Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Atlassian SourceTree vs Bitbucket Server comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 14, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Atlassian SourceTree
Ranking in Version Control
6th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Bitbucket Server
Ranking in Version Control
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
4.4
Number of Reviews
27
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Atlassian SourceTree is 6.2%, down from 6.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Bitbucket Server is 22.3%, down from 27.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Version Control Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Bitbucket Server22.3%
Atlassian SourceTree6.2%
Other71.5%
Version Control
 

Featured Reviews

PrinceKumar1 - PeerSpot reviewer
Utilize Agile methodologies with efficient project management, yet seek improvements in resolving merge conflicts
SourceTree is one of the best tools from a UI perspective. However, I would prefer if SourceTree could address merge conflicts more easily. Visual Studio or Visual Studio Code, providing a comprehensive tool for both development and code management, is favored because it can serve as both a development tool and a client for pushing or pulling code, resolving conflicts efficiently. It would be beneficial if SourceTree could offer similar integrated functionalities.
Dan Berg - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides strong code management and tracking features for development teams
We use Bitbucket Server in the company. Since I'm not using Bitbucket Server every day, it's more my technicians, developers, and engineers using it. I would need to talk with them first. We use Jira integration with Bitbucket Server, but I'm running out of time. I would need to discuss the satisfaction with these integrations with my technical product owners because they are more involved in this than I am right now. I believe installing Bitbucket Server is quite easy, but I'm not doing the installation or integration. I'm just working with other people who do that. I couldn't provide points for technical support because I haven't been in contact with them much. On a scale of 1-10, I rate Bitbucket Server an 8.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Atlassian SourceTree is a very stable product."
"For me, the branches ' graph was the most valuable feature of Atlassian SourceTree. I often used the terminal, but during a demo, my boss preferred I not switch to the terminal view. SourceTree's graphical interface for managing branches was handy for that. The demo involved making changes, committing them, pushing to the CI/CD tool, running the pipeline, and seeing the integration, all within about twenty minutes."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to fix a broken repository merge."
"The interface is very good and is easy to use. It tells you when you've committed, when you've uploaded, and gives you the differences."
"The solution's initial setup process is straightforward."
"The tool's UI is good."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"Bitbucket Server supports code collaboration by providing commands developers can use to check in code. Through comments, developers can specify the purpose of the code check-in. Additionally, Bitbucket allows tagging of code for releases."
"The most valuable feature is that it has its own pipelines."
"It is an amazingly stable solution."
"It is an easily scalable solution."
"Our code is secure."
"The product’s most valuable features are private repositories and the ability to work as a proxy for implementing CI/CD pipelines."
"It has consistently performed well without major issues, providing a reliable code management and collaboration environment."
"The initial setup is straightforward. It takes half an hour to deploy."
 

Cons

"People think that Visual Studio Code is more intuitive and can serve dual purposes for development and as a client to push or pull code."
"Its interface could be easy to understand for a programmer."
"For everyday use, I am more comfortable using the command line interface, rather than using SourceTree."
"The visuals, including the UI and UX, have simple fonts, making it an area where certain enhancements can be done."
"The product's UI needs improvement."
"I have had a food experience with Atlassian SourceTree but it might not be for everyone."
"Currently, the interface could benefit from a more sophisticated code viewing option."
"We opted for the on-premises solution, and while it's quite expensive, I believe there's room for improvement in terms of pricing."
"At the moment, there are not many details on how to proceed with the troubleshooting if one of the users faces an issue with the product."
"The product requires patching and version improvements. Some functions do not work properly when we move from one version to another. We need a technical improvement. Also, communicating with other Atlassian products becomes cumbersome when we move from one version to another. I want Bitbucket Server to include a dashboard similar to Jira's. Atlassian must also develop a tool to scan our complete base for vulnerabilities."
"It would have been better to use Bitbucket Server if it had something similar to the concept called GitHub Actions since it allows GitHub to provide seamless integration of CI/CD pipelines."
"The product's initial setup phase is complex."
"Instead of providing only raw features and plugins, Atlassian should provide a ready-to-use integration of both choices to incorporate "trunk-based" development."
"If I want to mail someone a master branch, then sometimes it shows some conflict with other codes in the master branch."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I do not recall the exact pricing details for SourceTree, but generally, Atlassian products are affordable, and SourceTree typically comes as part of a suite."
"There is a fee for using SourceTree."
"Atlassian SourceTree is a free solution."
"The solution comes as a part of the suite."
"The platform offers a free version for public repositories, which benefits open-source projects."
"One needs to pay towards the licensing charges associated with the product."
"The tool's licensing costs are yearly. Prices can become expensive if you have a lot of users."
"We pay around $6 per user."
"Bitbucket Server is quite expensive compared to other products."
"We opted for the on-premises solution, and while it's quite expensive, I believe there's room for improvement in terms of pricing. The licensing is based on the number of users, but I'm not entirely certain about the details."
"As for licensing, Bitbucket is one of the more affordable options."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.
866,218 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
19%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
15%
University
7%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Healthcare Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise4
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise15
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Atlassian SourceTree?
Both SourceTree and primary alternatives like Visual Studio Code are open-source, so there are no costs involved.
What needs improvement with Atlassian SourceTree?
SourceTree is one of the best tools from a UI perspective. However, I would prefer if SourceTree could address merge conflicts more easily. Visual Studio or Visual Studio Code, providing a comprehe...
What needs improvement with Bitbucket Server?
While Bitbucket Server performs well, the improvement lies not in the tool itself yet in the discipline of the team using it. The tool does not impose restrictions, allowing for flexibility in work...
What is your primary use case for Bitbucket Server?
Bitbucket Server is used for private code management and source code management. It facilitates versioning, allowing us to maintain a master branch which reflects the code in production, and manage...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Stash
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Facebook, NASA, Cisco, eBay, Redfin, Toyota, Kaiser Permanente, Gilt, CSIRO, Autodesk, The Daily Telegraph, CODE, Illumnia,
Netflix, Nasa, Rakuten, Best Buy, Philips, Nordstrom, Intuit, Zillow, Citi.
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian SourceTree vs. Bitbucket Server and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
866,218 professionals have used our research since 2012.