Buildkite vs TeamCity comparison

Buildkite and JetBrains are both solutions in the Build Automation category. Buildkite is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.2, while JetBrains is ranked #11 with an average rating of 6.8. Buildkite holds a 2.8% mindshare in BA, compared to JetBrains’s 6.1% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Buildkite users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of JetBrains users who would recommend it.

Buildkite

Read 14 Buildkite reviews

710 Views
696 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

TeamCity

Read 28 TeamCity reviews

2,013 Views
1,993 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Buildkite

TeamCity

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

TeamCity and Buildkite are leading tools in the CI/CD industry, each catering to different user preferences. Buildkite stands out for its simplicity and cloud-native capabilities, making it preferable for users seeking ease of setup and manageability, especially in cloud environments.

Features: TeamCity supports comprehensive configurations with features like build chains, cross-platform support, and an extensive plugin ecosystem, making it ideal for complex dependencies. It integrates seamlessly with various technologies. Buildkite is distinguished by its cloud-native operations, smooth functionality with AWS and Google Cloud, and the ability to manage builds using YAML files, offering efficient caching mechanisms for optimizing the build process.

Room for Improvement: TeamCity could enhance its user experience by simplifying its setup process, as users find its configuration complex and challenging. Improved out-of-box solutions and better integration support are desired. Buildkite needs to address issues with scalability and user interface by improving logging, error identification, and expanding third-party documentation and plugin support. Enhanced auto-scaling and easier external service integration would also improve its flexibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: TeamCity offers diverse deployment options, including private cloud and on-premises setups that cater to enterprise needs. In contrast, Buildkite is optimized for public cloud deployments, providing straightforward integration but limited on-premises capabilities. Both platforms maintain good customer service, though TeamCity users report occasional time zone issues. Buildkite users have access to thorough documentation and vibrant community forums.

Pricing and ROI: TeamCity operates on a freemium model, offering a useful free tier but can become costly for scaling beyond initial offerings, posing a consideration for smaller businesses. Buildkite’s pricing, based on a per-user model, is cost-effective for large enterprises using containerization, although it may not suit smaller teams due to higher expenses. Each solution brings value in build efficiency and integration, with TeamCity supporting robust builds, while Buildkite excels in flexibility and deployment time savings.

To learn more, read our detailed Buildkite vs. TeamCity Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Buildkite vs. TeamCity

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 880,511 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Buildkite

Ranking in Build Automation

8th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

TeamCity

Ranking in Build Automation

11th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of Buildkite is 2.8%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TeamCity is 6.1%, down from 7.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Buildkite	2.8%
TeamCity	6.1%
Other	91.1%

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

Raed I.Habib

Senior DevOps Engineer at a newspaper with 5,001-10,000 employees

Easy-to-use and provides good documentation for managing agents

Buildkite has been pushing a lot of effort toward the plugin marketplace and plugin users, especially with the Kubernetes plugin that supports the scalability of agents. The flexibility of some plugins is somewhat limited. In the past, I used to modify the plugins according to my needs. Now, plugins support some sort of configuration or reconfiguration. I would love to see some features added in that direction and the plugin's use. I would like to see some improvements in the hooks implementation. The hooks are amazing and give me a lot of extra flexibility in many of the pipelines, but they're still limited in some areas.

Read full review

RubyGarg

IT Professional at NatWest Group

Versatile agent support boosts builds but UI and setup costs need refinement

TeamCity's user interface could be improved; specifically, the tree structure on the homepage is not clear, making it difficult to search for projects. Moreover, there are some limitations related to the version we were using. For instance, there were issues with agent specifications for particular build jobs and a timeout issue where jobs running longer than three hours would fail automatically.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product's initial setup phase was easy."

"Buildkite makes it easier to conduct deployment. When I merge a PR in Buildkite, it automatically starts the deployment process. It used to be challenging to shift code from the development branch to the testing branch because I had to follow up with multiple developers. Previously, I was dependent on the DevOps team and developers to handle deployments, but now it allows me to deploy the solutions myself.This has made it much easier for me to handle both non-production and production environments."

"If you join our team, it's very easy to learn Buildkite. We have our own boilerplate, so you can just clone it and add your configuration steps. Plus, we have documentation available to guide you through the process."

"The documentation is quite helpful."

"Using Buildkite, it's much easier to manage pipelines. It's straightforward to understand what each pipeline returns, making it easy to edit configurations, such as passwords. Although there is a steep learning curve initially, the overall process is still comprehensible. Additionally, Buildkite offers features like hooks and triggers; for example, an action in the app can automatically trigger a pipeline. These elements can be added to specific pipelines, ensuring the entire process is automated."

"Buildkite allows us to build automations and integration tasks effectively."

"The tool is simple and has no learning curve. If you know YAML, you can master it. It is simple to learn."

"Buildkite's UI is particularly intuitive, making it simple to add steps to your pipeline. It also provides detailed logging."

More Buildkite pros

"It provides repeatable CI/CD throughout our company with lots of feedback on failures and successes to the intended audiences via email and Slack."

"It's easy to move to a new release because of templates and meta-runners, and agent pooling."

"The flexibility of TeamCity allows it to fit in workflows that I have yet to imagine."

"The integration is a valuable feature."

"TeamCity is more structured and user-friendly than other vendors."

"Good integration with IDE and JetBrains products."

"It is very easy to use, and its speed is impressive, allowing the code to be ready for production in seconds."

"TeamCity's GUI is nice."

More TeamCity pros

Cons

"There is a need for rework occasionally, and issues like syntax errors can occur multiple times, especially when manual changes are made in AWS or Amazon Connect that are not captured in the code."

"BuildKite should follow some providers like GitHub Actions. They can offer a shared agent or cloud agent."

"Based on the load, the agents can be scaled up and scaled down, and while they are scaling up, sometimes they just get stuck."

"The solution should offer more options for installing an agent and give users the option of having a separate self-hosted or provisioned agent."

"My company has had problems with the tool's parallel running and execution time. The testing framework also has some limitations. The tool cannot do everything."

"I would like to see some improvements in the hooks implementation."

"Most of our projects involve both front-end and back-end development. We write the code and then create a file to set up our process, including specifying the tests we want to run. Before deploying to production, we need to install and configure certain things. We need something like Docker Pro, but I'm unsure about that. I'm familiar with the steps for using Buildkite for this process. We start by defining which tests to run."

"Since we were using Buildkite for the first time, we had a lot of difficulty understanding how it worked. We didn't find any documentation from third parties; only Buildkite provided documentation. As a result, we faced a steep learning curve. After some time, it became much easier to use. Initially, understanding certain features, like the R integration, was challenging."

More Buildkite cons

"I would suggest creating simple and advanced configurations. Advanced configurations will give more customizations like Jenkins does."

"The UI for this solution could be improved. New users don't find it easy to navigate. The need some level of training to understand the ins and the outs."

"We've called TeamCity tech support. Unfortunately, all their tech support is based in Europe, so we end up with such a big time crunch that I now need to have one person in the US."

"Their online documentation is fairly extensive, but sometimes you can end up navigating in circles to find answers. I would like them (or partner with someone) to provide training classes to help newcomers get things up and running more quickly."

"If TeamCity could create more out of the box solutions to make it more user friendly and create more use cases, that would be ideal."

"The integration between other solutions and TeamCity could be smoother."

"Last time I used it, dotnet compilation had to be done via PowerShell scripts. There was actually a lot that had to be scripted."

"I need some more graphical design."

More TeamCity cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"For a business plan, it was 19 USD per month per user."

"I find Buildkite cost-effective as it has definitely increased my productivity, especially on the deployment side. It saved a lot of my time and improved data management because I can handle different environments myself now."

"The solution's per-user pricing model suits huge enterprises but is expensive for small to medium businesses."

"The self-hosted option is pretty cheap."

"We used the solution’s free version."

"Buildkite is known to be cheaper than GitHub Workflows, which is considered a standard in the industry. It can be cost-effective, especially for organizations that heavily utilize Docker and containerization, because every code change triggers a new build. Its integration with AWS, particularly with ECR, and its caching capabilities with layers are powerful features."

"I don't think the tool is expensive."

"Start with the free tier for a few build configs and see how it works for you, then according to your scale find the enterprise license which fits you the most."

"The licensing is on an annual basis."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,511 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user184734

Systems Administrator at Facebook

Jan 22, 2015

I generally find TeamCity a lot more intuitive than Jenkins.

Moving to TeamCity from Jenkins At work, we’re slowly migrating from Jenkins to TeamCity in the hope of ending some of our recurring problems with continuous integration. My use of Jenkins prior to this job has been almost strictly on a personal basis, although I pretty much only use Travis…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

17%

Newspaper

16%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

15%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	15

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Buildkite?

One area that needs improvement in Buildkite is the requirement for rework of the code. There can be syntax errors when running the Buildkite pipeline, especially if someone has made manual changes...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Buildkite?

I use Buildkite for deployment tasks related to building AMI images and deploying routing profile queues into Amazon Connect. This involves using Buildkite in conjunction with GitHub. We create fil...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Buildkite?

With two years of experience on Buildkite, I would recommend it to others due to its manageable pipeline and the support team available for big issues. I am satisfied with it, rating its stability ...

See all answers

What do you like most about TeamCity?

One of the most beneficial features for us is the flexibility it offers in creating deployment steps tailored to different technologies.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TeamCity?

Compared to new technologies, TeamCity is more expensive and is an older tool compared to tools like GitLab.

See all answers

What needs improvement with TeamCity?

See all answers

Comparisons

GitHub Actions vs Buildkite

Compared 25% of the time

GitLab vs Buildkite

Compared 12% of the time

Harness vs Buildkite

Compared 12% of the time

Tekton vs Buildkite

Compared 12% of the time

Nx vs Buildkite

Compared 9% of the time

More Buildkite Competitors

GitLab vs TeamCity

Compared 31% of the time

GitHub Actions vs TeamCity

Compared 13% of the time

Jenkins vs TeamCity

Compared 9% of the time

Harness vs TeamCity

Compared 9% of the time

Tekton vs TeamCity

Compared 6% of the time

More TeamCity Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Buildkite

January 2026

Download Buildkite product report

Buyer's Guide

TeamCity

December 2025

Download TeamCity product report

Overview

Buildkite is a powerful CI/CD tool praised for its scalability and flexibility in automating and managing complex workflows across multiple platforms. Its integration capabilities with various systems and supports for secure, customizable environments enhance development efficiency and data privacy. The feedback highlights significant boosts in productivity and operational cost reduction, making Buildkite a strategic asset for businesses aiming to streamline development tasks and align with organizational goals.

Buildkite

TeamCity is a Continuous Integration and Deployment server that provides out-of-the-box continuous unit testing, code quality analysis, and early reporting on build problems. A simple installation process lets you deploy TeamCity and start improving your release management practices in a matter of minutes. TeamCity supports Java, .NET and Ruby development and integrates perfectly with major IDEs, version control systems, and issue tracking systems.

JetBrains

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Toyota, Xerox, Apple, MIT, Volkswagen, HP, Twitter, Expedia

Buyer's Guide

Buildkite vs. TeamCity

December 2025

Free Report: Buildkite vs. TeamCity

Find out what your peers are saying about Buildkite vs. TeamCity and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,511 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Buildkite vs. TeamCity report.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.