Cisco FabricPath vs HPE ProCurve comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cisco Logo
543 views|296 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Logo
3,059 views|2,664 comparisons
97% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco FabricPath and HPE ProCurve based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two LAN Switching solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Cisco FabricPath vs. HPE ProCurve Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"As I mentioned earlier, the durability, flexibility, and security of Cisco devices are notable. Particularly with switches, the capability to implement multiple VLANs and easily aggregate the network has been advantageous. The ability to have different VLANs and aggregate the network without complications is a key feature of Cisco FabricPath.""It's very stable.""FabricPath's best features are routing, OSPS, ethernet, and performance.""The technical assistance is good.""Cisco is the market leader in this space and it is a product that I recommend.""Additional bandwidth is available when needed.""It's a reliable product and you know that it will work in the enterprise environment.""It is stable and reliable."

More Cisco FabricPath Pros →

"HPE ProCurve offers a very good value proposition compared to that of other switches and is very energy-efficient.""The product's stability is good. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.""The web page interface is very convenient and easy to use for setting up your feedback loops.""Inter-VLAN is a great feature.""One of the biggest things in HPE ProCurve that I like, though not necessarily a feature, is the HPE warranty because it's probably better than any of the other vendors that we deal with, as it has a lifetime replacement. Feature-wise, the web interface of HPE ProCurve is typically pretty good and I like that as well.""HPE ProCurve's most valuable feature is that it is user-friendly.""Its easy manageability is most valuable. It's easy to manage.""This is a very reliable solution."

More HPE ProCurve Pros →

Cons
"I would like one management console to control the network.""The initial setup is a little complex.""Lack of security features for which we need to use another solution.""If Cisco can include management for this protocol in Layer 3, that would be ideal.""While Cisco products are excellent, the problem is the cost. Cisco products are product, Cisco products are very expensive. I rate Cisco FabricPath three out of 10 for affordability.""Improvements could be made on specific technical issues such as implementation.""Layer 3 does not have higher availability.""The price is a little bit too high."

More Cisco FabricPath Cons →

"The dashboards could be improved to be more interesting.""The solution should offer different gigabit interfaces. Right now, they have ten gigabits. However, for our needs, we only need one gigabit. We don't need 24 or 48 ports. We only need eight to ten. HPE should introduce into their portfolio some smaller and more compact options.""We do occasionally have issues with the solution and need to change out the switches sometimes. This can be due to the fan, but, in most cases, it's because the power supply was broken.""The solution's pricing could be made cheaper.""The pricing model could be improved in HPE ProCurve.""There is one proprietary function they lack, and I can't remember what it was called, but it monitors the ports, and then every 10 seconds if the port is down, it can divert the traffic somewhere else.""The solution doesn't have web-based management, which is why we've moved to a different solution.""The only things that might need improvement would be the administrative tools and the graphical interface. The GUI could be improved on the administrative interface, for example."

More HPE ProCurve Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing for this product is good."
  • "The price of Cisco FabricPath could be reduced, it is expensive in the market here in Sri Lanka. The solution is subscriptions based, if the customer wants any future integrations, or if there are any future enhancements they will have to pay. There are different license options available, such as one or three years purchases."
  • "FabricPath is very reasonably priced."
  • "The solution falls under the pricier category, but it provides value for the price charged."
  • "It is very expensive."
  • More Cisco FabricPath Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "You buy the switch and that's it."
  • "The cost of HPE ProCurve is good."
  • "The purchasing cost a few years ago for two units was approx €5,000."
  • "This is an expensive switch."
  • "The price of this product is cheap."
  • "HPE ProCurve products are reasonably priced."
  • "The price could be more competitive."
  • "We are a public company, so we are obliged to take the best offer from the vendors. They gave us the best price for the needs we had. It was considerably less than Cisco. It had maybe 40% lower cost."
  • More HPE ProCurve Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which LAN Switching solutions are best for your needs.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:As I mentioned earlier, the durability, flexibility, and security of Cisco devices are notable. Particularly with switches, the capability to implement multiple VLANs and easily aggregate the network… more »
    Top Answer:In terms of the series, I find that the integration with other teleconferencing applications needs to be more seamless. I have suggested to Cisco that the endpoint device should allow joining calls… more »
    Top Answer:HPE ProCurve is used to connect servers and storage in the data center.
    Top Answer:The solution's pricing could be made cheaper.
    Ranking
    8th
    out of 16 in LAN Switching
    Views
    543
    Comparisons
    296
    Reviews
    11
    Average Words per Review
    335
    Rating
    8.3
    2nd
    out of 16 in LAN Switching
    Views
    3,059
    Comparisons
    2,664
    Reviews
    15
    Average Words per Review
    491
    Rating
    8.4
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    FabricPath
    ProCurve, HP ProCurve
    Learn More
    Overview
    Cisco FabricPath is a Cisco NX-OS software innovation combining the plug-and-play simplicity of Ethernet with the reliability and scalability of Layer 3 routing. Using FabricPath, you can build highly scalable Layer 2 multipath networks without the Spanning Tree Protocol. Such networks are particularly suitable for large virtualization deployments, private clouds, and high-performance computing (HPC) environments. The benefits of Cisco FabricPath include: Minimal commands per switch ease configuration and operation, Autodiscovery simplifies addition of new links and switches, Provision additional network bandwidth without impacting network, Supports one-, two-, or three-tier architectures, VLAN extensibility across the data center.
    HP Networking (HP ProCurve) products enable a cost-effective network that's agile, flexible, and fully interoperable. Boost availability, performance, monitoring, and productivity with HP network software, services, and support.
    Sample Customers
    Bellevue, Calligaris, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Management Science Associates, Multi-Customer, Oediv, Roper St. Francis, SNAM
    Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, Cardinal Newman Catholic Secondary School, DY 4 Systems, EdgeWing, Edmonton Public Schools District, Halton Catholic District School Board, Hartwick College, Hatch Associates, Huntingdon College, Roseville Joint Union High School District, Saddleback Valley Unified School District, One Superior Place
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Comms Service Provider27%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Integrator9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company31%
    Government14%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    University7%
    REVIEWERS
    Government19%
    Retailer14%
    Wholesaler/Distributor10%
    Healthcare Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company13%
    Comms Service Provider12%
    Educational Organization9%
    Government8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business45%
    Midsize Enterprise27%
    Large Enterprise27%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business9%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise71%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business44%
    Midsize Enterprise28%
    Large Enterprise28%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise54%
    Buyer's Guide
    Cisco FabricPath vs. HPE ProCurve
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco FabricPath vs. HPE ProCurve and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cisco FabricPath is ranked 8th in LAN Switching with 21 reviews while HPE ProCurve is ranked 2nd in LAN Switching with 36 reviews. Cisco FabricPath is rated 8.2, while HPE ProCurve is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Cisco FabricPath writes "On overall effective product with good performance and a simple setup ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE ProCurve writes "Offers reliability and helps with vulnerability assessment". Cisco FabricPath is most compared with Juniper QFabric, Cisco Nexus and Arista Campus LAN Switches, whereas HPE ProCurve is most compared with Cisco Catalyst Switches, Aruba Instant On Switches, NETGEAR Switches, Dell PowerConnect Switches and Cisco Nexus. See our Cisco FabricPath vs. HPE ProCurve report.

    See our list of best LAN Switching vendors.

    We monitor all LAN Switching reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.