Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs Kiuwan comparison

Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Read 23 Kiuwan reviews

1,474 Views
1,297 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Kiuwan and Check Point CloudGuard WAF are strong contenders in software security and web application firewall protection. Check Point CloudGuard WAF appears to have the upper hand in terms of features, while Kiuwan is more appealing to budget-conscious buyers due to its pricing and support advantages.

Features: Kiuwan offers easy integration, effective vulnerability identification, and straightforward deployment. Check Point CloudGuard WAF provides extensive threat intelligence capabilities, scalability, and a broad range of protections.

Room for Improvement: Kiuwan could enhance customization options, expand reporting features, and improve user interface design. Check Point CloudGuard WAF might focus on simplifying its setup process, improving UI intuitiveness, and reducing the learning curve for new users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kiuwan is known for straightforward deployment and responsive customer support, with faster resolution times. Check Point CloudGuard WAF, despite being highly functional, receives varied feedback on deployment complexity, and users report a more intricate support experience.

Pricing and ROI: Kiuwan is noted for competitive pricing and favorable setup costs, offering good ROI for small to medium enterprises. Check Point CloudGuard WAF requires a higher initial investment, but its comprehensive features offer valuable returns for businesses with larger budgets.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Kiuwan Report (Updated: July 2025).

Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Kiuwan

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Ranking in Application Security Tools

9th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Web Application Firewall (WAF) (11th)

Kiuwan

Ranking in Application Security Tools

23rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (24th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Check Point CloudGuard WAF is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kiuwan is 1.1%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Dialungana Malungo

Principal Cybersecurity Specialist at Unitel S.A.

Protects our web applications and APIs and has a very low false positive rate

CloudGuard WAF is a very straightforward solution. I do not have to worry about signatures. Most of the solutions that are out there are mainly based on signatures, and I have to do a lot of maintenance to get the signature updates, and sometimes, due to a lack of resources, I am not able to do so. With CloudGuard WAF, I have peace of mind, because most of the features are AI-based, and there is not much configuration that needs to be done on my side. Once set, I only go to CloudGuard WAF to check. I do not have to worry about signatures or updates. Everything is done perfectly, and I have a sense of peace because I know our applications are safe. It is very important for us that CloudGuard WAF protects our applications against threats without relying on signatures. That is definitely one of the key features I need.

Read full review

Mustufa Bhavnagarwala

CyberRisk Solution Advisor at Deloitte

Though a stable tool, the UI needs improvement

Kiuwan can improve its UI a little more. The user experience can be made better. Kiuwan offers a user interface that is similar to the one offered by Windows 7 or Windows 98, which I saw when I ran the tool and tried to scan the repository to find the security issues. The product's UI has certain shortcomings, where improvements are required.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a very scalable and stable solution."

"With the solution, we managed to obtain complete comprehensive visibility of the entire environment in the cloud, thus having better control of each of the resources."

"The DirectStorage gives me a vision that I did not have of the check that occurs on the web servers."

"The tool helps us to block IPs and applications."

"It provides advanced analytics that gives each team time to prepare for any threat that might occur in the future."

"I rate it ten out of ten."

"After integrating AppSec with other applications, team members can easily work without fear of confidential information exposure."

"We have saved money by protecting our environment from new vulnerabilities and preventing theft by cybercriminals."

More Check Point CloudGuard WAF pros

"We use Kiuwan to locate the source of application vulnerabilities."

"Software analytics for a lot of different languages including ABAP."

"I've found the reporting features the most helpful."

"We are using this solution to increase the quality of our software and to test the vulnerabilities in our tools before the customers find them."

"The most valuable feature is the time to resolution, where it tells you how long it is going to take to get to a zero-base or a five-star security rating."

"I've tried many open source applications and the remediation or correction actions that were provided by Kiuwan were very good in comparison."

"I like that it provides a detailed report that lets you know the risk index and the vulnerability."

"I like that I can scan the code without sending it to the Kiuwan cloud. I can do it locally on my device. When the local analyzer finishes, the results display on the dashboard in the cloud. It's essential for security purposes to be able to scan my code locally."

More Kiuwan pros

Cons

"The web user interface needs some improvement, even though the functionality is good."

"It was costlier than other solutions."

"Deeper and more transparent integration between Cloud Application Security and analysis monitoring tools could be very valuable - although the solution currently offers integrations with third-party security tools."

"They should improve in the delivery of more detailed reports with more information."

"Cost reduction and trial period extension should be considered with some lucrative discount offerings in buying standard versions."

"The web user interface needs some improvement, even though the functionality is good."

"The documentation of each of the tools that they offer needs to be better."

"It doesn't detect user activity like some of its competitors. It's not a vulnerability, but it's a legitimate activity that it doesn't detect. It only detects vulnerabilities or misconfigurations."

More Check Point CloudGuard WAF cons

"Perhaps more languages supported."

"The QA developer and security could be improved."

"I would like to see additional languages supported."

"The product's UI has certain shortcomings, where improvements are required."

"The configuration hasn't been that good."

"DIfferent languages, such Spanish, Portuguese, and so on."

"Kiuwan's support has room for improvement. You can only open a ticket is through email, and the support team is outside of our country. They should have a support number or chat."

"It could improve its scalability abilities."

More Kiuwan cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As Infiniti customers, the pricing is manageable, as we have allowances dedicated to each Check Point product. The price is not as high compared to other options I have dealt with in the past."

"Check Point CloudGuard Application Security's pricing is not friendly."

"Check Point CloudGuard Application Security's pricing is comparable to other products in the market."

"Check Point CloudGuard WAF is expensive compared to Azure WAF."

"The sales team or account managers from Check Point are top-notch. As I am using other products as well, my pricing was competitive compared to others."

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly and competitive."

"It is not cheap, but it is worth it."

"The pricing is competitive compared to other solutions on the market. So, the licensing cost is average."

More Check Point CloudGuard WAF pricing and cost advice

"This solution is cheaper than other tools."

"It follows a subscription model. I think the price is somewhere in the middle."

"The price of Kiuwan is lower than that of other tools on the market."

"Nothing special. It's a very fair model."

"I recommend contacting a sales person who will create the best plan payment plan for you, as we did."

"Check with your account manager."

"Kiuwan is an open-source solution and free to use."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

19%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

Computer Software Company

16%

University

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CloudGuard for Application Security?

We have not had any incidents. We could realize its benefits immediately. We watched and monitored the traffic, and it was amazing to see the results.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudGuard for Application Security?

The initial cost of Check Point CloudGuard WAF is high.

What needs improvement with CloudGuard for Application Security?

There are improvements that can be made regarding pricing since it has a high initial cost. If they could reduce that, it would be beneficial. Additionally, it has a complex initial configuration. ...

What do you like most about Kiuwan?

The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is quick when processing and giving an output or generating a report.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kiuwan?

I'm not entirely sure about the price and business aspects, but I assume Checkmarx might be less expensive. I think Checkmarx might offer more affordable options, especially in its smaller business...

What needs improvement with Kiuwan?

Imperva Web Application Firewall vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Comparisons

Compared 18% of the time

F5 Advanced WAF vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 16% of the time

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 12% of the time

AWS WAF vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 11% of the time

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 11% of the time

More Check Point CloudGuard WAF Competitors

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Kiuwan

Compared 48% of the time

Veracode vs Kiuwan

Compared 9% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Kiuwan

Compared 9% of the time

Snyk vs Kiuwan

Compared 7% of the time

SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) vs Kiuwan

Compared 6% of the time

More Kiuwan Competitors

Product Reports

Check Point CloudGuard WAF

August 2025

Download Check Point CloudGuard WAF product report

Download Kiuwan product report

August 2025

Also Known As

Check Point CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard AppSec

No data available

Overview

Check Point CloudGuard WAF offers advanced security for web applications and APIs with features such as intrusion prevention, bot prevention, and AI-driven threat detection, ensuring organizations achieve high-level protection and efficient security management.

Check Point CloudGuard WAF integrates with APIs, providing a seamless security enhancement while reducing false positives. Its scalability supports rapid deployment, valuable for companies aiming to secure resources in clouds like AWS and Azure. Enhanced threat prevention, comprehensive compliance support, and advanced threat protection methods such as SQL injection and cross-site scripting prevention are key strengths. Despite its robust capabilities, there are opportunities for improvement, such as lower costs, improved third-party tool integration, and a more intuitive interface to enhance usability.

What are the key features of Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

Intrusion Prevention System: Effectively detects and blocks unauthorized access attempts.
Bot Prevention: Shields applications from malicious bot traffic.
AI-driven Threat Detection: Uses advanced algorithms to identify and mitigate threats.
Log Management: Offers extensive logging capabilities for tracking and analysis.
Scalability: Supports rapid deployment across different environments, including multi-cloud.

What benefits should users expect from Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

Security Efficiency: Combines high-grade protection with ease of use to simplify security management.
Cost Efficiency: Aids in effective resource utilization, minimizing overhead.
Compliance Support: Helps meet various industry standards effortlessly.
Enhanced Threat Protection: Provides robust safeguards against common web vulnerabilities.

Check Point CloudGuard WAF is predominantly applied within industries requiring stringent security standards, such as financial services, healthcare, and e-commerce. Its deployment strengthens the defense of critical APIs, facilitates compliance, and supports efficient multi-cloud security management, aligning well with evolving industry demands.

Check Point Software Technologies

Software analytics technology with a breadth of third party integrations that takes into account the wealth of applications your teams are currently using.

We facilitate and encourage work between unlocalized teams. We understand the complexity of working on multi technology environments, constantly striving to increase the number of programming languages and technologies we support.

Sample Customers

Orange España, Paschoalotto

DHL, BNP Paribas, Zurich, AXA, Ernst & Young, KFC, Santander, Latam, Ferrovial