Apica vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) comparison

Apica and Kovai.co are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Apica is ranked #16 with an average rating of 7.7, while Kovai.co is ranked #69. Apica holds a 0.5% mindshare in APM, compared to Kovai.co’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Apica users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Kovai.co users who would recommend it.

Apica

Read 11 Apica reviews

1,227 Views
834 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Turbo360 (Formerly Serverle...

Read 2 Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) reviews

719 Views
460 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Apica

Turbo360 (Formerly Serverle...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Apica and Turbo360 are two robust solutions in the monitoring and integration space. While Apica excels in ease of deployment and support, Turbo360's extensive features make it superior in functionality and worth the investment.

Features: Apica offers advanced monitoring capabilities, reliable performance metrics, and accurate data they provide. Turbo360 provides extensive integration options, efficient workflow automations, and robust feature set which is versatile.

Room for Improvement: Apica needs improvements in reporting tools, customization options, and additional analytics features. Turbo360 requires enhancements in alert configurations, documentation, and user interface simplicity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Apica is known for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. Turbo360 offers excellent customer support with more complex deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Apica is noted for its competitive setup costs and satisfactory ROI, making it budget-friendly. Turbo360, though more costly, justifies its investment through richer features and higher ROI over time.

To learn more, read our detailed Apica vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Apica vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 872,019 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apica

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

16th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (18th), IT Operations Analytics (6th), Observability Pipeline Software (2nd)

Turbo360 (Formerly Serverle...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

69th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Management (53rd), Cloud Monitoring Software (49th), Cloud Cost Management (31st)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Apica is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Apica	0.5%
Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)	0.3%
Other	99.2%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Punith H K

Senior Systems Engineer at Infosys

Enables users to create scripts easily and provides excellent real-time monitoring features

It is easy to create scripts. We don't have to write any script. Ready-made options are available. We can select, drag, and drop the options, and the script is ready. The solution’s real-time monitoring features have had a huge impact on our service delivery. If we have an application and the script for it, we keep monitoring it. When the script goes red, it indicates that something is not working. So, we check and analyze the applications. We keep track of applications and monitor whether they are live or not. The tool is also useful for monitoring cloud services.

Read full review

reviewer1868589

Python Engineer at Msys Technologies

Great topic subscription monitoring, helpful management, and useful for audits

Addition of more monitoring features to Azure Cosmos DB can be a huge help as we use the same as the main database for our applications. One more thing to note is that their support team was always ready to clear all our doubts regarding the product but we feel that it would be much appreciated if they could share with us the required resources to get new customers like us well-versed in traversing through different modules of the product. These are the very few areas where Serverless360 can be improved.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Anyone can understand the solution easily because it doesn't require a specific scripted language."

"One of the biggest advantages of moving to Apica is the ability get to a hybrid model with the architecture in the cloud and our agents on-prem. We also have access to Apica's cloud agent across the globe. That has changed the way that we have our load testing setup at this point. Previously, it was always internal. Now, with this change in the way it is implemented for load testing, we can test anywhere across the globe and from the list of agents available within Apica's cloud. If I don't have an agent available in a second location, it just takes an email to their customer support, then it is spun up within 24 hours. That flexibility has changed the way that we perceive our load tests, not just in the US, but globally."

"The solution’s real-time monitoring features have had a huge impact on our service delivery."

"What I like the most is that Apica can simulate different browsers and different versions of desktop or mobile browsers."

"It is easy to set up and configure."

"There are several features that are really good. The first one is the flexibility and the advanced configuration that Apica offers when it comes to configuring synthetic checks. It provides the ability to customize how the check should be performed and it is very flexible in the number of synthetic locations that it can use. It allows us to run scripts from different locations all over the world, and they have a really good number of these locations."

"The GUI is powerful and doesn't require scripting or regular expressions. It has a vast finder for correlation, which is easier than other tools like JMeter and LoadRunner. It's also easy to integrate with other tools with a separate execution environment. The tool is also easy to use."

"As always, within the IT industry, everybody's always looking to upgrade and update everything else like that. Apica has been one of those things but it's really hard to replace because it offers us the unique capability to see what the customer is seeing. A lot of other ones can do Selenium script and things like that, but there's a lot in Apica that we use right now. We utilize a lot of the scenario options in Apica right now, and there's a lot of other ones that do parts of it, but it doesn't do everything that Apica does."

More Apica pros

"Service Bus topic subscription monitoring turned out to be the most useful for us."

"It offers all the core capabilities we need to manage and monitor our Azure services."

Cons

"The reporting part that we use for our executives needs a bit more customization capabilities. Right now, you can use only the three main templates for reporting. We would like to be able to customize them."

"If you are adding any input file, the tool fails to capture the path."

"The customer service and support were a little slow to respond. The browser sometimes checks alerts on unknown issues like latency from Apica's side."

"Apica was a relatively new tool when I started using it. Although Apica had good documentation, it still felt less developed or advanced than a tool like LoadRunner."

"Learning the tool has always been a little difficult from a scripting perspective because the framework is proprietary and unique. Once we became used to what it does and how to perform it, then it became easier for my team and me. I would like to see some of the testing steps be part of a more well-known language, like Java or Python. That would be a big improvement."

"The initial screen on their dashboard could have a bit more data, but this is a small thing. It could have more data, so we do not need to drill down to a screen behind that initial information. I would like them to get a little better on the user interfaces that we need to go into."

"I have noticed that the tool isn't widely recognized outside our organization. Also, there aren't any tutorials or dedicated resources for this tool, making it challenging for newcomers to learn. It would be beneficial if someone experienced with it could provide guidance."

"The accuracy of alerts can be improved a little bit. Right now, it's pretty good in terms of alerting pretty quickly about failures or changes in response times. However, what we have seen happen is the number of alerts that we are getting is very frequent, and we would like to tone down the number of alerts. That's the only trouble we have. Apica could tone down those settings because there is no option for us to tone it down to a level that would reduce the alerts to a minimum. As a platform, it does send us good alerts, but it could be improved a bit."

More Apica cons

"The user interface of Serveress360 could be improved a bit to make the platform even easier to use."

"Addition of more monitoring features to Azure Cosmos DB can be a huge help as we use the same as the main database for our applications."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is very reasonable, but it is not cheap."

"I am sure that Apica's price will be lower than LoadRunner."

"The tool is completely free and open source. I've been using it for about two and a half years and installed it on both my personal and client machines without needing a license. All features are available for use without any hidden fees."

"Apica is pretty cost-effective if you buy both solutions together: Synthetic and LoadTest. If you are going for one solution, the cost is on par with any tool in the market."

"The solution's pricing is not cheap, but it is in the midrange."

"The product is less expensive compared to LoadRunner."

"I know Apica is an expensive solution, but it is worth the money for the service it provides."

"License management is another area that Apica could do better. We have already had these conversations with our account teams. This is something that they are looking at largely improving in upcoming releases. I believe that this is already on their roadmap."

More Apica pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,019 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

24%

Media Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

28%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Performing Arts

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	17

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Apica Synthetic?

The GUI is powerful and doesn't require scripting or regular expressions. It has a vast finder for correlation, which is easier than other tools like JMeter and LoadRunner. It's also easy to integr...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apica Synthetic?

I know Apica is an expensive solution, but it is worth the money for the service it provides.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Apica Synthetic?

Apica cannot perform endurance or scale-up tests independently. It requires other tools like ALM. When editing scripts, only one can be accessed at a time, risking changes affecting other folders. ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs Apica

Compared 20% of the time

Cribl vs Apica

Compared 20% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Apica

Compared 12% of the time

Grafana vs Apica

Compared 12% of the time

Datadog vs Apica

Compared 11% of the time

More Apica Competitors

Elastic Observability vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

Compared 29% of the time

Datadog vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

Compared 20% of the time

Azure Monitor vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

Compared 18% of the time

Xosphere vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

Compared 12% of the time

Grafana vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

Compared 11% of the time

More Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apica

October 2025

Download Apica product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

October 2025

Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) report

Download Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) product report

Also Known As

Apica LoadTest, Apica Synthetic

Serverless360

Overview

Apica leads in observability cost optimization, empowering IT teams to manage telemetry data economics efficiently. It supports various data types, reducing costs by 40% with flexible deployment options and eliminating tool sprawl through modular solutions.

Apica Ascent optimizes observability costs across metrics, logs, traces, and events and provides adaptability beyond proprietary formats. Its patented InstaStore™ technology ensures maximum storage efficiency and advanced root cause analysis. Organizations leverage Apica for comprehensive control over observability investments, reducing runaway costs. With solutions for mitigating high-cardinality data challenges, Apica supports any data lake preference and offers cloud or on-premises deployments. Its modular solutions eliminate unnecessary tool redundancies, enhancing economic efficiency in telemetry data management.

What features define Apica's capabilities?

Global Presence: Extensive points of presence worldwide
Advanced Alerting: Accurate system notifications
Robust Scripting: Supports multiple protocols easily
Flexible Integration: Effortless system connections
Environment Simulation: Adapts various test scenarios globally

Which benefits should users expect from Apica?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces observability costs by 40%
Data Flexibility: Supports any data source
Modular Approach: Eliminates tool redundancies
Advanced Analysis: Enhanced root cause capabilities
Deployment Variety: Cloud and on-premises options available

Apica addresses industry needs in monitoring and testing applications, enhancing user experience across sectors. It is instrumental in synthetic checks, load testing, API monitoring, and validating functionalities for stability in gaming, finance, eCommerce, and banking platforms. Apica's versatility supports both on-premises and cloud environments, ensuring accurate insights into service availability and network performance.

Apica

Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is an advanced Cloud Management platform that empowers you with significant Azure Cost savings and Infra Monitoring for complex Azure Environments. Our customers have experienced annual savings of up to 30% through advanced cost monitoring, granular analysis, optimization insights, and reduced incident resolution time by 80% through holistic infra monitoring across multiple Azure resources with business context. Also, our platform stands out by offering all the necessary features for incorporating FinOps practice into your organization, ensuring an accurate and granular source of truth about costs for all your stakeholders. By seamlessly offering infrastructure monitoring and cost management in one place, we aim to help maximize your ROI on Azure investments.

Our Core features:

Get clarity on your investments: Get unparalleled visibility of your spending with advanced Azure cost analysis across Azure tenants, teams and any business units.
Eliminate wasteful spending: Ensure cost reductions through strategic recommendations for rightsizing resources/purchasing reserved instances and setting up auto-pausing of resources outside business hours.
Accelerate incident resolution: Tie monitoring alerts to business units and remediate faster with a single report spotlighting critical issues across Azure services, streamlining your focus on troubleshooting.
End-to-end business tracking: Bring business context over the messages flowing through intricate Azure/hybrid integration for effectively tracking and troubleshooting critical issues.
Technical Azure Documentation: Auto-generate documentations on resource usage, cost/security and generate editable diagrams for seamlessly sharing them with relevant stakeholders.

Kovai.co

Sample Customers

HBO, JPMC, Morgan Stanley, Xander, EA Sports, Volvo

MSC, Transalta, Rank Group, RACQ, BBC, Q2 Solutions, Middleway, BUPA, Columbia Sportswear, EDF

Buyer's Guide

Apica vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

September 2025

Free Report: Apica vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

Find out what your peers are saying about Apica vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

872,019 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apica vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.