Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Boomi AtomSphere API Management vs Kong Gateway Enterprise comparison

Boomi and Kong are both solutions in the API Management category. Boomi is ranked #26 with an average rating of 7.3, while Kong is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.9. Boomi holds a 1.1% mindshare in APIM, compared to Kong’s 5.6% mindshare. Additionally, 77% of Boomi users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Kong users who would recommend it.
Boomi AtomSphere API Manage...
Read 10 Boomi AtomSphere API Management reviews
  • 1,013 Views
  • 1,013 Comparison Views
77% willing to recommend
Kong Gateway Enterprise
Read 26 Kong Gateway Enterprise reviews
  • 6,004 Views
  • 6,004 Comparison Views
92% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Kong Gateway Enterprise and Boomi AtomSphere API Management compete in the API management space. Kong Gateway Enterprise has the upper hand in performance for high traffic, while Boomi AtomSphere excels in integration for diverse IT environments.

Features: Kong Gateway Enterprise showcases scalability, flexibility, and robust traffic handling capabilities. It offers excellent plugin support and customizable security policies. On the other hand, Boomi AtomSphere API Management is renowned for its strong integration tools, intuitive data flow across applications, and excellent automation capabilities, making it a worthy choice for enterprises seeking seamless integration solutions.

Room for Improvement: Kong Gateway Enterprise could benefit from more user-friendly setup processes and enhancements in customer support services. Improving its cloud deployment capabilities and streamlining API governance could also be advantageous. For Boomi AtomSphere API Management, a reduction in the initial cost could attract more businesses, along with improvements in handling extremely high traffic volumes and optimizing its configuration speeds.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Boomi AtomSphere API Management benefits from a cloud-centric deployment model, making setup and management easier, coupled with strong customer service that aids in resolving complex integration challenges. Kong Gateway Enterprise, while flexible, requires more manual configuration effort and doesn't emphasize customer service as effectively as Boomi, resulting in a more technical setup experience.

Pricing and ROI: Kong Gateway Enterprise offers a favorable pricing structure, providing significant ROI for traffic-heavy applications due to its scalability. Conversely, Boomi AtomSphere API Management, despite higher initial costs, delivers ROI through its potent integration features, which streamline and enhance business processes, justifying the expense based on integration excellence.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Boomi AtomSphere API Management vs. Kong Gateway Enterprise Report (Updated: March 2026).
Buyer's Guide
Boomi AtomSphere API Management vs. Kong Gateway Enterprise
March 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 884,933 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Boomi AtomSphere API Manage...
Ranking in API Management
26th
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Kong Gateway Enterprise
Ranking in API Management
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
26
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Boomi AtomSphere API Management is 1.1%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kong Gateway Enterprise is 5.6%, down from 6.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
API Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Kong Gateway Enterprise5.6%
Boomi AtomSphere API Management1.1%
Other93.3%
API Management
 

Featured Reviews

Vijaya KumarMaddela - PeerSpot reviewer
Vijaya KumarMaddela
Founder at EAIESB
Has required significant improvements due to limited features but offers simple implementation and good support
Boomi AtomSphere API Management has very few features. If you ask me to name the top two, I would say MuleSoft and Apigee, as it depends on the customer-to-customer use cases. After those, WSO2, Kong, and whether you say Informatica API Manager or Boomi AtomSphere API Management, they stand with only three out of ten features which are essential for API management. All the features that Apigee has, they need to add. All the features that MuleSoft has, they need to add. It is not a simple task. The problem is that they lack features. It is not their performance. There are many features to mention. When you take and compare all the features that Apigee has and all the features that MuleSoft has, they need to implement those features.
Read full review
ES
Evgeny Shkard
Enterprise Architect at El Al
Seamless integration and efficient security boost API management capabilities
More plugins for additional integrations would be helpful and openness for traditional development languages, such as .NET, because many enterprises are looking for .NET solutions or incorporating with .NET solutions. I mostly missed local resellers or partners that we could use within our enterprise, because it was difficult for some tech personnel to work with remote tech support.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"AtomSphere is tightly integrated into the Boomi iPaaS platform. And Boomi has been augmenting AtomSphere API Management for the past couple of years so version 2.0 is better than 1.0."
"AtomSphere API Management is a simple platform that's easy to use. If you're using it on-prem, there's a little learning curve."
"The product's stability is good."
"We can create APIs straightforwardly and quickly and build jobs for data migration."
"Integration is straightforward. There is no issue with it."
"The stability of the solution is good."
"Boomi allows for more secure URLs and easy customization of HTTP and HTTPS protocols, which I find very beneficial."
"Integrations take less time."
More Boomi AtomSphere API Management pros
"The tool's feature that I find most beneficial is rate limiting. In our usage, especially in the financial sector, we prioritize limiting API usage. This is crucial because we provide APIs to other companies and must ensure they adhere to their allocated usage limits. Without rate limiting, there's a risk of excessive usage, which could result in significant costs."
"The features I like include ease of operation and implementation in a cloud environment, the dashboarding features for API statistics, and the user-friendly developer portal."
"Kong Enterprise has excellent plugin support."
"The clients that we have already deployed are happy with it."
"There are a few features that I like about Kong when it comes to authentication and authorization. Specifically, being able to use Kong for role-based access control (RBAC), and then further being able to integrate the RBAC mechanism with our enterprise directory, was very useful."
"The route limiting feature is very valuable."
"This is a solid intrusion prevention system that combines a firewall and antivirus in a single solution."
"The most valuable features of Kong Enterprise are the out-of-the-box open source easy functionality."
More Kong Gateway Enterprise pros
 

Cons

"Most of the basic functionality is there in Boomi, but APG is a more feature-rich solution."
"Boomi AtomSphere API Management can be improved in terms of threshold management and policy management."
"The API management has room for improvement."
"Scalability is an area where Boomi lacks."
"The solution must provide more AI services."
"From an improvement perspective, the price could be cheaper."
"Boomi AtomSphere API Management has very few features. If you ask me to name the top two, I would say MuleSoft and Apigee, as it depends on the customer-to-customer use cases."
"The product is really complex to manage."
More Boomi AtomSphere API Management cons
"The main challenge, in my opinion, is the price. It's difficult to convince our management to approve the budget to purchase it from our vendor. There are no technical problems."
"The developer portal needs to be improved."
"The tool needs improvement in UX."
"Kong is meant for north-south communications, so it will be interesting to see what solutions they can come up with in the realms of east-west communications, service-to-service communications, and Zero Trust architecture. I believe that if they can provide for these areas, then they will be able to solve the overall integration and security concerns for microservices architecture in general."
"The software version upgrade process should be improved."
"Kong Enterprise fails to provide live tracing of the APIs, which is possible nowadays."
"Kong Enterprise needs to improve its pricing, which starts at hundreds of thousands of dollars. Pricing should be based on API usage rather than monthly. It should improve its documentation as well."
"There should be an easier way to integrate with other solutions, even though it's the same API solution layer. Comparability will be a good improvement."
More Kong Gateway Enterprise cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product can get very expensive quickly if you connect to multiple databases."
"Boomi AtomSphere API Management gives customers a good price. Price-wise, the product is good."
"Boomi AtomSphere API Management is a cheap product."
"The price is reasonable."
"Basically, my company uses the tool's open-source version."
"I don't have any information on licensing costs currently."
"It's expensive in Thailand (10 million baht, in Thai currency)."
"Kong Enterprise's pricing is at par compared to the other technologies."
"The licensing is expensive."
"There is a need to pay towards the licensing charges...In some areas, the functionalities are available free of charge."
"The licensing fees are paid yearly."
"Kong Enterprise is cheaper than Apigee. I rate its pricing as four out of ten."
More Kong Gateway Enterprise pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Individual & Family Service
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Marketing Services Firm
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Insurance Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise4
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Large Enterprise20
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Boomi AtomSphere API Management?
Integrations take less time.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Boomi AtomSphere API Management?
In terms of pricing, Boomi is expensive for small companies due to its license model. For enterprise companies, it is cheaper than competitors like MuleSoft, as large enterprise accounts have huge ...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Boomi AtomSphere API Management?
Boomi AtomSphere API Management has very few features. If you ask me to name the top two, I would say MuleSoft and Apigee, as it depends on the customer-to-customer use cases. After those, WSO2, Ko...
See all answers
How does Kong Enterprise compare with Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager?
The Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager was designed with its users in mind. Though it is a reasonably complex piece of software, it is easy to install and upgrade. While there are different things that ...
See all answers
What do you like most about Kong Enterprise?
The tool's feature that I find most beneficial is rate limiting. In our usage, especially in the financial sector, we prioritize limiting API usage. This is crucial because we provide APIs to other...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Kong Enterprise?
Bringing in additional features to Kong Gateway Enterprise would not necessarily help it. Improving the existing features, increasing security, and adding robustness would be more beneficial. The f...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure API Management vs Boomi AtomSphere API Management Logo
Microsoft Azure API Management vs Boomi AtomSphere API Management
Compared 13% of the time
Oracle Communications Services Gatekeeper vs Boomi AtomSphere API Management Logo
Oracle Communications Services Gatekeeper vs Boomi AtomSphere API Management
Compared 13% of the time
Amazon API Gateway vs Boomi AtomSphere API Management Logo
Amazon API Gateway vs Boomi AtomSphere API Management
Compared 12% of the time
Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs Boomi AtomSphere API Management Logo
Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs Boomi AtomSphere API Management
Compared 10% of the time
Frends vs Boomi AtomSphere API Management Logo
Frends vs Boomi AtomSphere API Management
Compared 10% of the time
More Boomi AtomSphere API Management Competitors
Apache APISIX vs Kong Gateway Enterprise Logo
Apache APISIX vs Kong Gateway Enterprise
Compared 13% of the time
WSO2 API Manager vs Kong Gateway Enterprise Logo
WSO2 API Manager vs Kong Gateway Enterprise
Compared 12% of the time
Apigee vs Kong Gateway Enterprise Logo
Apigee vs Kong Gateway Enterprise
Compared 10% of the time
Microsoft Azure API Management vs Kong Gateway Enterprise Logo
Microsoft Azure API Management vs Kong Gateway Enterprise
Compared 7% of the time
Tyk vs Kong Gateway Enterprise Logo
Tyk vs Kong Gateway Enterprise
Compared 2% of the time
More Kong Gateway Enterprise Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Boomi AtomSphere API Management
March 2026
Boomi AtomSphere API Management reportDownload Boomi AtomSphere API Management product report
Buyer's Guide
Kong Gateway Enterprise
March 2026
Kong Gateway Enterprise reportDownload Kong Gateway Enterprise product report
 

Also Known As

Boomi API Management
No data available
 

Overview

Boomi API Management supports the full lifecycle of APIs in a hybrid environment. Configure APIs and expose real-time integrations effortlessly. Centrally test and deploy APIs and enforce contracts and policies with an API gateway. Monitor the health of APIs with usage dashboards and engage API developers using the catalog and developer portal.

Boomi

Kong delivers a next generation API platform built for modern architectures. With a lightnight-fast, lightweight, and flexible core, Kong delivers sub-millisecond latency across all your services. Kong's is deployment-, vendor-, and pattern-agnostic, allowing you to run your services how you want, where you want, and with who you want - from baremetal to cloud, monolith to microservices, service mesh, and beyond.

Kong
 

Sample Customers

Avalara, Cornell University, Dropbox
Cargill, Zillow, Ferrari, WeWork, Healthcare.gov, Yahoo! Japan, Giphy, SkyScanner
Buyer's Guide
Boomi AtomSphere API Management vs. Kong Gateway Enterprise
March 2026
Free Report: Boomi AtomSphere API Management vs. Kong Gateway Enterprise
Find out what your peers are saying about Boomi AtomSphere API Management vs. Kong Gateway Enterprise and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Boomi AtomSphere API Management vs. Kong Gateway Enterprise report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.