Adobe Workfront and Zoho Projects are both project management tools, each with unique strengths. Adobe Workfront is better suited for large organizations due to its robust customization and integration options, while Zoho Projects appeals to smaller enterprises focused on cost-effectiveness and ease of use.
Features: Adobe Workfront provides advanced customization, integration with other Adobe solutions, and robust automation capabilities. Zoho Projects offers essential management tools, including time tracking, file sharing, and collaborative features within a user-friendly interface. Workfront caters to complex requirements, whereas Zoho emphasizes accessibility and value.
Room for Improvement: Adobe Workfront could improve by simplifying its initial setup process, offering more out-of-the-box templates, and reducing complexity in non-integration scenarios. Zoho Projects could enhance its features by providing more advanced reporting options, refining its API capabilities, and expanding integration with non-Zoho applications.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Adobe Workfront involves a comprehensive deployment process due to its complex feature set but offers control over detailed workflows. Meanwhile, Zoho Projects boasts quick deployment and efficient customer service, facilitating rapid project starts and support.
Pricing and ROI: Adobe Workfront entails higher setup costs suitable for extensive projects, potentially yielding a substantial ROI in complex environments. Zoho Projects, with lower costs, ensures quicker ROI due to its affordability and sufficient features for simpler project needs.
We tracked all of the savings through Adobe Workfront, and at the end of the year, for those 2,500 users, we saved over 1,200 hours, or 1,200 man hours.
It has helped me streamline processes by using my SOPs and Zoho for improvement.
They provide answers and guidance on how to resolve issues, such as clearing cookies and cache, and assist in best practice configuration and optimization of the platform.
It is considered a citizen admin system, and you don't need to be an IT professional to be an administrator.
If L5 does not understand, it moves to L4. If they can't solve it, it moves to a higher level.
They are just a chat away, and there is typically a dedicated person or two handling my account.
We have gone from two or three marketing teams up to over 40 marketing teams and 6,500 users in a few years.
The solution is really scalable.
Adobe Workfront provides a stable foundation for project management.
Overall, I would rate the stability and reliability of Adobe Workfront a ten.
I have not faced any challenges with the stability of Adobe Workfront.
Changes sometimes don't reflect.
We can enhance integrations, such as ensuring Adobe Workfront integrates more seamlessly with other Adobe products like Experience Manager and Creative Cloud.
If I have issue-level data and project-level data that I need to see, with some custom coding, you can do some of it in a report, but in general, if you have a lot of that blended data between levels, you need to use a dashboard, which requires two different reports due to the difficulty in pulling data at the different levels into one thing.
Integration with Azure DevOps could be improved to facilitate better communication between the two systems.
Providing small bite-sized instructional videos, like how to create a bug, and customizable help icons would be beneficial.
Managing multiple projects in the project presents challenges.
This can include items such as mileage, supplies, software, licenses, and travel costs.
The per-user cost in the ultimate plan of Adobe Workfront is approximately $1,232 when purchasing 800 to 1,000 licenses.
Initially, it was an affordable option for early adopters, but the price has risen four to five times.
Zoho Projects is considered cheap compared to Google and Microsoft services.
It provides comprehensive features with built-in integration for creative tools, addressing the pain point of creative collaboration in the content supply chain.
Reporting is a major part of Adobe Workfront, making it not just a workflow management tool but also a tool where we can get data and present it to executives through comprehensive reporting.
The system aids in supporting demand management and producing high-level status reports.
Its integration with Zoho Docs and features like creating a Wiki and the ability to co-author documents without performance constraints are valuable.
The collaboration tools within Zoho Projects are good.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
Adobe Workfront | 2.7% |
Zoho Projects | 1.1% |
Other | 96.2% |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 8 |
Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
Large Enterprise | 30 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 15 |
Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
Large Enterprise | 1 |
AtTask is a cloud-based Enterprise Work Management solution that helps marketing, IT, and other enterprise teams conquer the chaos of excessive email, redundant status meetings, and disconnected tools. Unlike other tools, AtTask Enterprise Work Cloud is a centralized, easy-to-adopt solution for managing and collaborating on all types of work through the entire work lifecycle, which improves team productivity and executive visibility. AtTask is trusted by thousands of global enterprises, like Adobe, Cisco, HBO, House of Blues, REI, Trek, Schneider Electric, and ATB Financial. To learn more, visit www.AtTask.com or follow us on Twitter @AtTask.
Zoho Projects is an online project management software that helps you run your business with ease. It stands as a comprehensive solution to your day-to-day problems in project management and adds value to your business by leaps and bounds.
We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.