Basecamp vs OpenText Project and portfolio Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Basecamp Logo
436 views|316 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Basecamp and OpenText Project and portfolio Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Project Portfolio Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Basecamp vs. OpenText Project and portfolio Management Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The ease of use is valuable.""The ability to network informally is great for communicating with colleagues."

More Basecamp Pros →

"Scenario comparison is the feature most valuable to us and the reason why we decided to choose HPE PPM over other portfolio management products.""It is very important that the platform gives us a single place where we can measure progress toward goals, as we have weekly meetings with the CTO. We present these consolidated overviews and dashboards to him so that he has an overview of all the projects and can see the status of all the problems that we have and we are working on.""The data provided by PPM is trusted and is available almost immediately; without trusted data there is very less scope of any tool to be successful.""There are so many different pieces of functionality, and we use almost every single piece from deployment to demand, project, resource, and time management.""I like the ease of customization from an admin perspective. I'm really excited about some of the things that are coming in version 10.0.3 as far as what admins are able to do.""Micro Focus PPM is flexible and easy to use. It's simple to customize and configure workflows.""Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management (PPM) has a very strong workflow engine.""Recent Program Management lifecycle, Program Management aggregation views due to interactive UI (selection of risks, issues, and changes in Program Overview) and “flash look & feel" of this functional chunk, which is different in comparison to other parts of HPE PPM."

More OpenText Project and portfolio Management Pros →

Cons
"The solution could be more user-friendly.""The product isn't easy to use. It's not very intuitive."

More Basecamp Cons →

"Micro Focus PPM should be less dependent on coding. It could also benefit from some updates to the software architecture. These have been on the roadmap for years now, but they haven't been released.""The user interface is very, very old and is missing some functions, such as, for example, re-do, follow, and share functions. The UI is not good.""Currently, HPE PPM does not allow “Project” approval, but only simple “Demand Request” approval (mobility).""I was not involved in the initial setup. I know that the project involved a lot of consulting that took a long time.""I would also like to see improvement in PPM's reporting and alerts. PPM has reporting capabilities, including HTML reports and portlets. But a majority of clients will build their own reporting platforms, or they will use external reporting platforms like Tableau and QlikView.""User interface continues to be poor. The product does not have a similar view in the different modules, e.g., staffing vs financial management, it looks like you are working with a different product and it is not easy to use or intuitive.""Portfolio scenarios: This is a very powerful feature. However, it’s limited to analyses.""The solution can sometimes be a little inflexible and a bit caustic."

More OpenText Project and portfolio Management Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Support and license management are two hurdles for us. Every time we purchase new licenses, it has taken us half a year to implement those."
  • "It is SaaS without a base fee."
  • "HPE PPM SaaS model is comprehensive, however, the base fee component has customer resistance to its recurring setup,"
  • "Now, we also received an increase in the support license prices, without any advanced notice. At this point, switching to unify all our licensing under HPE and customer support has been poor."
  • "We have an annual license, and it is fairly priced in comparison to that of other solutions."
  • "A large organization will find Micro Focus PPM affordable, but it may be a bit costly for a small or medium-sized company. The license is based on the number of users."
  • More OpenText Project and portfolio Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The licensing costs are approximately $900 annually. I rate the price a four out of ten, with one being cheap and ten being expensive.
    Top Answer:The recent update on the solution has made it a little bit complex. For example, to create a team and a project, there is a separate button that you need to click. Recently they updated it with only… more »
    Top Answer:Hi, @Cheryl Joseph Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management solution could be a good candidate, see my review on this product, or if you may need more information to drop me a message.  You can… more »
    Top Answer:Micro Focus PPM is flexible and easy to use. It's simple to customize and configure workflows.
    Top Answer:A large organization will find Micro Focus PPM affordable, but it may be a bit costly for a small or medium-sized company. The license is based on the number of users.
    Ranking
    22nd
    Views
    436
    Comparisons
    316
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    349
    Rating
    9.0
    Views
    665
    Comparisons
    292
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    1,368
    Rating
    7.9
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management (PPM), HPE Project and Portfolio Management, HPE PPM
    Learn More
    Overview
    Basecamp is a web-based project-management tool developed by Basecamp and launched in 2004, with a new version being launched in 2012. Basecamp offers to-do lists, wiki-style web-based text documents, milestone management, file sharing, time tracking, and a messaging system. Basecamp Classic also offers integration with Basecamp's own Campfire product, and features APIs that are used by a host of web and mobile apps. Basecamp Classic's interface is available in different languages (e.g. Spanish, French, Italian, German, Finnish and Japanese). The newer version of Basecamp currently only supports English as the interface language.
    OpenText Project and Portfolio Management (PPM) combines workflows and data to align investments with strategy. Top-down and bottom-up analytics power this strategic portfolio and project management tool.
    Sample Customers
    Ashland Addison Florist Co., Victory Auto Wreckers, Ideal Box Co., Hollymatic Corp.
    Bank Simpanan Nasional, Smart Communications, Aareon AG
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm43%
    Insurance Company14%
    Non Profit14%
    Maritime Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company30%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Government11%
    Insurance Company5%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise63%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise75%
    Buyer's Guide
    Basecamp vs. OpenText Project and portfolio Management
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Basecamp vs. OpenText Project and portfolio Management and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Basecamp is ranked 22nd in Project Management Software with 3 reviews while OpenText Project and portfolio Management is ranked 10th in Project Portfolio Management with 24 reviews. Basecamp is rated 7.6, while OpenText Project and portfolio Management is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Basecamp writes "Easy to navigate and good for communications but needs better documentation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Project and portfolio Management writes "Gives management a cohesive place for tracking business strategies and goals, but cosmetic aspects need work". Basecamp is most compared with Planview Portfolios, Jira, Smartsheet and ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management, whereas OpenText Project and portfolio Management is most compared with Jira, Planview PPM Pro, Smartsheet and Teamwork . See our Basecamp vs. OpenText Project and portfolio Management report.

    See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors and best Project Management Software vendors.

    We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.