AutoSys Workload Automation vs OpenText Cloud Service Automation comparison

The compared Broadcom and OpenText solutions aren't in the same category. Broadcom is ranked #8 in WA , with an average rating of 7.8, and holds a 12.2% mindshare in the category. OpenText is ranked #35 in CM , and holds a 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

AutoSys Workload Automation

Read 81 AutoSys Workload Automation reviews

6,567 Views
4,695 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

OpenText Cloud Service Auto...

Read 6 OpenText Cloud Service Automation reviews

247 Views
164 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AutoSys Workload Automation

OpenText Cloud Service Auto...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AutoSys Workload Automation and OpenText Cloud Service Automation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, Broadcom, Redwood Software and others in Workload Automation.

To learn more, read our detailed Workload Automation Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Workload Automation

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 851,371 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AutoSys Workload Automation

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Workload Automation (8th)

OpenText Cloud Service Auto...

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Management (35th)

Mindshare comparison

AutoSys Workload Automation and OpenText Cloud Service Automation aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. AutoSys Workload Automation is designed for Workload Automation and holds a mindshare of 12.2%, down 18.3% compared to last year.
OpenText Cloud Service Automation, on the other hand, focuses on Cloud Management, holds 0.7% mindshare, up 0.6% since last year.

Workload Automation

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

Antony Askew

Technical Lead at Natwest

Helps us manage complex workloads, reduce our workload failure rates, and save us time

The visibility and control features are somewhat limited. This is a recognized weakness, but thee vendor is currently revamping the user interface to address it. While the current UI is a bit outdated, it's undergoing improvement. AutoSys Workload Automation has some areas for improvement, particularly in housekeeping and product maintenance. These tasks are currently quite manual and labor-intensive for our team. Additionally, the reporting and forecasting functionalities could be more robust. One area for improvement with AutoSys Workload Automation is that it comprises several distinct tools configured to work together. This necessitates familiarity with multiple tools for effective solution management. Consequently, it can sometimes lack a sense of cohesiveness as a unified solution.

Read full review

SunpritSingh

Test Lead at MindTree

A user friendly solution that makes it easy to submit and view jobs

The most valuable feature of Micro Focus Cloud Service is how user-friendly the solution is. Traditionally, when we use a mainframe system to submit jobs, we have to see the spool or any error we might get in the spool. It is very command-based and uses a green screen, which is not user-friendly. Micro Focus enterprise makes it easy to submit and view jobs. We just have to log into the particular portal, go to the catalog and view any files we want. The same can be said about submitting jobs. We know what JCL we want to submit, give it the path, and then submit it with no command required. It is very user-friendly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has allowed us to automate many of the functions of our operations staff. For instance, we had production control staff spending two hours a day entering date parms into our daily business processes. And now, CA Workload Automation does it for us."

"The most valuable features of AutoSys Workload Automation are the file transfer protocol and file watcher. The solution has a user-friendly user interface. It is very simple to use. You have a scope of all your jobs, jobs are what you call tasks that you will automate in the solution. It lets you monitor everything in these jobs."

"The most valuable feature of AutoSys Workload Automation is user-friendliness. If someone has some knowledge of the tool they can use it."

"We use technical support all the time. We would be lost without them. They're fantastic. Really good job. We're able to reach the right person to help us out right away."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the functions are easy to use."

"This solution has made my clients' workplaces a lot less labor-intensive."

"It gives a real-time view of all the batch processing that we have. Monitoring-wise, it is really good."

"It allows you to automate tasks, and reduce headcount, prevent errors, self-heal."

More AutoSys Workload Automation pros

"The tool's most valuable feature is life cycle management."

"The most valuable feature of Micro Focus Cloud Service is how user friendly the solution is."

Cons

"We are trying to see if we can use this from a cloud perspective with AWS, Azure, and other clouds, but it seems that there is no cloud integration in this product. We would like to see cloud integration. We are very pleased with this solution, but we are moving our application to the cloud, and we found out that it doesn't support any cloud features. So, we are trying to find a replacement."

"Documentation and cross-application externals could be improved."

"A better graphical user interface, because we have a lot of people using the client utility, and we want to get them away from that."

"The solution could improve by having support for container environments."

"CA installation processes are never anything but complex."

"AutoSys Workload Automation could improve the integration."

"Performance improvements in the UI would be appreciated."

"I am looking forward to more of their dashboard features. I think it would be very valuable for us to have dashboard features that could be delivered to our customers in the form of a URL, and they could refresh that URL whenever they wanted to get up to date performance metrics out of our systems."

More AutoSys Workload Automation cons

"OpenText Cloud Service Automation needs to incorporate easier installation. It should improve skills and quality of support."

"I would like fewer restrictions as a software tester."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is overpriced."

"I don't have information on the exact licensing cost of AutoSys Workload Automation because that's managed by the tools and financing teams. For agents, it's close to $4,00, but for the server setup, it's usually a one-time license initially, and it's AMC which is paid every year and comes close to $8,000 to $10,000."

"CA pricing has been a problem, and not looked upon favorably here at all."

"Validate how many agents you need beforehand."

"We paid to use the solution monthly."

"There is an annual license to use AutoSys Workload Automation."

"People need to pay attention to how they use their ESP agents on the distributed platform. That's where some of the cost comes in, based on how many you need or how many you use."

"The pricing needs to be improved. Some of my client's complained that it was too expensive."

More AutoSys Workload Automation pricing and cost advice

"OpenText Cloud Service Automation's pricing is average."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,371 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

48%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does Control-M compare with AutoSys Workload Automation?

Control-M acts as a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes, which is helpful because nothing gets left unattended since it is all visible in one place, and th...

See all answers

What do you like most about AutoSys Workload Automation?

The most valuable aspects of AutoSys Workload Automation are its performance, scalability, and ease of getting started for new users.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AutoSys Workload Automation?

The solution is costly. The pricing is based on the number of users, which for me, translates to approximately $120,000 to $130,000 for a license period of two to three years.

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus Cloud Service Automation?

The tool's most valuable feature is life cycle management.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Cloud Service Automation?

OpenText Cloud Service Automation needs to incorporate easier installation. It should improve skills and quality of support.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Micro Focus Cloud Service Automation?

We have large customers for OpenText Cloud Service Automation. I rate it a nine out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

Control-M vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 34% of the time

Automic Automation vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Workload Automation vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 8% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 6% of the time

Stonebranch vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 5% of the time

More AutoSys Workload Automation Competitors

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs OpenText Cloud Service Automation

Compared 56% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs OpenText Cloud Service Automation

Compared 44% of the time

More OpenText Cloud Service Automation Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AutoSys Workload Automation

May 2025

Download AutoSys Workload Automation product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Cloud Service Automation

April 2025

OpenText Cloud Service Automation report

Download OpenText Cloud Service Automation product report

Also Known As

CA Workload Automation, CA Workload Automation AE

Micro Focus Cloud Service Automation, Cloud Service Automation Manager, HPE Cloud Service Automation

Overview

AutoSys Workload Automation is used by organizations for executing thousands of automations, managing server workloads, scheduling CP jobs, file transfers, enterprise batch scheduling, and ETL processing.

Organizations leverage AutoSys Workload Automation for running extensive workloads day and night, particularly important for banks, insurance clients, and enterprises needing robust job scheduling and file transfer processes. It is crucial for managing cross-functional dependencies with 24/7 automated triggers, batch processing, and centralized business process control, ensuring seamless operations across various servers and environments.

What are the most important features?

Easy Configuration: Simplifies initial setup and updates.
SAP Integration: Seamlessly integrates with SAP environments.
Minimal Maintenance: Requires less frequent updates and interventions.
Scalability: Scales to accommodate growing business needs.
Speed and Stability: Ensures high performance and reliable operations.
User-friendly Interface: Enhances user experience and efficiency.
Real-time Batch Processing View: Provides instant insights into batch jobs.
Compatibility: Works well with various software systems.
Robustness: Delivers consistent, reliable performance.
Easy Setup: Simplifies deployment process.
File Transfer Protocol: Facilitates smooth and secure file transfers.
File Watcher: Monitors and manages file changes effectively.
Performance and Upgrades: Ensures improved performance and simplified upgrades.

What are the benefits or ROI items to consider?

Improved Efficiencies: Reduces manual intervention and automates repetitive tasks.
Cost Savings: Optimizes resource usage and reduces operational costs.
Enhanced Reliability: Decreases downtime with robust performance.
Better Integration: Seamlessly integrates with existing systems.
24/7 Operations: Ensures uninterrupted business processes.
Scalable Solutions: Adapts to growing business needs.
Advanced Scheduling: Provides comprehensive job scheduling options.

AutoSys Workload Automation is widely implemented in banking for day and night operations, insurance client environments for reliable support, and enterprises for automated file transfers and robust job scheduling. Organizations centralize business processes and manage cross-functional dependencies effectively with its 24/7 automated triggers, supporting diverse industry needs through scalable and reliable performance.

Broadcom

OpenText Cloud Service Automation provides open, heterogeneous, extensible enterprise-grade cloud service lifecycle management to design and orchestrate full stack services. CSA embraces existing automation assets with an enhanced orchestration engine, which provides IT with an informed, transparent delivery of secure compliant services for the hybrid cloud.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Gaumont, Mercantil do Brasil, CCEE, Hanwha Life

China Merchants Bank, Osiatis

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, Broadcom, Redwood Software and others in Workload Automation. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

851,371 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.