We performed a comparison between Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune and Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Patch Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I like the product's Peer to Peer patching feature."
"It is very easy to use, as well as extremely efficient and accurate."
"We use the solution for security patching of Windows devices."
"Ivanti Patch's most valuable features are the patch module and the package distribution."
"The solution is a good product and I have heard that the interface is more friendly than that of Windows."
"The most valuable features are device management and support for upgrading applications."
"Both in terms of features and operations, this is a good solution."
"I have found the interface and ease of use valuable features. Additionally, it is very easy to patch VMs and other systems, such a Linux. We are able to do patches even without the internet manually."
"It's been doing a lot for us, especially with third-party software patching and scheduling. We create multiple projects for monthly patch distribution and manage it all well."
"When it comes to Ivanti Patch for endpoints, I find peer-to-peer patching valuable. Having a peer-to-peer patching capability is highly beneficial for us."
"The product is easy to use, easy to implement, and easy to manage."
"Clear visibility regarding the status of the endpoint."
"It's a difficult configuration because you need to install many servers in a location, and you have to install the primary server in the main location."
"Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune needs to improve stability. We had issues with patching."
"Ivanti Patch could be improved with better integration with other cloud solutions."
"There are times when there is an update that causes some issues. These issues should be sorted out before the release."
"The product's support and configuration need to improve. It needs to be more scalable."
"Customers sometimes ask about non-existent features, and we pass these requests on to Ivanti."
"I tried to be a partner of Ivanti and, from this vantage point, the quotes are, perhaps, a bit high."
"The reports have to show the compliance level of the patching, which Ivanti does not provide."
"The major challenges are macOS updates, patching, and backups. And for drawbacks, I wish Patch management was cloud-based instead of hosted on our own server."
"It would be great to have an easier way to patch Linux machines within the product."
"The UI must be more user-friendly."
"Inability to configure a rule-based management."
More Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune is ranked 8th in Patch Management with 10 reviews while Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager is ranked 17th in Patch Management with 4 reviews. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune is rated 8.0, while Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune writes "Allows us to set maintenance windows and deliver patches". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager writes "Smoothly handles software patching and scheduling, enabling monthly patch distribution across multiple projects". Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune is most compared with Microsoft Configuration Manager, Microsoft Windows Server Update Services, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, Quest KACE Systems Management and Ivanti Security Controls, whereas Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager is most compared with GFI LanGuard, Ivanti Security Controls and Microsoft Configuration Manager. See our Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune vs. Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager report.
See our list of best Patch Management vendors.
We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.