CA Unified Communications Monitor vs Statseeker comparison

Broadcom and Techniche are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #87, while Techniche is ranked #66 with an average rating of 7.0. Broadcom holds a 0.5% mindshare in NMS, compared to Techniche’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Techniche users who would recommend it.

CA Unified Communications M...

Read 2 CA Unified Communications Monitor reviews

1,090 Views
752 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Statseeker

Read 38 Statseeker reviews

1,232 Views
1,170 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

CA Unified Communications M...

Statseeker

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

CA Unified Communications Monitor and Statseeker compete in the network performance monitoring and management space. CA Unified Communications Monitor appears to have the upper hand in comprehensive insights and network status alerts, while Statseeker stands out in capacity planning and historical analysis features.

Features: CA Unified Communications Monitor delivers comprehensive network insights, status alerts, and in-depth analysis capabilities. Statseeker offers robust capacity planning, historical performance analysis, and expansive monitoring features.

Room for Improvement: CA Unified Communications Monitor could enhance its user interface, reduce initial complexity, and improve response times for alerts. Statseeker might benefit from simplifying its deployment, enhancing integration capabilities, and expanding its analytics dashboards.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CA Unified Communications Monitor provides seamless integration with accessible customer assistance, while Statseeker has a slightly more complex deployment but compensates with strong ongoing support.

Pricing and ROI: CA Unified Communications Monitor requires a significant upfront investment but offers high ROI through its extensive network benefits. Statseeker, with its cost-effective setup, delivers quicker ROI with efficient performance tools.

To learn more, read our detailed CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Statseeker Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Statseeker

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,376 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CA Unified Communications M...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

87th

Average Rating

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Unified Communications Monitoring (3rd), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (65th)

Statseeker

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

66th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of CA Unified Communications Monitor is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Statseeker is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Statseeker	0.4%
CA Unified Communications Monitor	0.5%
Other	99.1%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

reviewer1605927

Sr.Solutions Engineer | Project Manager at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Meets the needs of the customer but all of the features need improvement

I do not choose the solution. The client does. I am an implementer. We are systems integrators. It is worth mentioning that the solution should be easy to install and offer the user exhibition capabilities. Also, a data sheet should be used to gather information about the product, to facilitate easy and simple implementation. I rate CA Unified Communications Monitor as a five out of ten.

Read full review

John Elhariry

Team Leader at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

We can set up a dashboard to monitor the status of an entire site, which provides more insight into any issues across devices

One engineer is enough for the solution's maintenance. There has been a significant improvement in Statseeker in the last few versions. It includes a wallet map and features we plan to implement when deploying the latest or penultimate versions across all our sites. This will significantly assist in identifying sites surpassing thresholds or KPIs, making issue detection much more accessible. The threshold feature is handy for identifying delays and major outages. This graphical map enables us to quickly assess the scope of nationwide problems, allowing for swift action and efficient reporting to management and service providers. This tool facilitates monitoring by visualizing all network elements with their respective coordinates, highlighting any downtimes or issues through color-coded green for operational, orange for approaching thresholds, yellow for minor alarms, and red for critical issues. The tool is a monitoring tool that helps in identifying problems. It is necessary to have someone trained to set up the dashboards because they might require some programming or specific configuration skills. Once it's configured, it works well. It's not as straightforward as other tools where you plug in the device, and everything works. With Statseeker, you still need to put in some effort to set up your dashboard properly. It requires someone with good training and proficiency in setting up these dashboards. They can benefit the technical and operations teams, providing useful insights into the network and the executive management team to receive reports on the overall network health. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We use the solution to meet the needs of the customer."

"For us, it's very key to know the voice quality of the total solution, which is based on many components across many domains."

"Good end-to-end monitoring"

"We use the solution to meet the needs of the customer."

"The most valuable feature is the dashboard, where you have everything right there on the screen."

"It is very scalable, stable, easy to use and manage."

"This solution helps us to track down problems faster; whether it is a down network switch or a down router, we can get back online faster for the customers."

"If somebody is complaining about slow networking then this solution allows us to see various ports to find out whether they are being overloaded."

"This solution helps in terms of troubleshooting, and you can do capacity planning with it."

"It is fairly simple and easy to use as an all-purpose network monitor."

"Summary Reports provide a quick way to identify where potential issues are. Drill-downs provide more granular details very quickly."

"Statseeker helps reduce the complexity of our network monitoring because it's real-time, or somewhat real-time, so we're able to see stuff quickly and react to it."

More Statseeker pros

Cons

"All the features and functions of the solution can be improved, specifically the user experience."

"All the features and functions of the solution can be improved."

"The solution should have automatic baseline detection."

"It would be nice if they had twenty-four-hour technical support because we contact Australia and we have to wait for them to open."

"The interface could be more user-friendly and it would be nice if there were enhanced options for reporting."

"I do not feel that this solution is very scalable."

"Statseeker tech support was bad around 2-3 years ago."

"If it's twice as much, however, then it's already getting a little expensive."

"I would like to see fully automatic updates so that our version is always current."

"I would like to see a friendlier user interface in the administration tool."

"I would like to see NetFlow improved, with better reporting capabilities that are similar to Scrutinizer."

More Statseeker cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Compared to other solutions such as Zabbix and AKiPS, this solution is very well priced."

"Pricing is reasonable but licensing should unlimited."

"It's probably $5K a year for the license."

"Statseeker is pretty cheap."

"The yearly cost varies as per the number of devices being monitored. The cost for 25,000 devices is about $4500."

"We pay somewhere between $5,000 and $8,000 yearly in licensing fees."

"One thing that needs improvement is how it's licensed. I understand historically the company licensed it off a same charge for everyone. I understand the company needs to make money, but how they introduced the tiered licensing model, and then multiple layers of licensing was a bit of an issue. So, on the whole, coming up with a licensing model that isn't confusing and complicated and is easy to understand would be one way to improve the product. They have told me lately that they're changing how they license stuff, but they haven't made that - as I understand it - in their marketing material public knowledge as of yet. I would say that at the moment it's a bit convoluted. It's confusing. Some of their basic licensing model is a bit of a ripoff. If you go over five or ten support calls in the basic licensing model they start charging you for support calls. I think that's a bit rich."

"Up until we actually talked to Statseeker, and Statseeker came and gave us an enterprise licensing model for multiple accounts, I would have said the pricing was not good value. The fact they've come to the party now and given us a very good discount, I would say it's probably about right, the pricing they're giving us now. But the retail pricing, if I went out and, as a separate company, and asked for pricing for one account, I probably would say their retail pricing is not competitive. The fact that they've given us a discount now because we have multiple servers across multiple accounts, I would say that pricing is about right, but not their retail pricing. It's too expensive."

More Statseeker pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Marketing Services Firm

15%

Construction Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	34

Comparisons

StackState vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 13% of the time

Icinga vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 9% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 8% of the time

Zabbix vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 8% of the time

LogicMonitor vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 8% of the time

More CA Unified Communications Monitor Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs Statseeker

Compared 24% of the time

Meraki Dashboard vs Statseeker

Compared 15% of the time

Pico Corvil Analytics vs Statseeker

Compared 13% of the time

Zabbix vs Statseeker

Compared 12% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs Statseeker

Compared 9% of the time

More Statseeker Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ScienceLogic

March 2026

CA Unified Communications Monitor report

Download CA Unified Communications Monitor product report

Buyer's Guide

Statseeker

March 2026

Download Statseeker product report

Also Known As

CA UC Monitor

No data available

Overview

CA Unified Communications Monitor is a unified communications monitoring solution that evaluates and reports on the network’s support of real-time applications in multi-vendor environments, so that Network Administrators can optimize the network’s quality of service and end user experience.

Broadcom

Statseeker is the only network performance monitoring technology to seamlessly and successfully combine speed + scale + value. Statseeker is a global provider delivering innovative network monitoring solutions for the IT enterprise and OT industrial market space. With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Instant visibility: Installed in minutes, polls up to 1 million ports from a single server… reduce your time to repair. Powerful monitoring: Checks every port over entire network, every 60 seconds… low network consumption bandwidth. Fast reporting: Practical real-time dashboard, reports in seconds, instant alerts… maximize your up-time. Smart data: 100% network data, original granularity, never rolled up, never averaged… tune for peak performance, control CAPEX and OPEX.

Techniche

Sample Customers

BBVA Compass

With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Some example customers include: FedEx, Optus, Verizon, California State University, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Monash University, Texas A&M University.

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Statseeker

March 2026

Free Report: CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Statseeker

Find out what your peers are saying about CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Statseeker and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Statseeker report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.