Azure Backup vs Carbonite Server comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Microsoft and OpenText are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Microsoft is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.0, while OpenText is ranked #55. Microsoft holds a 1.1% mindshare in BRS, compared to OpenText’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Azure Backup

Read 60 Azure Backup reviews

6,607 Views
6,343 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Carbonite Server

Read 7 Carbonite Server reviews

4,624 Views
3,098 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Azure Backup

Carbonite Server

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

Carbonite Server and Azure Backup compete in the data backup and recovery category. Azure Backup appears to have the upper hand due to superior features and user satisfaction, making it worth the investment based on the comparison results.

Features: Carbonite Server offers reliability, simple setup, and cost-effectiveness. Azure Backup provides comprehensive integration with other Azure services, advanced security options, and a rich feature set.

Room for Improvement: Carbonite Server could improve faster recovery times, better scalability, and enhance user interface. Azure Backup can enhance documentation, address occasional performance issues, and streamline its user interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Carbonite Server is noted for quick deployment and responsive support. Azure Backup's deployment is more complex due to extensive features but benefits from strong customer support channels.

Pricing and ROI: Carbonite Server is cost-effective with a quick ROI. Azure Backup, although more expensive, justifies the cost with advanced features and seamless integration capabilities. Azure Backup's pricing model is seen as fair relative to its overall value.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Backup vs. Carbonite Server Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Azure Backup vs. Carbonite Server

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 918,614 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Backup

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

18th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Carbonite Server

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

55th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Backup (37th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Azure Backup is 1.1%, down from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Carbonite Server is 0.9%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Azure Backup	1.1%
Carbonite Server	0.9%
Other	98.0%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Sanjay Sahu

Project Manager at Capgemini

Has supported secure data storage with incremental backups and centralized monitoring

Azure Backup supports all the features that we need, so additional features are not an immediate need for me. The documentation for Azure Backup seems okay for me; it is good overall, but it should be more descriptive for each item. It should elaborate more on how backup and restore are fulfilled in different scenarios. One of the reviews indicates that Azure Backup needs improvements for specific backup options beyond just full VM snapshots. I believe it should be improved actually. Regarding specific backup options, I say there should be improvements compared to how they provided them in older days.

Read full review

Chris Puddy

Backup, storage and disaster recovery technical specialist at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

A reliable backup product which needs little management

For most technical users the setup and initial deployment are fairly straightforward and once deployed it 99% of the time looks after itself. Installation of the agents is similar to most other products in that it has an install wizard to guide you, the accompanying documentation is also very useful to assist wherever you are in the agent install and policy setup process. Normally our customers' IT team does the deployment of agents, however, this isn't a daunting task unless you are dealing with multiple servers to protect the product. On a server-by-server basis, the deployment doesn't take long. From the MSP side of things, the infrastructure sitting behind the scenes doesn't take too much to install, configure and maintain.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like that it's a simple system."

"I have no issues with the stability at all. So I don't necessarily care about the stability of the product. I look more at whether or not can I recover. And I haven't had a failed recovery yet. I've got no failed recoveries of all my years."

"The product is cost-effective compared to other vendors."

"I would recommend this solution to other companies because it's an enterprise product that suits all requirements."

"It is a stable solution...It is a highly scalable solution."

"It's useful, it works, and it's fairly reliable."

"Microsoft technical support is okay; I never had any problem with it, and compared to Amazon Web Services, I think I like Microsoft's support because I just have to call them to obtain all the support that I need, and they are very proactive, helping you build solutions since they know that your business will grow and mature after helping you design the solution, provide you with tools, and free licenses."

"We are happy with this product and have not found any issues while using it."

More Azure Backup pros

"The Granular Restore of SQL feature has been a lifesaver more times than I can count. One of the main reasons for looking at Carbonite was their support for platforms like AIX and AS/400 Series."

"It does not slow down your computer or use a lot of resources as it works."

"This solution is very simple to use and I will recommend it to anybody."

"The advice that I have for people looking into using Carbonite Server is that it seems reliable and easy to use."

"The solution is very stable."

"Technical support handled all our issues quickly and effectively."

"I find the BMR/image and the recovery pieces are valuable."

"It seems reliable and easy to use."

More Carbonite Server pros

Cons

"In Avamar, the file-based restores are very quick and fast, whereas, in Azure Backup, VM restore is super easy, but if I have to do a file or a folder restore, I have to mount the entire VM image. I have to wait for some time for it to be mounted, and then I have to go inside and then check the file and copy it somewhere. It's a bit of a manual process, whereas in Avamar, you can directly select a file and folder, and it'll recover with whatever permissions you want."

"Ransomware protection is missing in Azure Backup."

"The monitoring and tagging features could be improved. I would like to see more functionality in regards to the mapping."

"I believe more options could be available to understand better what's happening in the system. Additionally, automating the client updates and connector updates would be beneficial. Updating the connector from time to time can be challenging, and it could be made more transparent and straightforward for users. Moreover, another drawback lies in the time it takes to test full data backup recovery. Deploying a full recovery takes longer. We need to allocate a longer period for complete data recovery to establish the environment again."

"One of the reviews indicates that Azure Backup needs improvements for specific backup options beyond just full VM snapshots. I believe it should be improved actually."

"I once tried restoring a Linux environment, and the size of the Linux VM or the data disk was really huge. It took a really long time to restore the environment and send the data from the storage to the disk. It took around 25 to 30 minutes, which was much longer than I anticipated. They can improve the duration of such restore operations. In the next release, it would also be good if they could reduce the duration for transferring the data from their storage to the actual storage while creating a virtual machine. They can reduce the duration or increase the data transfer rate."

"The reporting functionality of Azure Backup needs improvement."

"Azure Backup can be improved by providing an option and a utility so we can restore quickly instead of any manual intervention."

More Azure Backup cons

"It could be a little bit easier or faster to be able to access data files without having to download anything."

"I would like to see an improvement on the management user interface, as well as Kellion integrations."

"In the next release I would like to see an improvement in the auto failover option."

"The stability has room for improvement."

"The support for object storage isn't quite there yet. Its public cloud support can be improved. I would love to see the public cloud support for object storage, and it would be great, but what I always hear from the folks at Carbonite is that in a lot of cases, it directly competes with their cloud offering. So, I don't know when or where that will go or if that will go anywhere, but we are hopeful to see something. The dashboard is a little outdated. If they gave it a facelift and put some better design around their dashboard, that would be tremendous. I generally care less about the visual aesthetics of an application as long as it does what it needed to do, which is true in the case of this solution. We also have the Microsoft 365 platform. Because they're two separate platforms, I have to log in to my Microsoft platform to manage it, and I have to log into my Carbonite server backup platform to manage it. Having these two coexist together in one management console is really what we're looking for, but we went for it knowing this. We also knew that there would be some integration coming down the road. So, we're again hoping to see some of that coming in 2021."

"The support for object storage isn't quite there yet; its public cloud support can be improved."

"When you have to restore it, Carbonite takes a lot of time."

"They do not yet have USB recovery but they are adding it in coming releases."

More Carbonite Server cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Support payment works by the level of partnership and the number of shares."

"There is a cost per terabyte for using this solution."

"This is an expensive solution in the Bangladesh marketplace."

"The price is pretty good, maybe $30 for a machine, I can't complain."

"The product is neither too expensive nor too cheap."

"Price-wise, it's similar to AWS."

"Pay as you go is the pricing model."

"Azure Backup can be expensive if you are not vigilant about your storage steering."

More Azure Backup pricing and cost advice

"Its price is reasonable."

"We pay 9,000 dollars per year for our license."

"The solution is open source."

"The pricing is between $120 and $150 per year."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

918,614 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Construction Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

11%

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	26
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	25

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

How does Azure Backup differ from Veeam Backup & Replication?

Veeam has a version for Azure but there are organizations, like ours, that are considering moving to an Azure environment and wonder if Azure Backup is better than Veeam Backup and Replication (Vee...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Backup?

The pricing of Azure Backup is fine; it is a low-cost solution.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Backup?

Azure Backup can be improved by providing an option and a utility so we can restore quickly instead of any manual intervention. Restoration times require manual backup and manual interventions, and...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Rubrik vs Azure Backup

Compared 9% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Azure Backup

Compared 9% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs Azure Backup

Compared 7% of the time

N2W vs Azure Backup

Compared 6% of the time

N-able Cove Data Protection vs Azure Backup

Compared 3% of the time

More Azure Backup Competitors

HPE Zerto Software vs Carbonite Server

Compared 5% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Carbonite Server

Compared 5% of the time

Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 vs Carbonite Server

Compared 4% of the time

SugarSync vs Carbonite Server

Compared 4% of the time

Carbonite Safe Backup vs Carbonite Server

Compared 3% of the time

More Carbonite Server Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Backup

October 2026

Download Azure Backup product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Backup

September 2026

Download Carbonite Server product report

Also Known As

No data available

Carbonite Recover Backup

Overview

Azure Backup provides efficient data protection with features like fast recovery and encryption. It integrates seamlessly with Azure services, offering scalable, secure storage solutions. Users benefit from straightforward configurations and flexible retention, although improvements in hybrid integration are needed.

Azure Backup stands out with its comprehensive data protection capabilities, including features such as incremental backups and geo-replication. It ensures consistent security and performance through its scalability and redundancy. Users find the platform cost-effective and appreciate its seamless integration with Azure services. While Azure Backup excels in many areas, such as ease of use and robust monitoring, challenges persist in hybrid environment integration and application-level backups.

What key features does Azure Backup offer?

Ease of use: Features straightforward configuration and incremental backups.
Fast recovery: Supports rapid data restoration with geo-replication.
Advanced protection: Provides encryption and flexible retention options for data security.
Seamless integration: Works well with Azure services for a unified experience.
User-friendly management: Offers robust monitoring and reporting tools.

What advantages should users expect from Azure Backup?

Cost-effectiveness: Provides affordable data protection solutions.
Scalability: Ensures consistent performance with cloud scalability.
Security: Enhances data security with advanced encryption features.
Efficiency: Simplifies backup processes with efficient scheduling.

Azure Backup is widely used in sectors requiring robust data protection, such as financial services, healthcare, and government. It is ideal for organizations looking to back up virtual machines, manage disaster recovery, or support cloud migrations. Its adaptability allows businesses to safeguard SAP workloads and SQL databases efficiently.

Microsoft

Carbonite Server offers robust disaster recovery and data protection, with efficient features for restoring and managing complex server environments.

With capabilities like Bare Metal Recovery and SQL granular restore, Carbonite Server supports AIX and AS/400 Series, making it versatile for different platforms. Its efficient replication and failover processes are particularly beneficial for maintaining business continuity. Users appreciate the straightforward setup, responsive technical support, and automatic updates. There is room for improvement in areas such as instant recovery, more granular user permissions, and enhanced cloud integration. Managed service providers find it useful for offering reliable cloud and on-premises backup solutions.

What are the key features of Carbonite Server?

Bare Metal Recovery: Simplifies full system recovery with minimal user intervention.
SQL Granular Restore: Enhances precision in database recovery operations.
Platform Support: Compatible with AIX, AS/400, VMware, vSphere, and vSAN.
Efficient Replication: Facilitates swift disaster recovery and data transfer.
Automatic Updates: Ensures current software status with less manual effort.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Disaster Recovery: Quick recovery processes improve business resilience.
Easy Verification: Simplifies compliance and data integrity checks.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes system resource usage, enhancing performance.
Reliable Support: Access to responsive technical support mitigates downtime.
Data Protection: Comprehensive solutions for cloud backups and data security.

Industries leveraging Carbonite Server enjoy its ability to support cloud backups, off-site data protection, and complex server restoration, especially in virtualized environments. It is widely used by managed service providers to deliver backup services and ensure application consistency in data transfers.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Russell Reynolds Associates, Somerset County Council, Kardem, PCL Construction

INLINE Commercial Construction, Hamilton County

Buyer's Guide

Azure Backup vs. Carbonite Server

September 2026

Free Report: Azure Backup vs. Carbonite Server

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Backup vs. Carbonite Server and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

918,614 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure Backup vs. Carbonite Server report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.