Atlassian SourceTree vs Git comparison

Read 38 Git reviews

1,055 Views
1,055 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Atlassian SourceTree

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 14, 2024

Git and Atlassian SourceTree compete in version control systems. Git has the upper hand with its robust support and lower pricing, while Atlassian SourceTree is noted for its comprehensive features.

Features: Git's decentralized version control, performance in handling large projects, and flexible branching model are highly valued. Atlassian SourceTree excels in graphical representations, ease of managing both Git and Mercurial repositories, and visual tools integration.

Room for Improvement: Git could enhance its graphical management tool, simplify complex workflows, and improve integration features. Atlassian SourceTree needs performance optimization, better handling of large repositories, and improved customer service responsiveness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Git offers smooth deployment and extensive community support, easing the learning and troubleshooting process despite some initial setup challenges. Atlassian SourceTree provides quick installation but faces occasional criticism for its customer service and documentation quality.

Pricing and ROI: Git's lower pricing and potential for zero-cost usage are appealing for budget-conscious users and scalable projects. Atlassian SourceTree provides good ROI with its intricate feature set and hybrid support for Git and Mercurial, particularly benefiting teams needing graphical interfaces.

To learn more, read our detailed Atlassian SourceTree vs. Git Report (Updated: September 2025).

Atlassian SourceTree vs. Git

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,370 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Atlassian SourceTree

Ranking in Version Control

6th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Git

Ranking in Version Control

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Atlassian SourceTree is 6.4%, up from 6.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Git is 10.0%, up from 7.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Git	10.0%
Atlassian SourceTree	6.4%
Other	83.6%

Version Control

Featured Reviews

PrinceKumar1

Expert Software Engineer at FIS

Utilize Agile methodologies with efficient project management, yet seek improvements in resolving merge conflicts

SourceTree is one of the best tools from a UI perspective. However, I would prefer if SourceTree could address merge conflicts more easily. Visual Studio or Visual Studio Code, providing a comprehensive tool for both development and code management, is favored because it can serve as both a development tool and a client for pushing or pulling code, resolving conflicts efficiently. It would be beneficial if SourceTree could offer similar integrated functionalities.

Read full review

Grazvydas Govaras

Senior Solution Architect at Danske

Helps to store and version the code

We use the solution for code management to store and version the code. It is the standard service we use for developing applications and infrastructure services You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches. I would like to see less updates with the product. I…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"For me, the branches ' graph was the most valuable feature of Atlassian SourceTree. I often used the terminal, but during a demo, my boss preferred I not switch to the terminal view. SourceTree's graphical interface for managing branches was handy for that. The demo involved making changes, committing them, pushing to the CI/CD tool, running the pipeline, and seeing the integration, all within about twenty minutes."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"The interface is very good and is easy to use. It tells you when you've committed, when you've uploaded, and gives you the differences."

"The solution's initial setup process is straightforward."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to fix a broken repository merge."

"The tool's UI is good."

"Atlassian SourceTree is a very stable product."

"It is a pretty standard product with features like git clone and development branches."

"The product is easy to use."

"Git's learning curve is shallow, making the solution easy to use after a few tutorials."

"We use the tool to store codes."

"You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches."

"Git is a product everyone uses, so it's almost inescapable. I like the fact that there is a large ecosystem around it. You can bolt various graphical user interfaces onto it or sign up for various repositories like GitHub and AWS CodeCommit. Git has a large community, so there are lots of resources and knowledge bases you can use."

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...Since I am a very simple user of the tool, its scalability is good for me."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the branch management functionality."

More Git pros

Cons

"The visuals, including the UI and UX, have simple fonts, making it an area where certain enhancements can be done."

"Its interface could be easy to understand for a programmer."

"The product's UI needs improvement."

"People think that Visual Studio Code is more intuitive and can serve dual purposes for development and as a client to push or pull code."

"For everyday use, I am more comfortable using the command line interface, rather than using SourceTree."

"I have had a food experience with Atlassian SourceTree but it might not be for everyone."

"The UI can be more user-friendly."

"Git removed the credential feature."

"If the file changes are on the same line, we need to resolve a merge conflict manually. Let's say there is a merge conflict on line 50 because we have multiple commits on the same line number. Git could add some artificial intelligence to resolve the conflict automatically."

"The tool is complicated for a beginner. You need to have some training to use it. It is also hard to find a parameter."

"The solution could improve by having more customization."

"We would like to see tutorials added to the product, for new users to follow so that they can optimize their use of the solution."

"I believe there is room for improvement in preventing work loss due to conflicts or overwriting. Another area for improvement could be implementing features for automated code verification within Git."

"There is nothing that could be improved at this time."

More Git cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is a fee for using SourceTree."

"Atlassian SourceTree is a free solution."

"I do not recall the exact pricing details for SourceTree, but generally, Atlassian products are affordable, and SourceTree typically comes as part of a suite."

"Git is completely free."

"As a student, I didn't have to pay for the license."

"The platform is less expensive."

"Git is an open-source software."

"I am not required to pay due to the small number of users we have. We have a small user base, and we are not using the enterprise version."

"The tool is free."

"We are using the open-source version, which is available free of charge."

"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten."

More Git pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

19%

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

14%

University

Manufacturing Company

17%

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	21

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Atlassian SourceTree?

The initial setup is straightforward.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Atlassian SourceTree?

Both SourceTree and primary alternatives like Visual Studio Code are open-source, so there are no costs involved.

What needs improvement with Atlassian SourceTree?

What do you like most about Git?

You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Git?

Git is an open-source software.

What needs improvement with Git?

There is nothing that could be improved at this time.

Bitbucket vs Atlassian SourceTree

Comparisons

Compared 34% of the time

Bitbucket Server vs Atlassian SourceTree

Compared 24% of the time

GitHub vs Atlassian SourceTree

Compared 24% of the time

More Atlassian SourceTree Competitors

IBM Rational ClearCase vs Git

Compared 36% of the time

Surround SCM vs Git

Compared 15% of the time

Helix Core vs Git

Compared 11% of the time

Canonical Bazaar vs Git

Compared 9% of the time

Bitbucket vs Git

Compared 8% of the time

More Git Competitors

Product Reports

Download Atlassian SourceTree product report

Version Control

August 2025

Download Git product report

September 2025

Overview

Atlassian SourceTree is a graphical user interface (GUI) desktop client that facilitates user interaction with Git repositories. SourceTree provides a visual interface that is easy to use and intuitive. It allows developers to save a lot of command lines when working with Git.

The tool is free and works as a Git client for Windows and Mac OS. You can visualize and manage your repositories via the simple GUI. The client offers an efficient and consistent development process for Git and Mercurial.

Atlassian SourceTree Key Features

Branch management: Typically, managing branches is a time-consuming and tedious process for project managers and developers. With SourceTree, you can switch working copies with a single click. You can also see where you are compared with the version in the repository, alerting you to push or pull.
Working copy: Developers who work using the command line often lack visibility. Access the “working copy” section to see the difference between your local copy and the version in the Git repository. This feature allows you to see exactly what has changed.
Branch history: the History section displays the full history of the branch, displaying each commit and file change. This feature enables smooth version control.
GitFlow: GitFlow organizes the workflow, streamlining parallel code changes and reducing merge conflicts.

Atlassian SourceTree Benefits

Any level user can use SourceTree: beginners and experts benefit from the visibility and streamlined workflows of SourceTree. Beginners benefit from the simplified version control. Experts can review changesets and stash and pick between branches. Senior programmers can customize changeset and stashes, apply patches, rebase or shelve changesets. The tool offers detailed tutorials to help beginners and experts start quickly. Other benefits for beginners include easy access to commands with one click and simplified distributed version control.
Code visibility: the visualization of the Git process enables users to manage large projects with multiple branches and commits. SourceTree automatically tracks the activity of your code. It also features bookmarks where you can see a summarized view of all projects and repositories. Therefore, you can check a specific branch or commit with a single click. Finally, it features detailed branching diagrams that make it easy to follow the process.
Git and Hg support: the fully-featured GUI supports Git and Mercurial, offering a consistent development process from the start. You can also use SourceTree for a project on Github. Start by creating the project on Github, then connect it to the SourceTree software.
Free: the SourceTree tool is free to use, even for commercial uses, without buying a license.
Supports Git LFS: users can track large assets and submit code from a single dashboard.
Subordinated modules: you can use submodules for hand-picked dependencies and manage and group projects.

Atlassian SourceTree Use Cases

Check-in and check-out code using the client-side application.
You can also use SourceTree to repair broken Git repositories because you can easily detect mistakes at a glance.
The simple and intuitive user interface allows users to search for and clone remote repositories.

Reviews from Real Users

A Program Manager/Engineer at a government says, "The most valuable feature is the ability to fix a broken repository merge… This product has helped because we have been able to fix problems when our code repository breaks."

Atlassian

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. Git is easy to learn and has a tiny footprint with lightning fast performance. It outclasses SCM tools like Subversion, CVS, Perforce, and ClearCase with features like cheap local branching, convenient staging areas, and multiple workflows.

Sample Customers

Facebook, NASA, Cisco, eBay, Redfin, Toyota, Kaiser Permanente, Gilt, CSIRO, Autodesk, The Daily Telegraph, CODE, Illumnia,

Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, LinkedIn, Netflix, PostgreSQL, Android, Rails, QT, Gnome, Eclipse