Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs Kiuwan comparison

Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Read 23 Kiuwan reviews

1,522 Views
1,263 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Kiuwan and Check Point CloudGuard WAF are strong contenders in software security and web application firewall protection. Check Point CloudGuard WAF appears to have the upper hand in terms of features, while Kiuwan is more appealing to budget-conscious buyers due to its pricing and support advantages.

Features: Kiuwan offers easy integration, effective vulnerability identification, and straightforward deployment. Check Point CloudGuard WAF provides extensive threat intelligence capabilities, scalability, and a broad range of protections.

Room for Improvement: Kiuwan could enhance customization options, expand reporting features, and improve user interface design. Check Point CloudGuard WAF might focus on simplifying its setup process, improving UI intuitiveness, and reducing the learning curve for new users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kiuwan is known for straightforward deployment and responsive customer support, with faster resolution times. Check Point CloudGuard WAF, despite being highly functional, receives varied feedback on deployment complexity, and users report a more intricate support experience.

Pricing and ROI: Kiuwan is noted for competitive pricing and favorable setup costs, offering good ROI for small to medium enterprises. Check Point CloudGuard WAF requires a higher initial investment, but its comprehensive features offer valuable returns for businesses with larger budgets.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Kiuwan Report (Updated: September 2025).

Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Kiuwan

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Ranking in Application Security Tools

7th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Web Application Firewall (WAF) (10th)

Kiuwan

Ranking in Application Security Tools

21st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (25th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Check Point CloudGuard WAF is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kiuwan is 1.1%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Check Point CloudGuard WAF	0.3%
Kiuwan	1.1%
Other	98.6%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Dialungana Malungo

Principal Cybersecurity Specialist at Unitel S.A.

Protects our web applications and APIs and has a very low false positive rate

CloudGuard WAF is a very straightforward solution. I do not have to worry about signatures. Most of the solutions that are out there are mainly based on signatures, and I have to do a lot of maintenance to get the signature updates, and sometimes, due to a lack of resources, I am not able to do so. With CloudGuard WAF, I have peace of mind, because most of the features are AI-based, and there is not much configuration that needs to be done on my side. Once set, I only go to CloudGuard WAF to check. I do not have to worry about signatures or updates. Everything is done perfectly, and I have a sense of peace because I know our applications are safe. It is very important for us that CloudGuard WAF protects our applications against threats without relying on signatures. That is definitely one of the key features I need.

Read full review

Mustufa Bhavnagarwala

CyberRisk Solution Advisor at Deloitte

Though a stable tool, the UI needs improvement

Kiuwan can improve its UI a little more. The user experience can be made better. Kiuwan offers a user interface that is similar to the one offered by Windows 7 or Windows 98, which I saw when I ran the tool and tried to scan the repository to find the security issues. The product's UI has certain shortcomings, where improvements are required.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution preemptively blocks zero-day attacks and detects hidden anomalies effectively."

"The communication between the on-premises device and the cloud for analysis and feedback is a valuable feature."

"It offers good functionality of the application that is currently running."

"Check Point CloudGuard WAF works well for preemptively blocking Zero Day attacks and detecting hidden anomalies."

"We have saved money by protecting our environment from new vulnerabilities and preventing theft by cybercriminals."

"The tool's most valuable feature is AI, which makes operations easier. Moreover, it is easy to deploy."

"After integrating AppSec with other applications, team members can easily work without fear of confidential information exposure."

"The most effective CloudGuard feature for threat prevention is its web app protection."

More Check Point CloudGuard WAF pros

"The solution offers very good technical support."

"I've tried many open source applications and the remediation or correction actions that were provided by Kiuwan were very good in comparison."

"We use Kiuwan to locate the source of application vulnerabilities."

"I like that it provides a detailed report that lets you know the risk index and the vulnerability."

"The feature that I have found the most valuable in Kiuwan is the speed of scanning. Compared to other SaaS tools I have used, Kiuwan is much quicker in performing scans. I have not yet used it on a large code base, but from what I have experienced, it is efficient and accurate. Additionally, I have used it both manually and in an automated pipeline, and both methods have been effective. The speed of scanning is what makes it valuable to me."

"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is quick when processing and giving an output or generating a report."

"It provides value by offering options to enhance both code quality and the security of the company."

"I find it immensely helpful because it's not just about generating code; it's about ensuring efficiency in the execution."

More Kiuwan pros

Cons

"Check Point CloudGuard WAF can be improved; initially, the setup is very complicated, and there's not a lot of documentation available, plus it didn't have something for anti-bot, but other than that, it is fine."

"The documentation of each of the tools that they offer needs to be better."

"We are satisfied with the product because it does what we need it to do, but one thing that I would like to see improved in the product is the protection of our mobile applications. When I migrate the traffic from our mobile application to CloudGuard, we are not getting what we expected."

"I am pretty happy with the current version. I have not yet used it to its full potential, but there could be improvements as I explore it further."

"Cost reduction and trial period extension should be considered with some lucrative discount offerings in buying standard versions."

"The creation of security profiles for each application takes a lot of time."

"CloudGuard for Application Security, like the other Check Point applications, has been presenting major latency problems when entering their administrative portal."

"I would like to be able to integrate the theme of Artificial Intelligence to help review issues and to monitor and view the security issue while also suggesting and interpreting and additionally configuring solutions - basically, acting as an interpreter."

More Check Point CloudGuard WAF cons

"It would be beneficial to streamline calls and transitions seamlessly for improved functionality."

"It could improve its scalability abilities."

"Integration of the programming tools could be improved."

"I would like to see better integration with the Visual Studio and Eclipse IDEs."

"The solution seems to give us a lot of false positives. This could be improved quite a bit."

"The integration process could be improved. It'll also help if it could generate reports automatically. But I'm not sure about the effectiveness of the reports. This is because, in our last project, we still found some key issues that weren't captured by the Kiuwan report."

"DIfferent languages, such Spanish, Portuguese, and so on."

"In Kiuwan there are sometimes duplicates found in the dependency scan under the "insights" tab. It's unclear to me why these duplicates are appearing, and it would be helpful if the application teams could investigate further."

More Kiuwan cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I find the pricing to be reasonable."

"The base solution costs approximately 30,000 euros, with an additional 2,000 euros per year for licenses and support."

"As Infiniti customers, the pricing is manageable, as we have allowances dedicated to each Check Point product. The price is not as high compared to other options I have dealt with in the past."

"If the pricing for the Infinity platform covers everything, it would be more straightforward. I had a hard time selling it to our CEO as a former CFO because of the differentials. There are different deltas year to year over a five-year period. It is very difficult to explain. It would be easier to digest for our executives if there was a flatter scale"

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly and competitive."

"Check Point CloudGuard Application Security's pricing is not friendly."

"Check Point CloudGuard WAF is expensive compared to Azure WAF."

"The pricing is competitive compared to other solutions on the market. So, the licensing cost is average."

More Check Point CloudGuard WAF pricing and cost advice

"Nothing special. It's a very fair model."

"This solution is cheaper than other tools."

"The price of Kiuwan is lower than that of other tools on the market."

"Kiuwan is an open-source solution and free to use."

"Check with your account manager."

"It follows a subscription model. I think the price is somewhere in the middle."

"I recommend contacting a sales person who will create the best plan payment plan for you, as we did."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

20%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Computer Software Company

14%

University

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	25
Midsize Enterprise	18
Large Enterprise	16

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CloudGuard for Application Security?

We have not had any incidents. We could realize its benefits immediately. We watched and monitored the traffic, and it was amazing to see the results.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudGuard for Application Security?

I don't know about the pricing, setup cost, or licensing for Check Point CloudGuard WAF, as I don't manage costs.

What needs improvement with CloudGuard for Application Security?

Check Point CloudGuard WAF can be improved; initially, the setup is very complicated, and there's not a lot of documentation available, plus it didn't have something for anti-bot, but other than th...

What do you like most about Kiuwan?

The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is quick when processing and giving an output or generating a report.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kiuwan?

I'm not entirely sure about the price and business aspects, but I assume Checkmarx might be less expensive. I think Checkmarx might offer more affordable options, especially in its smaller business...

What needs improvement with Kiuwan?

Imperva Application Security Platform vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Comparisons

Compared 19% of the time

F5 Advanced WAF vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 14% of the time

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 11% of the time

open-appsec vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 10% of the time

More Check Point CloudGuard WAF Competitors

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Kiuwan

Compared 44% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Kiuwan

Compared 11% of the time

Veracode vs Kiuwan

Compared 10% of the time

Snyk vs Kiuwan

Compared 9% of the time

SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) vs Kiuwan

Compared 9% of the time

More Kiuwan Competitors

Product Reports

Check Point CloudGuard WAF

October 2025

Download Check Point CloudGuard WAF product report

Download Kiuwan product report

September 2025

Also Known As

Check Point CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard AppSec

No data available

Overview

Check Point CloudGuard WAF offers advanced security for web applications and APIs with features such as intrusion prevention, bot prevention, and AI-driven threat detection, ensuring organizations achieve high-level protection and efficient security management.

Check Point CloudGuard WAF integrates with APIs, providing a seamless security enhancement while reducing false positives. Its scalability supports rapid deployment, valuable for companies aiming to secure resources in clouds like AWS and Azure. Enhanced threat prevention, comprehensive compliance support, and advanced threat protection methods such as SQL injection and cross-site scripting prevention are key strengths. Despite its robust capabilities, there are opportunities for improvement, such as lower costs, improved third-party tool integration, and a more intuitive interface to enhance usability.

What are the key features of Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

Intrusion Prevention System: Effectively detects and blocks unauthorized access attempts.
Bot Prevention: Shields applications from malicious bot traffic.
AI-driven Threat Detection: Uses advanced algorithms to identify and mitigate threats.
Log Management: Offers extensive logging capabilities for tracking and analysis.
Scalability: Supports rapid deployment across different environments, including multi-cloud.

What benefits should users expect from Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

Security Efficiency: Combines high-grade protection with ease of use to simplify security management.
Cost Efficiency: Aids in effective resource utilization, minimizing overhead.
Compliance Support: Helps meet various industry standards effortlessly.
Enhanced Threat Protection: Provides robust safeguards against common web vulnerabilities.

Check Point CloudGuard WAF is predominantly applied within industries requiring stringent security standards, such as financial services, healthcare, and e-commerce. Its deployment strengthens the defense of critical APIs, facilitates compliance, and supports efficient multi-cloud security management, aligning well with evolving industry demands.

Check Point Software Technologies

Software analytics technology with a breadth of third party integrations that takes into account the wealth of applications your teams are currently using.

We facilitate and encourage work between unlocalized teams. We understand the complexity of working on multi technology environments, constantly striving to increase the number of programming languages and technologies we support.

Sample Customers

Orange España, Paschoalotto

DHL, BNP Paribas, Zurich, AXA, Ernst & Young, KFC, Santander, Latam, Ferrovial