Boomi AtomSphere API Management vs SnapLogic comparison

"Boomi AtomSphere API Management is a good product for integrating with Boomi as a backend service."

"The product's stability is good."

"We can develop almost any interface that we need."

"The stability of the solution is good."

"Boomi allows for more secure URLs and easy customization of HTTP and HTTPS protocols, which I find very beneficial."

"We can create APIs straightforwardly and quickly and build jobs for data migration."

"Integrations take less time."

"Integration is straightforward. There is no issue with it."

"SnapLogic is more user-friendly than Boomi in terms of debugging. You can move the mouse to a place, and it will record and show the data easily."

"SnapLogic has helped automate manual data transfers, improved workflow efficiency, and significantly reduced the integration development timelines, which is a measurable outcome."

"It is a stable solution."

"It's more developer-friendly, and development can be done at a faster phase."

"They are very good at building out new aspects according to customer requirements."

"You can use other languages, such as Python, and easily connect to other systems."

"It is a scalable solution."

"I find SnapLogic to be user-friendly, especially for beginners with limited experience in data engineering or ETL."

"It's difficult to integrate the on-prem application with the Dell Boomi Cloud. We have to check to ensure the Dell domain engine is running. It just requires some service endpoints from our on-prem application to connect to Dell Boomi Cloud to make it available to integrate. It would be better if AtomSphere API Management were offered as a purely SaaS application, so I wouldn't need an on-prem component to make it available. We could make a test call or provide some connection parameters. That should enable it to pull the data."

"Scalability is an area where Boomi lacks."

"From an improvement perspective, the price could be cheaper."

"To some degree, you need to know what type or amount of API you are creating - whether it's a rest API or web service API. You need to know ETL in order to really get the most out of Boomi."

"Most of the basic functionality is there in Boomi, but APG is a more feature-rich solution."

"The solution must provide more AI services."

"Boomi AtomSphere API Management has very few features. If you ask me to name the top two, I would say MuleSoft and Apigee, as it depends on the customer-to-customer use cases."

"Boomi AtomSphere API Management can be improved in terms of threshold management and policy management."

"We'd like zero downtime in the future."

"I am looking for more scheduling options. When it comes to scheduling, there are different tools in the market."

"The biggest issue we have faced in our company with SnapLogic is regarding the EDI format"

"One of the areas for improvement in SnapLogic is that the connectors for some of the applications should be more available in terms of testing in the dev environment. Another area for improvement is that the logging should be standardized, for example, the integration with an ELK stack should be required out-of-the-box, so you can ship the log and have it in the ELK stack. There should be integration with ELK stack for the log shipping."

"Connecting to data behind enterprise firewalls has been tricky."

"SnapLogic sits somewhere in the middle. It doesn’t offer enough easy canned integrations for its users like some of the easier to use integration apps."

"The problem is that SnapLogic doesn't offer a wide variety of connectors. For example, integrating with Salesforce is not that easy."

"What could be improved in SnapLogic is that it was not capable in terms of processing a large number of datasets, but at that point, SnapLogic was evolving. It didn't give a lot of Snaps. I heard recently there are a lot of Snaps getting added and the solution was being enhanced, particularly to connect different data sources. When I was working with SnapLogic six months to one year back, I faced the issue of it not being capable of handling a huge volume of datasets or didn't have much of Snaps, and that was the drawback. If there is any large number of data sets, that's based on or depends on your configuration. If it is a huge volume of data, other traditional ETL tools such as Informatica and Talend can process millions and billions of records, while in SnapLogic, the Snaplex fails or it returns an error in terms of processing that huge volume of data. Informatica, Talend, or any other ETL tool can run for hours in terms of jobs, while SnapLogic jobs fail when the threshold is reached. SnapLogic isn't able to withstand processing, but I don't know if that's still an issue at present, because the solution is getting enhanced and it's been more than six months to one year since I last worked with SnapLogic. There are now a lot of Snaps getting added to the solution, and if it can overcome the limitations I mentioned, SnapLogic could be the go-to tool because currently, it's not being used as much in organizations. It's being used comparatively less compared to other retail tools."

"Boomi AtomSphere API Management is a cheap product."

"Boomi AtomSphere API Management gives customers a good price. Price-wise, the product is good."

"The price is reasonable."

"The product can get very expensive quickly if you connect to multiple databases."

"The license model is based on consumption."

"The cost with SnapLogic is an annual license and better than Informatica."

"The pricing is okay."

"By scaling the solution incrementally the cost is controlled and more beneficial to the client."

"SnapLogic's price is high compared to the other tools available in the market."

"SnapLogic is not expensive. It's reasonably priced."

"From the ROI perspective, the price is extremely high"

"When comparing it with solutions like Apigee or MuleSoft, it still offers better value."