No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Astro by Astronomer vs AutoSys Workload Automation comparison

Why PeerSpot?
Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 18, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

JAMS Scheduler
Sponsored
Ranking in Workload Automation
3rd
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
47
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Astro by Astronomer
Ranking in Workload Automation
7th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
4.9
Number of Reviews
30
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
AutoSys Workload Automation
Ranking in Workload Automation
5th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
84
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Workload Automation category, the mindshare of JAMS Scheduler is 3.5%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Astro by Astronomer is 1.3%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of AutoSys Workload Automation is 6.5%, down from 9.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Workload Automation Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
JAMS Scheduler3.5%
AutoSys Workload Automation6.5%
Astro by Astronomer1.3%
Other88.7%
Workload Automation
 

Featured Reviews

LV
Principal Data Base And Infrastructure Engineer at a outsourcing company with 501-1,000 employees
Automation has replaced nightly monitoring and delivers reliable, unified job scheduling
We have really enjoyed working with JAMS in terms of notifications, alerts, and streamlining. There used to be a process with Automate, which is another product from Fortra, but even before that, the other division of the company that we were merging with had a tool that was built in-house called a file handler or file distributor. It was an in-house developed tool, but it was not as streamlined or as efficient as JAMS is. We literally had to have a dedicated nighttime person monitoring. Although we are 24/7, the divisions of the company that we were using JAMS for have been small scale. While we have automated it, we have streamlined it in such a way that notifications go out and alerts go out, but if there is anything, then we get paged and alerted, and if anything needs to happen at midnight, we can wake up. On the other hand, with the tool I mentioned, the file handler and distributor, we used to have a dedicated nighttime person that had to be sitting and monitoring it to see when a file arrived, whether it met the conditions, and then execute the next particular job. By using JAMS, we have gained a lot more efficiencies in terms of all of those to streamline it, and there is no necessary need for having an overnight engineer just keeping an eye on all of this.
FS
Data Platform Engineer at Babbel
Unified orchestration has reduced costs and improves governance for complex data workflows
I would say it would be much more helpful if Astro by Astronomer can provide an MCP to use and integrate with Astro by Astronomer and their AI agent Auto, so that we can use our tools like Claude, Code, or Cursor to have a central location where we integrate that MCP in Databricks via the AI gateway, and then we can have a place where we can connect to Astro by Astronomer, Databricks, other tools such as Jira and DataDog, and then have a much more comprehensive analysis and overview and monitoring of the entire data ecosystem. Having an MCP integration would tremendously help us to have a more comprehensive data platform that is more AI-ready. That is one of the features that I can think of. Another thought would be having an integration with Kubernetes instead of just scheduling everything on Astro by Astronomer workers. That would be helpful. One thing I can think of is that the Astro by Astronomer local developer environment can be improved further, but perhaps that is a very niche use case that I have in mind, and it may not be useful for others. There is room for improvement around having an improved UI and also integration with other tools. On governance, I would say we can have a more granular level of governance even inside workspaces. Having much more granular control over people belonging to the same team in Astro by Astronomer could have different access to different DAGs, depending upon our tagging strategy. That is one of the areas I can suggest in terms of improvement. The AI capabilities can be improved further. I would compare the current AI capabilities to newer models provided by Claude such as Opus or Codex.
PK
Assistant VP at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Experience significant automation with robust integration and user-friendly interfaces
There are areas of AutoSys Workload Automation that have room for improvement. They are implementing good enhancements in the R24 release. The web UI needs some improvement. Cloud integrations are limited to 25 or 30 configurable plugins and integrations to the cloud. They can improve in that area. They have separate tools, not AutoSys Workload Automation, such as Atomic and other SaaS-based solutions that can run inside the cloud. AutoSys Workload Automation can be configured in the cloud, but it requires a substantial number of VMs depending on the load. For on-premises deployment, it is a very good solution. They need to increase their footprint in the cloud and improve the web UI. They are making excellent progress in the R24 release.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It has definitely drastically improved our capabilities to scale our automation. Before JAMS, there were a lot of manual processes. We had a couple of operators who spent all day doing that. A lot of the time with human intervention and human processes, it is as good as the person who may be following a procedure and human error is a big problem."
"JAMS has helped save IT staff time by automating tasks previously performed with scripts, and its scheduling feature has been particularly useful."
"Being able to create a series of chained jobs, which are basically linked jobs is valuable."
"It's a full-featured job scheduling tool. The part that I liked the best was the support team. This tool was new, and we were all learning it and setting up the different jobs that were complex in nature. Their support team was very responsive in helping us out through the setup and resolving the issues. They have been incredibly awesome."
"In summary, this product is top class."
"The dashboard is intuitive."
"The most valuable feature for us is that it's DR-ready. With respect to disaster recovery, it has the built-in capability for failover to our DR site. If all of the required ports are open, it can be done seamlessly."
"The planning capabilities are most valuable."
"The return on investment has been remarkable, with savings exceeding seventy-five percent compared to previous manual cron job management."
"Astro by Astronomer has positively impacted my organization by significantly improving developer productivity, reducing downtimes, alleviating overhead associated with upgrades, and delivering nearly a 45% reduction in cloud spending, translating to a high return on investment."
"With Astro by Astronomer, we are paying less than before for MWAA, we are paying for the usage, we can offer Astro by Astronomer usage for other teams which did not have access to our AWS account, and we manage access for them, so it is also a bit easier."
"Previously, developing DAGs took days and sometimes a sprint, now I can deliver within a couple of hours."
"I saved a significant amount of time compared to my previous setup as I deployed Astro by Astronomer on my local machine in about five minutes, whereas with the Airflow documentation it took much more time and was very painful compared to the Astro by Astronomer deployment."
"Astro by Astronomer has had a positive impact on my organization mainly in terms of time savings and error reduction, since I seek to standardize all the processes within my framework."
"Astro by Astronomer has positively impacted my organization by automating ingestion pipelines, transformations, and error handling, and it has given us relief."
"I think that Astro by Astronomer is a good example of how data orchestration is important to the company when we think about big data and ingestion from many external companies or external institutions that bring to us data that is important to provide final products that can provide to the company the best decision-making in the future for the company regarding revenue, costs, and guidelines for the company that want to grow at a very fast pace."
"The solution is stable, there are no bugs or glitches, it does not crash or freeze, and it's reliable."
"It has allowed us to automate many of the functions of our operations staff. For instance, we had production control staff spending two hours a day entering date parms into our daily business processes. And now, CA Workload Automation does it for us."
"The integration that it provides and the auditing features are the most valuable to us."
"CA ESP is a solid product and very easy to use."
"The web UI is beneficial and the granular security policies allow us to cover all of our audit requirements."
"It has improved our organization by automating processes in a centralized platform, making us more productive and enabling us to provide better value to the business."
"It's very easy to work with. The learning curve is not that steep."
"The initial setup is easy."
 

Cons

"One issue which can prevent jobs from running is when a script gets into a loop."
"The ACL or access permission area needs to be improved. When it comes to defining and providing security permissions, it's a bit confusing if you are new to JAMS. JAMS needs to improve the features for security access or permissions."
"All my machines at work are Macs. JAMS client is a Windows-based thing. It is all built on .NET, which makes perfect sense. However, that means in order for me to access it, I need to connect to a VPN, then log onto one of our Azure VMs in order to access the JAMS client. This is fine, but if for some reason I am unable to do so, it would be nice to be able to have a web-based JAMS client that has all the exact same functionality in it. There are probably a whole bunch of disadvantages that you would get with that as well, but that is definitely something that would make life easier in a few cases."
"The search capability needs to be improved because when we try to search for a job, it's hard to do."
"Right now there's not much of an Azure integration with JAMS at the moment directly because we run separate pipelines."
"There could be a better simulation for banning the termination. You have to simulate every one of the processes in order to have an idea for better planning. This kind of simulation is broken and needs improvement."
"The cost has definitely gone up tremendously. That is where I do know, as much as the feature sets are there, and if the newly acquired company is going to be doing a pushback, they might just say, 'Do we still need to pay this much? Or at that point, should we look into an alternative?'"
"JAMS has built-in reporting. I've never really used it. I tried using it a few years ago and I couldn't figure it out. It was wonky. It could be improved upon."
"Overall, my experience with Astro by Astronomer was very positive, but there are a few areas where it could improve."
"Astro by Astronomer could improve by reducing costs or decreasing infrastructure management and having less dependency on Kubernetes so that the infrastructure is simpler."
"Astro by Astronomer can be improved always by integrating and being in attention with the capabilities that are emerging in the technology as well."
"Sometimes we experience performance bottlenecks, depending on the time we are running DAGs simultaneously."
"I believe my experience with pricing, setup, cost, and licensing could be better."
"After using Astro by Astronomer for four years, I can say it has evolved significantly, which is positive; however, improving the debugging experience for complex workflows remains a pain point."
"I would like to add that the pricing could be improved."
"One challenge I find with Astro by Astronomer is the cost because it is relatively higher than other tools."
"Since Broadcom acquired it, the prices have increased. Many companies feel the same way and are looking for alternate solutions to replace AutoSys Workload Automation."
"AutoSys Workload Automation does not perform performance tuning, monitoring, or management."
"Ease of implementation for upgrades."
"We've had stability problems with the tool."
"I am not sure whether it is our limitation or a tool limitation because we haven't yet explored it, but whenever we look for different types of reporting, we have some limitations in getting those. It could be because of the way we have set it up internally in our enterprise, but it would be helpful if we can customize the reporting features and some of the alerts that can go out. When we connect enterprise systems, each one looks for a different use case, and if we can get different types of reporting, it will be helpful."
"The main push is the web UI."
"Quick search feature and job analysis could be improved."
"To make it a lot more user-friendly, in order to make it so other people can use it without having to do much training with it; the more user-friendly it is, the easier it is to work with."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"JAMS is priced competitively compared to similar solutions and offers flexible licensing options to cater to user needs."
"For what it does, the product is priced very well."
"JAMS is relatively inexpensive, with additional costs only incurred for tags, other services, and optional support renewals."
"Our licensing is pretty cheap because we have a state solution. So, we pay only $1,000 a year."
"This is a good product at a fair price."
"It's certainly a lot cheaper than Tivoli and Control-M. In comparison to them, you get a lot more bang for your buck. You get pretty much the whole functionality and more, in some cases, when compared to Control-M, but at a fraction of the price."
"The pricing is reasonable."
"The product is reasonably priced, and we don't have any add-ons."
Information not available
"I don't have information on the exact licensing cost of AutoSys Workload Automation because that's managed by the tools and financing teams. For agents, it's close to $4,00, but for the server setup, it's usually a one-time license initially, and it's AMC which is paid every year and comes close to $8,000 to $10,000."
"I certainly think the pricing is worth the value."
"It is overpriced."
"The pricing needs to be improved. Some of my client's complained that it was too expensive."
"The return on investment would be very high because doing things manually without this product would be extremely expensive."
"We paid to use the solution monthly."
"There is an annual license to use AutoSys Workload Automation."
"Validate how many agents you need beforehand."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.
915,287 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
Construction Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Outsourcing Company
14%
Educational Organization
13%
University
7%
Financial Services Firm
32%
Outsourcing Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Insurance Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business15
Midsize Enterprise16
Large Enterprise25
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise25
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business13
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise79
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JAMS?
I was not really involved in the pricing, setup cost, and licensing at that level. I am more involved in the technica...
What needs improvement with JAMS?
In terms of improvements, I believe JAMS can enhance its user interface for better user experiences. I would like to ...
What is your primary use case for JAMS?
My primary use case for JAMS is enterprise workload automation and batch job orchestration. I use it to schedule and ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Astro by Astronomer?
It was as we expected in terms of cost because previously we had three different orchestrators, and now we have only ...
What needs improvement with Astro by Astronomer?
If we can improve something, it would be to have hibernation for the production deployment. Currently, setting up hib...
What is your primary use case for Astro by Astronomer?
The main purpose of Astro by Astronomer today is Airflow. We are using Airflow in order to orchestrate our data pipel...
How does Control-M compare with AutoSys Workload Automation?
Control-M acts as a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes, which is helpful b...
What needs improvement with AutoSys Workload Automation?
There are areas of AutoSys Workload Automation that have room for improvement. They are implementing good enhancement...
 

Also Known As

No data available
No data available
CA Workload Automation, CA Workload Automation AE
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
Demo not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Teradata, Arconic, General Dynamics, Yum!, CVS Health, Comcast, Ghiradelli, & Boston’s Children’s Hospital
Information Not Available
Gaumont, Mercantil do Brasil, CCEE, Hanwha Life
Find out what your peers are saying about Astro by Astronomer vs. AutoSys Workload Automation and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
915,287 professionals have used our research since 2012.