Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Bonita vs IBM WebSphere BPMS comparison

Bonitasoft and IBM are both solutions in the Process Automation category. Bonitasoft is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.3, while IBM is ranked #33 with an average rating of 7.0. Bonitasoft holds a 4.6% mindshare in PA, compared to IBM’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Bonitasoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of IBM users who would recommend it.
Bonita
Read 27 Bonita reviews
  • 2,458 Views
  • 501 Comparison Views
96% willing to recommend
IBM WebSphere BPMS
Read 6 IBM WebSphere BPMS reviews
  • 172 Views
  • 39 Comparison Views
83% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

IBM WebSphere BPMS and Bonita compete in the business process management domain. IBM WebSphere BPMS stands out for its scalability and enterprise-grade capabilities, making it suitable for large-scale projects. Bonita is favored for its flexibility and ease of use, appealing in rapidly changing environments.

Features: IBM WebSphere BPMS offers robust integration, scalability, and complex workflow management for large enterprises needing comprehensive solutions. Bonita excels with an open-source foundation, agility, and rapid development capabilities, supporting customization and diverse use cases.

Room for Improvement: IBM WebSphere BPMS could enhance user-friendliness and reduce the complexity of its deployment process. Its integration with newer technologies may also require updates. Bonita could benefit from improving its performance under heavy loads, expanding its documentation, and refining advanced feature support for complex process modeling.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM WebSphere BPMS involves a comprehensive deployment model, necessitating technical expertise and time. Its customer support is extensive but complex. Bonita features a straightforward deployment process with flexible cloud and on-premises options. Its customer service is accessible and responsive, contributing to user satisfaction.

Pricing and ROI: IBM WebSphere BPMS requires considerable upfront investment, with potential ROI in long-term use despite initial costs being high. Bonita offers lower setup costs, providing a cost-effective solution favorable for budget-conscious organizations. Its ROI is accelerated due to ease of use and short time to value.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Bonita vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Bonita vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Bonita
Ranking in Process Automation
15th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
27
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Design (12th), Business Process Management (BPM) (20th)
IBM WebSphere BPMS
Ranking in Process Automation
33rd
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of Bonita is 4.6%, down from 5.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM WebSphere BPMS is 0.2%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Automation
 

Featured Reviews

Paparao Nadipineni - PeerSpot reviewer
A simple and lightweight college course automation system with third-party integrations
The initial setup is straightforward and can be completed with the environment within an hour. First, take the latest from the git repository and check the git code to the monitor studio and a bar file, a deployable Bonita archive file. Then, take that process to the Bonita server, running at runtime on another server. Finally, deploy and enable it by selecting the proper organization.
Read full review
ST
Systematic role management and flexible integration improve efficiency, but low-code capabilities and setup complexity need addressing
The most valuable feature of IBM WebSphere BPMS ( /products/ibm-websphere-bpms-reviews ) is the systematic framework it provides for building different systems. The critical component is the authorization within the workflow assignment, which is an attractive aspect of this tool. It has helped us in systematic role management within the workflow. Additionally, it offers flexible integration capabilities facilitating front-end and back-end separation practices, allowing for technologies like Angular and Spring Boot ( /products/spring-boot-reviews ).
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It is a great product that is powerful in developing applications."
"I find process management and user interface designing the most valuable features."
"The user interface is easy to use."
"Its user-friendliness, along with the availability of comprehensive and clear documentation on the website is the most valuable."
"Compared to other products on the market, Bonita presents a pretty acceptable level of robustness."
"One of the most valuable features is you can create without coding, it is a low code platform."
"We use the tool to validate and give access to the users. It is for access management."
"I really enjoy using the workflow management."
More Bonita pros
"We like the feature in which we can trace back instances."
"The most valuable feature of IBM WebSphere BPMS is the systematic framework it provides for building different systems."
"IBM WebSphere BPMS provides significant return on investments, especially in the BAW component."
"The UI capabilities of the solution are great. The speed of delivery is good."
"This product is flexible in its ability to integrate processes and it can be extended and integrated with other software."
 

Cons

"The interface is advanced and quite good, but it could improve."
"The dashboard has limited features."
"Installation could be made easier."
"I have run into a lot of problems because there is not enough documentation."
"It would be nice to have a wizard to help walk through the development process and create a backbone."
"It is missing some important features that other products have."
"The community edition has limited module functionality. If they could release some of the functionality that's available in the enterprise edition that would be helpful to those learning to use the solution."
"There is a need for more components in the library and additional customization options for these components."
More Bonita cons
"The user interface could be improved, and although integration opportunities are good, they could be improved further."
"There is a need for more capabilities in low-code and no-code development to increase efficiency and make implementation simpler."
"Looking forward, IBM WebSphere BPMS could add more adapters to integrate with SAP or Salesforce integrator in upcoming releases."
"Sometimes there are tasks that failed without any reason."
"The solution lacks acceptable stability."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are using the Community Version, which can be used free of charge."
"Price to service ratio with Bonita BPM is good."
"The price is fair for what we are using the solution for."
"The product's pricing is acceptable. Pricing is yearly."
"The Enterprise edition is very expensive."
"I am using the free version of Bonita."
"have installed the image of Bonita BPM on Amazon AWS and there is just one option to use and pay for."
"The product is not cheaper, not costlier; it is reasonable. Bonita’s license is very flexible, with options to meet the needs of different customers and clients. Previously, it was less flexible, but now, many different licensing options are available."
More Bonita pricing and cost advice
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Educational Organization
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?
One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...
See all answers
What do you like most about Bonita?
The user interface is easy to use.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bonita?
The Enterprise edition is very expensive.
See all answers
What needs improvement with IBM WebSphere BPMS?
There is a need for more capabilities in low-code and no-code development to increase efficiency and make implementation simpler. The tool currently involves a complex setup requirement, and having...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for IBM WebSphere BPMS?
We use IBM WebSphere BPMS ( /products/ibm-websphere-bpms-reviews ) internally in the bank for process automation and management. Our IT department self-builds different systems to serve various use...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering IBM WebSphere BPMS?
I recommend IBM WebSphere BPMS for large enterprises concerned with total system management. It is not ideal for SMB due to its complexity and the need for significant IT resources. I rate it seven...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Camunda vs Bonita Logo
Camunda vs Bonita
Compared 54% of the time
Bizagi vs Bonita Logo
Bizagi vs Bonita
Compared 15% of the time
Flowable vs Bonita Logo
Flowable vs Bonita
Compared 7% of the time
IBM BPM vs Bonita Logo
IBM BPM vs Bonita
Compared 4% of the time
SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Bonita Logo
SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Bonita
Compared 3% of the time
More Bonita Competitors
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Bonita
June 2025
Bonita reportDownload Bonita product report
Buyer's Guide
IBM WebSphere BPMS
June 2025
IBM WebSphere BPMS reportDownload IBM WebSphere BPMS product report
 

Also Known As

Bonita BPM
WebSphere BPMS
 

Overview

Bonitasoft helps innovative companies worldwide deliver better digital user experiences for customers and employees. The extensible and open Bonita application platform unleashes the full potential of multidisciplinary development teams to create Living Apps: applications that allow continuous and incremental improvement, connecting tailored user interfaces with reliable back-office operations.
Bonitasoft
Information not available
IBM
 

Sample Customers

With more than 1000 customers in 75 countries, and its ecosystem of more than 120,000 members, Bonitasoft is the largest provider of open-source Business Process Management, Low-code and Digital Transformation software worldwide.
Schahin Group, Korean Credit Card Company, Versicherungskammer Bayern, Biogrid Australia
Buyer's Guide
Bonita vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS
June 2025
Free Report: Bonita vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS
Find out what your peers are saying about Bonita vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Bonita vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS report.
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.