Atera vs Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager comparison

Atera and Ivanti are both solutions in the Patch Management category. Atera is ranked #11 with an average rating of 9.0, while Ivanti is ranked #14 with an average rating of 7.5. Atera holds a 3.5% mindshare in PM, compared to Ivanti’s 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Atera users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Ivanti users who would recommend it.

Atera

Read 15 Atera reviews

1,418 Views
917 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Ivanti Patch for Endpoint M...

Read 4 Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager reviews

368 Views
278 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Atera

Ivanti Patch for Endpoint M...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager and Atera target IT management and endpoint patching. Atera has the upper hand in user experience, providing comprehensive, streamlined deployment and features.

Features: Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager includes detailed patch management capabilities, control granularity, and comprehensive reporting. Atera integrates remote monitoring, automation, and analytics in an all-in-one IT management platform. Ivanti excels in endpoint management, while Atera offers a broader suite for MSPs.

Room for Improvement: Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager needs a better update process, improved integration with other tools, and enhanced inter-tool operability. Atera requires better patch management capabilities, advanced reporting options, and refined specialized patch management features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager has a more intricate deployment requiring a steeper learning curve, but strong post-deployment support. Atera features a simplified deployment process, immediate functionality, and satisfactory customer support. Atera is preferred for deployment ease, while Ivanti is praised for customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager has higher setup costs but offers substantial long-term benefits and ROI. Atera provides flexible pricing plans and quick ROI due to its integrated approach. Users are happier with Atera’s pricing model, while both products are seen as worthwhile investments.

To learn more, read our detailed Atera vs. Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Atera vs. Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Atera

Ranking in Patch Management

11th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Service Management (ITSM) (13th), Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) (4th)

Ivanti Patch for Endpoint M...

Ranking in Patch Management

14th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of Atera is 3.5%, down from 5.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager is 2.2%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Patch Management

Featured Reviews

James Clowes

IT Manager at Dynamic Bradview Roofing

Having fewer hardware replacements saves us in annual costs

There is a new version of the interface coming out. I have been asking for a new version for a while. While the interface is nice, I guess the developer thinks one way and the user thinks another. So, I think the interface is getting a big overhaul. This is what they have mentioned in their webinars and stuff. It is in beta, but I'm not on the beta program, so I haven't seen it. I can't really complain about the old interface, but now that I have heard there is a new one coming, all I want is the new one. The one thing that could do with improvement is the reporting. This is from someone who worked in an MSP, where I would want to run a report and be able to just present that to a client. Reports are fine for internal use, where they never leave your company. However, if I was an MSP, I would probably want a little bit more information or the ability to customize some of it without having to edit PDFs.

Read full review

PraveenRajan

Director of Infrastructure at Elevate Services

Smoothly handles software patching and scheduling, enabling monthly patch distribution across multiple projects

We face some challenges, particularly with non-domain-joined macOS devices. Patching, updating, and syncing with the server can be tricky for them. So, the major challenges are macOS updates, patching, and backups. And for drawbacks, I wish Patch management was cloud-based instead of hosted on our own server. If Ivanti Patch had a cloud-based option instead of requiring an on-premises server and software. Hosting it in the cloud would simplify management, eliminating dependence on VPNs or other connectivity issues. Similar to Microsoft's EMS licensing, offering a cloud-based solution like Azure Active Directory or Endpoint Management Suite (EMS) would be ideal. EMS allows us to manage policies, batching, and software distribution entirely through the cloud, minimizing server downloads. If Ivanti considered a cloud-based approach, it would be hugely beneficial in today's hybrid work environment, where employees use desktops, laptops, and various locations. It's not just about patching office PCs anymore; mobile workers and backups need seamless access as well. Cloud-based patching would be much easier in a hybrid environment. Imagine updates coming directly from the cloud instead of relying on individual VPN connections. It would streamline the entire process.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of this solution are automatic batch matching and unattended support access."

"Atera saves money. A trip to the customer costs between $20 to $30. Then, you need to charge the customer $20 to $30 for the travel. However, if you are doing this work remotely, then you are not driving. This makes the process easier and saves money for you and the customer. For example, if it is just one machine, then the savings comes out to $50 to $60. If we are talking about a huge client, who has hundreds of machines and is changing their infrastructure, that is a lot of money."

"Pricing is definitely my favorite part of it. It is also extremely easy to use."

"Atera has helped me to provide more accurate solutions based on a given problem. For example, we base our solutions on event scenarios, like the alerts. We identify that there's a series of problems occurring in a particular area from the information provided by the alerts."

"It is reliable, and when it is working, it works without issues."

"All of the features of Atera are valuable because they allow the customers to achieve their goals. It is easy to use, has good collaboration, and has zero maintenance."

"I really like the Shared Script Library and automation tasks which they have implemented... because all the Atera users in the community can share their scripts and their automation tasks knowledge. The same goes for the Shared SNMP Template Library."

"It's very easy to use, not just for me, but even for people who have claimed, "I'm not very good at IT." Once you have it installed and you have it set up, it pretty much works by itself. It really helps you do what you need to do. It's easy to use for a beginner, compared to some of the other larger RMMs that are a little bit more complicated."

More Atera pros

"Clear visibility regarding the status of the endpoint."

"The product is easy to use, easy to implement, and easy to manage."

"When it comes to Ivanti Patch for endpoints, I find peer-to-peer patching valuable. Having a peer-to-peer patching capability is highly beneficial for us."

"It's been doing a lot for us, especially with third-party software patching and scheduling. We create multiple projects for monthly patch distribution and manage it all well."

Cons

"Having more freedom to perform identity access management would be great."

"I would like to see more mobile device management. iPad is a big one. I know they've been working on some of that. For me, it would be amazing if I could do tablet devices and even expand it to POS systems or the like. I know that a lot goes into that but I've seen it is an area they're looking at."

"There should be enhancements in network monitoring capabilities beyond just physical devices like computers and servers. It would be beneficial to include better tools for monitoring networking infrastructure such as routers. Additionally, while Atera excels in ticket management, I believe there's room for improvement in user authentication and security features, especially when accessing and managing remote equipment. These updates would contribute to a more robust and secure user experience overall. Atera should include a monitoring tool integrated with Azure or similar cloud platforms. It would be beneficial to have capabilities for monitoring network growth and automatically generating statistics based on system stability and performance metrics. This feature would help us better manage and optimize our equipment and network resources, especially for strategic customer planning and resource allocation."

"It will be interesting if Atera can integrate all kinds of products. In North America, there are a lot of resellers, like Ingram Micro, Tech Data, Arrow Electronics, etc. It would be amazing if Atera could integrate with these products. If they could integrate with these products for MSPs, it would be much easier. Then, if you are buying something, and need to add something, you don't need to jump from place to place because this is a very quick sales instrument for use on a daily basis."

"The billing module has a standard layout which is too limited for my needs."

"Atera could be improved by adding more granular control over technician roles. We need more specific controls on what technicians can access, like limiting their ability to view certain sections or access devices and share files. This feature request has already been made. The IP asset management capabilities need improvement to better manage assets beyond just devices."

"Customization could be improved."

"They are working on an update, and I would like to see more stuff outside of just computers and servers. Increasingly, we need to be able to monitor and manage network devices. Atera is improving on that already, which is one place that it is currently lacking."

More Atera cons

"The major challenges are macOS updates, patching, and backups. And for drawbacks, I wish Patch management was cloud-based instead of hosted on our own server."

"Inability to configure a rule-based management."

"The UI must be more user-friendly."

"It would be great to have an easier way to patch Linux machines within the product."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution cost approximately $200 Canadian per month."

"As an internal IT, it's gold right there. It is money in the bank."

"We pay per user. I am the only user. It is $150 per user. If I need to add one, it is not as costly as expanding with other providers."

"Atera happened to have the best pricing model."

"Atera's pricing stays fixed and predictable, enabling us to add more customers and unlimited monitored devices. We still have a number of clients who fit a break/fix IT model. This is something where clients are complaining more about having to pay extra month-by-month for technology services. With Atera's model, we don't have to be going out and asking for more from clients each month. Right now, with where we are at in terms of scale, this is very important to us."

"The price is reasonable for what we require."

"Our company is a startup. The initial reason I looked into Atera was the fact that you pay by the technician, not per-device. That means you are able to jump right in with a service without having a large overhead."

"The value of the product is perfect, neither cheap nor expensive. I think it is the right rate. It would be awesome if it continued to be the same price because it is a great solution that I like. I like it because I'm not paying per device. I have some customers on monthly contracts and some of them are on break'n fix. If I have a client who is on break'n fix, and they need to pay per agent, then I am losing money. If they were ever to change structures, going to pay-per-device model, then I would need to think about changing to something else."

More Atera pricing and cost advice

"In terms of pricing, it is on the expensive side."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Retailer

Educational Organization

Computer Software Company

14%

University

10%

Government

10%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Atera?

Pricing is low. It costs around 149 bucks per month.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Atera?

It should improve its processes.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Atera?

Atera is integral to our daily operations. We use it for RMM, PSA, our ticket system, and contact with people. We also integrate it with different products.

See all answers

What do you like most about Ivanti Patch for Endpoints?

It's been doing a lot for us, especially with third-party software patching and scheduling. We create multiple projects for monthly patch distribution and manage it all well.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ivanti Patch for Endpoints?

The UI must be more user-friendly.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Ivanti Patch for Endpoints?

We use the solution to patch Windows and Linux machines. We download the patches and implement them. We get vulnerability reports after patching.

See all answers

Comparisons

NinjaOne vs Atera

Compared 36% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Atera

Compared 13% of the time

N-able N-central vs Atera

Compared 9% of the time

Datto Remote Monitoring and Management vs Atera

Compared 8% of the time

Freshservice vs Atera

Compared 6% of the time

More Atera Competitors

Patch My PC vs Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager

Compared 28% of the time

Ivanti Security Controls vs Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager

Compared 25% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager

Compared 17% of the time

GFI LanGuard vs Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager

Compared 16% of the time

Vicarius vRx vs Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager

Compared 13% of the time

More Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Atera

April 2025

Download Atera product report

Buyer's Guide

Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager

April 2025

Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager report

Download Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager product report

Also Known As

No data available

Ivanti Patch for Endpoints, Patch for Endpoints, Shavlik Patch for Endpoints

Overview

Atera offers a comprehensive solution for MSPs and IT Professionals. The platform provides in one integrated solution: full remote monitoring and management (RMM), PSA, remote access, patch management, billing, reports, and so much more! Atera’s disruptive pricing model also helps managed IT service providers scale their business while providing continued best-in-class service. All plans include unlimited devices, meaning you only pay per technician.Everything you need, in one easy-to-use platform

Thousands of paying users in over 75 countries
Free 30-day trial, no credit card or commitment required
No hidden fees or restrictions, all plans include unlimited devices
Seamless integration with your favorite IT tools including: Splashtop, AnyDesk, TeamViewer, and ScreenConnect

What can Atera do for you?

Improve Efficiency. Atera delivers customers the tool suite for IT management. Everything you need in an all-in-one, easy-to-use platform.
Automation. Set alerts and proactively prevent issues for your clients. Minimize time spent on manual tasks and spend more time on what matters most, serving your customers.
Disruptive Pricing, Unlimited Devices. Per technician-based pricing with unlimited servers and workstations means you can cover it all, at one fixed price.

Atera

Patch for Endpoint Manager can swiftly detect vulnerabilities in Windows, Mac OS, Linux, and hundreds of third-party apps (Acrobat Flash/Reader, Java, Web browsers, and more) and deploy expertly pre-tested patches everywhere you need them.

Ivanti

Sample Customers

MSPs, IT consultants, and IT departments worldwide trust and use Atera.

InfoPro Digital, Cypress-Fairbanks Independent School District

Buyer's Guide

Atera vs. Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager

April 2025

Free Report: Atera vs. Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about Atera vs. Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Atera vs. Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager report.

See our list of best Patch Management vendors.

We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.