Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AppWorx Workload Automation vs JAMS comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 21, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
8.2
AppWorx Workload Automation improves efficiency and ROI by enhancing automation, monitoring, and reducing job creation and management times.
Sentiment score
6.3
JAMS automates job management, reducing costs and labor while enhancing efficiency and allowing staff to focus on critical tasks.
It has significantly reduced the time required for tasks that were previously manual, such as running batch and online jobs and report submissions.
Senior Developer at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees
The product manages workloads efficiently, allowing our operators to learn and operate it quickly, which underscores its value to our business.
IT Infrastructure Manager with 10,001+ employees
The architecture of JAMS is neat and clean, enabling us to run agents on different machines while having the job scheduler and servers on one machine.
Cloud Engineer at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.0
AppWorx support is praised for efficiency and availability, though experiences vary due to agreements and third-party complexities.
Sentiment score
6.4
JAMS offers impressive, knowledgeable support with quick, effective solutions, proactively addressing user needs through various channels.
Their current support level is really good.
IT Infrastructure Manager with 10,001+ employees
Technical support is managed by third parties now, which complicates direct customer assistance from Broadcom.
Senior Developer at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees
The customer support is excellent; they are fast, technically strong, and the people I've interacted with know what needs to be done.
Cloud Engineer at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
We contacted JAMS vendor, who guided us through the necessary steps, and after following their guidance, everything was resolved.
ETL Data Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
They are very quick to respond depending on the issue's severity.
System Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.7
AppWorx Workload Automation's scalability receives mixed reviews, with outdated tech challenges yet some users report satisfactory performance.
Sentiment score
6.6
JAMS efficiently scales to handle thousands of jobs daily, offering flexibility, ease, and consistent performance, though licensing may limit scalability.
We might be underutilizing it, but as more jobs require processing, additional servers would be necessary.
System Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
JAMS's scalability is noteworthy; we run 6,000 jobs per day without facing any problems.
Cloud Engineer at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.6
AppWorx Workload Automation is highly stable and reliable, with users confident in its performance despite minor connectivity issues.
Sentiment score
7.4
JAMS is stable and reliable, with the desktop version praised, while rare issues are due to external factors.
We have not faced any real issues, and it’s the main reason why we haven't enabled a lot of the redundancy features.
IT Infrastructure Manager with 10,001+ employees
We experience periods of major incidents annually due to capacity constraints, which result in job failures.
Manager of Reliability Engineering and Security Operations at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees
Being on the new version, there's been zero downtime.
System Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
 

Room For Improvement

AppWorx Workload Automation needs improvements in UI, security, scalability, AI, mainframe support, and simplified licensing.
JAMS users seek enhanced UI, search, automation, security, AI integration, and documentation to improve functionality and performance.
AppWorx Workload Automation does not support mainframe environments.
IT Infrastructure Manager with 10,001+ employees
Licensing fees have increased as they charge based on executions rather than user agents, causing higher costs.
Senior Developer at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Another area for improvement would be the addition of source control for jobs internally, as this feature would solve several problems for me.
Manager of Reliability Engineering and Security Operations at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees
If around 5,000 or more jobs run at a time, JAMS slows down, and we have to wait around five to 10 minutes or restart JAMS scheduler services.
ETL Data Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
A major improvement would be the integration of AI to help us accomplish various tasks.
System Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
 

Setup Cost

AppWorx Workload Automation pricing receives mixed reviews, with concerns about high costs impacting license renewals and cost structure changes.
JAMS offers competitive pricing for enterprise scheduling, with flexibility in licensing and lower costs than Control-M and Tivoli.
Licensing now depends on execution counts as opposed to agent counts, leading to increased costs.
Senior Developer at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees
The licensing is fair and reasonable for what the product offers.
IT Infrastructure Manager with 10,001+ employees
The price is fair considering the functionality and importance of the tool, although the increase did unsettle our management.
System Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
 

Valuable Features

AppWorx Workload Automation offers reliable and flexible scheduling, AI integration, and user-friendly interface for efficient workload management.
JAMS offers automation, intuitive scheduling, and integration, enhancing efficiency with flexible workflows, PowerShell support, and responsive user assistance.
It has great error-handling capabilities and can perform actions like opening tickets for support teams.
IT Infrastructure Manager with 10,001+ employees
Atomic Applications Manager is user-friendly and accommodates around 100 users who can monitor and run their jobs effectively.
Senior Developer at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees
JAMS has positively impacted my organization by completely removing the headache of scheduling jobs, not just for the organization but for all internal operations teams need.
Cloud Engineer at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
The most valuable feature of JAMS is its user-friendly interface, especially after upgrading from version six to seven.
System Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
JAMS offers features that stand out, especially when compared with Control-M monitoring tool, where JAMS is easily accessible and simple to understand regarding the setups and jobs being bifurcated.
ETL Data Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
 

Categories and Ranking

AppWorx Workload Automation
Ranking in Workload Automation
13th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
JAMS
Ranking in Workload Automation
3rd
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
37
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Workload Automation category, the mindshare of AppWorx Workload Automation is 1.8%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JAMS is 2.6%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Workload Automation Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
JAMS2.6%
AppWorx Workload Automation1.8%
Other95.6%
Workload Automation
 

Featured Reviews

Srikanth Gubba - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Developer at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Automation boosts efficiency with a user-friendly interface
Currently, I have switched to negotiating through third-party vendors for licensing, which has made it more expensive. Broadcom should address this by dealing directly with customers again. Licensing fees have increased as they charge based on executions rather than user agents, causing higher costs. Technical support also involves third-party interactions, complicating direct assistance from Broadcom.
reviewer2770605 - PeerSpot reviewer
Cloud Engineer at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
Has streamlined complex job scheduling across scripting languages while reducing manual effort
JAMS could be improved with a web client that is accessible and as fast as a normal website, eliminating the need to RDP to the servers to access the JAMS client. A functionality running on the JAMS server to continuously check the JAMS agents would ensure they are working properly. If an agent is not responding, a feature to restart the service from the job server machine would be beneficial. The upgrade process, particularly when switching from V6 to V7, could be clearer in terms of documentation, ideally with screenshots showing exactly what needs to be done on each screen.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.
880,315 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
12%
University
11%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Computer Software Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Healthcare Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise8
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise18
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AppWorx Workload Automation?
Compared to other tools, it is now expensive. Licensing now depends on execution counts as opposed to agent counts, leading to increased costs.
What needs improvement with AppWorx Workload Automation?
Currently, I have switched to negotiating through third-party vendors for licensing, which has made it more expensive. Broadcom should address this by dealing directly with customers again. Licensi...
What is your primary use case for AppWorx Workload Automation?
In general, I use Atomic Applications Manager to manage our unique servers in our cloud infrastructure, specifically for support in our manufacturing industry. We are an enterprise and utilize many...
What do you like most about JAMS?
I find the historical tracking feature of JAMS invaluable for reviewing past events.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JAMS?
They recently switched to subscription-based pricing, which increased. The price is fair considering the functionality and importance of the tool, although the increase did unsettle our management.
What needs improvement with JAMS?
As far as we are using JAMS version 6, it looks good and there is nothing major to add about it. Everything is functioning properly. From the past three years, it has remained the same, but sometim...
 

Also Known As

CA Automic Applications Manager
No data available
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Sandvik, Hanwha Life
Teradata, Arconic, General Dynamics, Yum!, CVS Health, Comcast, Ghiradelli, & Boston’s Children’s Hospital
Find out what your peers are saying about AppWorx Workload Automation vs. JAMS and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.
880,315 professionals have used our research since 2012.