• Home
  • Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. TestObject

Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs TestObject comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Digital.ai Logo

Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Read 2 Digital.ai Continuous Testing reviews
454 views|324 comparisons
50% willing to recommend
Sauce Labs Logo

TestObject

Read 1 TestObject review
80 views|36 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Mobile App Testing Tools
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Digital.ai Continuous Testing and TestObject based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Mobile App Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Mobile App Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Jakob Nielsen
Useful for running tests on many different types of real devices but requires some end-to-end video examples to get started quickly
RajeevSAwant
Low-code testing platform used for API and visual testing as well as AI-based scriptless automation
TestObject have released new capabilities that have helped us to provide a comprehensive solution to our end customers. Customers do not need to... Read more →
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable part of Experitest is the number of real devices on which the test is run.""Experitest is one of the only companies to offer a real device on the cloud to perform testing. They also provide quality documentations that help you navigate and maximize the solution."

More Digital.ai Continuous Testing Pros →

"TestObject have released new capabilities that have helped us to provide a comprehensive solution to our end customers. Customers do not need to provide upfront investment in mobile devices as these are pretty costly."

More TestObject Pros →

Cons
"I would also like to see more videos and descriptions that could make installation more efficient.""I have been automating tests for many years on many things but not on mobile devices. The amount of time that I have spent on just figuring out how to use Experitest and get it to work was quite long compared to what I have been doing before. I spent the first two weeks just getting it started. It would be good to have some video explanation of how to use it on your devices and get started. Their online documentation is quite good and extensive, but it would be quite good to have some end-to-end examples demonstrated."

More Digital.ai Continuous Testing Cons →

"In a future release, we would like to have the ARML model included."

More TestObject Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It is quite fairly priced, but it really depends on your budget. It is somewhere in the mid-range of products. It is not free and it is not QGP that nearly costs a whole house. You pay for the number of users who require access to execute the tests."
  • "We make monthly payments. The cost is dependent on the number of devices we intend to support."

    • More Digital.ai Continuous Testing Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile App Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    What do you like most about TestObject?
    Top Answer:TestObject have released new capabilities that have helped us to provide a comprehensive solution to our end customers. Customers do not need to provide upfront investment in mobile devices as these… more »
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TestObject?
    Top Answer:TestObject is cost effective, especially from a test automation coverage perspective.
    What needs improvement with TestObject?
    Top Answer:In a future release, we would like to have the ARML model included.
    Ranking
    10th
    out of 15 in Mobile App Testing Tools
    Views
    454
    Comparisons
    324
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    9th
    out of 15 in Mobile App Testing Tools
    Views
    80
    Comparisons
    36
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    310
    Rating
    10.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Experitest Seetest, Experitest
    Learn More
    Digital.ai
    Sauce Labs
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Experitest's continuous testing solutions enable enterprises to reduce risk and provide their customers satisfying, error-free experiences across all devices and browsers. They seamlessly integrate with best-in-class tools throughout the DevOps pipeline allowing organizations to rapidly deliver highly protected, quality applications at-speed and at-scale.

    Everyone hates bugs. That’s why TestObject – an in-the-cloud, all-you-need testing tool – was founded in 2012. App quality has a major impact on your apps’ success but massive fragmentation of operating systems and mobile devices makes it hard for developers to test and guarantee the functionality of apps under different conditions. This is where TestObject comes to play. The company from Brandenburg, Germany provides a cloud platform with numerous real Android and iOS devices, accessible directly from your browser. Developers can upload their apps onto devices and see if and how they work. Along with the devices TestObject provides several testing tools to check the app’s functionality from all angles. Test more, worry less.

    Sample Customers
    Samsung, American Express, Barclays, China Mobile, Citi, Cisco, McAfee
    BW Bank, Telefonica
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Insurance Company8%
    Retailer7%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise75%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Mobile App Testing Tools
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Mobile App Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Digital.ai Continuous Testing is ranked 10th in Mobile App Testing Tools while TestObject is ranked 9th in Mobile App Testing Tools with 1 review. Digital.ai Continuous Testing is rated 6.6, while TestObject is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Digital.ai Continuous Testing writes "Useful for running tests on many different types of real devices but requires some end-to-end video examples to get started quickly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TestObject writes "Low-code testing platform used for API and visual testing as well as AI-based scriptless automation". Digital.ai Continuous Testing is most compared with Perfecto, Tricentis Tosca, LambdaTest, Sauce Labs and Katalon Studio, whereas TestObject is most compared with .

    See our list of best Mobile App Testing Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Mobile App Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.