Regarding pricing, it is favorable compared to other tools, providing good value. The licensing is flexible, with options for one or two-year terms based on user requirements, and BlazeMeter occasionally offers discounts, which is excellent.
BlazeMeter's pricing depends on the type of account used. They offer multiple account types, with cost variations based on features accessible under each account.
It is a bit pricey, especially if you're primarily interested in its recording and script conversion features. However, you'll need to opt for the higher-priced plans to access advanced features like scalability and distribution, as these features aren't included in the basic version. Additionally, the resources available in the basic plan are limited compared to the higher tiers.
Senior Manager at 360logica Software Testing Services
Real User
Feb 21, 2024
The pricing is manageable. It is not that big. Big companies won't mind the licensing costs. However, Neustar has more reasonable pricing. Most people don't prefer Neustar, but it is a good solution.
It is an averagely priced product. One of the reasons my company opted for the tool is because it is an averagely-priced product. Though we do have an APM tool in place, we chose BlazeMeter for cloud testing in our company.
Senior Product Owner at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Sep 18, 2022
It's consumption-based pricing but with a ceiling. They're called CVUs, or consumption variable units. We can use API testing, GUI testing, and test data, but everything gets converted into CVUs, so we are free to use the platform in its entirety without getting bogged down by a license for certain testing areas. We know for sure how much we are going to spend. There's one additional component of dedicated IP. That was added for us because for SaaS and cloud-based applications, we wanted to use the SaaS but not the whole internet. Dedicated IPs are expensive, so that is charged separately.
The product isn't cheap, but it isn't the most expensive on the market. During our proof of concept, we discovered that you get what you pay for; we found a cheaper solution we tested to be full of bugs. Therefore, we are willing to pay the higher price tag for the quality BlazeMeter offers.
I can't speak about pricing. My general evaluation isn't from that standpoint. I make the pitch to the leadership, saying, "I think we should get this," and somebody above me makes a decision about whether we can afford it.
The pricing of the solution is pretty good. It's not overly expensive. We pay to license the solution every year. There are many types of license models. We have chosen the UH license model for which we pay every year.
BlazeMeter offers cloud-based load generation with flexibility through open-source tools, supporting high concurrent user tests with a user-friendly interface. Its integrations enhance performance testing capabilities significantly, although challenges remain in speed and load generator provisioning.BlazeMeter is a comprehensive performance testing platform that supports JMeter test scalability and integrates smoothly with tools like New Relic for detailed analytics. It supports API and...
Regarding pricing, it is favorable compared to other tools, providing good value. The licensing is flexible, with options for one or two-year terms based on user requirements, and BlazeMeter occasionally offers discounts, which is excellent.
BlazeMeter's pricing depends on the type of account used. They offer multiple account types, with cost variations based on features accessible under each account.
BlazeMeter requires licensing, which means it is not free like JMeter, adding to the setup cost considerations.
BlazeMeter's pricing is competitive but can be negotiable.
It is a bit pricey, especially if you're primarily interested in its recording and script conversion features. However, you'll need to opt for the higher-priced plans to access advanced features like scalability and distribution, as these features aren't included in the basic version. Additionally, the resources available in the basic plan are limited compared to the higher tiers.
We pay a yearly licensing fee for the solution.
The product pricing is reasonable.
I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, where one is very cheap, and ten is very expensive.
The pricing is manageable. It is not that big. Big companies won't mind the licensing costs. However, Neustar has more reasonable pricing. Most people don't prefer Neustar, but it is a good solution.
It is an averagely priced product. One of the reasons my company opted for the tool is because it is an averagely-priced product. Though we do have an APM tool in place, we chose BlazeMeter for cloud testing in our company.
When compared with the cost of the licenses of other tools, BlazeMeter's license price is good.
I rate the product's price two on a scale of one to ten, where one is very cheap, and ten is very expensive. The solution is not expensive.
BlazeMeter is more affordable than some alternatives on the market, but it is still expensive.
It's consumption-based pricing but with a ceiling. They're called CVUs, or consumption variable units. We can use API testing, GUI testing, and test data, but everything gets converted into CVUs, so we are free to use the platform in its entirety without getting bogged down by a license for certain testing areas. We know for sure how much we are going to spend. There's one additional component of dedicated IP. That was added for us because for SaaS and cloud-based applications, we wanted to use the SaaS but not the whole internet. Dedicated IPs are expensive, so that is charged separately.
The product isn't cheap, but it isn't the most expensive on the market. During our proof of concept, we discovered that you get what you pay for; we found a cheaper solution we tested to be full of bugs. Therefore, we are willing to pay the higher price tag for the quality BlazeMeter offers.
I can't speak about pricing. My general evaluation isn't from that standpoint. I make the pitch to the leadership, saying, "I think we should get this," and somebody above me makes a decision about whether we can afford it.
The solution is free and open source.
The cost is a bit high for the Indian consumer. For a European or American user, the solution may not seem that expensive.
The pricing of the solution is pretty good. It's not overly expensive. We pay to license the solution every year. There are many types of license models. We have chosen the UH license model for which we pay every year.
The licensing fees are billed on a monthly basis and they cost approximately $100 for the basic plan.
Cost is a little high but is reasonable for a startup at our scale. For personal use I believe the pricing for the paid plans is a bit out of reach.