We performed a comparison between Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager and Microsoft Windows Server Update Services based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Patch Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's been doing a lot for us, especially with third-party software patching and scheduling. We create multiple projects for monthly patch distribution and manage it all well."
"Clear visibility regarding the status of the endpoint."
"When it comes to Ivanti Patch for endpoints, I find peer-to-peer patching valuable. Having a peer-to-peer patching capability is highly beneficial for us."
"Downloads critical reports separately."
"We get server updates from the internet and from the Bluetooth server. All of the clients are connected to it, and they're all updated from this exact server. It updates automatically."
"PowerShell is a valuable feature."
"The performance has been okay."
"The most important aspect is that we can centrally deploy the updates that are necessary for the organization. It's important."
"Setup is very simple and straightforward."
"The central points of managing product updates have been the tool's most valuable features."
"I am absolutely happy with its stability and performance. It is a stable product."
"It would be great to have an easier way to patch Linux machines within the product."
"The major challenges are macOS updates, patching, and backups. And for drawbacks, I wish Patch management was cloud-based instead of hosted on our own server."
"Inability to configure a rule-based management."
"Setup is complex."
"Microsoft Windows Server Update Services could improve the ease of use."
"I would like to see support for other operating systems such as Linux."
"More integration with different platforms would be an improvement."
"They could reduce the platform's prices."
"Some issues with scalability in larger organizations."
"The only complex part was the solution’s tricky setup phase."
"The security could be improved."
More Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Microsoft Windows Server Update Services Pricing and Cost Advice →
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager is ranked 17th in Patch Management with 3 reviews while Microsoft Windows Server Update Services is ranked 3rd in Patch Management with 38 reviews. Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager is rated 8.0, while Microsoft Windows Server Update Services is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager writes "Smoothly handles software patching and scheduling, enabling monthly patch distribution across multiple projects". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Windows Server Update Services writes "Lets us manage all our organization's updates from a single management console". Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager is most compared with GFI LanGuard, Microsoft Configuration Manager and Ivanti Security Controls, whereas Microsoft Windows Server Update Services is most compared with BigFix, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, Quest KACE Systems Management, Microsoft Configuration Manager and Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune. See our Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager vs. Microsoft Windows Server Update Services report.
See our list of best Patch Management vendors.
We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.