We performed a comparison between AppWorx Workload Automation and AutoSys Workload Automation based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: AppWorx Workload Automation is highly regarded for its intuitive interface and reliable functionality. Users appreciate its user-friendly design and consistent performance. AutoSys Workload Automation is praised for its impressive scalability and ease of use. Users value its quick processing speed and constant availability. In addition, AutoSys provides additional features such as file transfer protocol and file watcher, enhancing its capabilities.
Users of AppWorx Workload Automation are seeking enhanced API integration and improved integration with other tools. Additionally, they desire better scalability. AutoSys Workload Automation users are in need of integration with cloud services, simplified reporting and comparison of job performance, and access to more advanced features and functionalities.
Service and Support: AppWorx stands out for its exceptional technical support, while AutoSys is commended for being highly supportive and responsive.
Ease of Deployment: AppWorx Workload Automation's initial setup is time-consuming, requiring several months to complete and administrator involvement. AutoSys Workload Automation offers a quick and effortless setup that can be done in approximately 10 minutes with minimal clicks. It is regarded as straightforward and simple.
Pricing: AppWorx Workload Automation's setup cost is based on the number of systems used, which can be costly. AutoSys Workload Automation offers different pricing and licensing choices, including a one-time license fee for server setup and the possibility of monthly payments for certain users.
ROI: AppWorx Workload Automation lacks details regarding ROI. AutoSys Workload Automation provides advantages such as heightened productivity, enhanced efficiency, cost-effectiveness, improved visibility, and minimized downtime.
Comparison Results: AutoSys Workload Automation is the preferred choice over AppWorx Workload Automation. Users praise AutoSys for its quick and simple setup process, scalability, ease of use, speed, and availability. It offers valuable features like job orchestration, real-time batch processing view, and a user-friendly interface.
"The most valuable features of AppWorx Workload Automation are simplicity and reliability. Additionally, they recently transformed the UI which is better."
"It has improved my organization through automation of back office and infrastructure procedures, and by integrating and orchestrating key business applications spanning multiple technology stacks."
"The solution is very user friendly so anyone can use it."
"It is really a robust product."
"It is an object-based approach to task and process design in conjunction with conditional logic and event-based scheduling actions, which enables a build once/use often design methodology to be employed."
"We have a lot of nightly jobs that need to be run. Therefore, we perform a lot of calculations and processes during nighttime hours."
"The interface is good."
"The automated solution is the most valuable piece. Otherwise, we would have to be doing everything manually on every server."
"This solution enables us to improve our daily processing times. We can do everything faster than before we used this solution."
"To me, what's most valuable in AutoSys Workload Automation is its robustness and quickness. The tool can trigger jobs within a few milliseconds, and it can handle large volumes of jobs."
"It has improved my organization by automating IT applications."
"I prefer AutoSys over the other ones out there for ease of use, ease of understanding, and getting people to understand how the tool works."
"The CA workload agent has gotten much better. For our organization it's important for us to communicate in a secure fashion between the host and the other platforms, and we are able to do that with our CA product"
"It is very valuable for us when we are trying to arrange or orchestrate jobs into a system. It is helpful for triggering jobs for a scheduled task."
"This solution has made my clients' workplaces a lot less labor-intensive."
"We run millions of jobs through it every day using it for financial transactions, banking, credit cards, PeopleSoft, payroll, etc."
"It has been a deprecated product, because it is so old. There has been a couple of new solutions that are a little more advanced."
"We are looking for additional features that would allow us to call APIs and integrate the product with other tools more effectively."
"The graphical interface is pretty cool but not the best so it could use some improvement."
"The internal security model can be complex when configuring multiple user groups."
"It is not really scaling per say because they are not putting much into it. They are trying to push their new product."
"It is difficult to integrate with the Active Directory (AD)."
"As a general process automation and integration tool, it has been superseded by other offerings, notably the Workload Automation suite."
"The scalability could improve."
"CA Workload Automation is not part of CA's strategic vision going forward."
"We are trying to see if we can use this from a cloud perspective with AWS, Azure, and other clouds, but it seems that there is no cloud integration in this product. We would like to see cloud integration. We are very pleased with this solution, but we are moving our application to the cloud, and we found out that it doesn't support any cloud features. So, we are trying to find a replacement."
"Needs better documentation with fully explained examples for some of the job types."
"The solution does not have a friendly subscription model because it forces users to take a five-year subscription simultaneously, charging millions of dollars."
"I would like to see the Service Orchestrator, a B2B product, and maybe a process audit."
"The WCC could be improved."
"The GUI/Workstation is weak and needs to be improved. CA is working on this right now."
"I would like to see two-factor authentication, since you see a lot of companies in the news for security breaches. That is a really big thing for us."
AppWorx Workload Automation is ranked 17th in Workload Automation with 7 reviews while AutoSys Workload Automation is ranked 6th in Workload Automation with 79 reviews. AppWorx Workload Automation is rated 8.0, while AutoSys Workload Automation is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of AppWorx Workload Automation writes "The scheduling tool and finance module are valuable features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of AutoSys Workload Automation writes "Helps us manage complex workloads, reduce our workload failure rates, and save us time". AppWorx Workload Automation is most compared with Automic Workload Automation, Control-M, Automic Automation Intelligence and Stonebranch, whereas AutoSys Workload Automation is most compared with Control-M, IBM Workload Automation, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Stonebranch and Automic Workload Automation. See our AppWorx Workload Automation vs. AutoSys Workload Automation report.
See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.