BizFlow vs CMW Tracker comparison

BizFlow and CMW Lab are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. BizFlow is ranked #41, while CMW Lab is ranked #39. BizFlow holds a 0.8% mindshare in BPM, compared to CMW Lab’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of BizFlow users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of CMW Lab users who would recommend it.

BizFlow

Read 3 BizFlow reviews

493 Views
488 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CMW Tracker

Read 15 CMW Tracker reviews

885 Views
584 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

BizFlow

CMW Tracker

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 21, 2025

BizFlow and CMW Tracker are competitors in the business process management arena. CMW Tracker seems to have the upper hand due to its robust project management tools and customizability, appealing more to organizations with complex needs.

Features: BizFlow provides dynamic workflow and task automation, adaptable templates, and seamless integration with third-party applications. In contrast, CMW Tracker offers comprehensive project management features, high customizability, and powerful reporting tools, which enable detailed insights and extensive control over processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CMW Tracker facilitates easy cloud-based deployment with minimal IT support, and offers robust customer support and training resources. BizFlow also features a straightforward deployment process, emphasizing customization assistance and dedicated account management. CMW Tracker's flexibility and support ensure a smoother experience in complex environments.

Pricing and ROI: BizFlow offers a cost-effective pricing model, reducing initial investments and providing favorable ROI with moderate setup costs and ongoing savings. CMW Tracker's pricing reflects its extensive capabilities, potentially leading to longer-term gains through productivity improvements, despite a steeper upfront cost.

To learn more, read our detailed BizFlow vs. CMW Tracker Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BizFlow vs. CMW Tracker

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BizFlow

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

41st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

CMW Tracker

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

39th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (38th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of BizFlow is 0.8%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CMW Tracker is 0.9%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
CMW Tracker	0.9%
BizFlow	0.8%
Other	98.3%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Satya Singh

Human Resource Executive at MetLife

Seamless automation for workflows, customizable and UI friendly

I would rate the stability a seven out of ten because other tools in the market have extra capabilities that BizFlow doesn't have yet. They have some built-in capabilities and AI features, and everyone is thinking about how to implement AI in their area. I haven't seen any updates from BizFlow on this, but they might plan to implement it soon. However, we don't have this capability right now. This could be one reason why people might move from BizFlow to another tool. For example, with Nintex, we can integrate Google Cloud and achieve some functionality from Google Cloud as well. IBM also introduced some free tests in their DPM services with AI. These are good things in the market right now.

Read full review

Sarah Sheluchin

Works

Excellent task manager software - supports both management and workflow

Excellent task manager software - supports both management and workflow. Time tracking is available and much used in our firm. Integration with Microsoft Outlook is also a great feature, along with the ability to access from mobile. Being able to use Comindware Tracker for common processes or standalone tasks for crucial in our decision to test the software. The software is flexible and computer-novice friendly, making training required minimal and efficient to implement.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"There are so many advantages. First things, like we have a seamless automation capability available here in BizFlow. Totally customizable, UI we can create, and the third-party integration is also achievable. Not with the in-built functionality, but with custom code and all, we can achieve that thing also."

"Customize workflow processes visually and interactively."

"I love this software because this software helps me to increase team productivity day-by-day."

"Low code development."

"The ability to access Comindware Tracker from mobile has been greatly valuable to our organization. We are often out of office and this can create timeframe and task management issues. Being able to access tasks and time tracking while on the move is a great asset."

"The configurable dashboard analytics and reporting capabilities ensure timely decision making."

"The workflow tracker helps us to track our staff's workflow. It helps us to improve the productivity of our team."

"The clean interface, prioritization, and private task lists aren't present in other solutions."

"This software makes it so easy and enjoyable to work with the team. Any user can learn and start using the application quickly."

More CMW Tracker pros

Cons

"Nintex provided an in-built functionality. Like integration-related things, so many service types are available. You just have to configure it. So, such kinds of things decrease the timing of development. So, it is missing in Bizflow."

"The UX/UI could be reviewed and revamped to meet new the criteria of Digitalization and Innovation."

"I am expecting new updates to improve the software."

"It would be wonderful to have newer version releases more frequently, but it is quite a minor con."

"We are using the backdated version of this software. That is why we lack of some features. I hope when we update the version, then all the problems will be solved."

"The initial setup can be quite slow and finicky."

"Figuring out how to integrate defined teams or groups into this system is difficult, and there are no contextual menus."

"The OpenAPI is good, but it is not enough. It lacks out-of-box integrations with popular web services."

"The initial setup seemed a bit complex, and there is no great documentation."

More CMW Tracker cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is a main concern for any organization, but some big organizations may find it affordable. For example, in Indian currency, it would be around 1,000 per license for a BizFlow license."

"I benefit from this software by getting a variety of reporting options and features for a relatively low cost"

"The price is so reasonable."

"Great value for the money."

"The pricing and licensing is as per market standards, except that the process of extending licenses is also easy."

"This solution has a very lost cost."

"Price per user works for me when they do not count my clients, which fill forms."

"Setup cost is reasonable and average on the market. They offer simple licensing and price per user."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	3

Comparisons

Camunda vs BizFlow

Compared 46% of the time

OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs BizFlow

Compared 27% of the time

IBM BPM vs BizFlow

Compared 27% of the time

More BizFlow Competitors

Aurea CX Process vs CMW Tracker

Compared 15% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs CMW Tracker

Compared 13% of the time

OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs CMW Tracker

Compared 12% of the time

IBM BPM vs CMW Tracker

Compared 11% of the time

Fujitsu Interstage BPM vs CMW Tracker

Compared 10% of the time

More CMW Tracker Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BizFlow

January 2026

Download BizFlow product report

Buyer's Guide

CMW Tracker

January 2026

Download CMW Tracker product report

Also Known As

No data available

Comindware Tracker

Overview

Business process management & workflow automation software; designed to work with people and with existing systems.

BizFlow

CMW Tracker offers a browser-accessible workflow management platform supporting low code development with features such as team collaboration and excellent customer service. Users value its affordability and ability to enhance transparency and standardize processes.

CMW Tracker streamlines project management by allowing non-technical users to create workflows, manage tasks, and synchronize tools efficiently. This platform emphasizes ease of deployment and modification, bringing transparency and clarity to processes while enabling workflow automation. Its user-friendly design, robust analytics, and cost-effectiveness make it a favored choice for organizations needing efficient workflow management.

What are the main features of CMW Tracker?

Easy Deployment and Modification: Quickly set up and customize according to user needs.
Browser Accessibility: Access from any location using any web browser.
Low Code Development: Empower users without technical expertise to create workflows.
Team Collaboration Tools: Facilitate seamless communication and collaboration among team members.
Robust Analytics and Reporting: Comprehensive analysis and reporting to track and optimize projects.
Mobile Accessibility: Manage time and tasks efficiently outside the office.

What benefits can users expect from CMW Tracker?

Improved Transparency: Increased visibility into project processes and status.
Standardized Processes: Better alignment and consistency in task management.
Cost-Effective Solution: Affordability without compromising on features and support.
Enhanced Ease of Use: User-friendly design reduces reliance on technical teams.

CMW Tracker is widely implemented across industries requiring efficient workflow management, particularly in settings where collaboration and process transparency are critical. Organizations benefit from its ability to standardize operations, reduce IT dependency, and enhance service delivery by enabling seamless communication among dispersed team members working on joint projects.

CMW Lab

Sample Customers

The Immigration and Custom Enforcement, The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, Naval Special Warfare, Jardine Lloyd Thompson, Premier Pensions Management Ltd, Continental AG, Samsung Heavy Industries, Brazos Higher Education Service Corporation

Anthem, Hertz, Aetna, CVS Pharmacy, Covidien, Quicken Loans, Associated British Ports, United Card Services

Buyer's Guide

BizFlow vs. CMW Tracker

December 2025

Free Report: BizFlow vs. CMW Tracker

Find out what your peers are saying about BizFlow vs. CMW Tracker and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BizFlow vs. CMW Tracker report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.