Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Pros & Cons summary

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.
Get the report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

Check Point CloudGuard WAF is highly scalable and stable, providing seamless deployment and rapid setup.
Its AI capabilities are powerful, offering enhanced threat prevention and productivity improvements.
The web application firewall effectively blocks zero-day attacks and provides real-time threat intelligence updates.
Integrating AppSec with other applications enhances team security operations without additional security hardware.
Check Point CloudGuard WAF reduces manual workloads and false positives by automating policy management and threat detection.

CONS

Check Point CloudGuard WAF shows major latency problems when accessing the administrative portal and administration from mobile devices could be improved.
Technical support for Check Point CloudGuard WAF is problematic, including missing configuration features and issues with blocking aspects.
The initial setup for Check Point CloudGuard WAF is complicated, with inadequate documentation available, and it lacks anti-bot features.
Check Point CloudGuard WAF could incorporate a feature for fast threat response with direct integration into cloud-native services.
Check Point CloudGuard WAF presents high pricing and licensing costs, which could be more accessible with a more understandable pricing model.
 

Check Point CloudGuard WAF Pros review quotes

SP
Jul 12, 2024
Machine learning is a valuable tool for this assessment because it allows for a two-phase approach: secure and non-secure.
reviewer2379006 - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 14, 2024
On the endpoint side, the most valuable feature is undoubtedly the cloud-based management capability, along with the ransomware protection, despite not encountering any instances so far.
JC
Mar 15, 2024
We have not had any incidents. We could realize its benefits immediately. We watched and monitored the traffic, and it was amazing to see the results.
Learn what your peers think about Check Point CloudGuard WAF. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: October 2025.
872,706 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Dialungana Malungo - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 5, 2025
With CloudGuard WAF, I have peace of mind, because most of the features are AI-based, and there is not much configuration that needs to be done on my side.
reviewer2355705 - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 7, 2024
The first valuable feature is that it is not a complex process to get it up and running. It was not complex at all. We were in a close relationship with the team that developed the app, and it worked in a few hours. The second valuable feature is the information that comes out of it.
Baruch Peretz - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 4, 2025
The ability to preemptively block zero day attacks and detect hidden anomalies is exactly its advantage.
reviewer2751468 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 4, 2025
Check Point CloudGuard WAF has positively impacted our organization in security and operational efficiency, with a 30-40% drop in malicious traffic and a 15-20% reduction in manual intervention for our SOC team due to reduced false positives and automated protection.
reviewer2619747 - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 4, 2025
Overall, the product is excellent.
RF
Feb 4, 2025
I have thousands of exposed websites and APIs. Being able to control what is happening and try to prevent any attack is the best feature.
Sujay Kurup - PeerSpot reviewer
May 3, 2024
Whenever there was a new CVE, Check Point CloudGuard WAF used to block them.
 

Check Point CloudGuard WAF Cons review quotes

SP
Jul 12, 2024
While the GUI allows configuration for application-related features, specific definitions cannot be modified through the code.
reviewer2379006 - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 14, 2024
Improving the process for handling licensing renewals would be a welcome enhancement.
JC
Mar 15, 2024
In terms of features, I do not have any negatives. Their integration is extremely quick. It is better than others I have been involved with in the past. Their pricing model, however, can be better.
Learn what your peers think about Check Point CloudGuard WAF. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: October 2025.
872,706 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Dialungana Malungo - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 5, 2025
We are satisfied with the product because it does what we need it to do, but one thing that I would like to see improved in the product is the protection of our mobile applications. When I migrate the traffic from our mobile application to CloudGuard, we are not getting what we expected.
reviewer2355705 - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 7, 2024
I do not know if it is already there, but I would like to have complete visibility between the posture management and firewall as a service.
Baruch Peretz - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 4, 2025
I would like it to be able to analyze more complex functions, although I did not examine the case study of more complex implementations. Things like forum fields, etc seem to need a little more focused protection of the fields scheme validation.
reviewer2751468 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 4, 2025
Areas where Check Point CloudGuard WAF can improve include simple policy tuning, as the protection seems strong, though initial rule tuning can be complex.
RF
Feb 4, 2025
They might be able to add more integrations.
Sujay Kurup - PeerSpot reviewer
May 3, 2024
It was costlier than other solutions.
AS
Feb 3, 2023
They need improved latency in the main window.