We performed a comparison between Camunda and Flowable based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Appian and others in Process Automation."The most valuable feature is the scheduling."
"I think that the positives of Camunda Platform are that our customers can start with the free version. I think it is the most important."
"We can easily define and deploy business processes. Camunda provides the tools that allow business people to design business processes. We don't have to have developers for it. It is so easy to use that our business people can go into the tool and model their business processes. We get time to do other things than just designing business processes."
"Camunda's most valuable feature is its ability to integrate with different products."
"The solution is good for data models."
"It has been a stable solution so far since it meets our needs, including data modeling, which we need to do before we embark on analyzing and optimizing the business processes."
"The solution is easily compatible with HTML forms and HTML language programming and that is the most significant part."
"Provides an easy way to integrate with the architectural environment."
"The tool's most valuable feature is the process engine. It allows us to define BPM-based workflows, deploy them into our process engine, and interact with them within our product."
"Process interfaces between diagrams could be improved."
"The product must provide more videos and training materials."
"The Camunda Modeler installation poses a challenge, requiring local installation, which doesn't help collaboration like other online tools, for instance."
"I would like to see better pricing."
"The product's initial setup phase is difficult for beginners."
"Collaborations and process documentation in Camunda Platform are areas with shortcomings that need improvement."
"The initial set up could be simplified, it's complex."
"It would be helpful to have more readily available use cases on the internet. Camunda's documentation feels less comprehensive."
"In my opinion, areas of improvement for Flowable include the management and creation of forms within the open-source components and the documentation and examples provided. While the cloud-based Flowable implementation with no-code features is attractive, we prefer more control over integration, especially since we deploy our product onto AWS. We also want to avoid additional licensing fees for Flowable runtime user components on top of our software development and implementation charges."
Earn 20 points
Camunda is ranked 1st in Process Automation with 69 reviews while Flowable is ranked 31st in Process Automation with 1 review. Camunda is rated 8.2, while Flowable is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas Flowable is most compared with .
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
