BlazeMeter vs Digital.ai Continuous Testing comparison

Perforce and Digital.ai are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Perforce is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.0, while Digital.ai is ranked #21 with an average rating of 8.0. Perforce holds a 0.5% mindshare in TAt, compared to Digital.ai’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Perforce users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Digital.ai users who would recommend it.

BlazeMeter

Read 49 BlazeMeter reviews

335 Views
56 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Read 3 Digital.ai Continuous Testing reviews

284 Views
22 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

BlazeMeter

Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

BlazeMeter and Digital.ai Continuous Testing compete in automated testing solutions. BlazeMeter is often preferred for competitive pricing and support, while Digital.ai Continuous Testing is noted for its advanced features that justify its cost.

Features: BlazeMeter offers comprehensive load testing, integration with CI/CD tools, and reliable performance testing. Meanwhile, Digital.ai Continuous Testing provides robust functional testing, advanced analytics, and deep test management capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BlazeMeter offers straightforward cloud-based deployment with accessible support for quick setups. Digital.ai Continuous Testing involves a complex deployment process with customization but offers dedicated technical support and comprehensive onboarding for enterprises.

Pricing and ROI: BlazeMeter provides a cost-effective entry with flexible pricing models, presenting strong ROI for performance testing priorities. Digital.ai Continuous Testing involves higher initial costs but yields richer returns through expansive testing functionalities, suiting businesses with long-term strategic goals.

To learn more, read our detailed BlazeMeter vs. Digital.ai Continuous Testing Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BlazeMeter vs. Digital.ai Continuous Testing

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,168 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BlazeMeter

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (2nd), Functional Testing Tools (10th), Load Testing Tools (3rd), API Testing Tools (6th)

Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

21st

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Testing Tools (8th), AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of BlazeMeter is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Digital.ai Continuous Testing is 0.5%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Manoj Raghavendra

Director at SMKR Consultancy LLP

Provides global load simulations without managing infrastructure and offers built-in reporting features

BlazeMeter should improve or make available some features out of the box that JMeter requires customization for. The licensing cost is also a concern since BlazeMeter is not free like JMeter, which limits its use. Additionally, if there is no host in preferred locations such as some Asian or Middle Eastern countries, it might not be convenient to use BlazeMeter.

Read full review

Alan Chiou

PM at Galaxy Software Services

Has Mobile Studio feature which can generate scripts

The integration process was good, but I've faced some challenges. Every time they release a new version, I find bugs in the UI and features. Sometimes, buttons don't work well. When this happens, I submit a ticket to technical support, but they often have to fix it in the next version.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product's initial setup phase was straightforward."

"The extensibility that the tool offers across environments and teams is valuable."

"There is a repository of all the scripts that we have created. You can go back and compare tests to see what the tests looked like. If I want to go and compare something with whatever happened six months or one year back, I can do that."

"They have good support documentation and when we have contacted them, they helped to guide us."

"The stability is good."

"The solution offers flexibility with its configurations."

"Its most valuable features are its strong community support, user-friendly interface, and flexible capacity options."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its ability to run high loads and generate reports."

More BlazeMeter pros

"The most valuable part of Experitest is the number of real devices on which the test is run."

"Experitest is one of the only companies to offer a real device on the cloud to perform testing. They also provide quality documentations that help you navigate and maximize the solution."

"The most useful feature for me is Mobile Studio. It has a UI where I can click on elements, and it generates a script for me. Mobile Studio can generate code from testing steps. I'm using Python with it."

Cons

"The support could be better."

"The seamless integration with mobiles could be improved."

"For a new user of BlazeMeter, it might be difficult to understand it from a programming perspective."

"The reporting capabilities could be improved."

"Version controlling of the test cases and the information, the ability to compare the current version and the previous version within Runscope would be really nice. The history shows who made the changes, but it doesn't compare the changes."

"The product could improve in areas such as mobile testing and the integration of AI analytics."

"The pricing is high"

"The Timeline Report panel has no customization options. One feature that I missed was not having a time filter, which I had in ELK. For example, there are only filter requests for a time of less than 5 seconds."

More BlazeMeter cons

"I would also like to see more videos and descriptions that could make installation more efficient."

"I have been automating tests for many years on many things but not on mobile devices. The amount of time that I have spent on just figuring out how to use Experitest and get it to work was quite long compared to what I have been doing before. I spent the first two weeks just getting it started. It would be good to have some video explanation of how to use it on your devices and get started. Their online documentation is quite good and extensive, but it would be quite good to have some end-to-end examples demonstrated."

"The integration process was good, but I've faced some challenges. Every time they release a new version, I find bugs in the UI and features. Sometimes, buttons don't work well. When this happens, I submit a ticket to technical support, but they often have to fix it in the next version."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The overall product is less costly than our past solutions, so we've absolutely saved money."

"The pricing is manageable. It is not that big. Big companies won't mind the licensing costs."

"When compared with the cost of the licenses of other tools, BlazeMeter's license price is good."

"It is an averagely priced product."

"It's consumption-based pricing but with a ceiling. They're called CVUs, or consumption variable units. We can use API testing, GUI testing, and test data, but everything gets converted into CVUs, so we are free to use the platform in its entirety without getting bogged down by a license for certain testing areas. We know for sure how much we are going to spend."

"The product isn't cheap, but it isn't the most expensive on the market. During our proof of concept, we discovered that you get what you pay for; we found a cheaper solution we tested to be full of bugs. Therefore, we are willing to pay the higher price tag for the quality BlazeMeter offers."

"The product pricing is reasonable."

"We pay a yearly licensing fee for the solution."

More BlazeMeter pricing and cost advice

"We make monthly payments. The cost is dependent on the number of devices we intend to support."

"It is quite fairly priced, but it really depends on your budget. It is somewhere in the mid-range of products. It is not free and it is not QGP that nearly costs a whole house. You pay for the number of users who require access to execute the tests."

"The price is reasonable for our company, but I'm not the decision-maker."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

19%

Retailer

10%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does BlazeMeter compare with Apache JMeter?

Blazemeter is a continuous testing platform that provides scriptless test automation. It unifies functional and performance testing, enabling users to monitor and test public and private APIs. We ...

See all answers

What do you like most about BlazeMeter?

It has a unique programming dashboard that is very user-friendly.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BlazeMeter?

BlazeMeter's pricing depends on the type of account used. They offer multiple account types, with cost variations based on features accessible under each account.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Digital.ai Continuous Testing?

The price is reasonable for our company, but I'm not the decision-maker.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Digital.ai Continuous Testing?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Digital.ai Continuous Testing?

I'm using Digital.ai Continuous Testing to create and test a mobile application. We're developing and testing a mobile app.

See all answers

Comparisons

Apache JMeter vs BlazeMeter

Compared 45% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs BlazeMeter

Compared 16% of the time

Tricentis NeoLoad vs BlazeMeter

Compared 16% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs BlazeMeter

Compared 4% of the time

k6 Open Source vs BlazeMeter

Compared 4% of the time

More BlazeMeter Competitors

BrowserStack vs Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Compared 55% of the time

Perfecto vs Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Compared 27% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Compared 18% of the time

More Digital.ai Continuous Testing Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BlazeMeter

June 2025

Download BlazeMeter product report

Buyer's Guide

ConformIQ Creator vs. Digital.ai Continuous Testing

June 2025

Download Digital.ai Continuous Testing product report

Also Known As

JMeter Cloud

Experitest Seetest, Experitest

Overview

BlazeMeter ensures delivery of high-performance software by enabling DevOps teams to quickly and easily run open-source-based performance tests against any mobile app, website or API at massive scale to validate performance at every stage of software delivery.

The rapidly growing BlazeMeter community has more than 100,000 developers and includes prominent global brands such as Adobe, Atlassian, Gap, NBC Universal, Pfizer and Walmart as customers. Founded in 2011, the company is headquartered in Palo Alto, Calif., with its research and development in Tel Aviv.

Perforce

Experitest's continuous testing solutions enable enterprises to reduce risk and provide their customers satisfying, error-free experiences across all devices and browsers. They seamlessly integrate with best-in-class tools throughout the DevOps pipeline allowing organizations to rapidly deliver highly protected, quality applications at-speed and at-scale.

Digital.ai

Sample Customers

DIRECTV, GAP, MIT, NBCUniversal, Pfizer, StubHub

Samsung, American Express, Barclays, China Mobile, Citi, Cisco, McAfee

Buyer's Guide

BlazeMeter vs. Digital.ai Continuous Testing

June 2025

Free Report: BlazeMeter vs. Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Find out what your peers are saying about BlazeMeter vs. Digital.ai Continuous Testing and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BlazeMeter vs. Digital.ai Continuous Testing report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.