BlazeMeter's pricing depends on the type of account used. They offer multiple account types, with cost variations based on features accessible under each account.
It is a bit pricey, especially if you're primarily interested in its recording and script conversion features. However, you'll need to opt for the higher-priced plans to access advanced features like scalability and distribution, as these features aren't included in the basic version. Additionally, the resources available in the basic plan are limited compared to the higher tiers.
Senior Manager at 360logica Software Testing Services
Real User
Top 10
Feb 21, 2024
The pricing is manageable. It is not that big. Big companies won't mind the licensing costs. However, Neustar has more reasonable pricing. Most people don't prefer Neustar, but it is a good solution.
It is an averagely priced product. One of the reasons my company opted for the tool is because it is an averagely-priced product. Though we do have an APM tool in place, we chose BlazeMeter for cloud testing in our company.
Senior Product Owner at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Sep 18, 2022
It's consumption-based pricing but with a ceiling. They're called CVUs, or consumption variable units. We can use API testing, GUI testing, and test data, but everything gets converted into CVUs, so we are free to use the platform in its entirety without getting bogged down by a license for certain testing areas. We know for sure how much we are going to spend. There's one additional component of dedicated IP. That was added for us because for SaaS and cloud-based applications, we wanted to use the SaaS but not the whole internet. Dedicated IPs are expensive, so that is charged separately.
The product isn't cheap, but it isn't the most expensive on the market. During our proof of concept, we discovered that you get what you pay for; we found a cheaper solution we tested to be full of bugs. Therefore, we are willing to pay the higher price tag for the quality BlazeMeter offers.
I can't speak about pricing. My general evaluation isn't from that standpoint. I make the pitch to the leadership, saying, "I think we should get this," and somebody above me makes a decision about whether we can afford it.
AVP at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 5
Jul 30, 2021
The pricing of the solution is pretty good. It's not overly expensive. We pay to license the solution every year. There are many types of license models. We have chosen the UH license model for which we pay every year.
BlazeMeter ensures delivery of high-performance software by enabling DevOps teams to quickly and easily run open-source-based performance tests against any mobile app, website or API at massive scale to validate performance at every stage of software delivery.
The rapidly growing BlazeMeter community has more than 100,000 developers and includes prominent global brands such as Adobe, Atlassian, Gap, NBC Universal, Pfizer and Walmart as customers. Founded in 2011, the company is headquartered...
BlazeMeter's pricing depends on the type of account used. They offer multiple account types, with cost variations based on features accessible under each account.
BlazeMeter requires licensing, which means it is not free like JMeter, adding to the setup cost considerations.
BlazeMeter's pricing is competitive but can be negotiable.
It is a bit pricey, especially if you're primarily interested in its recording and script conversion features. However, you'll need to opt for the higher-priced plans to access advanced features like scalability and distribution, as these features aren't included in the basic version. Additionally, the resources available in the basic plan are limited compared to the higher tiers.
We pay a yearly licensing fee for the solution.
The product pricing is reasonable.
I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, where one is very cheap, and ten is very expensive.
The pricing is manageable. It is not that big. Big companies won't mind the licensing costs. However, Neustar has more reasonable pricing. Most people don't prefer Neustar, but it is a good solution.
It is an averagely priced product. One of the reasons my company opted for the tool is because it is an averagely-priced product. Though we do have an APM tool in place, we chose BlazeMeter for cloud testing in our company.
When compared with the cost of the licenses of other tools, BlazeMeter's license price is good.
I rate the product's price two on a scale of one to ten, where one is very cheap, and ten is very expensive. The solution is not expensive.
BlazeMeter is more affordable than some alternatives on the market, but it is still expensive.
It's consumption-based pricing but with a ceiling. They're called CVUs, or consumption variable units. We can use API testing, GUI testing, and test data, but everything gets converted into CVUs, so we are free to use the platform in its entirety without getting bogged down by a license for certain testing areas. We know for sure how much we are going to spend. There's one additional component of dedicated IP. That was added for us because for SaaS and cloud-based applications, we wanted to use the SaaS but not the whole internet. Dedicated IPs are expensive, so that is charged separately.
The product isn't cheap, but it isn't the most expensive on the market. During our proof of concept, we discovered that you get what you pay for; we found a cheaper solution we tested to be full of bugs. Therefore, we are willing to pay the higher price tag for the quality BlazeMeter offers.
I can't speak about pricing. My general evaluation isn't from that standpoint. I make the pitch to the leadership, saying, "I think we should get this," and somebody above me makes a decision about whether we can afford it.
The solution is free and open source.
The cost is a bit high for the Indian consumer. For a European or American user, the solution may not seem that expensive.
The pricing of the solution is pretty good. It's not overly expensive. We pay to license the solution every year. There are many types of license models. We have chosen the UH license model for which we pay every year.
The licensing fees are billed on a monthly basis and they cost approximately $100 for the basic plan.
Cost is a little high but is reasonable for a startup at our scale. For personal use I believe the pricing for the paid plans is a bit out of reach.