ExtremeSwitching and Cisco FabricPath are competitors in the networking solutions domain. While Cisco seems to have the upper hand in terms of security and advanced features, ExtremeSwitching appeals to smaller businesses with its cost-effectiveness and unique features.
Features: ExtremeSwitching stands out with its ease of configuration, leveraging a unique ring topology protocol, and offers features such as deep packet inspection, scalability, and cloud management through ExtremeCloud IQ. Cisco FabricPath is noted for its strong security features, network efficiency, and the ability to support multiple VLANs, integrate with VXLAN, and provide advanced routing capabilities.
Room for Improvement: ExtremeSwitching could benefit from enhancing its training resources and pricing strategy to compete more aggressively against Cisco. Cisco FabricPath, although robust, is seen as costly, prompting users to desire better pricing and improved documentation. Both could improve on cyber asset management and integration with teleconferencing applications.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ExtremeSwitching supports diverse deployment options including on-premises, private cloud, and hybrid environments. It has generally good customer service but could improve its training programs. Cisco FabricPath also offers multiple deployment architectures and is known for quick and reliable service, with better responsiveness compared to ExtremeSwitching.
Pricing and ROI: ExtremeSwitching is recognized for its competitive pricing, making it cost-effective for small and medium businesses. While its licensing fees are reasonable, rising costs are a concern. Cisco FabricPath, although more expensive with high licensing and operational costs, justifies its price with superior performance and stability, making the ROI evident after several years.
The return on investment is high.
Based on my experience with technical support from Cisco, they are helpful and responsive; they respond based on severity.
Cisco provides excellent support.
Requiring improvement in the technical support provided to customers.
ExtremeSwitching is highly scalable, and I would rate it as nine out of ten.
Cisco FabricPath is stable.
Additionally, parts availability in these regions needs improvement to address hardware failure situations, such as the availability of parts like a power cable.
In future updates, I would prefer to see features such as more AI functionality or better integration added to Cisco FabricPath.
ExtremeSwitching's software stability could be improved, as it sometimes crashes.
They are somewhat good at the starting point, but when you get the license and such, it becomes very expensive.
While pricing is slightly on the higher side, the overall assessment, which includes cost and technical capabilities, often favors Cisco.
ExtremeSwitching is priced in the mid-range, not too expensive nor too cheap.
I have experienced operational efficiencies with Cisco FabricPath that are 200% better than the old legacy equipment and protocols.
Cisco is the best choice in terms of cost, quality, and post-procurement services.
The most valuable feature of ExtremeSwitching is the Extreme Fabric, specifically the switching fabric.
We monitor all LAN Switching reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
