We performed a comparison between ARIS BPA and QualiWare X based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."There is a really powerful reporting API that allows you to create almost any kind of report you want out of your process and document repository."
"Also, the UML parts have been improved very much in the last two years. And it's very powerful now to combine the BPMN and UML parts in the product, because you can make a connection between them, so that you have the right interoperability between them. So if you're doing data modeling, you can use your class diagram and bind that to the BPMN part."
"ARIS BPA is customizable as per specific business requirements."
"The solution provides integrations to ServiceNow and other systems, flexibility of connectivity, and reporting."
"Collaboration and governance over enterprise artifacts."
"I like everything about ARIS BPA. I've used it for a long time and it's a fantastic tool. There is a list of things ARIS has that other solutions do not have."
"BPA, the modeling tool, is the main module used because of our need for documentation."
"Objects can be reused across different BPMNs and processes, so we can design new processes quicker and easier."
"I like the solution's traceability."
"ARIS needs to make a better user interface. The user interface sucks. The problem with ARIS is that they have two interfaces for the same product."
"Training is one of the important aspects for process awareness. As soon as a process is rolled out, process training is required. If ARIS could generate output in PowerPoint, it would be great for business users."
"The model graphics can be exported in PDF, but the model is too small to read."
"The workflow approval process could be represented better in the overviews."
"The areas of ARIS where we see room for improvement are actually related to the background services that support it. Over the last number of years, Software AG has moved from an on-premises solution into deploying a SaaS solution to their enterprise base. That has been really successful from my point of view, as I have been a customer of ARIS, managing the relationship, for a couple years. Certain support functions around the knowledge base, customer service, and the cross and upselling of modules within the core ARIS component are lagging behind the SaaS movement."
"There are reports available in ARIS and you can modify them a bit if you want something more specific, but it's not that easy to adjust them and make modifications. It would be nice to have some kind of tool to do that, something that is more user-friendly for people who are not too technical, so that they could create reports the way they want them."
"Create simple data uploader."
"The governance mechanism could be better, as could automation."
"The solution is not easy and intuitive to use. I would also like the software to have a reference metamodel that can guide the modeling."
ARIS BPA is ranked 6th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 64 reviews while QualiWare X is ranked 36th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 3 reviews. ARIS BPA is rated 8.4, while QualiWare X is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of ARIS BPA writes "I can usually find an answer to my issue on ARIS Community". On the other hand, the top reviewer of QualiWare X writes "Works as a reference for architecture but not very intuitive ". ARIS BPA is most compared with SAP Signavio Process Manager, ADONIS, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, Camunda and Bizagi, whereas QualiWare X is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, iServer, Avolution ABACUS and ARIS Cloud. See our ARIS BPA vs. QualiWare X report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
