Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager vs Microsoft Configuration Manager comparison

Ivanti and Microsoft are both solutions in the Patch Management category. Ivanti is ranked #16 with an average rating of 7.5, while Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.1. Ivanti holds a 2.2% mindshare in PM, compared to Microsoft’s 12.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Ivanti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Ivanti Patch for Endpoint M...

Read 4 Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager reviews

469 Views
469 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Configuration Man...

Read 84 Microsoft Configuration Manager reviews

10,784 Views
3,235 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Ivanti Patch for Endpoint M...

Microsoft Configuration Man...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 12, 2025

Microsoft Configuration Manager and Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager are competing in endpoint management. Microsoft Configuration Manager often receives favorable reviews for pricing and support, whereas Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager stands out for its feature-rich offerings.

Features: Microsoft Configuration Manager is valued for integration within Windows environments, comprehensive endpoint management, and broad system management. Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager offers advanced patch management, automation features, and streamlined patching.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Configuration Manager provides intuitive deployment with excellent integration into Windows infrastructures, supported by Microsoft's vast service network. Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager has an efficient setup process and dedicated support enhancing deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Configuration Manager generally has lower initial costs and solid ROI through integration with Microsoft ecosystems. Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager might have higher setup costs but can achieve a higher ROI owing to specialized patch management efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,349 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ivanti Patch for Endpoint M...

Ranking in Patch Management

16th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Microsoft Configuration Man...

Ranking in Patch Management

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Software Distribution (1st), Server Monitoring (6th), Configuration Management (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager is 2.2%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Configuration Manager is 12.0%, down from 17.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Patch Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Microsoft Configuration Manager	12.0%
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager	2.2%
Other	85.8%

Patch Management

Featured Reviews

PraveenRajan

Director of Infrastructure at Elevate Services

Smoothly handles software patching and scheduling, enabling monthly patch distribution across multiple projects

We face some challenges, particularly with non-domain-joined macOS devices. Patching, updating, and syncing with the server can be tricky for them. So, the major challenges are macOS updates, patching, and backups. And for drawbacks, I wish Patch management was cloud-based instead of hosted on our own server. If Ivanti Patch had a cloud-based option instead of requiring an on-premises server and software. Hosting it in the cloud would simplify management, eliminating dependence on VPNs or other connectivity issues. Similar to Microsoft's EMS licensing, offering a cloud-based solution like Azure Active Directory or Endpoint Management Suite (EMS) would be ideal. EMS allows us to manage policies, batching, and software distribution entirely through the cloud, minimizing server downloads. If Ivanti considered a cloud-based approach, it would be hugely beneficial in today's hybrid work environment, where employees use desktops, laptops, and various locations. It's not just about patching office PCs anymore; mobile workers and backups need seamless access as well. Cloud-based patching would be much easier in a hybrid environment. Imagine updates coming directly from the cloud instead of relying on individual VPN connections. It would streamline the entire process.

Read full review

JunedBedrekar

Expert at Tata Consultancy

Have effectively deployed patches and applications while integrating with cloud solutions

The features I find most valuable in Microsoft Configuration Manager are replication and scripting. If I want to get a fetch report for anything, such as hardware-related issues or group policy-related issues, I need to fetch the report by using SCCM's scripting language and remediation part. The inventory collection features of Microsoft Configuration Manager are good because we always prefer the inventory. We do it by using the script language. We use remote management capabilities in Microsoft Configuration Manager. Remote management capabilities are useful if the user is not providing access; we can use the backend users to update the group policy and sync the devices. These are the main features we require.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"When it comes to Ivanti Patch for endpoints, I find peer-to-peer patching valuable. Having a peer-to-peer patching capability is highly beneficial for us."

"Clear visibility regarding the status of the endpoint."

"It's been doing a lot for us, especially with third-party software patching and scheduling. We create multiple projects for monthly patch distribution and manage it all well."

"The product is easy to use, easy to implement, and easy to manage."

"With the right administrator, application deployment can do wonders."

"I have found the solution to be scalable. We have around 50,000 users using the solution."

"The tool's most valuable features are easy patch management and software deployment."

"The major features of this product are the reporting tools. The most valuable features are package deployment and application deployment. Security management is also good because any vulnerability will be identified, and you can fix it. It's the best tool because you never know what kind of client you will have. For example, you may have your offices in low bandwidth remote areas. But it's achievable because it accommodates the bandwidth that you have available. Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager is an excellent reporting tool for your environment. If you want to know the details about the hardware configuration, software configuration, what is causing a problem, or when a new feature update comes in for Windows, even that goes on SCCM itself. A lot of deployment stuff."

"Automation of operating system, application, and update deployments massively reduces IT operations effort."

"It is easy to install, and quick to deploy."

"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager is patch management."

"Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager is valuable in keeping our systems updated. We are able to send updates to all the systems. Additionally, the Intune integration is helpful."

More Microsoft Configuration Manager pros

Cons

"It would be great to have an easier way to patch Linux machines within the product."

"Inability to configure a rule-based management."

"The major challenges are macOS updates, patching, and backups. And for drawbacks, I wish Patch management was cloud-based instead of hosted on our own server."

"The UI must be more user-friendly."

"It does seem a bit buggy from time to time."

"Based on my experience with SCCM 2016, the main, big issue is not having a good user-friendly environment. It needs much better GUI."

"The solution is a bit heavy on the sources such as RAM or CPU and the software needs to be a bit lighter."

"The TSM component could be improved."

"It would be nice to have everything in one place. Now they have Intune for the desktops and SCCM to handle their servers."

"The ability to integrate MDM would be great."

"Its dashboard can be improved and made a little bit better."

"I would like to see some improvements in WSUS and control of other, non-Microsoft, product updates."

More Microsoft Configuration Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In terms of pricing, it is on the expensive side."

"The price could be better."

"The licensing is good because they have various options, depending on what you are looking for."

"SCCM comes with its own version of SQL Server. If you use that SQL Server with SCCM and don't use it for another applications than you get an SQL Server for free."

"The price is competitive and reasonable."

"We have a support license from Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager and the overall price of the solution is reasonable."

"There is not a license needed to use the solution."

"Pricing and licensing are a downside of SCCM. It's expensive. I'd have to confirm this, but I think they changed the licensing to core-based instead of socket-based. It's not cheap, because you have to buy the software, you have to buy SQL. Another thing we learned from talking to Microsoft is that they provide you a license for SQL if you run it on the same box as the primary server. If you run it outside that box, you have to buy SQL. Microsoft does recommend you running it on the same box because of performance. But then, in order to run SQL, SCCM, and everything on the same box, you better have some resources. It's an expensive solution. There's no doubt about it."

"The price of SCCM depends on the size of the organization. The price is competitive."

More Microsoft Configuration Manager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

10%

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

University

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

11%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	63

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Ivanti Patch for Endpoints?

It's been doing a lot for us, especially with third-party software patching and scheduling. We create multiple projects for monthly patch distribution and manage it all well.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ivanti Patch for Endpoints?

The UI must be more user-friendly.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Ivanti Patch for Endpoints?

We use the solution to patch Windows and Linux machines. We download the patches and implement them. We get vulnerability reports after patching.

See all answers

How does Ansible compare to Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (SCCM)?

Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager takes knowledge and research to properly configure. The length of time that the set up will take depends on the kind of technical architecture that your org...

See all answers

How to choose between ManageEngine Desktop Central and Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (formerly SCCM)?

ManageEngine Desktop Central is very easy to set up, is scalable, stable, and also has very good patch management. What I like most about ManageEngine is that I can log on to every PC very easily a...

See all answers

What do you like most about SCCM?

One of the standout features of SCCM is its application management capabilities. It allows us to create packages efficiently and deploy them to specific groups within our network. This streamlined ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Patch My PC vs Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager

Compared 31% of the time

Ivanti Security Controls vs Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager

Compared 28% of the time

GFI LanGuard vs Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager

Compared 13% of the time

Vicarius vRx vs Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager

Compared 9% of the time

More Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager Competitors

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Microsoft Configuration Manager

Compared 13% of the time

ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Microsoft Configuration Manager

Compared 10% of the time

Tanium vs Microsoft Configuration Manager

Compared 8% of the time

BigFix vs Microsoft Configuration Manager

Compared 5% of the time

KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) vs Microsoft Configuration Manager

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Configuration Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager

September 2025

Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager report

Download Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Configuration Manager

August 2025

Download Microsoft Configuration Manager product report

Also Known As

Ivanti Patch for Endpoints, Patch for Endpoints, Shavlik Patch for Endpoints

Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager, System Center Configuration Manager (SCCM ), Microsoft SMS

Overview

Patch for Endpoint Manager can swiftly detect vulnerabilities in Windows, Mac OS, Linux, and hundreds of third-party apps (Acrobat Flash/Reader, Java, Web browsers, and more) and deploy expertly pre-tested patches everywhere you need them.

Ivanti

Microsoft Configuration Manager streamlines IT management with features such as software deployment, patch management, and automation, centralizing operations for Windows environments. Integration with Microsoft products allows efficient oversight of workstations and servers.

Microsoft Configuration Manager provides comprehensive IT management, offering software deployment, patch management, and application pushing. Automation reduces manual tasks, ensuring consistency across systems. Centralized management enables standardized OS deployments, application updates, and configuration integrity. Integration with Microsoft products facilitates seamless operations, while hardware and software inventory, compliance reporting, and remote control functions enhance IT management. Users seek improvements in application deployment for those without deep scripting knowledge and desire better WSUS control, PowerShell and Intune integration, Linux compatibility, and user interface enhancements. Performance improvements are requested for remote user management and third-party application support.

What features enhance Microsoft Configuration Manager?

Software Deployment: Efficiently distribute software across large networks.
Patch Management: Automate and streamline update processes for security and functionality.
Automation Capabilities: Reduce manual effort and enhance consistency in IT tasks.
Centralized Management: Standardize OS deployments and application updates.
Integration with Microsoft Products: Seamless operation with existing Microsoft infrastructure.
Hardware and Software Inventory: Comprehensive tracking for assets and resources.
Compliance Reporting: Ensure compliance with internal and external standards.
Remote Control Functions: Enhance support and troubleshooting capabilities.

What benefits should users expect when evaluating Microsoft Configuration Manager?

Decreased Manual Work: Automation reduces time spent on repetitive tasks.
Enhanced Security: Automated patch management keeps systems secure.
Consistent Configurations: Centralized updates ensure uniformity across systems.
Improved Integration: Seamless operation within Microsoft ecosystems boosts productivity.
Comprehensive Oversight: Detailed inventory and reporting tools aid in strategic planning.
Streamlined Support: Remote capabilities improve IT support and user satisfaction.

Microsoft Configuration Manager is widely implemented in organizations to manage Windows workstations and servers. It is essential for deploying operating systems and applications, managing software updates, and conducting hardware and software inventories. The tool is crucial for endpoint and configuration management, ensuring compliance, and automating processes like patching and vulnerability management. Industries such as finance, healthcare, and education rely on Microsoft Configuration Manager to keep systems secure and operational, adapting it to address their specific needs and challenges in maintaining diversified IT environments.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

InfoPro Digital, Cypress-Fairbanks Independent School District

Bank Alfalah Ltd., Wªrth Handelsges.m.b.H, Dimension Data, Japan Business Systems, St. Lucie County Public Schools, MISC Berhad

Buyer's Guide

Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager

July 2025

Free Report: Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager report.

See our list of best Patch Management vendors.

We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.