We performed a comparison between Azure Key Vault and N-able Passportal based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Password Managers solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The platform has a valuable feature for seamless integration."
"The product’s advantageous feature is integration."
"There is advanced data protection available. We're working in a highly regulated environment, and this is essential to us."
"The solution does an excellent job of storing and retrieving our stored keys."
"Azure Key Vault is very affordable, with charges of less than a dollar for over ten thousand keys."
"The most valuable feature is that you can retrieve user account details from the cloud."
"The initial setup is very straightforward. It only took a few minutes."
"A high level of security."
"The most valuable feature of the N-able Passportal is its functionality. You can store your passwords safely, and not just anyone can gain access to them. If you have an onsite system, it can change the password for you on a daily basis. This is a great benefit because you don't have to worry about if the account's breached tomorrow, your pass is going to be changed. It's perfect."
"The most valuable features of the N-able Passportal are the password rotations, and the ability to be able to store passwords. You can have it on your phone or your desktop. You're not required to have it only on your desktop computer."
"If I consider how some people complain that a solution to store information should be available at a low cost, I would say that Azure Key Vault's price should be made cheaper."
"Inability to access the solution on the phone."
"If you check the capabilities of other key management services across Amazon, HashiCorp, and Google, there are features that Key Vault doesn't have. It could be the case that when you use Key Vault, you might be forced to use a third-party solution to get certain services. If those services could be included in Key Vault, there would be diminished reasons to go for a third-party key management system."
"The product must provide AI features."
"Azure needs to provide versions of Key Vault that are suitable for different sizes of companies."
"Azure has great documentation, but I would like to see more use cases pertaining to specific industries. For example, case studies on how to use HIPAA compliant solutions in the healthcare industry or how to use PCI compliant data analytics solutions in the financial technology industry would be helpful."
"The solution needs to improve reliability and protection."
"There's room for improvement in cross-platform compatibility."
"Sometimes accessing the solution is a bit slow, but that could be due to conditions at many different points. However, some issues that do arise are outside of our control."
"N-able Passportal can improve the stability because sometimes I can't log in. I had some issues a couple of months ago where I couldn't log in and that was problematic."
Azure Key Vault is ranked 1st in Enterprise Password Managers with 46 reviews while N-able Passportal is ranked 18th in Enterprise Password Managers with 2 reviews. Azure Key Vault is rated 8.6, while N-able Passportal is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Azure Key Vault writes "Allows us to securely store our keys to prevent unauthorized access to unwanted users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of N-able Passportal writes "Useful daily password changes and scales well". Azure Key Vault is most compared with AWS Secrets Manager, HashiCorp Vault, CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault, AWS Certificate Manager and Delinea Secret Server, whereas N-able Passportal is most compared with Keeper. See our Azure Key Vault vs. N-able Passportal report.
See our list of best Enterprise Password Managers vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Password Managers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.