We performed a comparison between AutoSys Workload Automation and OpenText Cloud Service Automation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, Tidal Software by Redwood, Redwood Software and others in Workload Automation."The most valuable feature of this solution is the functions are easy to use."
"Integration with multiple services and applications across the enterprise."
"Easy configuration and integration with SAP."
"The customized views that each individual can create, and views that can be made free-form, makes this very popular with the programmers."
"The solution has been stable."
"It is stable, it works, and it does what it is supposed to."
"CA Workload Automation AutoSys Edition is one of the most powerful schedulers that you have on the open systems, or going between Window servers; to be able to schedule and take advantage of the different powers that the automation has with it."
"We need to have things run in a very sequential order, so it is very useful that we can schedule the work flows."
"The most valuable feature of Micro Focus Cloud Service is how user friendly the solution is."
"The tool's most valuable feature is life cycle management."
"They could do better supporting it. They have too many of the same type of products, so sometimes it doesn't get as much attention as it should."
"The solution could improve by having support for container environments."
"A better graphical user interface, because we have a lot of people using the client utility, and we want to get them away from that."
"Because this product only computes processing days, it is hard when things need to be scheduled according to non-processing days."
"Some support issues need to be addressed, but not through email, through personal contact via phone or WebEx."
"The visibility and control features are somewhat limited."
"This product needs to improve its graphical user interface."
"The GUI/Workstation is weak and needs to be improved. CA is working on this right now."
"I would like fewer restrictions as a software tester."
"OpenText Cloud Service Automation needs to incorporate easier installation. It should improve skills and quality of support."
More OpenText Cloud Service Automation Pricing and Cost Advice →
AutoSys Workload Automation is ranked 6th in Workload Automation with 79 reviews while OpenText Cloud Service Automation is ranked 27th in Cloud Management with 6 reviews. AutoSys Workload Automation is rated 8.4, while OpenText Cloud Service Automation is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of AutoSys Workload Automation writes "Helps us manage complex workloads, reduce our workload failure rates, and save us time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Cloud Service Automation writes "Comes with life cycle management features but needs improvement in installation ". AutoSys Workload Automation is most compared with Control-M, IBM Workload Automation, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Stonebranch and Automic Workload Automation, whereas OpenText Cloud Service Automation is most compared with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.