Atera vs Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager comparison

Atera and Ivanti are both solutions in the Patch Management category. Atera is ranked #11 with an average rating of 10.0, while Ivanti is ranked #14 with an average rating of 7.5. Atera holds a 3.4% mindshare in PM, compared to Ivanti’s 2.3% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Atera users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Ivanti users who would recommend it.

Atera

Read 15 Atera reviews

2,665 Views
1,093 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Ivanti Patch for Endpoint M...

Read 4 Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager reviews

644 Views
644 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Atera

Ivanti Patch for Endpoint M...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager and Atera target IT management and endpoint patching. Atera has the upper hand in user experience, providing comprehensive, streamlined deployment and features.

Features: Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager includes detailed patch management capabilities, control granularity, and comprehensive reporting. Atera integrates remote monitoring, automation, and analytics in an all-in-one IT management platform. Ivanti excels in endpoint management, while Atera offers a broader suite for MSPs.

Room for Improvement: Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager needs a better update process, improved integration with other tools, and enhanced inter-tool operability. Atera requires better patch management capabilities, advanced reporting options, and refined specialized patch management features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager has a more intricate deployment requiring a steeper learning curve, but strong post-deployment support. Atera features a simplified deployment process, immediate functionality, and satisfactory customer support. Atera is preferred for deployment ease, while Ivanti is praised for customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager has higher setup costs but offers substantial long-term benefits and ROI. Atera provides flexible pricing plans and quick ROI due to its integrated approach. Users are happier with Atera’s pricing model, while both products are seen as worthwhile investments.

To learn more, read our detailed Atera vs. Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Atera vs. Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,711 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Atera

Ranking in Patch Management

11th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Help Desk Software (13th), Network Monitoring Software (33rd), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (37th), IT Service Management (ITSM) (11th), Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) (5th), AIOps (17th), Agentic Automation (7th)

Ivanti Patch for Endpoint M...

Ranking in Patch Management

14th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of Atera is 3.4%, down from 4.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager is 2.3%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Patch Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Atera	3.4%
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager	2.3%
Other	94.3%

Patch Management

Featured Reviews

Avi Vaserman

Owner at Sytex Ltd.

Quick setup and efficient automation boost IT consulting services

It would be beneficial if Atera implemented telephone support for general questions. When onboarding new clients and creating their portal, it would be helpful if presidents or company owners could see the current configuration progress step-by-step, rather than relying solely on email and ticket systems. The task system for technicians could be improved by adding recurring task capabilities. This would allow technicians to have checkmarks and task lists they can mark off as completed. While scalability meets growing needs, there haven't been many additions in the last two years. They are adding new features gradually, but there is always room for improvement.

Read full review

PraveenRajan

Director of Infrastructure at Elevate Services

Smoothly handles software patching and scheduling, enabling monthly patch distribution across multiple projects

We face some challenges, particularly with non-domain-joined macOS devices. Patching, updating, and syncing with the server can be tricky for them. So, the major challenges are macOS updates, patching, and backups. And for drawbacks, I wish Patch management was cloud-based instead of hosted on our own server. If Ivanti Patch had a cloud-based option instead of requiring an on-premises server and software. Hosting it in the cloud would simplify management, eliminating dependence on VPNs or other connectivity issues. Similar to Microsoft's EMS licensing, offering a cloud-based solution like Azure Active Directory or Endpoint Management Suite (EMS) would be ideal. EMS allows us to manage policies, batching, and software distribution entirely through the cloud, minimizing server downloads. If Ivanti considered a cloud-based approach, it would be hugely beneficial in today's hybrid work environment, where employees use desktops, laptops, and various locations. It's not just about patching office PCs anymore; mobile workers and backups need seamless access as well. Cloud-based patching would be much easier in a hybrid environment. Imagine updates coming directly from the cloud instead of relying on individual VPN connections. It would streamline the entire process.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Atera has saved our organization money. We look at Atera as an extra employee that we only pay about $300 a month. This is incredible savings over having to hire somebody to do all the tasks that Atera performs for us."

"I really like the Shared Script Library and automation tasks which they have implemented... because all the Atera users in the community can share their scripts and their automation tasks knowledge. The same goes for the Shared SNMP Template Library."

"The most valuable features of this solution are automatic batch matching and unattended support access."

"Measuring the integration is very helpful when using Atera Assist Test. It takes the solution to the next level by automating activities. It doesn't just provide the solution but also allows running scripts to fix issues before a technician has to work on them."

"Atera has helped me to provide more accurate solutions based on a given problem. For example, we base our solutions on event scenarios, like the alerts. We identify that there's a series of problems occurring in a particular area from the information provided by the alerts."

"Atera saves money. A trip to the customer costs between $20 to $30. Then, you need to charge the customer $20 to $30 for the travel. However, if you are doing this work remotely, then you are not driving. This makes the process easier and saves money for you and the customer. For example, if it is just one machine, then the savings comes out to $50 to $60. If we are talking about a huge client, who has hundreds of machines and is changing their infrastructure, that is a lot of money."

"It's very easy to use, not just for me, but even for people who have claimed, "I'm not very good at IT." Once you have it installed and you have it set up, it pretty much works by itself. It really helps you do what you need to do. It's easy to use for a beginner, compared to some of the other larger RMMs that are a little bit more complicated."

"All of the features of Atera are valuable because they allow the customers to achieve their goals. It is easy to use, has good collaboration, and has zero maintenance."

More Atera pros

"The product is easy to use, easy to implement, and easy to manage."

"When it comes to Ivanti Patch for endpoints, I find peer-to-peer patching valuable. Having a peer-to-peer patching capability is highly beneficial for us."

"Clear visibility regarding the status of the endpoint."

"It's been doing a lot for us, especially with third-party software patching and scheduling. We create multiple projects for monthly patch distribution and manage it all well."

Cons

"It should improve its processes."

"Atera could be improved by adding more granular control over technician roles. We need more specific controls on what technicians can access, like limiting their ability to view certain sections or access devices and share files. This feature request has already been made. The IP asset management capabilities need improvement to better manage assets beyond just devices."

"The mobility of Atera is also a feature which needs to be addressed so that it can be used on iPads, iPhones and things of this nature. I would also like to see an agent included on these devices so that I can monitor, maintain and manage them."

"Having more freedom to perform identity access management would be great."

"It will be interesting if Atera can integrate all kinds of products. In North America, there are a lot of resellers, like Ingram Micro, Tech Data, Arrow Electronics, etc. It would be amazing if Atera could integrate with these products. If they could integrate with these products for MSPs, it would be much easier. Then, if you are buying something, and need to add something, you don't need to jump from place to place because this is a very quick sales instrument for use on a daily basis."

"The chat solutions need improvement because we first need to connect to the customer. This needs to improve so that there is a particular feature that can provide support to customers even if they are not connected to a computer."

"There is definitely room for improvement with its automation capabilities."

"I would like to see more mobile device management. iPad is a big one. I know they've been working on some of that. For me, it would be amazing if I could do tablet devices and even expand it to POS systems or the like. I know that a lot goes into that but I've seen it is an area they're looking at."

More Atera cons

"Inability to configure a rule-based management."

"The UI must be more user-friendly."

"It would be great to have an easier way to patch Linux machines within the product."

"The major challenges are macOS updates, patching, and backups. And for drawbacks, I wish Patch management was cloud-based instead of hosted on our own server."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In terms of cost, it's not very expensive. I’d rate it around three or four out of ten, considering its value for money."

"The price is reasonable for what we require."

"It comes with unlimited devices, so the fixed price cost is taken out of my budget. So, I'm all good."

"With Atera, the more you add, the cheaper the cost of the additional endpoints will be."

"Atera happened to have the best pricing model."

"Pricing is my favorite part of it. It was per user, not per client."

"Our company is a startup. The initial reason I looked into Atera was the fact that you pay by the technician, not per-device. That means you are able to jump right in with a service without having a large overhead."

"One of the biggest issues I face is the need to pay per technician. I've dealt with other platforms that you need to have 250-500 devices. Even though the cost declines as the number of devices a person has increases, they still require you to pay for 250 or 500, respectively. With Atera, the number doesn't matter as you always pay the same amount. I approximate that Atera saves me $100 per week."

More Atera pricing and cost advice

"In terms of pricing, it is on the expensive side."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

12%

Performing Arts

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Government

12%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Atera?

The prices have increased over time. After expressing concerns about pricing to account managers, they offered a 30% discount option for annual commitments. The main benefit we see with this produc...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Atera?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Atera?

We use it for maintenance support, patch management, the ticket system, ticketing, and automation in general. Atera enables us to take control quickly with different options. We can perform registr...

See all answers

What do you like most about Ivanti Patch for Endpoints?

It's been doing a lot for us, especially with third-party software patching and scheduling. We create multiple projects for monthly patch distribution and manage it all well.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ivanti Patch for Endpoints?

The UI must be more user-friendly.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Ivanti Patch for Endpoints?

We use the solution to patch Windows and Linux machines. We download the patches and implement them. We get vulnerability reports after patching.

See all answers

Comparisons

Kaseya VSA vs Atera

Compared 11% of the time

NinjaOne vs Atera

Compared 11% of the time

N-able N-central vs Atera

Compared 8% of the time

ConnectWise Automate vs Atera

Compared 7% of the time

JIRA Service Management vs Atera

Compared 7% of the time

More Atera Competitors

Ivanti Security Controls vs Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager

Compared 19% of the time

Patch My PC vs Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager

Compared 14% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager

Compared 10% of the time

Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune vs Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager

Compared 10% of the time

More Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Atera

January 2026

Download Atera product report

Buyer's Guide

Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager

December 2025

Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager report

Download Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager product report

Also Known As

No data available

Ivanti Patch for Endpoints, Patch for Endpoints, Shavlik Patch for Endpoints

Overview

Atera offers a comprehensive solution for MSPs and IT Professionals. The platform provides in one integrated solution: full remote monitoring and management (RMM), PSA, remote access, patch management, billing, reports, and so much more! Atera’s disruptive pricing model also helps managed IT service providers scale their business while providing continued best-in-class service. All plans include unlimited devices, meaning you only pay per technician.Everything you need, in one easy-to-use platform

Thousands of paying users in over 75 countries
Free 30-day trial, no credit card or commitment required
No hidden fees or restrictions, all plans include unlimited devices
Seamless integration with your favorite IT tools including: Splashtop, AnyDesk, TeamViewer, and ScreenConnect

What can Atera do for you?

Improve Efficiency. Atera delivers customers the tool suite for IT management. Everything you need in an all-in-one, easy-to-use platform.
Automation. Set alerts and proactively prevent issues for your clients. Minimize time spent on manual tasks and spend more time on what matters most, serving your customers.
Disruptive Pricing, Unlimited Devices. Per technician-based pricing with unlimited servers and workstations means you can cover it all, at one fixed price.

Atera

Patch for Endpoint Manager can swiftly detect vulnerabilities in Windows, Mac OS, Linux, and hundreds of third-party apps (Acrobat Flash/Reader, Java, Web browsers, and more) and deploy expertly pre-tested patches everywhere you need them.

Ivanti

Sample Customers

MSPs, IT consultants, and IT departments worldwide trust and use Atera.

InfoPro Digital, Cypress-Fairbanks Independent School District

Buyer's Guide

Atera vs. Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager

December 2025

Free Report: Atera vs. Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about Atera vs. Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Atera vs. Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager report.

See our list of best Patch Management vendors.

We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.