Apache Airflow vs Camunda comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 27, 2024
 

Categories and Ranking

Apache Airflow
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
2nd
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
33
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Camunda
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
73
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Design (2nd), Process Automation (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2024, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Apache Airflow is 6.9%, down from 10.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Camunda is 23.1%, up from 21.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business Process Management (BPM)
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
Business Process Design
12.8%
Process Automation
32.6%
 

Q&A Highlights

NC
Nov 07, 2021
 

Featured Reviews

CP
Jan 15, 2021
Scalable, stable and simple installation
We mainly used the solution in banking, finance, and insurance. We are looking for some opportunities in production companies, but this is only at the very early stages I do not have specific feedback because it is quite early in the review stage for comment. The dashboard is connected into the…
BN
Nov 16, 2022
Supports BPMN, integrates well, and saves time
They should focus more on enterprise challenges. We are using the enterprise license, and I would like to see more interactions with Camunda. The enterprise license should cover enterprise challenges. We would need more touchpoints so that Camunda understands better what's going on at the enterprise level. That's an area where Camunda could improve. They can understand the challenges of an enterprise and try to come up with solutions from their side for the enterprise. As an enterprise license owner, if we have some ideas for features, we expect them to release the features faster than now. So, a bit faster feature release is an area for improvement. There should be a multi-tenant solution for the platform where it supports multiple organizations on one platform instead of having to spin up multiple clusters for each organization. There should be an easy way to integrate different departments into one platform without having to operate multiple platforms. The operations should be easier with the enterprise solution. It should not create more overhead for the operations people. Another improvement area is the licensing model. We are yet to find out a smart licensing model for Camunda. We are mainly using the CP engine, and we require only a support and service contract, but this is not yet possible. Their licenses were probably made 10 or 20 years ago, but we need tailor-made licenses for the implemented use case. As a platform owner, I have to provide our customers with a static price tag. The price should not increase exponentially, and we should be able to tell them that we are not overcharging them. If the cost gets too high, it's likely to not be used in the future.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"One of its most valuable features is the graphical user interface, providing a visual representation of the pipeline status, successes, failures, and informative developer messages."
"The solution is flexible for all programming languages for all frameworks."
"The user interface for monitoring and managing workflows has been excellent, particularly in the latest version. c"
"The reason we went with Airflow is its DAG presentation, that shows the relationships among everything. It's more of a configuration-driven workflow."
"The solution is quite configurable so it is easy to code within a configuration kind of environment."
"The most valuable feature of Apache Airflow is creating and scheduling jobs. Additionally, the reattempt at failed jobs is useful."
"The solution's UI allows me to collect all the information and see the code lines."
"Its user-friendly interface makes it straightforward to operate, offering a plethora of features for data preparation, buffering, and format conversion."
"It's user friendly, much better than most tools I have seen."
"One reason we selected Camunda or Cloud/DB is that it comes with the support of the BPMN notation, which helps to define processes in a standard manner. Another reason was that Camunda Cloud, as the name says, is designed for a new cloud era."
"The BPMN diagram is valuable. For our use case of transferring money from one account to another, the connections have to be done in the traditional financial ways. There are a lot of unexpected errors and a lot of instability with this kind of system, and we are using Camunda in order to have clear flows. With BPMN, I can show a flow to my business partner, and the business team can easily understand what's going on. The technical team can understand what the implementation is, and we can model different errors and the process for recovering from these errors."
"The product has a good task management engine."
"The number of client implementations and cross-language capabilities to support multiple frameworks is very pluggable compared to Pega. It's also more portable."
"The solution is easily compatible with HTML forms and HTML language programming and that is the most significant part."
"When I compare it with other BPM tools, like IBM, it is great, open source, and free when you use the community version."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to share the logic within the rules engine with the business, so you can put it up for everybody to read."
 

Cons

"The graphical user interface can be improved."
"Adding more automated components in Apache Airflow for basic things like exporting the data would be helpful."
"We cannot run real-time jobs in the solution."
"I would like to see workflow integration across the servers."
"There is an area for improvement in onboarding new people. They should make it simple for newcomers. Else, we have to put a senior engineer to operate it."
"Apache Airflow should have better integration with cloud platforms."
"I would like to see it more friendly for other use cases."
"I have some issues with the solution's communication."
"When addressing a complex and extensive process, the domain it belongs to, be it banking, healthcare, or HR, requires widespread access."
"The product must provide more videos and training materials."
"I think that Camunda can try to do better when it comes to solving the complexities of all the products in its software stack."
"Documentation can be improved."
"Collaborations and process documentation in Camunda Platform are areas with shortcomings that need improvement."
"When building interfaces, there are limited tools to work with, especially when dealing with different types of tasks, such as user tasks and system tasks."
"The cockpit features of the Camunda Platform can be improved to make it a bit more user-friendly, in terms of providing a bit more user experience for non-technical users. There could be some additional documentation added."
"The business model could be easier to understand."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We use a community edition of Apache Airflow. It is open source and free."
"Apache Airflow is a product that is free of licenses, meaning there is no need to buy a license."
"The pricing for the product is reasonable."
"It's open-source."
"We are using the open-source version of Apache Airflow."
"The solution is cheap."
"It is an open-source tool. There are no additional fees or charges associated with the product."
"Apache Airflow is a cheap solution."
"It is good for a startup. When we started, its price was fair, but the way we are using it to orchestrate microservices makes it expensive. When you are growing as a company, you would have more microservices, and you would have more users. There is an exponential effect when you are growing in terms of the number of conditions, processes, and users because they bill you per process. So, the price was increasing very quickly for us, and it was very difficult."
"We are using the open-source version of this solution."
"The cost of this solution is better than some competing products."
"I tried to get some information about buying the license for the solution, but I found it kind of hard to understand the business model."
"Camunda is a cheaply priced product, making it one of its major USPs."
"The open-source version of the product is free to use."
"We have an annual subscription to this solution."
"We use a community version."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
24%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Retailer
5%
Financial Services Firm
26%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Which would you choose - Camunda Platform or Apache Airflow?
Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very...
What do you like most about Apache Airflow?
Apache Airflow is easy to use and can monitor task execution easily. For instance, when performing setup tasks, you can conveniently view the logs without delving into the job details.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apache Airflow?
It is an open-source tool. There are no additional fees or charges associated with the product. Expenses are associated with only the machines that our company uses on AWS.
How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?
One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...
Which do you prefer - Appian or Camunda Platform?
Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to imp...
What do you like most about Camunda Platform?
The solution is useful for small projects.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Airflow
Camunda BPM
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Agari, WePay, Astronomer
24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache Airflow vs. Camunda and other solutions. Updated: July 2024.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.