We performed a comparison between Camunda and QualiWare X based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The integration with almost any language, product, and even human tasks, is valuable. It's very seamless to integrate into existing systems. It doesn't require you to rewrite a lot of your existing system. That's where it really stands out."
"It is an absolutely stable solution."
"The UI is very user-friendly compared to other products. The native, vanilla UI is very interesting and intuitive to use. It's user-friendly when it comes to modernizing a business process."
"The most valuable feature is that, with a visual system, you can try to have a process client before beginning the programming for the application."
"I think that the positives of Camunda Platform are that our customers can start with the free version. I think it is the most important."
"I've found the active community most valuable but it also provides you with a lot of other features."
"The flexibility is great."
"We like the idea of working with Cawemo because it enables us to keep on working, remotely or not. It allows us to collaborate between areas. It's easy to model and easy to use"
"I like the solution's traceability."
"Lacking in forms visualization."
"If Camunda could develop something that creates user forms that would be a great feature to have. They also need to improve the UI."
"Camunda Platform's customer support could be improved because their response is quite slow."
"They could provide more documentation regarding the integration of different programming languages."
"As we experienced some difficulties in the beginning, deployment took almost a month."
"When addressing a complex and extensive process, the domain it belongs to, be it banking, healthcare, or HR, requires widespread access."
"I have faced problems in bringing up the Cockpit in terms of GUI processes. I think that there is room for improvement in those areas."
"Would be helpful if there were additional out-of-the-box activities."
"The solution is not easy and intuitive to use. I would also like the software to have a reference metamodel that can guide the modeling."
Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 69 reviews while QualiWare X is ranked 36th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 3 reviews. Camunda is rated 8.2, while QualiWare X is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of QualiWare X writes "Works as a reference for architecture but not very intuitive ". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas QualiWare X is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, ARIS Cloud and Avolution ABACUS. See our Camunda vs. QualiWare X report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.