suresh Pathipatti - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 27, 2024
The stability needs to be improved.
AH
Sep 7, 2023
It works too much on rebooting and there is some memory leakage.