We performed a comparison between Arista Campus LAN Switches and Cisco FabricPath based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Dell Technologies and others in LAN Switching."The feature sets are pretty cool. They've got almost everything that the competition offers."
"QoS is the most valuable feature because our clients work with VOIP and Critical applications."
"The CloudVision Portal allows us to centrally manage all of our Arista products."
"The most valuable features are the lead time and the high quality of the product."
"The solution has excellent stability."
"As I mentioned earlier, the durability, flexibility, and security of Cisco devices are notable. Particularly with switches, the capability to implement multiple VLANs and easily aggregate the network has been advantageous. The ability to have different VLANs and aggregate the network without complications is a key feature of Cisco FabricPath."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to migrate VMs between data centers."
"FabricPath's best features are routing, OSPS, ethernet, and performance."
"The most valuable feature is the central management where the customer can receive all the alerts."
"The fact that the solution is on the cloud is its most valuable aspect. If you are on the cloud, you can manage your network from anywhere, any place. It's very good."
"The best features of Cisco FabricPath is performance and reliability."
"I would like to see a version available with eight or sixteen ports."
"One of the issues that we have been faced with here in Brazil is that we don't have any list times for delivery."
"It would be ideal if the solution was less expensive."
"Lack of security features for which we need to use another solution."
"The pricing could be adjusted to make it easier to sell to clients."
"The management features are in need of improvement."
"While Cisco products are excellent, the problem is the cost. Cisco products are product, Cisco products are very expensive. I rate Cisco FabricPath three out of 10 for affordability."
"The solution should offer better reporting."
"The documents could improve for Cisco FabricPath. There are times when the relevant information is not present in the different sections of the documents, such as deployment. The documents should be more detailed and enhanced."
"The cloud version of Cisco Fabric Path could be improved."
"Layer 3 does not have higher availability."
Earn 20 points
Arista Campus LAN Switches is ranked 13th in LAN Switching while Cisco FabricPath is ranked 8th in LAN Switching with 22 reviews. Arista Campus LAN Switches is rated 8.8, while Cisco FabricPath is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Arista Campus LAN Switches writes "Stable, has a lot of uplink interfaces, and several can be centralized managed through a single portal". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco FabricPath writes "On overall effective product with good performance and a simple setup ". Arista Campus LAN Switches is most compared with Cisco Catalyst Switches, whereas Cisco FabricPath is most compared with Juniper QFabric and Cisco Nexus.
See our list of best LAN Switching vendors.
We monitor all LAN Switching reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
