Coming October 25: PeerSpot Awards will be announced! Learn more
Julia Frohwein - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Director of Delivery at PeerSpot (formerly IT Central Station)
  • 0
  • 1

What needs improvement with AppWorx Workload Automation?

Please share with the community what you think needs improvement with AppWorx Workload Automation.

What are its weaknesses? What would you like to see changed in a future version?

PeerSpot user
3 Answers
PeerSpot user
Enterprise Application Architect at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
Real User
05 July 20

This solution could be improved in the areas of reporting, forecasting, and intelligence. In addition, the portability and deployment, artificial intelligence and machine learning, whether it's integrated or embedded, could also be improved. These things would help me to know the SLAs for when a job will end.

Manager at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Real User
13 February 20

The compliance features are limited to the server and not the entire infrastructure.

Database & Process Automation Administrator at a music company with 501-1,000 employees
Real User
18 July 18

* The user interface (UI) could be modernised. * The internal security model can be complex when configuring multiple user groups. * It is difficult to integrate with the Active Directory (AD).

Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, BMC, SMA Technologies and others in Workload Automation. Updated: September 2022.
633,572 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Related Questions
Rick Murray - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr. Data Coordinator at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
Aug 26, 2021
I have been an AWA client for around 16 years. Due to a core conversion it is being recommended that we convert from Automic Workload Automation to Automic/Appworx Applications Manager or OpCon. I am not familiar with the Appworx Application Manager or OpCon, so I am not sure of the benefits and limitations compared to AWA. Looking for the good, the bad, and the ugly on these workload automati...
2 out of 6 answers
PeerSpot user
Owner at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
20 July 20
I am sorry because cannot help you. We have no experience with Appworx Application Manager.
Rony_Sklar - PeerSpot reviewer
Community Manager at PeerSpot (formerly IT Central Station)
20 July 20
@NickWilcox you recently reviewed OpCon - would you be willing to share your experiences with @Rick Murray to help him with his decision? @reviewer1166826 maybe you can give some insight into the pros and cons of AppWorx?
it_user686973 - PeerSpot reviewer
User at ibm
Mar 29, 2021
We are in process of evaluating best scheduler tool for our client. Currently we are using ASG Zena. We find it complex to administer and no technical documents are available to self learn. I have gone through various articles and posts and seems like Control M, CA and Tidal are most widely used. Can you guys please share your experiences/thoughts which one would be the best choice? Thanks
2 out of 24 answers
11 July 17
HI, I don't know which solution is the best, it depends on so many things. But as you want to self learn, why don't you try or have a look on Open Source solutions as OJS or Rundeck?
PeerSpot user
IBM Hybrid Cloud Solution Leader - Core and SO Accounts at IBM
11 July 17
If IBM is not a possibility, BMC then. Try to allign with an IBM or BMC business partner with proven installation/setups already made "recently". If customer has "Mainframe", IBM for sure. Tidal i do not know but with CA, historically there was always too much scheduler engines to go for and no one in particular to get focused.
Download Free Report
Download our free Workload Automation Report and find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, BMC, SMA Technologies, and more! Updated: September 2022.
633,572 professionals have used our research since 2012.