Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs Perfecto comparison

Digital.ai and Perforce are both solutions in the Mobile App Testing Tools category. Digital.ai is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.0, while Perforce is ranked #5. Digital.ai holds a 5.8% mindshare in MTT, compared to Perforce’s 7.0% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Digital.ai users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Perforce users who would recommend it.

Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Read 7 Digital.ai Continuous Testing reviews

1,454 Views
582 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Perfecto

Read 23 Perfecto reviews

4,386 Views
921 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Perfecto

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Perfecto and Digital.ai Continuous Testing compete in the continuous testing space, with Digital.ai often seen as having the upper hand due to its integration abilities and deep insights, which many believe justify the investment.

Features: Perfecto includes comprehensive browser and device coverage, scriptless test automation, and extensive cloud environment testing. Digital.ai Continuous Testing offers integration with DevOps tools, advanced analytics, and valuable insights into application performance. The main difference lies in Digital.ai's smooth integration within existing DevOps workflows.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Perfecto supports straightforward cloud deployment with extensive documentation, allowing quick setup. Digital.ai Continuous Testing requires more initial configuration but benefits from a robust support network, aligning seamlessly with modern DevOps environments.

Pricing and ROI: Perfecto provides competitive pricing and potential for significant ROI through its efficient cloud testing platform. Digital.ai Continuous Testing may have higher setup costs but offers substantial ROI with increased test coverage and automation efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. Perfecto Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. Perfecto

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,915 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools

3rd

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

10th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

4.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools (3rd)

Perfecto

Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools

5th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

19th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (14th), Functional Testing Tools (16th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Mobile App Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Digital.ai Continuous Testing is 5.8%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Perfecto is 7.0%, up from 5.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Mobile App Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Digital.ai Continuous Testing	5.8%
Perfecto	7.0%
Other	87.2%

Mobile App Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Mampi Bhattacharya

Developer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Continuous testing has accelerated daily releases and now provides faster, richer debugging insights

Digital.ai Continuous Testing could be better in certain areas, and I can share my experience-based view on what can be frustrating. One issue is device availability and queue delays during peak CI hours. Sometimes devices are busy, causing tests to queue and the pipeline to slow down unexpectedly, which is especially painful for large regression suites or tight release timelines. Improvements are needed in smarter auto-scaling of device pools and better priority-based scheduling. Additionally, execution speed variability occurs; the same test sometimes runs fast and sometimes slow, depending on device load and network latency, making results less predictable. More stable execution environments and better performance isolation per session would help. Furthermore, debugging can still be indirect; even with logs or videos, I do not fully control the device as I would with local debugging, making it hard to pause and inspect live states or reproduce edge-case issues locally. More interactive debugging and improved local reproduction tools are necessary. Cost versus usage efficiency is another area of concern, as device cloud usage can be expensive and we sometimes have idle or inefficient tests that waste money. Improvements in usage analytics and cost optimization suggestions for smart test selection to run only impacted tests are areas where I believe Digital.ai Continuous Testing could improve.

Read full review

Glenford John

Product Manager, Device Integration at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Saves us $2.6 million per year, provides more efficient testing, and helps us strengthen relationships with vendors

The automation piece is the most valuable feature. Every time we had a new version of either OS or an application, we found that being able to automate the testing across different devices is very valuable. Perfecto is great at executing cross-platform testing. From a carrier perspective, it's all mobile, but we also have web applications. We used to be able to test on Symbian, Windows OS, Android, and iOS. Today, we can go on a big screen and test on Chrome, Firefox, Explorer, and other browsers. My team leverages Perfecto's reporting and analytics. When we start stress testing an application, we can look at all the reporting that comes from that, and we can tell at what part of the day the app is performing better. Our analytics are very important to us. Presentations are important, so it's good to have reports with graphs that show the time of day or how the app was performing for months at a time. We use those reports to screen capture, go with the data, and to show to upper management. We can do a comparison of one version performance to another version of the application or device performance. We utilize Perfecto's cloud-based lab to test across devices, browsers, and OSs. We are a carrier, so we have our devices with different OS versions of devices. Right now, it's mostly just Apple and Androids. Back in the day, they had many different versions of the OS, but the only other thing on top of that is web-based browsers. We don't test Linux, which is an operating system of Windows. We don't use Perfecto's cloud. We use our own devices because we test on only our organization's devices. Unless we do some kind of competitive analysis, it's not really a test; it's just a comparison to see how other solutions compare to ours. The range of open-source technologies that Perfecto supports is great. I have a team of contractors that report to me and do all the testing for our organization, and that team turns over every couple of years. We mostly utilize the in-house automation that is available for anyone who isn't a great programmer. They have support for all these other drivers, and they have something for non-programmers who want to automate their work, which is amazing.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Digital.ai Continuous Testing has had a very positive impact in terms of efficiency and quality."

"Experitest is one of the only companies to offer a real device on the cloud to perform testing, and they also provide quality documentations that help you navigate and maximize the solution."

"Digital.ai Continuous Testing has had a pretty positive impact on the organization, especially in terms of speed and reliability."

"The most useful feature for me is Mobile Studio. It has a UI where I can click on elements, and it generates a script for me. Mobile Studio can generate code from testing steps. I'm using Python with it."

"Digital.ai Continuous Testing has positively impacted my organization with massive reductions in testing time, enabling us to cut our regression cycle from two to three days down to two to three hours, transition from weekly releases to nearly daily deployments, and reduce production defects by 30 to 50% while significantly improving debugging efficiency and overall team productivity."

"Experitest is one of the only companies to offer a real device on the cloud to perform testing. They also provide quality documentations that help you navigate and maximize the solution."

"I have seen a clear positive ROI after implementing Digital.ai Continuous Testing, especially in terms of time saving, faster release cycle, and improved efficiency."

"The most valuable part of Experitest is the number of real devices on which the test is run."

More Digital.ai Continuous Testing pros

"The number one feature, which if we didn't have out-of-the-box would be missed, is the fact that we have video execution. That gives us the ability to view errors or defects in the progression, from beginning to the end of the video."

"One of the good things about Perfecto is the scalability that it provides."

"The Perfecto device lab has allowed us to run tests on multiple devices at the same time and across multiple platforms as well, increasing the efficiency of our testing and saving money, time, and effort while enabling comprehensive testing and high app quality that we otherwise wouldn't be able to achieve."

"We are able to offer a quality product that has been tested fully, which improves our customer satisfaction."

"Overall, it's a great solution."

"The most valuable aspect of the solution is that it covers all types of devices on the market allowing you to test different versions of an operating system."

"I also like the reporting functions. We are constantly downloading these reports and sharing them with our final customers. They help us understand what kind of bugs are happening through the applications. The recording feature is handy because it lets us see a video of the process we run through the pipeline and discover the point at which the automation is breaking."

"Perfecto facilitates delivering the product on time, through the cloud devices, so that there is no impact to our end-users."

More Perfecto pros

Cons

"The integration process was good, but I've faced some challenges. Every time they release a new version, I find bugs in the UI and features. Sometimes, buttons don't work well. When this happens, I submit a ticket to technical support, but they often have to fix it in the next version."

"The amount of time that I have spent on just figuring out how to use Experitest and get it to work was quite long compared to what I have been doing before."

"Digital.ai Continuous Testing is a solid tool, but there are a few things that can be frustrating at times."

"I have been automating tests for many years on many things but not on mobile devices. The amount of time that I have spent on just figuring out how to use Experitest and get it to work was quite long compared to what I have been doing before. I spent the first two weeks just getting it started. It would be good to have some video explanation of how to use it on your devices and get started. Their online documentation is quite good and extensive, but it would be quite good to have some end-to-end examples demonstrated."

"I would also like to see more videos and descriptions that could make installation more efficient."

"Digital.ai Continuous Testing is a strong platform, but there are a few areas where it could be improved to make the experience even better."

"I believe that it could be more stable. During times when something is not working, it is difficult to find the solution."

"One challenge is that the initial setup and integration with CI/CD pipelines can sometimes be a bit complex, especially for teams new to automation."

More Digital.ai Continuous Testing cons

"One improvement would be speed of execution. If it is an iOS native app, we have noticed that the speed is a bit slower."

"We have had some issues with performance, which is something that should be improved."

"The monitoring features, in particular network traffic monitoring, could be improved."

"Previously, we used the cradle. Every time the mobile was blocking it, we would have to ask Perfecto to provide another one. That took a lot of time away from us."

"I'm hoping that Perfecto will come up with browser testing as well because it would be easier to access it."

"It is slow compared to physical device testing. The interactive speed could be improved."

"Going by the dashboard or analytics capabilities that Perfecto or Perforce is looking to offer in its roadmap, it will certainly help if they also cater to executing and enabling decision-making, rather than just focusing on standard testing metrics such as execution, efficiency, and defect rate. These are good metrics, but they don't necessarily enable decision-making for SLTs. Any improvements in the dashboards and reporting tools should focus on metrics or SLAs that can help with decision-making."

"There was a discussion about having the capability to export the test results to a certain tool that we use in our project. If that were added it would be great not having to manually take screenshots, put them in a document, and share them on the different test management tools."

More Perfecto cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is quite fairly priced, but it really depends on your budget. It is somewhere in the mid-range of products. It is not free and it is not QGP that nearly costs a whole house. You pay for the number of users who require access to execute the tests."

"The price is reasonable for our company, but I'm not the decision-maker."

"We make monthly payments. The cost is dependent on the number of devices we intend to support."

"Perfecto has definitely saved us on the costs and efforts of having to maintain our own virtual test environment. We lost about 20 devices in the past to maintenance and audit. That was a massive loss for us, as a company, because we were giving devices to someone, but don't know whether we would get it back or not. Having those virtual labs, we don't need to worry about these kinds of things. We are easily saving $5,000 to $10,000 a month on device costing."

"Although Perfecto is a good product for us to use, it is a bit expensive. It takes management a bit of work to find the appropriate funding for us to keep Perfecto. I imagine there could be some way to make it more accessible."

"Perfecto is about 30-40% cheaper than Device Anywhere. That was a big reason why we switched. Perfecto also solves some of the issues that we had with Device Anywhere. We have grown by 100% since we started to use Perfecto, and now we have devices roaming. When we look at the competition, we would still stick with Perfecto."

"Pricing-wise, it is fine. It is not as expensive as what we used to have in the past from HP, IBM, and others. It is decently priced."

"Pricing is an area where Perfecto can do a little better. When we obtain additional licenses, we enter into negotiations with them."

"Perfecto's price is excellent compared to other products with similar features. It was the lowest of the three we evaluated. We also established a partnership with Perfecto, so they provide discounts when we sell Perfecto projects and licenses to our customers."

"It's definitely on the higher end of prices for this type of service."

"I am not sure about its pricing, but from our perspective, licensing has been easy. Anytime I have new users or requests for users that want to get added, it's a very simple process. I just give the architectural owner of the product the name and email address, and they're able to easily add a new user. We don't have any issues in regards to getting licenses, but I don't have any insights into pricing."

More Perfecto pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile App Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,915 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

University

17%

Outsourcing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

22%

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	23

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Digital.ai Continuous Testing?

The price is reasonable for our company, but I'm not the decision-maker.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Digital.ai Continuous Testing?

Digital.ai Continuous Testing is a solid tool, but there are a few things that can be frustrating at times. One thing I noticed is that the initial setup and configuration can feel complex, especia...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Digital.ai Continuous Testing?

The main use case for Digital.ai Continuous Testing has been automating test execution as part of the CI/CD pipeline, especially for ensuring builds are stable before the release. For example, I us...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

TestObject vs Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Compared 10% of the time

Xamarin Test Cloud vs Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Compared 6% of the time

BrowserStack vs Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Compared 5% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Compared 5% of the time

More Digital.ai Continuous Testing Competitors

BrowserStack vs Perfecto

Compared 13% of the time

Sauce Labs vs Perfecto

Compared 10% of the time

TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) vs Perfecto

Compared 5% of the time

Appium vs Perfecto

Compared 4% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs Perfecto

Compared 2% of the time

More Perfecto Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Digital.ai Continuous Testing

May 2026

Download Digital.ai Continuous Testing product report

Buyer's Guide

Perfecto

April 2026

Download Perfecto product report

Also Known As

Experitest Seetest, Experitest

Perfecto Mobile, Perfecto Web

Overview

Digital.ai Continuous Testing offers automated testing with real device cloud access and CI/CD integration to efficiently manage web and mobile app testing, ensuring reliability and consistency.

Digital.ai Continuous Testing is designed to streamline testing by automating executions across multiple environments and devices, reducing manual efforts and speeding up feedback cycles. With features like cross-browser testing, and integration into CI/CD pipelines, it helps detect defects early and improve release quality. Users benefit from parallel and automated test executions for faster delivery and enhanced compatibility, leveraging Mobile Studio for versatile scripting. However, initial setup can be complex, and users note UI/UX improvements and issue navigation challenges. Despite these, it facilitates quality assurance through its comprehensive testing capabilities.

What are the key features of Digital.ai Continuous Testing?

Real Device Cloud Access: Provides extensive testing across different devices.
CI/CD Integration: Streamlines testing within development pipelines.
Automated Test Execution: Speeds up testing processes with parallel runs.
Cross-Browser Testing: Ensures compatibility and functionality across browsers.
Mobile Studio Scripting: Allows diverse scripting for mobile tests.

What benefits should users consider?

Efficiency Improvements: Significant reduction in manual testing efforts.
Time Savings: Faster feedback and early defect detection.
Reliability & Consistency: Better outcomes with multi-device testing.
Improved Release Quality: Higher delivery and compatibility standards.

Industries utilize Digital.ai Continuous Testing to automate and integrate testing within CI/CD pipelines for web and mobile applications, improving application quality by testing across varied devices and environments. It enhances release quality and delivery speed by verifying new features, detecting bugs early, and supporting accessibility testing. This facilitates rapid feedback by prioritizing critical tests and maintaining stability pre-release.

Digital.ai

Perfecto is a cloud-based testing platform that supports automated and manual testing processes across many devices and operating systems, facilitating cross-platform and real-time data access. Users experience seamless testing integrations, although improvements are sought in some areas.

Perfecto provides extensive mobile testing capabilities across iOS, Android, and more, with automation and enhanced reporting options such as video recordings. While it excels with Appium and Selenium integration for cross-platform consistency and CI Dashboard features, it faces challenges in iOS web testing and hybrid apps. Users indicate the need for better integration with test management tools, dashboard metrics improvements, and machine learning features. Cloud device response times and UI interactions could benefit from performance enhancements, while users desire longer report history and API automation advancements.

What are Perfecto's most important features?

Cloud-based Architecture: Access a vast array of devices and OS versions for testing scalability.
Automation: Supports Selenium and Appium for streamlined testing processes.
Enhanced Reporting: Offers video recordings to help validate tests thoroughly.
Cross-platform Testing: Execute tests across multiple platforms efficiently.
Real-time Data Access: Monitor tests via CI Dashboard and Live Stream.

What benefits or ROI can users expect from reviews?

Increased Device Availability: Quickly access the newest devices and software updates.
Improved Testing Speed: Allow faster test execution and feedback loops.
Scalability: Easily scale up or down with cloud-based resources.
Enhanced Productivity: Automate tests and streamline reporting for efficiency.

Perfecto has broad applications in industries such as retail, finance, and technology, where secure and scalable testing is critical. Organizations employ it in both private and public cloud environments for mobile, web, and API testing. Its ability to provide extensive device coverage and integration into existing CI/CD processes makes it integral for ensuring reliable mobile app performance and compatibility across platforms.

Perforce

Sample Customers

Samsung, American Express, Barclays, China Mobile, Citi, Cisco, McAfee

Virgin Media, Paychex, Rabobank, R+V, Discover

Buyer's Guide

Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. Perfecto

April 2026

Free Report: Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. Perfecto

Find out what your peers are saying about Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. Perfecto and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,915 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. Perfecto report.

See our list of best Mobile App Testing Tools vendors and best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Mobile App Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.