Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Boomi AtomSphere API Management vs Microsoft Azure API Management comparison

Boomi and Microsoft are both solutions in the API Management category. Boomi is ranked #15 with an average rating of 7.7, while Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.9. Boomi holds a 0.5% mindshare in APIM, compared to Microsoft’s 18.5% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Boomi users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.
Boomi AtomSphere API Manage...
Read 9 Boomi AtomSphere API Management reviews
  • 762 Views
  • 528 Comparison Views
87% willing to recommend
Microsoft Azure API Management
Read 81 Microsoft Azure API Management reviews
  • 24,142 Views
  • 20,248 Comparison Views
91% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Microsoft Azure API Management and Boomi AtomSphere API Management are competing products in the field of API management. Boomi AtomSphere API Management seems to have the upper hand due to its extensive features that justify its cost, while Microsoft Azure API Management attracts with competitive pricing and support.

Features: Microsoft Azure API Management integrates strongly with other Azure services, offers scalability, and security features. Boomi AtomSphere API Management provides broad integration possibilities, ease of use, and flexible deployment options. A notable feature is Boomi's simplified integration process with various platforms.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Azure API Management can benefit from simplifying its deployment process and enhancing integration with non-Microsoft services. Improving its user interface and expanding third-party API support would also be advantageous. Boomi AtomSphere API Management could enhance its cost-effectiveness, provide more in-depth documentation, and expand its real-time analytics capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Boomi AtomSphere API Management offers a straightforward deployment model and robust customer support, which simplifies implementation. Microsoft Azure API Management has a more complex deployment process but benefits from Microsoft's extensive support infrastructure and ecosystem.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Azure API Management is appealing to budget-conscious users with a more attractive initial setup cost. However, Boomi AtomSphere API Management, despite its higher initial cost, may lead to a better ROI in the long term given its superior feature set and integration capabilities.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Boomi AtomSphere API Management vs. Microsoft Azure API Management Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Boomi AtomSphere API Management vs. Microsoft Azure API Management
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Boomi AtomSphere API Manage...
Ranking in API Management
15th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Microsoft Azure API Management
Ranking in API Management
1st
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
81
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Boomi AtomSphere API Management is 0.5%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Azure API Management is 18.5%, down from 19.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
API Management
 

Featured Reviews

ShashankRavikumar - PeerSpot reviewer
Enables real-time insights and secure API management for efficient customer interactions
The main improvement needed is the ability to have different base URLs for HTTP and HTTPS for different clients. Currently, I can have only one base URL for one atom. It would help if I could set up a proxy with different URLs within Boomi as a simple configuration instead of needing external applications. Also, Boomi can integrate AI to manage backend loads and provide insights into runtime engine consumption.
Read full review
Rajiv Bala Balasubramanian - PeerSpot reviewer
Efficiently manages and monetizes API
It is a scalable solution. You can add more computing power to your APM gateway. It also gives you the ability to have VNet integrations with your on-prem. It is one of the leading products in the API management space. It is not just software for users but software to handle requests. For example, for a B2C e-commerce store, all requests that users make from within the store pass through this API gateway. So it is defined by the number of requests to the API gateway, not by the number of actual users who use it. If you look at the number of requests, it would be a lot from all the different systems we have within Pampers.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Boomi AtomSphere API Management is a good product for integrating with Boomi as a backend service."
"The product's stability is good."
"Boomi allows for more secure URLs and easy customization of HTTP and HTTPS protocols, which I find very beneficial."
"The stability of the solution is good."
"Integrations take less time."
"We can create APIs straightforwardly and quickly and build jobs for data migration."
"We can develop almost any interface that we need."
"AtomSphere API Management is a simple platform that's easy to use. If you're using it on-prem, there's a little learning curve."
More Boomi AtomSphere API Management pros
"The most valuable features of Microsoft Azure API Management are the easy configuration and deployment with automation."
"The package as a whole is useful for our customers."
"The integration and API Connect are valuable when we need to connect with web services and REST APIs."
"Everything is already available and ready to operate without a lot of preparation work."
"The stability and performance are good. It is easy to install, and it scales well too."
"The UI management is very easy to use."
"The initial setup is not that complex, but there are certain challenges."
"It's very well integrated with the Azure environment."
More Microsoft Azure API Management pros
 

Cons

"The solution must provide more AI services."
"Boomi AtomSphere API Management can be improved in terms of threshold management and policy management."
"Scalability is an area where Boomi lacks."
"To some degree, you need to know what type or amount of API you are creating - whether it's a rest API or web service API. You need to know ETL in order to really get the most out of Boomi."
"Most of the basic functionality is there in Boomi, but APG is a more feature-rich solution."
"From an improvement perspective, the price could be cheaper."
"It's difficult to integrate the on-prem application with the Dell Boomi Cloud. We have to check to ensure the Dell domain engine is running. It just requires some service endpoints from our on-prem application to connect to Dell Boomi Cloud to make it available to integrate. It would be better if AtomSphere API Management were offered as a purely SaaS application, so I wouldn't need an on-prem component to make it available. We could make a test call or provide some connection parameters. That should enable it to pull the data."
"The product is really complex to manage."
More Boomi AtomSphere API Management cons
"The scalability of this solution could be improved. The volume which the API Management task service can handle needs to be improved. Cost wise, this solution could be optimized."
"The developer console for external users could be improved, especially in the testing site."
"Microsoft Azure API Management could be improved by enhancing the preview feature, specifically the workspaces."
"Azure API Management could be improved with better integration with all of Microsoft's tools."
"Microsoft Azure API Management should have the ability to allow multitenancy."
"Support for GraphQL could be better."
"Azure is our most expensive resource; it's costly."
"Maybe the customization could be a bit better."
More Microsoft Azure API Management cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product can get very expensive quickly if you connect to multiple databases."
"Boomi AtomSphere API Management gives customers a good price. Price-wise, the product is good."
"Boomi AtomSphere API Management is a cheap product."
"The price is reasonable."
"It's free for less than ten users. If you want to go beyond that, it's around $3.50 per user per month. If you want a DevOps integration, it's about $7.50 per user per month. Costs depend on the size, complexity, usage, and what facility you want to integrate. So, we use Microsoft Azure and have the entire DevOps and Visual Studio on the cloud. We get all three flavors for $7.50 per user per month."
"We pay for a yearly license."
"The solution appears cheaper because it's a cloud SaaS model."
"Since everyone is isocentric here, it is reasonable for me."
"Because of our partner relationship, our pricing is pretty decent. But in general, if I compare pricing, I think the initial offer that we got from Microsoft until the relationship kicked in was more expensive than AWS. There were some unexpected expenses because we had to pause. This was due to our inexperience and because we were doing this significant public cloud migration for the first time. We were using SAP on a public cloud for the first time."
"It's being paid monthly."
"Azure API Management is the most expensive solution on the market."
"There are additional costs to the standard licensing fees."
More Microsoft Azure API Management pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Insurance Company
10%
Retailer
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Insurance Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Boomi AtomSphere API Management?
Integrations take less time.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Boomi AtomSphere API Management?
In terms of pricing, Boomi is expensive for small companies due to its license model. For enterprise companies, it is cheaper than competitors like MuleSoft, as large enterprise accounts have huge ...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Boomi AtomSphere API Management?
The main improvement needed is the ability to have different base URLs for HTTP and HTTPS for different clients. Currently, I can have only one base URL for one atom. It would help if I could set u...
See all answers
How does Apigee differ from Azure API Management?
Apigee offers both cloud-based and on-prem options while Microsoft Azure API Management currently only offers a cloud-based solution. Both solutions are easy to use. Apigee allows for the ability...
See all answers
Which is better - Azure API Management or Amazon API Gateway?
If you use Azure products, API Management is a great solution. It solves many of the problems of externalizing web services. For example, when you need versioning, establish a developer portal and ...
See all answers
What do you like most about Microsoft Azure API Management?
Microsoft Azure API Management is a good, comprehensive solution for enterprise implementation.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Amazon API Gateway vs Boomi AtomSphere API Management Logo
Amazon API Gateway vs Boomi AtomSphere API Management
Compared 29% of the time
Apigee vs Boomi AtomSphere API Management Logo
Apigee vs Boomi AtomSphere API Management
Compared 20% of the time
Oracle Communications Services Gatekeeper vs Boomi AtomSphere API Management Logo
Oracle Communications Services Gatekeeper vs Boomi AtomSphere API Management
Compared 12% of the time
More Boomi AtomSphere API Management Competitors
Amazon API Gateway vs Microsoft Azure API Management Logo
Amazon API Gateway vs Microsoft Azure API Management
Compared 44% of the time
Apigee vs Microsoft Azure API Management Logo
Apigee vs Microsoft Azure API Management
Compared 21% of the time
IBM API Connect vs Microsoft Azure API Management Logo
IBM API Connect vs Microsoft Azure API Management
Compared 6% of the time
Kong Gateway Enterprise vs Microsoft Azure API Management Logo
Kong Gateway Enterprise vs Microsoft Azure API Management
Compared 5% of the time
MuleSoft API Manager vs Microsoft Azure API Management Logo
MuleSoft API Manager vs Microsoft Azure API Management
Compared 4% of the time
More Microsoft Azure API Management Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Boomi AtomSphere API Management
April 2025
Boomi AtomSphere API Management reportDownload Boomi AtomSphere API Management product report
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Azure API Management
April 2025
Microsoft Azure API Management reportDownload Microsoft Azure API Management product report
 

Also Known As

Boomi API Management
Azure API Management, MS Azure API Management
 

Overview

Boomi API Management supports the full lifecycle of APIs in a hybrid environment. Configure APIs and expose real-time integrations effortlessly. Centrally test and deploy APIs and enforce contracts and policies with an API gateway. Monitor the health of APIs with usage dashboards and engage API developers using the catalog and developer portal.

Boomi

Microsoft Azure API Management is essential for managing APIs, facilitating integration, and ensuring secure internal and external communication.

Organizations leverage Microsoft Azure API Management for seamless integration and effective API management. It supports microservices, legacy modernization, and platform orchestration in sectors like healthcare, telecom, and finance. Features such as developer portals and centralized libraries simplify usage. While it showcases strengths in hybrid cloud support and scalability, improvements are suggested in versioning and multi-tenancy.

What key features does it offer?
  • Integration with Microsoft services ensures robust access control and user-friendly deployment.
  • Developer portal and documentation improve usability and learning.
  • Hybrid cloud support offers seamless on-premise connectivity.
  • Scalability and security features are well-regarded.
  • Centralized API library simplifies management.
What benefits or ROI should users consider?
  • Facilitates API lifecycle management enhancing user experience.
  • Simplifies authentication and subscription models.
  • Enhances data exchange and real-time monitoring.
  • Streamlines API mapping and orchestration across platforms.
  • Promotes flexibility and transparency in system integration.

Microsoft Azure API Management aids modernization across healthcare, telecom, and financial services by enabling legacy system updates and facilitating smooth platform orchestration.

Microsoft
 

Sample Customers

Avalara, Cornell University, Dropbox
adnymics GmbH, LG CNS, Centrebet, netfabb GmbH, MedPlast, Accelera Solutions, Sochi Organizing Committee, realzeit GmbH, Opensistemas
Buyer's Guide
Boomi AtomSphere API Management vs. Microsoft Azure API Management
April 2025
Free Report: Boomi AtomSphere API Management vs. Microsoft Azure API Management
Find out what your peers are saying about Boomi AtomSphere API Management vs. Microsoft Azure API Management and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Boomi AtomSphere API Management vs. Microsoft Azure API Management report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.