AppWorx Workload Automation and JAMS compete in the workload automation category, focusing on simplifying and supporting complex scheduling tasks. JAMS appears to hold an advantage due to its flexibility and comprehensive scheduling capabilities tailored for complex business needs.
Features: AppWorx is known for simplicity, reliability, and environment flexibility, supporting deployment across platforms like Windows, AWS, or Azure. It integrates AI to enhance automation. JAMS is notable for advanced scheduling, natural language processing, and robust exception management, providing detailed notifications and flexibility.
Room for Improvement: AppWorx could benefit from a modernized UI, better security integration, and enhanced reporting. Users report difficulties with mainframe compatibility and licensing. JAMS could improve global search and offer better out-of-the-box exception handling and an intuitive client interface. Expanding documentation and training would support user experience. More built-in integrations and a web-based client would improve accessibility.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both products support on-premises and cloud deployment, with AppWorx offering more hybrid cloud flexibility. AppWorx customer service is hampered by third-party management, impacting support quality, while JAMS receives praise for prompt, effective technical support and strong user satisfaction.
Pricing and ROI: AppWorx's per-execution licensing model leads to increased costs and reconsideration of renewal by some organizations. JAMS offers competitive and agent-based pricing, enhancing cost-effectiveness for enterprises seeking scalability. Despite recent pricing increases, JAMS maintains a favorable ROI, outperforming competitors like Control-M and Tivoli by automating complex scheduling efficiently.
It has significantly reduced the time required for tasks that were previously manual, such as running batch and online jobs and report submissions.
The product manages workloads efficiently, allowing our operators to learn and operate it quickly, which underscores its value to our business.
The architecture of JAMS is neat and clean, enabling us to run agents on different machines while having the job scheduler and servers on one machine.
Their current support level is really good.
Technical support is managed by third parties now, which complicates direct customer assistance from Broadcom.
The customer support is excellent; they are fast, technically strong, and the people I've interacted with know what needs to be done.
We contacted JAMS vendor, who guided us through the necessary steps, and after following their guidance, everything was resolved.
They are very quick to respond depending on the issue's severity.
We might be underutilizing it, but as more jobs require processing, additional servers would be necessary.
JAMS's scalability is noteworthy; we run 6,000 jobs per day without facing any problems.
We have not faced any real issues, and it’s the main reason why we haven't enabled a lot of the redundancy features.
We experience periods of major incidents annually due to capacity constraints, which result in job failures.
Being on the new version, there's been zero downtime.
AppWorx Workload Automation does not support mainframe environments.
Licensing fees have increased as they charge based on executions rather than user agents, causing higher costs.
Another area for improvement would be the addition of source control for jobs internally, as this feature would solve several problems for me.
If around 5,000 or more jobs run at a time, JAMS slows down, and we have to wait around five to 10 minutes or restart JAMS scheduler services.
A major improvement would be the integration of AI to help us accomplish various tasks.
Licensing now depends on execution counts as opposed to agent counts, leading to increased costs.
The licensing is fair and reasonable for what the product offers.
The price is fair considering the functionality and importance of the tool, although the increase did unsettle our management.
It has great error-handling capabilities and can perform actions like opening tickets for support teams.
Atomic Applications Manager is user-friendly and accommodates around 100 users who can monitor and run their jobs effectively.
JAMS has positively impacted my organization by completely removing the headache of scheduling jobs, not just for the organization but for all internal operations teams need.
The most valuable feature of JAMS is its user-friendly interface, especially after upgrading from version six to seven.
JAMS offers features that stand out, especially when compared with Control-M monitoring tool, where JAMS is easily accessible and simple to understand regarding the setups and jobs being bifurcated.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| JAMS | 2.2% |
| AppWorx Workload Automation | 1.7% |
| Other | 96.1% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 3 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 11 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 18 |
AppWorx Workload Automation automates your Ellucian’s Banner or Fiserv DNA processing. This innovative, best-in-class task scheduling solution accelerates your processing, provides visibility and control over business processes, and mitigates risk in both environments.
AppWorx Workload Automation Can:
Benefits of AppWorx Workload Automation For Your Ellucian’s Banner
Benefits of AppWorx Workload Automation For Your Fiserv DNA Processing
Reviews from Real Users
“The most valuable feature for me is the scheduling,” says an enterprise application architect at a retailer who has been using the solution for close to 10 years.
A manager at a tech services company adds that “The interface is good. The compliance-related features are very good.”
JAMS offers efficient automation and scheduling with strong capabilities in planning, dependency management, and multi-platform support. Its intuitive interface and robust tools assist in managing complex workflows for enhanced resource allocation.
JAMS stands out for its blend of automation and scheduling capabilities, making it suitable for handling complex workflows across platforms. Its features such as batch scheduling, natural language scheduling, and interactive agents promote seamless integration with other tools like PowerShell. The focus on metrics and notifications ensures users are informed about operational efficiency enhancements. While JAMS is effective in many areas, users report a need for improved simulation for termination processes and a more intuitive client setup. They see potential in enhanced search functions, better exception handling, and greater transparency in custom execution. The current setup challenges like disappearing options and mobile accessibility can affect user satisfaction. Including a fully web-based client and improving documentation could add value.
What are JAMS' key features?
What benefits should users consider?
Organizations using JAMS for workflow and batch job automation leverage its capabilities for SSIS, SQL procedures, and Python scripts. JAMS supports file automation and managed file transfers across environments like AWS and Azure. Users employ JAMS for data management, reporting, and integration tasks, including handling holiday-aware scheduling for improved task coordination.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
