HP Wolf Security vs SentinelOne Singularity Complete comparison

HP and SentinelOne are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. HP is ranked #46, while SentinelOne is ranked #2 with an average rating of 9.0. HP holds a 2.2% mindshare in EDR, compared to SentinelOne’s 5.0% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of HP users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of SentinelOne users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

SentinelOne Singularity Complete and HP Wolf Security are strong contenders in the cybersecurity protection category. SentinelOne seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced capabilities and comprehensive threat defense features, while HP Wolf Security is favored for its ease of use and integration.

Features: SentinelOne Singularity Complete offers comprehensive threat detection, automated response, and a broader spectrum of defense capabilities. HP Wolf Security features robust isolation technology, seamless device integration, and targeted security features aimed at specific needs.

Room for Improvement: SentinelOne could improve its analytics, reporting tools, and expand existing features. HP Wolf Security users seek enhancements in endpoint detection and response, improved performance metrics, and further refinement in current capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SentinelOne is recognized for its straightforward efficient deployment and responsive customer support. HP Wolf Security also offers easy deployment but has mixed reviews on customer service response times.

Pricing and ROI: SentinelOne Singularity Complete has higher costs with users feeling the ROI justifies the expense due to extensive features. HP Wolf Security is noted for being more cost-effective, providing good ROI for more modest budgets.

To learn more, read our detailed HP Wolf Security vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

HP Wolf Security vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 883,692 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.4%, down from 4.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HP Wolf Security is 2.2%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SentinelOne Singularity Complete is 5.0%, down from 5.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SentinelOne Singularity Complete	5.0%
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.4%
HP Wolf Security	2.2%
Other	89.4%

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Bert Hickman

Owner at Stoneridge Engineering, LLC

Adds a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments

The tool's deployment is easy. HP Wolf Security's deployment was a swift process since it was initially compatible with Windows 10, the operating system on both machines. However, when I transitioned to Windows 11, I encountered minor issues that prompted me to delve deeper into Wolf Security to fine-tune security settings according to my preferences. While I mostly used default settings, there was an initial adjustment where I disabled the AI function related to malware. Currently, the system is running smoothly with no reported issues. Adjusting some settings raised concerns about compatibility between HP Wolf Security and Norton 360. Specifically, aspects of HP Wolf Security, such as the virtual machine component, intrigued me, but I hesitated due to potential conflicts. During my investigation, Windows 11 raised a flag, questioning the system's security settings with Norton 360 and HP Wolf Security. However, it seems that they coexist well without causing issues.

Read full review

Daniel Giacomelli

Security and Compliance at a outsourcing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Strengthens cross-platform threat response while supporting audit compliance and log integration

The analytics and reporting can be a bit overwhelming. I love the dashboards, but I find that I need to better understand PowerQuery—specifically when to turn it on and off and its limitations. It's similar to SharePoint in that regard. As a former SharePoint instructor, I know it like the back of my hand. The best thing about SharePoint is that it can do whatever you want; the worst part is also that it can do whatever you want. You really need to know what you want before diving in. Most people usually have a good idea of what they need. SharePoint offers a lot out of the box, but you can customize it further if you wish. However, customization often requires hiring someone, which can be risky since you never know if it will work as intended. On the other hand, PowerQuery can help bridge some of those gaps within Singularity. The challenge arises when you want to incorporate what you've done into dashboards and charts, as there are limitations. For instance, I want more clickable drill-down options that allow me to filter on specific sections of the data, but that's currently not possible. It’s not to say that improvements won’t come in the future; it's just that it feels a bit early at this stage. Additionally, I find some navigation features frustrating, like the back button in certain contexts. For example, if you open PowerQuery from a chart, it doesn't open in a new window or tab. Clicking the back button takes you all the way back to the previous state, causing you to lose whatever progress you made. However, I'm actively providing this feedback to my partner, Pro Circular, through whom we access SentinelOne. They take our input seriously, and I've been sharing my observations. They have their own views but are addressing the issues I raise. It's good to see that suggestions occasionally lead to updates and improvements.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The one feature of Palo Alto Networks Traps that our organization finds most valuable is the App ID service."

"The product's most valuable features are massive user and feature intelligence exploit detection."

"It has pretty much everything we need and works well within the Palo Alto ecosystem."

"Palo Alto is constantly adding new features."

"The solution allows us to make investigations. Other XDR solutions also provide similar capabilities but for investigation, Cortex XDR is better."

"Their XDR agent and their behavioral indicators of compromise (BIOC) are pretty nice. Their managed threat hunting is also pretty nice. They also have WildFire, which is a service for actively looking for malware. It's quite useful."

"It collects and caches and the knowledge of machine learning from different customers to take to the cloud. It makes it better to use for everybody. It allows for quick learning and updates and can, therefore, offer zero-day malware security. This sharing of metadata helps make the solution very safe."

"Threat identification and detection are the most valuable features of this solution."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"Our overall security posture has absolutely improved as a result of adding Bromium to our security stack. We continue to have less user impact through a significantly reduced amount of malware infections. It's become a non-event."

"The most valuable feature is the process isolation because it simply stops malware from infecting the machines."

"We've been able to isolate and prevent malicious code from external email attachments and from downloaded internet files. Those are the two big areas that have really made an impact."

"The isolation feature is the most important because it prevents attacks."

"It has prevented thousands of potential threats by encapsulating them within its own vSentry container, thus providing overall protection and integrity of the operating system."

"The feature that stands out the most is that when someone clicks on a link in an email... [if] that link is malicious and it has some malware or keylogger attached to it, when it opens up in that Bromium virtualized browser, there's no chance of it actually being on the machine and running, because as soon as they click that "X" in the upper right-hand side of the browser, everything just vanishes. That is an added plus."

"Now, instead of us having to go through that analysis, they actually give us a monthly report that shows us: "Here's what you got hit with, here's what would have happened, here are the forensics behind the attack," and, obviously, Bromium stopped it."

"I use HP Wolf Security to add a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments."

"Unlike other endpoint solutions like Kaspersky or Trend Micro, SentinelOne's agents are exceptionally lightweight, updating seamlessly without consuming significant network or system resources."

"The most valuable aspect, in any scenario, was the rollback feature."

"We moved from ESET, and we find that the licensing scheme, particularly how the licenses are attributed to clients, is pretty nice compared to what ESET offers."

"I've seen a lot of improvements and simplifications, and Google SecOps has recently moved into Gartner's as the highest one for visionaries."

"Sentinel One has improved our organization by protecting the environment we are working in."

"The 365 management and analytics from the cloud is another great feature."

"The most valuable features are asset tracking, patching, endpoint tagging, and policy updates."

"The most valuable feature of SentinelOne is the good graph it provides. It has a specific page where it detects the recent attacks on other machines or the hackers, for example, group APT28 and all."

More SentinelOne Singularity Complete pros

Cons

"I would like to see some additional features related to email protection included."

"It tends to do 99.9% of things. The only thing I'd like is single sign-on authentication into their cloud platform so that my users can be properly authenticated against it."

"The solution should add unwanted malicious hash values to a block list so that whenever the action is triggered, it will automatically prevent the malicious content."

"It is not easy to sell Cortex XDR, not because it isn't a good tool. Its marketing needs to be improved."

"Cortex does not offer an on-premises solution. However, some customers would prefer not to be on the cloud. It would be ideal if it could offer something on-prem as well."

"It'll help if customization was easier."

"There are some third-party solutions that are difficult to integrate with, which is something that can be improved."

"Technology evolves every day, so it would be nice if it gets more secure. It can also have more integration with other platforms."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"Initial setup was complex. There were many configurations that needed to be worked out with the vendor. The setup required hands-on assistance from Bromium."

"Room for improvement would be keeping up with the rate of change, specifically on Windows platforms. There are a lot of updates that come out for Microsoft Windows operating systems and the Bromium product needs to be able to keep up quickly with those updates and all the browser updates that are coming out. It's hard to do, but that's really where they need to be more responsive because we end up with problems and then we have to call support to get patches, etc."

"The tool behaves differently when I ported to Windows 11."

"Initially, when we came in contact with Bromium a few years ago, it had a nice threat analyst, or a LAVA Pop, which is what they used to call it. Once it detected malware, it would show us the malware's path... I don't see that on the computers now. We only get to see that in the console. I would like to still see that on the individual machines because when we go out to look at a machine, we don't necessarily have access to the console."

"Reporting is one of the shortcomings of the product. We do mine the data that's in there from a forensics perspective... It becomes very difficult because you have to spend a lot of time digging through the volumes of data. Reporting is absolutely the biggest shortcoming."

"When you deploy, not only is the user asked to reboot their computer, they are also asked to wait for 20 minutes while it sits there and initializes. It definitely impacts the end-user. It takes time away from their day."

"They have always struggled with usability. The protection that it offers you is tremendous, but there's definitely an impact with use of resources on the computer. It's gotten a lot better now with Win 10. But sometimes, when you open up a website, it's going to take longer than it would without Bromium, and it's the same with documents."

"I did not find this to be an out-of-the-box solution, it required planning and alignment across many groups."

More HP Wolf Security cons

"Generally, the stability is good, but I would like to see better stability from the solution. The stability issue is partially a con of a behavioral-based product, but being behavioral-based, it also has a lot of pros."

"The solution should include USB blocking for specific machines."

"It would be good to see some small tools to test files or hashes that are a potential threat, I know there are already products offering this."

"The anti-ransomware technology takes up a lot of disc space."

"They should host a data center in Saudi Arabia, making it easy for customers to go for a SaaS model."

"All is good for now, but we cannot rest, and continuous development - in particular with regard to the areas of automation, machine learning, and artificial intelligence - is required to keep ahead of the cybercriminals."

"They are still largely an EDR product."

"Communication and documentation could be improved."

More SentinelOne Singularity Complete cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is present, but when compared to other competitive products, I would say it is not less expensive; however, when all of the other added values are considered, the price is reasonable."

"The cost depends on your chosen license type, like Pro or other licenses."

"The solution is expensive. It's pricing is on a yearly-basis."

"It's way too expensive, but security is expensive. You pay for your licensing, and then you pay for someone to monitor the stuff."

"It's about $55 per license on a yearly basis."

"It is cost-effective compared to similar solutions. It fits for the small businesses through to the big businesses."

"Every customer has to pay for a license because it doesn't work with what you get from a managed services provider."

"I feel it is fairly priced."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"The product's pricing is a good value. We only run it on our internet-facing workstations, we don't run it on everything in our environment. We are very selective. Some organizations may want to consider doing something like that to reduce their license count."

"I think the pricing is a good value. All of these security products are always going to be very expensive, but I don't think Bromium is unreasonable. I think Bromium is decently priced. It’s a tiered licensing platform. The more you buy, the cheaper gets per unit, and I think their tiers are very well defined. I think they're fair."

"The pricing is very fair compared to the competition. The licensing is straightforward."

"The product came as a bundle with the machine."

"Pricing is reasonable."

"USD$6 per end point which decreases as end points increase."

"It's around $8 per client per month."

"The price is costly compared to what we were previously paying with Microsoft Defender and McAfee."

"When it came to the price compared to other solutions we tested, SentinelOne Singularity gave us the price of our expectations whereas CrowdStrike could not."

"The product's pricing is at par with what you see among major competitors. It's higher than McAfee, yet cheaper than CrowdStrike."

"SentinelOne Singularity Complete's pricing is affordable."

"SentinelOne makes licensing easy by reducing the number of modules or packages that they have to offer. A lot of other vendors make licensing very complicated with separate modules or separate costs. By bundling necessary features, SentinelOne ensures that security leaders are not left confused by options. This bundling of necessities has served our needs well."

"I don't deal with the cost side of things, but the licensing, as far as endpoints go, is a pretty straightforward and simple process."

More SentinelOne Singularity Complete pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

883,692 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

10%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	44
Midsize Enterprise	20
Large Enterprise	47

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	92
Midsize Enterprise	45
Large Enterprise	78

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Which is better - SentinelOne or Darktrace?

Which solution is better depends on which is more suitable specifically for your company. Darktrace, for example, is ...

See all answers

What do you like most about SentinelOne Singularity?

The Ranger feature is valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SentinelOne Singularity?

It is neither too costly, but definitely, it is one of the advantages that SentinelOne is quite adapted towards the p...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 9% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 2% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

Bitdefender Total Security vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 12% of the time

Norton Small Business vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Business vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 6% of the time

AVG Internet Security Business Edition vs HP Wolf Security

Compared 3% of the time

More HP Wolf Security Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs SentinelOne Singularity Complete

Compared 5% of the time

Fortinet FortiEDR vs SentinelOne Singularity Complete

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs SentinelOne Singularity Complete

Compared 3% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs SentinelOne Singularity Complete

Compared 3% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs SentinelOne Singularity Complete

Compared 3% of the time

More SentinelOne Singularity Complete Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

March 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

HP Wolf Security

February 2026

Download HP Wolf Security product report

Buyer's Guide

SentinelOne Singularity Complete

February 2026

Download SentinelOne Singularity Complete product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

Bromium vSentry

Sentinel Labs, SentinelOne Singularity

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

HP Wolf Security is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution that bolsters your organization's cyber-resilience on multiple fronts. With its full-stack security approach, it ensures layered protection from hardware to the cloud, providing a robust defense against cyber threats. HP Wolf Security introduces endpoint isolation, a cutting-edge feature that effectively halts threats that may go unnoticed by Next-Generation Antivirus (NGAV) and Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) systems. Moreover, it extends its security coverage to printers, equipping them with advanced detection and self-healing capabilities to further safeguard your digital ecosystem. This integrated solution streamlines IT and security risk management, resulting in fewer alerts and false positives, and reduces the time and effort required for endpoint incident analysis and remediation. Notably, HP Wolf Security prioritizes productivity, allowing you to manage risk without disrupting the user experience, enabling worry-free work from anywhere, and offering rapid IT disaster recovery at scale.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete delivers advanced endpoint protection leveraging AI-driven threat detection and behavior analysis for efficient malware and ransomware response. Its standout features enhance security insights and ensure comprehensive endpoint management.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete provides robust ransomware recovery through unique rollback capabilities and seamless integration with various security solutions. Its machine learning enhances endpoint protection, minimizing false positives and automating responses. While praised for real-time threat monitoring, incident management, and asset management, it faces challenges in managing the console, customizing UI, and maintaining policy flexibility. Some users report difficulties with deployment and integration with existing systems, and enhanced reporting, alert management, and documentation are desired. Its appeal extends to deploying across multiple operating systems, offering comprehensive security coverage and facilitating cybersecurity compliance.

What standout features does SentinelOne Singularity Complete offer?

Rollback Capability: Provides effective ransomware recovery.
AI-Driven Threat Detection: Enhances threat identification and response.
Behavior Analysis: Automates and refines security processes.
Seamless Integration: Works well with other security solutions.
Machine Learning: Minimizes false positives and improves threat response.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Enhanced Security Insights: Improves overall threat management.
Reduced Detection Time: Lowers incident response time significantly.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies process for deployment and management.
Comprehensive Endpoint Protection: Ensures broad defense against threats.

Industries implement SentinelOne Singularity Complete for its AI capabilities in advanced endpoint protection, particularly against malware and ransomware. It's utilized across diverse operating systems, aiding in real-time threat monitoring and facilitating compliance. Organizations use it for vulnerability assessments and asset management, ensuring optimal protection in complex IT environments.

SentinelOne

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Valspar

Havas, Flex, Estee Lauder, McKesson, Norfolk Southern, JetBlue, Norwegian airlines, TGI Friday, AVX, Fim Bank

Buyer's Guide

HP Wolf Security vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete

January 2026

Free Report: HP Wolf Security vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete

Find out what your peers are saying about HP Wolf Security vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

883,692 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HP Wolf Security vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete report.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors and best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.